
Expectations grow for US-China trade truce
QUICK FIX
— The United States is likely to extend a trade war truce with China that is set to expire Tuesday. The two could nail down a firmer deal during a global gathering this fall.
— The White House clarified that Japan's 15 percent duty won't stack on top of existing tariffs amid conflicting interpretations of the trade deal.
— The Trump administration is hiking duties on Canadian softwood lumber days after slapping the country with a 35 percent tariff on goods.
It's Monday, Aug. 11. Welcome to Morning Trade! Got news tips? Suggestions? Want to grab a coffee? Hit us up at: ahawkins@politico.com, ddesrochers@politico.com and dpalmer@politico.com. Follow us on X: @_AriHawkins, @drdesrochers and @tradereporter.
Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories.
Driving the day
U.S.-CHINA DEAL TRACKER: The United States and China are likely to extend a tariff truce that expires on Tuesday. They could also push for a more comprehensive trade deal by the end of October, when leaders of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation will meet in South Korea for their annual summit, according to three former U.S. trade officials.
'You can see the choreography of what's happening,' said Jeff Moon, a former assistant U.S. trade representative for China, during a discussion posted Friday by the Washington International Trade Association. Certain 'confidence-building steps,' including China easing restrictions on rare earths exports and the U.S. effectively reversing a ban on H20 chips, highlight the hopes of a bigger deal to manage trade relations between the two sides, he said.
Context needed: With existing duties remaining in place, the U.S. in May agreed to temporarily lower tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent, while the Chinese dropped levies on U.S. goods from 125 percent to 10 percent.
That agreement is set to expire and would amount to an effective blockade on trade between the world's largest economies.
Chris Padilla, who was Commerce undersecretary for international trade in the George W. Bush administration, and Stephen Vaughn, who was USTR general counsel in the first Trump administration, both agreed that President Donald Trump was likely to extend the tariff truce.
But the three had varying opinions about how likely the two sides were to reach a deal by the Oct. 31 APEC leaders summit and how comprehensive any agreement might be.
Who has the upper hand? Trump 'exhausted his tariff leverage three months ago when he threatened an effective embargo and then backed off,' Moon said. 'The Chinese now have the leverage because they've found rare earths as a magic bullet and something that the West absolutely needs.'
Trump's apparent decision not to hit China with 'secondary tariffs' over its oil purchases from Russia, after threatening to do that and hitting India with them last week, is another sign of how badly he wants an agreement, both Padilla and Moon said.
What kind of deal? Vaughn, a partner at King & Spalding, where U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer formerly worked, disagreed that the negotiating dynamic has shifted in favor of Beijing and said any deal reached at APEC is likely to be similar to the broad frameworks that the administration has reached with other trading partners.
But Padilla said he doubts Chinese President Xi Jinping would agree to a 'very high-level, informal' deal like the ones Trump struck with the European Union, Japan and South Korea in which few details are written down. 'I call them 'bar napkin agreements,'' Padilla said.
Moon said he thinks any deal would probably look like the January 2020 'Phase 1' agreement that committed China to buy an additional $200 billion worth of U.S. goods over two years — even though Beijing fell short of those purchase commitments.
REGULATORY REVIEW
CLARITY WANTED: Higher tariffs on Japanese imports will replace existing duties rather than be stacked on top, a White House official confirmed to your host on Sunday, clearing up competing interpretations of the agreement unveiled last month.
'We agreed in subsequent discussions to provide Japan the same treatment as the EU with respect to MFN duties and reciprocal tariff rates. But that was not what was initially hashed out in the Oval Office,' said the White House official, granted anonymity to divulge details.
The statement seeks to clear up uncertainty over the terms of the U.S.-Japan trade agreement, after a 'no stacking' provision was applied to a trade deal between the U.S. and the EU but not Japan. That would mean certain Japanese commodities already subject to duties could see tariff rates rise, such as from the current 26.4 percent to 41.4 percent for beef. Trump is expected to issue a new executive order to make the change official in the near future.
Why it matters: The development is the latest indication of how the lack of a deal on paper is sparking confusion and raising tensions between the U.S. and its fifth-largest trading partner.
Keep in mind: The White House added that the 15 percent rate is 'separate from 232 matters,' referring to tariffs imposed under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Japan is still vulnerable to duties on critical sectors, after the administration hiked levies on steel, aluminum, autos and auto parts using the provision, and is conducting probes in nine additional sectors.
FIRST IN MORNING TRADE: Fifty-two House Democrats sent Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio a letter Sunday asking for more information about the status of the U.S. negotiations with the Democratic Republic of Congo on critical minerals, which are being held behind closed doors.
'As Members of Congress, we are deeply concerned with your administration's failure to consult Congress and the lack of transparency, especially given the dire security, human rights, labor, and environmental situation associated with mineral mining in the DRC,' the lawmakers wrote in the letter, which was led by Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.).
Keep in mind: China has historically outmaneuvered the U.S. when it comes to developments in Africa, particularly the DRC, thanks to Beijing's deployment of large-scale financing projects that include government-to-government engagement deemed exploitative by U.S. officials.
Around the World
LUMBER DUTIES HIKED: The Commerce Department on Friday announced higher countervailing duties on Canadian softwood lumber to offset what it says are unfairly low prices and Canadian subsidies, raising the total duty rate to 35.19 percent.
The countervailing duty rate is being raised to 14.63 percent, up from 6.74 percent, and would be in addition to existing anti-dumping duty rates.
Another stressor: The final levels are largely in line with projections, but are poised to inflame tensions between the U.S. and Canada as they pursue broader trade talks, and come days after Trump slapped a 35 percent tariff on the country, affecting goods deemed noncompliant with an existing North American trade deal known as the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
'This decision will harm communities on both sides of the border,' Kurt Niquidet, president of the BC Lumber Trade Council, which advocates for the Canadian lumber sector, said in a statement. 'It places unnecessary strain on forestry-dependent regions in Canada while driving up construction costs for American builders and families.'
Context: The duties on Canada come as the Trump administration separately pursues a Section 232 probe that could lead to new tariffs on lumber from more countries.
TRADE OVERNIGHT
—After the trade war, a new essay in Foreign Affairs from former United States Trade Representative and Council on Foreign Relations President Michael Froman.
— Foreign governments bet big to lobby Trump on tariffs. Most came up empty, POLITICO reports.
— Intel CEO Singled Out by Trump to Visit White House on Monday, per the Wall Street Journal.
— Canada courts Mexico as Trump escalates tariff fight, POLITICO reports.
— WTO cuts 2026 trade forecast as Trump tariff hike takes hold, per POLITICO Pro.
— Trump calls for Intel CEO to resign, per POLITICO Pro.
— Coast Guard discloses role in probe of Chinese ship-to-shore cranes, per POLITICO Pro.
THAT'S ALL FOR MORNING TRADE! See you again soon! In the meantime, drop the team a line: dpalmer@politico.com, ddesrochers@politico.com and ahawkins@politico.com. Follow us @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Trade.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Woman Is Going Viral For Hilariously Explaining The Brutal Truth About The US's Student Loan Crisis
I doubt it'll come as a surprise to anyone under 45, but according to nearly "one in six adult Americans" has federal student loan debt, and the New York Times reports that millennials hold the bulk of that debt. Back in May, President Trump resumed collections on previously defaulted student loans, which had been paused since 2020. Combined with the government allowing loan servicers to report late payments to credit bureaus again (which had also been on pause), the New York Times said that millions of people have seen their credit scores drop, and "a record number of borrowers are [now] at risk of defaulting by the end of the year." Student loans have continued to be a point of contention politically as well, with many conservatives arguing against student loan forgiveness, saying it's akin to getting something for free. However, younger people contend that the loans are predatory, unaffordable, and feel impossible to pay off, sometimes even after they've been making regular payments for years. Zoë Tyler, aka thezolyspirit, recently went viral in a video where she jokingly laid out exactly what the student loan crisis looks like in reality. Zoë started out the video satirically, in a perfect mid-Atlantic accent, with a text overlay that says, "What boomers think the student loan crisis is...": "Oh, yes," she said, "Well, I, I know I said I would pay back those student loans, but I... I've decided I don't want to," she said with a smile. "I don't ever want to grow up. I want to stay a child forever." @thezolyspirit / Via Then, she switched immediately back to her normal speaking voice with a text overlay that says "What it actually is..." as she began imitating a one-sided phone call. "Hi, yes, um — so, I have my student loan pulled up here — I've been making the minimum payment on time for 10 years, and I now owe more than I took out. So I just… I was wondering what's that about?" she asked. @thezolyspirit / Via "The interest accrues faster than you can pay it off? Oh, that's…that's you guys are able to do that." "What is the interest, by the way? I can't… It's 13%? Okay. That makes sense, that…that it would be that." Then, Zoë begins a new conversation. "Hi! I just graduated, and I noticed that my student loans are way more than I originally took out. It was accruing interest while I was at school? Uh. Hmm. But it says the principle is more than I took [out]..." @thezolyspirit / Via "When I graduated, you combined the accruing interest into the principle, so now… I took out $55,000, and it's saying that it accrued $20,000 while I was at school. So now, instead of taking the 10% interest off of $55,000, you're taking 10% interest off of $75,000? Wow!" @thezolyspirit / Via The video ended with Zoë signing off the call. "All right, well, uh, thank you. What was your name, sir? One more time? Beelzebub? Okay, thank you." People in the comments were quick to back Zoë up, pointing out that they'd had similar experiences with their own loans. "I borrowed $17k and they want $60k back. They need to be fr lmao," said one person. "My husband, after paying for 13 years, checked his student loan breakdown. Turns out, of the 350$ a month he has been paying on time for 13+ years, only .16 CENTS a month goes toward the principle balance." "atp my student loans are an issue between the government and god." Others pointed out how much costs have changed since the baby boomers were in school. "Tuitions and Fees have gone up 133% since the 80s." U.S. News & World Report confirms this statistic, with the qualifier that it is in regard to in-state tuition and fees at public national universities, and is not adjusted for inflation. "My FIL [father-in-law] paid for his college and his living expenses for the entire year by working an entry level construction job in the summer. No way anyone could do that now-a-days. A summer job wouldn't even cover books and fees." The conversation made its way over to Twitter (X) as well, when the video was shared with the comment, "A TikTok that explains the student-loan crisis better than any politician or journalist can, in 93 seconds." Quoting a response to the original tweet, they also said, "This is not 'basic finance,' these are exploitative non-negotiable terms which makes this a form of predatory lending." "If you get a 7-year car loan and make the minimum payment every month, the loan will be paid off in 7 years... It's literally only student loans that are like this." Unsurprisingly, there were commenters who felt that borrowers were the ones responsible for their debt. "Crying about being responsible for your choices just shows how out of touch that generation is," said one person. "What this tik tok explains really well is that people didn't learn the right things in college." "Do not sign don't understand. Especially don't do that and then try to make it other people's problem." But others pushed back, pointing out that people took these loans out when they were still teenagers, usually with a promise that going to college would help them earn more money later. "Worst part is people will see this and say 'well you as a 17/18 y/o should have realized how predatory it was.'" "Telling 18 year olds that they have to go to college to be successful and not fully explaining to them what loans are like is diabolical." "a lot of us were just shuffled through a line and told to sign a sheet of paper so we could go to school, all with minimal explanation of any of it." And finally, this commenter summed it up best: "But make sure you pay them off whilst also buying a house, paying for a wedding, and having children all whilst earning proportionally less than they ever did because wages are stagnant, ok? You can do it if you just cancel your Netflix." You can see Zoë's full video below: @thezolyspirit / Via And now I have to know: What do you think? Are you still paying off student loans? Do you feel they should be forgiven, or at least reduced after a decade of payments? Let us know in the comments. And if you'd like to remain anonymous, you can use the form below.


Buzz Feed
16 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
This Senator Made A Very, Very Good Point About Trump's Weird Comment About Gold
A bunch of Donald Trump's new tariffs went into effect on August 7. But there's one thing that won't be hit with a tariff, and that's gold. Yep, gold is off the table! Some people pointed how that this could be because of all of the gold in the Oval Office. Other people compared him to an Austin Powers villain. And this person said, "I miss when the federal government wasn't a meme." But one reply to Trump's post is going more viral than the rest, and it's from Senator Chris Coons of Delaware. Here's what he said: "Trump could have cancelled tariffs on groceries, clothing, back-to-school supplies – any one of a number of things that would have reduced costs for American families. Instead, he chose gold." NextGen America responded to that comment, "Trumponomics, simplified: More golden ballrooms for him, more tariffs for the rest of us." Thoughts?


The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump tells Europe he won't negotiate territory with Putin, say leaders
European leaders said President Trump on Wednesday said he would not negotiate territorial issues with Russian President Vladimir Putin at their summit in Alaska this week, saying it is an issue that must be discussed between Ukraine and Russia. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emanuel Macron both said Trump made the comments during a virtual meeting with European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday. Merz made the remarks alongside Zelensky, who came to Berlin for the call. The German leader said Trump told them that he wouldn't negotiate territorial issues and pledged to ask for an immediate ceasefire in the meeting, the Wall Street Journal reported citing two sources on the call. Macron similarly told reporters that Trump agreed with European leaders during the call that any talks on territorial concessions must involve Ukraine. Trump described the call with European leaders as 'very good, I would rate it a 10' when speaking to reporters at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday. He said there will be consequences for Putin if he does not agree to stop the war after their meeting in Alaska on Friday. Trump also sought to set expectations for the meeting, saying he didn't believe he has the power to get Putin stop attacking Ukrainian civilians. 'I've had that conversation with him, I've had a lot of good conversations with him and then I go home and I see that a rocket hit a nursing home, or a rocket hit an apartment building and people are laying dead in the street… but I guess the answer to that is probably no.' While Trump set an Aug 8 deadline for Putin to stop the war or face sanctions, the president allowed that deadline to pass in exchange for the face-to-face summit. Trump said the first meeting with Putin is an attempt to feel out the Russian leader's commitment to negotiations to end the war, but that the goal is to move toward a second summit with Zelensky, and possibly Trump too. 'There's a good chance we'll have a second meeting that will be more productive than the first – because the first I'll find out where we are and what we're doing,' he said.