Opposition seeks apology over MLC's ‘urban Naxal' remark on wari pilgrimage
Leaders across the Opposition spectrum — including Leader of the Opposition in the Legislative Council Ambadas Danve (Shiv Sena-UBT), Congress Legislature Party leader Vijay Wadettiwar, and NCP (SP) leader Jitendra Awhad — accused the Mahayuti government of attempting to defame a centuries-old religious tradition and demanded an apology from the ruling alliance.
'This is not just an attack on the wari, but on Maharashtra's cultural identity. The government must immediately withdraw these remarks and apologise to the warkari community,' Mr. Danve said during the protest.
The Ashadhi wari is a revered annual pilgrimage during which lakhs of devotees — known as warkaris — walk to Pandharpur to offer prayers to Lord Vitthal. Ms. Kayande, a nominated member of the Upper House, claimed in the Legislative Council on Wednesday (July 2, 2025) that urban Naxals had infiltrated the wari and were attempting to mislead devotees.
'Atheist individuals who do not believe in God have entered the wari. This is a serious matter. Under the guise of groups like Samvidhan Dindi, Paryavaran Wari, and Lokayat, they are staging street plays, delivering speeches, and influencing warkaris,' Ms. Kayande alleged. She also cited past instances where pieces of meat were reportedly thrown during the procession.
She urged the Mahayuti government to act swiftly to preserve the sanctity of the pilgrimage and said the proposed Maharashtra Public Security Bill would help curb such disruptive elements. 'During last year's Lok Sabha elections, these same elements spread a false narrative about the Constitution being changed,' Ms. Kayande added.
Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde, who heads the Shiv Sena faction that nominated Ms. Kayande, told the House that the government had taken cognisance of the matter and had directed the Home Department to investigate the claims.
Minister of State for Home Yogesh Kadam also said his office had received complaints about attempts by alleged 'urban Naxals' to disrupt social harmony and assured the House that the matter would be taken seriously.
The Opposition, however, dismissed the remarks as baseless and politically motivated. They alleged that the comments were part of a deliberate attempt to politicise a spiritual event and discredit the peaceful warkari movement.
'This is an attempt to sow division under the guise of security concerns. The government must stop targeting religious gatherings with ideological labels,' Mr. Awhad said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- Indian Express
As RSS calls for amending Preamble, why it puts BJP in a tricky position
When the RSS general secretary says that the words 'secular' and 'socialist' in the Preamble to the Constitution should be reviewed, it is more than a casual call for a debate, for the Sangh is measured in its utterances. Dattatreya Hosabale's comment last week is not the first time the issue has come up. BJP Rajya Sabha MP Rakesh Sinha moved a Private Member's Bill in 2020, and others have petitioned the courts. The Supreme Court examined the matter, and in 2024, a two-judge Bench led by then Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjeev Khanna upheld the insertion of 'socialist' and 'secular' in the Preamble. It is true, as the RSS says, that B R Ambedkar, and indeed Jawaharlal Nehru, did not feel it was required to explicitly include secularism and socialism in the Preamble when the Constitution was being framed. Ambedkar felt the idea was embedded in the essence of the document and did not need an overt expression. In 1976, Indira Gandhi decided to include the words in the Preamble amid the Emergency when fundamental rights were suspended, the press muzzled, the judiciary's oversight role withdrawn, and Opposition leaders in jail. In the preceding months, there had not been any demand for their inclusion in the Preamble, and there was hardly any discussion on the matter before it happened. The change came as part of the 42nd Amendment that concentrated power in the hands of the executive. Whatever be Mrs Gandhi's motivation — whether it was to insert 'socialist' to retain the support of the USSR, or add 'secularism' to make amends and send a signal to Muslims who were angry about enforced sterilisations during the Emergency — the Janata Party government chose not to remove the two words from the Preamble. The government, of which the BJP's precursor Jana Sangh was a part, clearly thought it politically prudent to retain them even though it undid many of the Emergency provisions through the 44th Amendment. The two 'S' words that have suddenly become so controversial did not create a kerfuffle back then and a few questioned if India was, or should be, a secular and socialist nation. Over the years, socialism has evolved into a widely accepted generic concept, understood as economic and social justice for the last person. PM Narendra Modi is more of a social-welfarist than several of his predecessors. Secularism, too, had near-universal acceptance till it began to be equated with minority appeasement. The RSS wants to turn the clock back. But in politics, sometimes it's easier to do than undo. To remove 'secular' from the Preamble today will signal that India is now moving towards a Hindu Rashtra. It is like talking about undoing reservation for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes given after Independence (22.5%), or quota for the Other Backward Classes (27%) that was given in 1990 following the Mandal Commission report. V P Singh had once said even if he wanted to undo the Mandal decision, he could not go back because it could lead to widespread violence. When RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat in 2015 spoke about moving beyond reservation, the resulting backlash only helped bring Lalu Prasad and Nitish Kumar to power in Bihar. The timing of the Sangh's move today is of as much interest as the move itself. After the fulfilment of its core agenda — Ram temple, Article 370, Uniform Civil Code — the Sangh may want to push its agenda further in its centenary year as it looks to create a Hindu civilisational entity. The response, or otherwise, of the BJP to Hosabale's comment is instructive. Union Agriculture Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan — who has been one of the Sangh's favourites for BJP presidentship — was the first to endorse the idea. Chouhan said 'sarva dharma sambhava (all religions are equal)' and not secularism (the French concept of separation of church and state) was a part of Indian culture. His Cabinet colleague Jitendra Singh also spoke in the same vein as did Chief Ministers Devendra Fadnavis and Himanta Biswa Sarma. The RSS's suggestion can complicate an already difficult situation for the BJP brass. First, the party will have to decide what it will do about the allegiance to secularism that is mentioned in its party Constitution. In 2014, PM Modi said that secularism 'flows in our blood'. Second, the BJP's NDA allies, on whom the party is dependent in its third term, are not likely to bite the bullet easily. Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) leader Chirag Paswan has already made it clear he is not in favour of amending the Preamble. Third, it will give another handle to the Congress to target the BJP. Lok Sabha Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi has already said the BJP prefers the Manusmriti to the Constitution. Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav has also accused the party of quietly going for a change in the Constitution because it is unable to openly oppose reservation for Dalits and OBCs. Both the BJP and the Opposition are manoeuvring to get the support of Dalits and OBCs. The ruling party knows how fraught with risks any talk of changing the Constitution can be, given that the Opposition's narrative dented it in the Lok Sabha elections last year and brought the party down to 240 seats. There is a growing perception today about the Constitution. The founding document (also, Constitutional secularism) is identified with Ambedkar, more than was the case in the 1970s and 80s. And Ambedkar is equated with Dalits and Dalits with reservation. Even though the RSS is saying it wants to return to the Preamble approved by Ambedkar, we do not know which way the cookie will crumble. Both the Congress and the BJP realise the Constitution is a live political issue today and observing the 50th anniversary of the Emergency is more than a mere recall of what happened then. We can discuss what kind of secularism suits the country. We can accept or reject the French model, and back the Indian concept that emphasises the equality of religions before the state. However, at the end of the day, secularism is not a luxury for a diverse nation such as India. It is a necessity that enables us to co-exist as one entity. (Neerja Chowdhury, Contributing Editor, The Indian Express, has covered the last 11 Lok Sabha elections. She is the author of How Prime Ministers Decide)
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
INDIA bloc considers legal action, rallies over Bihar voter rolls revision
The INDIA bloc is mulling legal action and a statewide campaign in Bihar against the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls, which the opposition alleges could disenfranchise over two crore voters ahead of the upcoming assembly elections.A day after a delegation of 11 INDIA bloc parties met Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and other election officials, sources within the alliance confirmed they are considering approaching the courts if their concerns are not alliance, comprising the Congress, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), and Left parties in Bihar, is also discussing joint rallies and other forms of public mobilisation to oppose the SIR. On Thursday, a senior alliance leader said that if the Election Commission continues with the revision process without ensuring safeguards, they would be left with no option but to seek legal recourse. Congress leader Pawan Khera, when asked about the possibility of going to court, said all options remain the nearly three-hour-long meeting with the Election Commission on Wednesday, the delegation raised strong objections to the timing and implementation of the SIR. Congress spokesperson and senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi alleged that the revision exercise, being conducted months before the state goes to polls, threatens to disenfranchise a minimum of two crore voters, particularly among Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, migrant workers, and those from impoverished argued that many voters would not be able to produce their or their parents' birth certificates on such short notice and risk having their names removed from the voter list. He also warned that there would be no way to challenge such deletions once the model code of conduct is in place and courts stop entertaining election-related the timing of the SIR, Singhvi pointed out that the last such revision in Bihar was in 2003. 'For 22 years, after four or five elections, were all those elections faulty or unreliable?' he asked. He also termed the exercise an attack on the Constitution, calling it a move towards disenfranchisement and Congress, RJD, and other INDIA bloc parties have intensified their opposition to the SIR, which has already started in Bihar and is expected to be rolled out in five other poll-bound states - Assam, Kerala, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal - next leader Tejashwi Yadav earlier stated that his party would take to the streets in protest if the names of the poor are arbitrarily removed from the electoral rolls.- EndsMust Watch
India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Party Is United, Country Is Hot': Trump Declares July 4 Signing Bash For ‘One Big Beautiful Bill'
Washington, D.C.: On July 4th eve, President Donald Trump set the stage for a splashy White House celebration. The long-awaited 'One Big Beautiful Bill' completed its journey through Congress on Thursday. The final tally stood at 218–214 in the House and 51–50 in the Senate – with Vice President JD Vance as the swing vote. Trump's statement rang with pride. He praised unity in the Republican caucus, naming Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Leader John Thune as key figures behind the effort. He added special thanks to every Republican lawmaker who backed the package. Only two voted no – Representatives Thomas Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick. With passage secured, Trump extended a personal invitation. 'Signing Celebration at the White House,' he said, set for Friday at 4 P.M. EST. "We are going to have a Signing Celebration at the White House tomorrow, at 4 P.M. EST. All Congressmen/women and Senators are invited. Together, we will celebrate our Nation's Independence and the beginning of our new Golden Age. The people of the United States of America will be Richer, Safer, and Prouder than ever before," Trump wrote on Truth Social. "Thank you to Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, and all of the wonderful Republican Members of Congress who helped us deliver on our Promises, and so much more. Together, we can do things that were not even imagined possible less than one year ago. We will keep working, and winning -- CONGRATULATIONS AMERICA!" he further added. The event promises to coincide with Independence Day festivities. Trump described the moment as the start of a new 'Golden Age' for the United States. A surge in prosperity. Greater national strength. Enhanced pride. This legislative package carries several core elements – a wave of tax relief a hefty boost to the Pentagon and funding to strengthen border security. Details vary, but key provisions include family-focused tax credits, military funding increases and a ramp-up in border patrols and technology. The House vote came after Thursday's ceremonial airport welcome featured a Guard of Honour for Trump's plane, not him. The atmosphere in the Capitol turned more charged. Just enough Republicans supported the package to secure approval. The Senate's earlier 51–50 vote offered a hint at how precarious the final outcome would be. Vice President Vance handed the deciding vote on Thursday evening, sending the bill to the president's desk. Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described the timing as 'a big, beautiful signing ceremony tomorrow at 5 p.m. on the Fourth of July'. White House staff confirmed rolling media coverage is in place. The package's journey reflects a striking moment of alignment within the Republican Party. Trump cast the effort as proof of what could happen when his team stayed on message and stuck together. Final approvals aside, preparations are underway. Invitations have gone out. Staff are rehearsing. Pundits are analysing the timing. On this eve of national celebration, Trump's ceremony may shift the spotlight from fireworks to signature ink. Noting that almost all representatives of the Republican party voted in favour of the bill, resulting in a final vote of 218-214, Trump said, "The Republicans in the House of Representatives have just passed the 'ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT. Our Party is UNITED like never before, and our Country is "HOT". The day has arrived. Lawmakers, pundits and the public await whether the ceremony will deliver the next chapter of Trump's political narrative and whether the new law will deliver the gains Trump promises.
