logo
Trump's attack on science risks dismantling a century of innovation

Trump's attack on science risks dismantling a century of innovation

American dominance in science and innovation was not inevitable. It was a deliberate, strategic achievement born of open borders, inclusive institutions and forward-looking investment in education and research. That edge, forged over a century, is eroding – quietly but rapidly threatening the foundations of US leadership worldwide.
In today's polarised national discourse, headlines focus on tariffs,
immigration and the culture wars. But behind the noise lies a far more consequential trend: the systematic
dismantling of America's scientific and research enterprise. Unlike a stock market crash or a military misstep, this decline is less visible, but the long-term costs could be far greater.
For much of modern history, the United States was a scientific follower, not a leader. In the early 20th century, Germany reigned supreme in chemistry, physics and engineering. British universities set the global research agenda. Between 1901 and 1930, Germany received about one-third of all Nobel Prizes in science; the US garnered just 6 per cent.
Three critical developments changed that. First, the exodus of talent from Europe in the 1930s and 1940s brought brilliance to America's shores. Fleeing fascism and
antisemitism , Jewish and other persecuted scientists – including luminaries like
Albert Einstein and Leo Szilard – reinvigorated US academia and spearheaded advances from quantum physics to nuclear energy.
Though Jews comprised less than 1 per cent of Germany's population at the time, they earned over 25 per cent of its scientific Nobels – a staggering figure that illustrates the calibre of minds who fled.
Second, the devastation of World War II levelled Europe's research infrastructure. The Soviet Union lost more than 24 million people; Britain, France and Germany lay in ruins. The US, by contrast, emerged with its economy, institutions and innovation hubs intact and ascendant.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Air Canada flight attendants will continue strike, union says, defying government
Air Canada flight attendants will continue strike, union says, defying government

South China Morning Post

time13 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Air Canada flight attendants will continue strike, union says, defying government

Air Canada flight attendants said on Sunday they will remain on strike and spurn a government return-to-work order they called unconstitutional that would send them back to their duties by 2pm local time. The Canadian Union of Public Employees said in a statement that members would remain on strike and invited Air Canada back to the table to 'negotiate a fair deal'. On Saturday, the Canadian government under Prime Minister Mark Carney moved to end a strike by more than 10,000 flight attendants at the country's largest carrier. The Canadian Industrial Relations Board agreed to a government request to order binding arbitration and end the strike to break their contract impasse, an action Air Canada had sought but unionised flight attendants fiercely opposed. The Canada Labour Code gives the government the power to ask the CIRB to impose binding arbitration in the interest of protecting the economy. The government, under former prime minister Justin Trudeau , intervened last year to head off rail and dock strikes that threatened to cripple the economy, but it is unusual for a union to defy a CIRB order. Air Canada had said it planned to resume flights on Sunday evening, following the expected end of the strike that caused the suspension of around 700 daily flights on Saturday, stranding more than 100,000 passengers.

Washington has already lost dirty chip war but does not know it yet
Washington has already lost dirty chip war but does not know it yet

South China Morning Post

time18 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

Washington has already lost dirty chip war but does not know it yet

The United States is fighting two chip wars against China. One involves playing dirty, which it has already lost, though it doesn't know it yet. The other, more legitimate, remains to be seen. It depends on whether America can maintain its longstanding tech innovation and leadership. But with Donald Trump at the helm with his weird and often incomprehensible 'strategies' – from cuts and firings in government-funded basic research to direct interference in the tech sector – things don't look good. The dirty chip war essentially tries to trip China over with export restrictions, bullying of allies from selling advanced tech, and sanctioning of Chinese tech firms, which often includes targeting their non-Chinese suppliers as well. It was started by Donald Trump 1.0, intensified under Joe Biden, but now somewhat moderated under Trump 2.0. You can say China also has its own tit-for-tat dirty war, which involves smuggling and copying of export-restricted advanced chips and related tech such as automated software designs. But historically, rising tech superpowers, including Britain and the US, have always taken from others as a kind of state industrial policy. China's development is the rule, not the exception. Tech diffusion can be slowed but never stopped. At the moment, there is something of a truce, though Washington clearly sees it as a continuation of the tech war by other means. There seems to be a consensus within the Trump White House that putting the squeeze on China has actually made it move faster to refashion its entire chipmaking industry by creating an increasingly self-sufficient domestic sector with its own secure supply chains. That's why Trump and Co have switched to a different track, by allowing Nvidia and AMD to sell to China respectively their lower-performance chips H20 and MI308 for artificial intelligence.

Trump's ‘pay-to-play' trade policy sets a dangerous precedent
Trump's ‘pay-to-play' trade policy sets a dangerous precedent

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

Trump's ‘pay-to-play' trade policy sets a dangerous precedent

Any lingering doubts about the extent to which US President Donald Trump has rewritten the rules of global trade should have been laid to rest with reports that chip giants Nvidia and AMD have agreed to pay the US government 15 per cent of the revenue from chip sales in China. The payments are a quid pro quo for approval of the export licences needed to sell semiconductors critical to China's artificial intelligence (AI) ambitions. The previously stalled licences were approved by the Commerce Department on August 8. As the US-China geostrategic rivalry has intensified in recent years, both Democratic and Republican administrations in Washington have tightened restrictions on the sale of sophisticated technologies to China. The export controls on Nvidia's H20 and AMD's MI308 chips were put in place earlier this year in response to US concerns that the chips would find their way into Chinese military applications and give Beijing a leg up in the race for AI superiority. This unprecedented arrangement with Nvidia and AMD does something which until now would have been considered incomprehensible. It monetises US trade policy. Companies are essentially paying the US government for approval to export their products.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store