Beats Solo 4 headphones are at their lowest-ever price at Amazon
All products featured here are independently selected by our editors and writers. If you buy something through links on our site, Mashable may earn an affiliate commission.
SAVE $100: As of June 9, Beats Solo 4 headphones are on sale for $99.95 at Amazon. That's a saving of 50% on list price.
Opens in a new window
Credit: Beats
Beats Solo 4
$99.95 at Amazon $199.95 Save $100.00
Get Deal
If a new pair of headphones has been on your wishlist for a while, why not check out the Beats Solo 4? Released just last year, these headphones bring some big upgrades to the Solo lineup, and as of June 9, they're half off at Amazon.
Right now, they are priced at just $99.95. And you won't get a better deal than this; in fact, they've never been priced lower. This deal is available across all colorways at Amazon except black/gold.
SEE ALSO: New version of Gemini beats other AIs at math, science, and reasoning
And for under $100, you're getting a great product. The Beats Solo 4 boast a battery life of up to 50 hours and a super-quick 10-minute charge time. The Solo 4 also introduces new, personalized Spatial Audio with head tracking. This is a really great feature that creates a 3D surround sound and a more immersive listening experience by adjusting sound based on your head movements. So music, movies, and calls feel more lifelike and high quality.
And as with all Beats devices, the sound quality is stellar for all types of listening. Enjoy a punchy bass and balanced sound, whether you're listening to music, podcasts, or watching TikTok.
Grab this great deal at Amazon.
Apple AirPods Pro 2nd Gen With MagSafe USB-C Charging Case — $169.00 (List Price $249.00)
Roku Ultra 4K Ultimate Streaming Player (2024 Release) — $79.99 (List Price $99.99)
Beats Pill Bluetooth Speaker — $99.00 (List Price $149.95)
Roborock Qrevo Master Robot Vacuum and Mop — $799.97 (List Price $1599.99)
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) — $74.99 (List Price $99.00)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy With $1,000 Right Now
Amazon's core e-commerce business is resilient, and the company's AI investments are paying off. Berkshire Hathaway oversees a diverse set of cash-rich businesses that are resistant to economic slowdowns. The company is also sitting on the largest war chest in its history. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › While uncertainty is always the name of the game in investing, the last few months have been particularly chaotic. Global trade tension spurred by President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, especially their on-again, off-again nature, has caused investor anxiety to spike. At a time like this, it's worth it to look at the portfolio of the legendary Warren Buffett to consider what might be some smart, no-brainer investments. Here are my two favorites from the "Oracle of Omaha." Although an apparent resolution to the ongoing trade negotiations has been reached, given how much Amazon's (NASDAQ: AMZN) supply chain is tied up with China, investors are right to be wary of the effect Trump's trade policies will have on the company's bottom line. That being said, I think the threat is overblown for investors looking to hold for the long term -- which is exactly the kind of investing at the core of Buffett's philosophy. A reescalation of the trade war with China would undoubtedly affect Amazon, but any disruptions would ultimately be temporary. The fact that Amazon's core e-commerce business is so deeply embedded in people's daily lives doesn't change with a temporary slowdown. Luckily for investors, Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud service provider and subsidiary of Amazon, is much less exposed to tariffs and changes in consumer spending. It's also the fastest-growing part of Amazon's empire, up 17% year over year in first-quarter 2025, as AI models demand more and more compute power. In the company's recent earnings call, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy cited just how big an opportunity AWS is addressing: "Before this generation of AI, we thought AWS had the chance to ultimately be a multi-hundred-billion-dollar revenue run rate business. We now think it could be even larger." Amazon is in a strong position to succeed in the highest growth area of the economy, AI, while continuing to enjoy a significant moat around its massive core e-commerce business. Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) (NYSE: BRK.B), Warren Buffett's own company, has proven itself a winner time and again for the last 60 years. Its investments in outside companies are the stuff of legend, and its diverse set of internal businesses spanning several recession-resistant industries provides it with a steady flow of cash. Now, quite famously, the company is sitting on its largest war chest ever, a sum of cash that would make most countries jealous. This makes Berkshire a wonderful hedge against any sort of major economic downturn or crisis. The company can use those funds to make strategic investments at a time when most investors are scrambling to protect their capital. Just as in the aftermath of 2008, a financial crisis offers those with major war chests like Berkshire the opportunity to find incredible deals. Take, for example, Buffett's investment in Bank of America following the Great Financial Crisis. In six years, Buffett turned a $5 billion investment into an on-paper profit of $12 billion (Berkshire held on to its shares). Even if a major crisis doesn't present itself any time soon, Berkshire's insurance business is strong. It's not without obstacles. Last year's multiple hurricanes and this year's Los Angeles fires had a major effect on Berkshire's bottom line, but as time goes on, premiums will adjust to make up for any increased rates of damage. And yes, the elephant in the room is that Buffett is stepping down as CEO of Berkshire, but I think fears surrounding his departure are overblown. The company he built is infused to the core with his ethos, and his successor, Greg Abel, is a competent replacement whom Buffett has been mentoring for many years. Political and economic uncertainty will always be part of investing, so it's critical not to jump ship when things get particularly rocky. It's why investing in companies you really believe in and want to hold for the long term is the best strategy. It makes it so much easier to take the long view and remain level-headed when the economy dips. For my money, both Amazon and Berkshire are excellent additions to any portfolio. Amazon continues to deliver growth and innovation, while Berkshire Hathaway stands as a pillar of stability and opportunity in times of crisis. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Bank of America is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Johnny Rice has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Bank of America, and Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 2 No-Brainer Warren Buffett Stocks to Buy With $1,000 Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I stopped using punctuation in my prompts — here's why I swear by it now
Do you really need punctuation, spell-check and proper grammar when chatting with AI? I've tested how being polite alters response, so I just had to know if the tone and content of chatbot replies changed based on whether I typed properly or as if I was texting with my eyes closed. To find out just how much punctuation (or the lack of it) shapes AI responses, I tested a range of prompts on several different chatbots including Gemini, Claude and ChatGPT. I tested everything from blog brainstorming and birthday messages to breaking news and weekend planning — all in two versions: buttoned-up and grammar-perfect vs. casual, typo-riddled. I even threw in an emoji prompt for differences were far more revealing than I expected. Prompt 1: 'Can you help me brainstorm blog post ideas about electric vehicles?'Prompt 2: 'can u help me brainstorm blogg ideas about electric vehiclez'Punctuation: This take is definitely geared toward readers who want the big picture. People who care about where the EV market is going, not just where it is today. It leans analytical and future-forward, touching on tech trends, policy implications and how EVs fit into broader conversations about sustainability and innovation. No punctuation & errors: This one is more grounded and relatable; it's the version that speaks directly to people trying to figure out if an EV is right for their life right now. It's less about macro trends and more about everyday decisions: charging logistics, cost savings and what it actually feels like to own and drive an With punctuation, the chatbot zoomed out, focusing on the bigger picture like tech trends, sustainability and market direction. Response 2 zooms in for results about the everyday experience of owning an EV, offering practical insights for mainstream consumers and potential buyers. Prompt 1: 'Write a funny birthday message to a coworker!'Prompt 2: 'write a funnie bday msge to a coworker'Punctuation: More polished and structured. Uses full sentences, proper grammar, punctuation and slightly more formal language (e.g., "significantly less of a drag," "skillfully pretending," "tangible asset"). Humor is witty and situational. No punctuation & errors: More casual and conversational, mimicking texting/informal chat. Uses abbreviations ("hbd", "ur", "bc", "ngl"), slang ("suck less", "wild", "bare minimum") and shorter, punchier phrasing. Humor is more direct and sometimes With punctuation, the response is clean, composed and leans into clever, well-crafted language with a polished tone and structured delivery. Without punctuation, the response is looser and more spontaneous, using internet slang and a casual voice that feels like a text from a friend. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Prompt 1: "Please tell me the top current news stories."Prompt 2: "plz tell me the top curentnews stories"Punctuation: Leads with Israel's strike on Iran ("Operation Rising Lion") but provides less tactical detail. Focuses on broader impacts (global markets, Iran's response). Includes Sen. Padilla's arrest as a separate major story. No punctuation & errors: Leads with far more detailed military specifics of Israel's strike (targets: Natanz + Fordow; scale: 200 jets, 330 munitions; agencies: IDF + Mossad). Immediately follows with a dedicated section on market reactions (" Oil, equities react...").Results: The prompt with punctuation delivered a broader, multi-story news roundup with geopolitical and market context; lighter on specifics. The prompt without punctuation felt like it was tactical-heavy with a focus on financial fallout and really no secondary news. Prompt 1 without emoji: 'Suggest weekend activities.'Prompt 2 with emoji: 'suggest wknd activities *smiley emoji*'Without emoji: Highly structured and categorized by activity type (Outdoor, Cultural, Social, Relaxing, Learning), offering a comprehensive menu of activities. It ends with a practical question. Emoji: Emphasizes fun, spontaneity and uplifting experiences (e.g., "spontaneous road trip," "backyard movie night," "karaoke night"). Features more whimsical, playful and novelty-focused activities like apple picking, mini golf, stargazing, escape rooms or visiting sunflower fields. Results: Without an emoji in the prompt, the response is more structured and utilitarian, offering categorized options based on activity type and ending with a practical, mood-based decision prompt. The response completely changed with an emoji with a more playful and emotionally driven tone, focusing on spontaneous, feel-good activities and an emphasis on immediate joy. Prompt 1: 'I have a busy weekend and am trying to organize my schedule. I have to do laundry, organize the basement, attend a soccer tournament and celebrate Father's Day. Help me plan.'Prompt 2: 'i have a busy weekend and am trying to organize my schedule i have to do laundry organize the basement attend a soccer tournament and celebrate fathers day'With punctuation: Although the responses are very similar, the response with punctuation is slightly more punctuation: This response offers flexibility and acknowledges The response with punctuation feels more structured and formal, offering a clear but slightly rigid tone. In contrast, the version without punctuation conveys more openness and adaptability, reflecting a looser, more conversational style. So, does punctuation matter when you talk to a chatbot? Surprisingly, yes! But maybe not in the way you think. Using punctuation tends to make the AI sound more polished, structured and formal, often zooming out to give big-picture takes. Leave it out, and the tone shifts to something looser, more conversational and often more practical or emotionally resonant. In the end, the 'right' way to prompt depends on what you're looking for: thoughtful analysis or text-from-a-friend vibes. Either way, the choice is yours. Period (or no period, your choice).
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Lessons From Barnes & Noble: Surviving The Threat Of Amazon
When Amazon disrupted the bookselling business model in the 1990s, some established bookstores ... More folded while others persisted. The key to survival was in the so-called "opportunity framing" adopted by CEOs. Words matter. When a company is faced with a disruptive new business model, leaders can respond in a number of ways: They may brush it away as unimportant, they may sound the alarm about it, or they may urge their employees to get creative and adapt to the opportunity. Each response impacts the actions the company takes. And that, in turn, can make or break the company's future. In our research published in the Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, my co-authors Christoph Zott (IESE Business School), Andreea Kiss (Lehigh University) and I shed light on a subtle but powerful driver of corporate survival in the face of disruption: how CEOs frame the situation. Our findings stem from a study on the bookselling industry in the U.S. between 1996 and 2011. Throughout the 1990s, American bookstore giants Borders and Barnes & Noble ruled the industry with their megastores. But when Amazon came into the picture, with its new online bookselling model, both Borders and Barnes & Noble recognized the shift that it represented. Both invested in e-commerce. But only one survived. What defined this fork in the road? It wasn't about money or access to technological solutions. It was about leadership framing of the new business model and the way it was sustained over time, which impacted the direction taken by the two incumbents. The importance of CEO framing When Amazon first launched as an online bookselling company in 1994, both Borders and Barnes & Nobel were at their prime. Hundreds of stores across the U.S. offered an array of books and music, with each company worth billions of dollars. But the emergence of Amazon's new business model (online-only browsing with fast home delivery) shook the two retailers' foundations. Each company responded in its own way: while Barnes & Noble worked continuously on integrating the online business model with its traditional store model, Borders focused on its physical stores and managed the online business model separately. By 2007, Borders was no longer profitable, filing for bankruptcy in 2011 and closing all of its stores. Barnes & Noble managed to survive, with around 600 stores still operating in the U.S today. Several factors account for the stark difference in the two competitors' journeys – among them, that Borders was late to invest in e-commerce and never properly integrated it into their physical stores. Those decisions, which determined the companies' futures, were largely propelled by the way each firm's CEO framed the new online model. Barnes & Noble's CEO spoke about the internet as a transformative force and outlined concrete strategies like introducing in-store kiosks, integrating logistics systems and aligning salesforce incentives for in-store and digital sales. This sustained 'opportunity framing' galvanized internal support and led to what we call a blending logic of integrating online and physical stores. Borders, on the other hand, engaged in ambiguous and shareholder-focused framing. Its CEO framed the online model as a secondary, 'adjunct' business. What's more, Borders outsourced its online presence to Amazon for several years, foregoing an important learning opportunity for digital innovation. Why language matters Though rooted in bookselling, our findings can extend beyond the business of books. Today, one of the biggest disruptors is the introduction of AI into the workforce – whether it's creating images and texts for media or changing the way pharmaceutical companies do clinical drug trials. By looking at how legacy industries responded to disruptive business models in the past, we can extend those lessons to today's leaders so they can better navigate change. It's particularly difficult for established firms to adapt to new, emerging business models because incumbents are often set in their ways. There's resistance to disruptive challenges, especially for companies with an existing commitment to a business model that works and has been working well for some time. In our research, though, we found that a successful adaptation requires CEOs to frame new business model opportunities in four complementary ways: intense (signaling excitement and growth potential), concrete (clearly articulating how value will be created), future-oriented (focusing on the future potential, not just short-term risks) and inclusive (involving key stakeholders like employees, customers and partners). The key lies in persistence. Our analysis of Borders and Barnes & Noble shows it's not enough for a CEO to check those boxes once. What truly made the difference was sustained framing over time: repeated, emotionally resonant and specific communication that continually reinforced why the opportunity mattered and how the organization should respond. If a CEO wants to see real change in their organization, they need to engage in sustained opportunity framing, over the span of several years, in order to yield results and push the company forward. Our research adds to growing evidence that language is a strategic tool, especially in times of disruption. This research suggests that leading through disruption is not just about vision or strategy; it's about sustained, multidimensional communication. By framing new business models as exciting, specific, forward-looking and inclusive of stakeholders, CEOs can help steer their organizations toward innovation, even when the future is uncertain. By Yuliya Snihur, Associate Professor of Entrepreneurship at IESE Business School.
