
While Trump slashes aid, hikes tariffs, China pumps $9.1B into Latin America
Here's a big story that went almost unnoticed in the U.S. media: China's President Xi Jinping announced a $9.1 billion line of credit, new infrastructure investments and a visa-free policy for several Latin American countries — a sharp contrast to President Trump's moves to raise tariffs, cut foreign aid and tighten visa rules for the region.
The Chinese leader made the announcement at the May 13 summit of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) in Beijing. The event was attended by the presidents of Brazil, Colombia, Chile and other top officials from about 30 countries.
Xi didn't mention Trump by name, but he seized the moment to portray China as a more reliable ally and business partner than the United States.
'There are no winners in tariff wars or trade wars,' Xi said in his inaugural speech at the meeting. 'Bullying and hegemonic policies only lead to self-isolation.'
He was clearly referring to Trump's tariff increases ranging from 10% to 25% for Latin American nations amid his overall higher global tariff hikes, as well as the U.S. president's estimated 83% cuts in global foreign aid programs. Trump has also tightened visitor entry rules as part of his immigration crackdown — and even vowed to 'take back' the Panama Canal.
China's new mega loan to Latin America will allow Chinese companies to increase investments and trade with the region, Xi said. Interestingly, the loan will not be in dollars, but in yuan — part of Xi's strategy to position China's currency as a real alternative to the U.S. dollar.
In addition, Xi announced a visa-free entry policy for tourists from Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Peru and Uruguay. Starting June 1, visitors from these countries will be able to visit China for up to 30 days without a visa. The policy may be extended to other Latin American countries later.
Also, China will invite 300 Latin American and Caribbean politicians annually to visit China over the next three years. China's foreign ministry spokesman Lin Jian predicted a 'golden decade' for China-Latin American ties, the South China Morning Post reported.
In an ironic reversal of roles, China's communist regime is now seen by many countries as a defender of free trade and a rules-based international economic order, while Trump's America is seen as a reckless, populist economic nationalist country.
Brazil's left-of-center President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said in his CELAC speech that 'President Xi Jinping and I advocate for fair trade based on the rules of the World Trade Organization.' He added, echoing Xi's words, that 'trade wars have no winners.'
Granted, China's inroads into Latin America aren't new. It's already the largest export market for several countries in the region, buying much of their soybeans, minerals and other commodities. Total trade between China and Latin America reached a record $500 billion last year, up from $12 billion in 2000.
While China's investments in the region have mainly been limited to ports, roads and bridges needed to ship commodity exports, they are diversifying into electric cars, renewable energy and artificial intelligence companies.
To be sure, China's economy is struggling, and its new credit line for Latin America will be less than half of what China announced at the first CELAC meeting in 2015. Nevertheless, it helps China portray itself as a better global citizen than Washington.
Ryan Berg, an expert on China-Latin America relations with the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told me he's most worried about China's planned invitations to 300 Latin American politicians a year to showcase 'China's governance model' to the visitors.
'What the hell is that?' Berg told me. 'Seems like an attempt to message that autocracy is an OK development model.'
The fact is that while China is offering new loans, investments, free-entry visas and all-expenses-paid visits for Latin American politicians, the Trump administration is pushing nothing but a negative agenda for the region. When Trump talks about Latin America, it's all about gruesome crimes, drugs and illegal immigration, most often cherry-picking isolated incidents to falsely present them as generalized calamities.
And the U.S. president didn't make things better when he was asked about Latin America on his first day back in the White House in January, and said, 'We don't need them, they need us.' In fact, the United States needs Latin America to do better, so it can increase trade, investments, and reduce migration.
To be fair, Washington's neglect of Latin America and China's rise in the region began about two decades ago, long before Trump's first presidency. But Trump's failure to present any constructive plans to improve ties with Latin America has elevated the U.S.'s lack of attention to the region to a whole new level.
If Trump doesn't come up with a positive agenda for the region, China will fill the vacuum, and the US. president will go down in history as the American leader who 'lost' Latin America to China.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump's Clash with Harvard Sparks Debate — This Week in Your Words
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. We're back with a fresh roundup of your highlighted comments of the week — and this time, one topic has taken center stage. President Donald Trump's ongoing clash with Harvard has ignited passionate discussions across the board. From sharp insights to thoughtful critiques, your comments have brought fresh perspectives that deepen the debate. Whether you agreed, challenged, or expanded the narrative, your voices once again brought this story to life in unexpected ways. Here are some of your highlighted comments from the past week. U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to... U.S. President Donald Trump, joined by Tesla CEO Elon Musk, speaks to reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025 in Washington, DC. Musk, who served as an adviser to Trump and led the Department of Government Efficiency, announced he would leave the Trump administration to refocus on his businesses. (Photo by) More Getty Images On the Latest on Donald Trump's Clash with Harvard Original Article: Donald Trump Says Harvard is 'Getting Their A** Kicked' Background: Trump and his administration have cracked down on Ivy League institutions, such as Harvard and Columbia University, since taking office in January. Original Comment: "I'm not sure what Trump is trying to prove here. It's silly to think he is just hurting Harvard, he is permanently damaging the International reputation of the US and damaging its reputation for those that want to study in the US. And for what? A couple protests and some DEI policies. Trump decided that's worth tanking 10 Billion dollars in research from arguably the best university in the US. And he's proud of it." - KevinBer702 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter cuts straight to the heart of the broader consequences behind Trump's actions. Rather than focusing solely on the political optics, they highlight the potential damage to America's global reputation and its standing in higher education. On Plans for Trump's Administration to Revoke Visas for Chinese Students Original Article: Marco Rubio Announces New Plan to Revoke Chinese Student Visas Background: Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced a new plan on Wednesday to "aggressively revoke" student visas issued to international students from China. Original Comment: "Another court challenge that will end up as another loss for Trump. Can't single out students based on their race or national origin for blanket visa revocation, and any decision must be rooted in credible and sufficient evidence of some tangible threat to national security concerning the specific student. Nearly all Chinese students at Harvard are the very cream of the crop, and actually add significant value to US university education. National security threats are managed by our security clearance system and controlling access to secret and top secret information, not by the visa system." - Metteyya What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter challenges the policy with a clear, informed perspective, arguing that targeting students undermines both legal standards and the strength of U.S. academia. On Calls for Universities to Align with the Trump Administration Original Article: Linda McMahon Says Colleges Must Be 'In Sync' with Trump Administration Background: Education Secretary Linda McMahon said in an interview that U.S. colleges and universities should be "in sync" with the Trump administration. Original Comment: "Only in a totalitarian nation-state would any university be REQUIRED to be "in-sync" with the presidential administration. Universities by definition are autonomous regarding academic rigor and freedom; they are apolitical." - countryman_1776 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter argues for the principle of academic independence, warning against political interference in universities. They highlight concerns that requiring alignment with the administration could undermine the core values of academic freedom and institutional autonomy. Further Reflections on Universities Aligning with the Trump Administration Original Comment: "The American university system has been the envy of the world for decades. That's due in large part to the deeply rooted tradition of academic freedom. The expectation that a university be in sync with the administration is antithetical to the idea of academic freedom." - vasant073 What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: This reader emphasizes the global reputation of the American university system, attributing its success to long-standing traditions of academic freedom. They challenge the notion that universities should conform to political agendas, reinforcing why such expectations conflict with academic ideals. On Asian Colleges Trying to Woo Harvard Students – and The Possible Fallout Original Article: Asian Colleges Aim to Woo Harvard International Students Background: As Harvard University faces looming restrictions on enrolling international students, colleges across Asia are positioning themselves to attract some of the world's brightest minds. Original Comment: "So the US has an advantage in research, medicine and AI but if you are telling potential students to go somewhere else, the money that foreign tuitions that could be used for us citizens scholarships would also disappear. This is unironically the biggest mistake you can make." - What Makes the Comment Noteworthy: The commenter points out the potential economic and academic fallout of pushing international students away. They highlight a less discussed consequence: that lost tuition could also impact scholarship support for domestic students. Thank you for sharing your thoughts and keeping the conversation alive. Your insights help us see these stories from new angles and remind us why open dialogue is so important. Keep the comments coming—we look forward to hearing more from you next week.


Fox News
34 minutes ago
- Fox News
Extra: The President's Crackdown on Foreign Students
The Trump Administration is cracking down on foreign student visas this week, pausing interviews, announcing plans to increase scrutiny of international students, and even revoking the visas of students from China. Earlier this week, George Washington University Law Professor and FOX News Contributor Jonathan Turley joined Jessica Rosenthal to weigh in on some of these actions and the legal battles they will spark. He also discussed President Trump's ongoing clash with Harvard University and other elite institutions, as well as his threats to withdraw federal funding. We often must cut interviews short during the week, but we thought you might like to hear the full interview. Today on Fox News Rundown Extra, we will share our entire interview with legal scholar Jonathan Turley and allow you to hear even more of his take on the President's visa crackdown. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Independent Non-Executive Director of Radiopharm Theranostics Picks Up 48% More Stock
Even if it's not a huge purchase, we think it was good to see that Ian Turner, the Independent Non-Executive Director of Radiopharm Theranostics Limited (ASX:RAD) recently shelled out AU$87k to buy stock, at AU$0.029 per share. That purchase might not be huge but it did increase their holding by 48%. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. The MD, CEO & Director Riccardo Canevari made the biggest insider purchase in the last 12 months. That single transaction was for AU$241k worth of shares at a price of AU$0.031 each. So it's clear an insider wanted to buy, even at a higher price than the current share price (being AU$0.024). It's very possible they regret the purchase, but it's more likely they are bullish about the company. We always take careful note of the price insiders pay when purchasing shares. As a general rule, we feel more positive about a stock if insiders have bought shares at above current prices, because that suggests they viewed the stock as good value, even at a higher price. In the last twelve months insiders purchased 22.43m shares for AU$772k. But insiders sold 1.50m shares worth AU$43k. Overall, Radiopharm Theranostics insiders were net buyers during the last year. Their average price was about AU$0.034. These transactions suggest that insiders have considered the current price attractive. You can see the insider transactions (by companies and individuals) over the last year depicted in the chart below. If you click on the chart, you can see all the individual transactions, including the share price, individual, and the date! Check out our latest analysis for Radiopharm Theranostics Radiopharm Theranostics is not the only stock that insiders are buying. For those who like to find small cap companies at attractive valuations, this free list of growing companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. Looking at the total insider shareholdings in a company can help to inform your view of whether they are well aligned with common shareholders. We usually like to see fairly high levels of insider ownership. From our data, it seems that Radiopharm Theranostics insiders own 11% of the company, worth about AU$6.3m. Overall, this level of ownership isn't that impressive, but it's certainly better than nothing! It's certainly positive to see the recent insider purchase. We also take confidence from the longer term picture of insider transactions. However, we note that the company didn't make a profit over the last twelve months, which makes us cautious. We would certainly prefer see higher levels of insider ownership but analysis of the insider transactions suggests that Radiopharm Theranostics insiders are expecting a bright future. While it's good to be aware of what's going on with the insider's ownership and transactions, we make sure to also consider what risks are facing a stock before making any investment decision. When we did our research, we found 4 warning signs for Radiopharm Theranostics (2 make us uncomfortable!) that we believe deserve your full attention. But note: Radiopharm Theranostics may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with high ROE and low debt. For the purposes of this article, insiders are those individuals who report their transactions to the relevant regulatory body. We currently account for open market transactions and private dispositions of direct interests only, but not derivative transactions or indirect interests. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.