logo
Another war, another trip, another ask: Netanyahu returns to Washington

Another war, another trip, another ask: Netanyahu returns to Washington

Russia Today05-07-2025
Fresh off a bruising 12-day war with Iran, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is flying back to Washington. This will be his third visit to the US since Donald Trump returned to the White House – but arguably the most consequential. For Netanyahu, it's more than a diplomatic courtesy call: it's a chance to cash in on battlefield momentum, convert military theatrics into political capital, and solidify his standing with Israel's most crucial ally.
According to Israeli media, Netanyahu's agenda goes beyond flag-waving and photo ops. He's expected to push forward on defense cooperation, intelligence sharing, and a new trade deal. But above all, he wants to translate Israel's perceived tactical success into long-term strategic advantage – ensuring that Washington remains firmly aligned with Israeli goals on regional security.
Leaked reports suggest that the prime minister's diplomatic playbook includes more than bilateral handshakes. One of the most sensitive issues on the table is the future of the Golan Heights. Sources say Israel has quietly renewed contacts with Syria's new leadership under Abu Mohammad al-Julani – a former jihadist now vying for international legitimacy. Behind closed doors, officials are floating the idea of a partial agreement in which Syria might recognize Israel's control over the Golan, in exchange for security coordination and regional stabilization.
But there's a catch: a real deal would demand Israeli concessions, and Netanyahu, still projecting strength, seems unwilling to budge. US officials are aware of these backchannel discussions and are said to be involved at key moments – though how far they're willing to go remains unclear.
On paper, Israel's military operation dealt a heavy blow to Iran's infrastructure, damaging key parts of its nuclear program and military network. But at home, the narrative isn't so tidy. The Iranian regime didn't collapse – far from it. Instead, Iranian society rallied around its leadership, framing the conflict as a defense of national sovereignty. In Israel, critics argue that Netanyahu oversold the war's objectives and underdelivered on its results.
The war left other wounds too. Dozens of Israeli hostages remain in Hamas custody – a painful, unresolved issue. Despite media efforts to frame the prime minister as a wartime leader, Netanyahu is facing sharp questions not just from his political opponents, but from restless members of his own coalition.
According to Haaretz, the Trump administration is growing impatient. US officials are urging Israel to suspend active operations in Gaza and prioritize a deal to bring home the hostages. The message from Washington is blunt: finish the humanitarian business now; total victory can wait.
The newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth reports that Netanyahu's tone has shifted. His previous rhetoric about 'total victory' has been quietly replaced by talk of 'humanitarian obligations' and 'pragmatic solutions.' That shift may signal a soft pivot toward a temporary truce.
Meanwhile, Channel 12 notes that the Israel Defense Forces are pressing the government to define a clear path forward. Should Israel double down and seize full control of Gaza – or cut a deal with Hamas for a phased prisoner exchange? According to military sources, the army favors the second option, seeing it as more realistic and less likely to spiral into chaos.
In the lead-up to the Washington summit, Israeli Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer arrived in the US to test the waters and align messaging. Around the same time, the US approved a new $510 million defense contract with Israel, including over 7,000 sets of precision-guided JDAM munitions.
The juxtaposition is striking: even as Washington pushes for de-escalation in Gaza, it continues to arm its closest Middle Eastern ally. The signal is mixed – and may reflect internal divisions within the Trump administration about how hard to press Israel toward restraint.
At the heart of the current deadlock is the question of a ceasefire. Hamas has proposed an immediate and full halt to hostilities, along with the complete withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. Israel has rejected the offer – unwilling to hand over military leverage without securing the return of its citizens.
With roughly 50 hostages still held in Gaza, the pressure on Netanyahu is mounting. But the path to an agreement remains narrow and treacherous. Mistrust runs deep, and the window for compromise is closing fast.
It's no secret that Trump sees himself as a dealmaker – especially in the Middle East. His declared 'victory' over Iran has set the stage for a new diplomatic push. If he can now broker a ceasefire in Gaza and bring Israeli hostages home, it would be a headline-grabbing foreign policy win ahead of his domestic battles.
But Netanyahu isn't rushing to help Trump craft his legacy. The prime minister remains wary: despite public praise from the US president, he's received no guarantees on issues closer to home – such as immunity from prosecution in his two ongoing corruption trials.
These criminal cases are more than a legal headache – they're a political time bomb. Trump's vocal support, including recent calls to drop the charges, may play well with Netanyahu's base, but they've stirred unease among Israeli institutions. Some officials see this transatlantic alliance as an attempt to shield the prime minister from accountability.
Within Israel, any deal with Hamas – especially one that involves concessions – risks alienating Netanyahu's hardline supporters. For a leader trying to balance survival with statesmanship, the choices are narrowing.
A rift is forming between Washington and West Jerusalem. Trump wants swift results – a diplomatic breakthrough that he can sell as evidence of his leadership. Netanyahu, by contrast, is playing a slower game: buying time, protecting his flank, and avoiding decisions that might weaken him politically.
Whether they can bridge this gap will define the outcome of the upcoming talks. For Trump, success means a dramatic headline: 'I stopped the war.' For Netanyahu, it's about navigating the storm without sinking.
In an ideal scenario – at least from West Jerusalem's point of view – Trump might back a new Israeli campaign against Iran. That would offer Netanyahu a cleaner battlefield, clearer objectives, and the chance to write a more triumphant chapter in his political story.
But for now, both leaders are walking a tightrope – balancing war, diplomacy, and ambition – hoping not to fall before the next election.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kiev's European backers make counter-offer ahead of Alaska talks
Kiev's European backers make counter-offer ahead of Alaska talks

Russia Today

time5 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Kiev's European backers make counter-offer ahead of Alaska talks

A number of European nations have joined Ukraine to present their own 'counterproposal' for a resolution of the conflict with Russia, the Wall Street Journal has reported, citing anonymous European officials. The plan was hastily drawn up after US President Donald Trump confirmed that he would be meeting with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, in Alaska next Friday. The Journal said on Saturday that representatives of Ukraine, the UK, France, and Germany had 'scrambled to respond' to a proposal reportedly floated following a meeting between US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Wednesday. According to media reports, Ukraine would be required to cede all of the Donetsk People's Republic to Russia as part of a peace agreement. Moscow considers the DPR, as well as the Lugansk People's Republic, Zaporozhye and Kherson regions, to be part of its territory following referendums held in 2022. However, Russia presently controls only the LPR in its entirety. During a meeting on Saturday in the UK, chief aides to European leaders presented the joint plan to US Vice President J.D. Vance, as well as Secretary of State Marco Rubio, with Trump's Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg and Witkoff joining via video link, WSJ reported. Kiev's European backers insisted that a 'ceasefire must take place before any other steps are taken,' the newspaper claimed. Moscow has consistently stressed that any peace process should proceed the other way round. The publication said that the 'counterproposal' advocated a strictly 'reciprocal' exchange of territory, and on condition that 'ironclad security guarantees [be provided to Ukraine,] including potential NATO membership.' The Kremlin has repeatedly described such a scenario as a red line. Also on Saturday, Zelensky insisted that Ukraine's borders are enshrined in its constitution and that 'nobody can or will' make concessions on the issue. His remark came after President Trump said that a peace agreement between Kiev and Moscow would likely involve 'some swapping of territories.'

Rubio accuses Macron of ruining Hamas-Israel talks
Rubio accuses Macron of ruining Hamas-Israel talks

Russia Today

time9 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Rubio accuses Macron of ruining Hamas-Israel talks

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has blamed France's announcement on recognizing a Palestinian state for the collapse of ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas. The Palestinian group was 'emboldened' by French President Emmanuel Macron's decision, Rubio claimed in an interview with the Eternal Word TV network on Thursday. Macron announced that his country would recognize Palestine as a state in a surprise statement on X last month, adding that he would formally do so at the UN General Assembly in September in New York. France would be the first G7 country or member of the UN Security Council to do so. The UK and Canada followed Paris' lead shortly afterwards, prompting criticism from the US and Israel. 'Talks with Hamas fell apart on the day Macron made the unilateral decision that he's going to recognize the Palestinian state,' Rubio asserted. He added that Hamas could be 'emboldened' by plans to recognize Palestinian sovereignty. 'If I'm Hamas, I'd basically conclude: 'Let's not do a ceasefire, we can be rewarded, we can claim it as a victory',' Rubio said. Macron's statement came amid efforts by US President Donald Trump's administration to end hostilities between Israel and the militant group. In late July, West Jerusalem withdrew its negotiators after more than two weeks of indirect talks in Qatar. Israel said the decision was made after it was displeased with Hamas' response to its ceasefire proposal. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said that the group's position showed 'a lack of desire to reach a cease-fire in Gaza.'

Russia and US ‘very far from detente'
Russia and US ‘very far from detente'

Russia Today

time11 hours ago

  • Russia Today

Russia and US ‘very far from detente'

While Washington has recently moved toward fixing relations with Moscow, celebrations would be premature, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergey Ryabkov has said. The diplomat added that Russia had earlier this month stopped abiding by a self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range missiles to 'cool hotheads in certain NATO capitals.' While the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty between Moscow and Washington collapsed in 2019, Russia had nonetheless continued observing the restrictions. During his first term in office, President Donald Trump pulled the US out of the accord, citing supposed Russian violations – a claim the Kremlin has denied. In an interview with broadcaster Rossiya-1 on Sunday, Ryabkov observed that 'some sprouts of common sense are appearing in the dialogue with the US, which have been sorely lacking in recent months and years.' However, the use of the term 'détente' would be wholly unwarranted at this point, the deputy minister stressed. Speaking of Russia's decision to lift a self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of intermediate-range missiles, Ryabkov argued that Moscow had no other choice in light of what the 'Americans and their allies, especially the European warmongers, are undertaking.' The Russian Foreign Ministry cited the 'disappearance of conditions for maintaining the unilateral moratorium' in explaining the decision earlier this month. The statement said the West was creating a 'direct threat' to Russian security, with the recent Talisman Sabre exercise in Australia being an example. The drills in mid-July featured the US Typhon mobile ground-based launcher, designed for firing Tomahawk cruise missiles, which have a range up to 1,800km, and SM-6 multipurpose missiles, with a range up to 500km. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated around the same time that Moscow reserves the right to deploy its own intermediate-range missiles 'when deemed necessary,' and would not announce it. Speaking last month, Trump hinted that he would like to resume negotiations with Russia to maintain the existing restrictions on nuclear weapons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store