Education is the key to overcoming women's challenges, says former KPSC member
The event, organised by the Karnataka Pranta Krishi Koolikarara Sangha and the Women Agricultural Workers State Sub-Committee, took place at the KEB Function Hall.
Ms. Bulla emphasised that poverty, illiteracy, superstition and even blind religious beliefs continue to hinder the progress of women. 'Education is the only cure,' she asserted.
Urging mothers not to let hardship disrupt their children's education, she added, 'Even if you cannot build a house or own land, giving your children a proper education will empower them to build their own future.'
She also cautioned against relying on others for change: 'No one else can come and transform our lives. We must use government schemes wisely and bring about our own change.'
Speaking about financial traps, she warned women to be wary of microfinance loans that offer 'easy and quick' credit. 'Instead, manage expenses wisely and find ways to save within your means,' she advised.
Advocate Sarasija Rajan, who addressing the gathering, stressed the importance of legal awareness among women. 'Knowledge of the law gives you strength and confidence. Without it, you're vulnerable to unnecessary legal troubles,' she said.
Ms. Rajan highlighted that women now have equal rights to ancestral property, a significant change brought by legal reforms. 'Previously, women were entitled only to maintenance. Today, they can inherit ancestral property just like men,' she stated.
She also encouraged women facing injustice to seek help from Legal Services Authorities available at every court complex. 'Don't suffer in silence. Use women-friendly laws to raise your voice effectively,' she concluded.
The event saw the participation of union leaders and activists, including B. Venkatesh, Mallamma Kudli, Sarojamma, M. Puttamadu, Chandrappa Hoskera and Bhimashetti Yampalli.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rajya Sabha returns Manipur budget, GST bill
The Rajya Sabha on Monday (August 11, 2025) returned the Manipur Appropriation Bill, 2025, and The Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025 amid opposition protests over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) issue. A brief debate on the Bills was also held. Also Read: Parliament Monsoon Session Day 16 highlights | August 11, 2025 The Manipur Appropriation Bill authorises payment and appropriation of certain sums out of the Consolidated Fund of the State of Manipur for services of the financial year 2025-26. The Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Bill, 2025, which seeks to implement the decisions approved by the GST Council, would replace the Manipur Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 2025. Opposition MPs, who took out a march to the Election Commission's headquarters on Monday (August 11, 2025), but were stopped midway and detained, reached the Upper House as the debate on the bills was being undertaken. Opposition MPs wanted Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge to be allowed to speak, and they raised slogans against the ongoing SIR exercise in Bihar. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman slammed the Opposition for opposing the Manipur budget. She said while the Opposition speaks about Manipur, when its budget and GST bills are being taken up, they are not just protesting on some other issue but also voting against it. Opposition MPs, many of whom were in the Well of the House, were heard saying 'no' as voting on the Bill was going on. The two Bills, which were both Money Bills, were returned to the Lok Sabha through voice vote.


Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
Commuted pension from pension funds to get full tax deduction, new version of Income Tax Bill, 2025 clarifies
ET Online Commuted pension from funds to get full tax deduction clarifies new version of income tax bill The new version of the income tax bill 2025 has explicitly allowed the entire amount of commuted pension as a tax deduction for those taxpayers who receive the pension from a specified fund as mentioned in Schedule VII of Income Tax Bill, 2025 like the LIC Pension fund, etc. Commuted pension means a lumpsum payout of the pension. In the earlier version this tax deduction for commuted was not explicitly clarified. Therefore, the Lok Sabha Select Committee said : 'The Committee, after a careful review of Clause 19, identified a gap in the equitable tax treatment of commuted pension for different types of recipients. The Committee, therefore, recommended that a deduction for commuted pension, similar to that available to employees under Clause 19, be explicitly allowed under the head "Income from other sources" for non-employees who receive such pension from a fund. Accordingly, the Committee finds no further modifications are necessary for Clause 19 and recommend the acceptance of its remaining provisions as drafted.' New Tax Bill 2025 What does this mean for pensioners? Chartered Accountant Suresh Surana explains: "In accordance with the current Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 10(10A)(iii) read with Section 10(23AAB) allows for full tax exemption of commuted pension not only for employees but also for payments received from approved pension funds like LIC, irrespective of employment status. The Select Committee, after a detailed examination of Clause 19 of the original Income-tax Bill, 2025, identified a critical gap in the equitable tax treatment of commuted pension across different classes of recipients. Under Clause 19, the Bill originally granted an exemption only to employees. However, no relief was provided for individuals who receive commuted pension from approved pension funds but are not employees, such as independent contributors or nominees. To address this disparity, the Committee recommended that a deduction be explicitly provided under the head "Income from Other Sources" for non-employees receiving commuted pension from approved pension fund. This ensures parity with the current law and maintains relief for all eligible recipients whether salaried or otherwise. As a result of this recommendation, Section 93(1)(g) was incorporated in the revised Income Tax Bill 2025. This clause now grants a deduction for the entire amount of commuted pension to recipients not covered under Clause 19, i.e., primarily non-employees and private individuals receiving pension payouts from approved pension fund. This suggestion is aimed at aligning the provisions of the Income Tax Act 1961 with the Income Tax Bill 2025, specifically to extend relief to taxpayers who are not in formal employment but invest in pension schemes as specified in approved pension funds (as specified in Schedule VII, Table SI. No. 3 of the Income Tax Bill 2025)." Who are considered as non-employees for the purpose of commuted pension under new tax bill 2025? Chartered Accountant (Dr.) Suresh Surana explains that in the context of Clause 93(1)(g) of the Income-tax Bill, 2025, the term 'non-employees' may reasonably extend to include individuals such as private sector employees whose employers do not operate a pension scheme or fund, but who have independently invested in an approved pension fund such as the LIC Pension Fund or similar notified funds under clause 10 (23AAB) of the Income-tax Act, to Dinkar Sharma, Company Secretary and Partner, Jotwani Associates, non-employees in the context of the tax bill 2025 can mean independent professionals, legal heirs, nominees, or other recipients who are not in an employer-employee relationship with the pension contributing explains: 'The Committee's recommendation is instead focused on non-employees—individuals who receive commuted pension from an approved fund but are not employees of the organization responsible for setting up or funding the pension scheme. These could include dependents, nominees of deceased pensioners, or beneficiaries under a group insurance-linked pension plan who are not themselves in a contract of employment with the employer. In such cases, the pension income is currently taxed fully under the head 'Income from other sources' because there is no provision analogous to Section 10(10A) for them.' What are the different types of pension schemes that qualify as eligible pension schemes under the Income Tax Act? Sharma explains: 'Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, certain pension schemes are considered 'eligible' for the purpose of availing tax exemptions on commuted pension amounts under Section 10(10A).'According to Sharma, the three broad categories of pension are: Government: Pensions received by employees of the Central or State Government are fully exempt from tax when commuted, as per Section 10(10A)(i). This includes civil service retirees, armed forces personnel, and those directly employed under statutory departments or ministries. Since these employees serve the government directly, they receive full exemption without any limit on the quantum of the commuted pension. Private: For non-government employees, including those from the private sector, the exemption applies only if the pension is received from a recognized superannuation fund. These are employer-managed funds approved by the Commissioner of Income Tax under the Income Tax Rules, typically funded during an employee's tenure. As per Section 10(10A)(ii), if gratuity is also received, only one-third of the commuted pension is exempt; if gratuity is not received, one-half of the commuted amount is exempt. Third-party self purchased pension: Under Section 10(10A)(iii), employees receiving pension from an approved pension fund set up by a life insurer (such as LIC or other registered insurers offering group pension schemes) are also eligible for exemption on the commuted portion, subject to specific conditions and approvals granted to the fund under the Income Tax Rules. N.R. Narayana Murthy Founder, Infosys Watch Now Harsh Mariwala Chairman & Founder, Marico Watch Now Adar Poonawalla CEO, Serum Institute of India Watch Now Ronnie Screwvala Chairperson & Co-founder, upGrad Watch Now Puneet Dalmia Managing Director, Dalmia Bharat group Watch Now Martin Schwenk Former President & CEO, Mercedes-Benz, Thailand Watch Now Nadir Godrej Managing Director, of Godrej Industries Watch Now Manu Jain Former- Global Vice President, Xiaomi Watch Now Nithin Kamath Founder, CEO, Zerodha Watch Now Anil Agarwal Executive Chairman, Vedanta Resources Watch Now Dr. Prathap C. Reddy Founder Chairman, Apollo Hospitals Watch Now Vikram Kirloskar Former Vice Chairman, Toyota Kirloskar Motor Watch Now Kiran Mazumdar Shaw Executive Chairperson, Biocon Limited Watch Now Shashi Kiran Shetty Chairman of Allcargo Logistics, ECU Worldwide and Gati Ltd Watch Now Samir K Modi Managing Director, Modi Enterprises Watch Now R Gopalakrishnan Former Director Tata Sons, Former Vice Chairman, HUL Watch Now Sanjiv Mehta Former Chairman / CEO, Hindustan Unilever Watch Now Dr Ajai Chowdhry Co-Founder, HCL, Chairman EPIC Foundation, Author, Just Aspire Watch Now Shiv Khera Author, Business Consultant, Motivational Speaker Watch Now Nakul Anand Executive Director, ITC Limited Watch Now RS Sodhi Former MD, Amul & President, Indian Dairy Association Watch Now Anil Rai Gupta Managing Director & Chairman, Havells Watch Now Zia Mody Co-Founder & Managing Partner, AZB & Partners Watch Now Arundhati Bhattacharya Chairperson & CEO, Salesforce India Watch Now


Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
New Income Tax Bill tabled in Lok Sabha after govt withdraws February draft
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Monday introduced a revised version of the Income Tax Bill in the Lok Sabha, incorporating most of the recommendations made by the Select Committee headed by Baijayant Panda. The move follows the government's decision last week to withdraw the Income-Tax Bill, 2025, which was presented on February 13 to replace the six-decade-old Income-Tax Act, 1961. The new draft, tabled on August 11, aims to provide lawmakers with a single, updated version that reflects all suggested changes. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Explaining the withdrawal in Parliament, Sitharaman said, 'Suggestions have been received which are required to be incorporated to convey the correct legislative meaning. There are corrections in the nature of drafting, alignment of phrases, consequential changes and cross-referencing.' She added that the earlier Bill was pulled back to avoid confusion and that the fresh draft will serve as the basis for replacing the 1961 Act. Key recommendations by the Select Committee The parliamentary panel had flagged multiple drafting errors and suggested amendments to reduce ambiguity: Live Events Clause 21 (Annual value of property): Remove the term 'in normal course' and add a clear comparison between actual rent and 'deemed rent' for vacant properties. Clause 22 (Deductions from house property income): Specify that the 30% standard deduction applies after deducting municipal taxes; extend pre-construction interest deduction to let-out properties. Clause 19 (Salary deductions – Schedule VII): Allow commuted pension deductions for non-employees receiving pensions from a fund. Clause 20 (Commercial property): Modify wording to avoid taxing temporarily unused business properties as 'house property' income. The Committee said these changes would improve fairness and clarity while aligning the law with existing provisions. Provisions in the withdrawn Bill The February draft was described as the most significant reform of India's direct tax code in over 60 years. Key features included: Simplified language, consolidation of deductions, and shorter provisions to ease compliance. Lower penalties for certain offences to make the system more taxpayer-friendly. No change in tax slabs, capital gains rules, or income categories. Reduction in litigation through a 'trust first, scrutinise later' approach. Modern administration with enhanced CBDT powers, digital monitoring, and the introduction of a 'tax year' concept. The earlier draft had 23 chapters, 536 sections, and 16 schedules, using tables and formulas for easier interpretation. It also proposed streamlined TDS rules, simplified depreciation provisions, and retention of residency criteria and financial year timelines.