logo
India strikes at the heart of terror in Pakistan, avenges Pahalgam

India strikes at the heart of terror in Pakistan, avenges Pahalgam

Economic Times07-05-2025
The Strikes
Live Events
What Next
There are moments in a nation's history that alter the outlook and destiny of the country forever. For India, inflicted with the wounds of terror for over three decades, the dastardly terror attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir on 22nd April may prove to be one such course altering moment in its history. Outraged by the killing of 26 innocent tourists (all men), who were shot and killed in cold blood after being identified as Non-Muslims and in front of their wives and mothers, the nation resolved to end this menace of terror. Leading from the front was Prime Minister Modi, who cut short his visit to Saudi Arabia and assured the nation that, 'India will identify, track and punish every terrorist and their backers. We will pursue them to the ends of the Earth'.In launching targeted strikes deep into Pakistan in a military operation codenamed ' Operation Sindoor ', India has demonstrated that its resolve to tackle the menace of terror emanating from Pakistan once and for all, no matter the costs. The military strikes, closely coordinated between the Army, Navy, and the Air Force, targeted nine locations across Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK) and Pakistan, carefully chosen for their significance to the terror network in Pakistan. Four of the nine locations struck were in Pakistan, across the International Border (IB).Bahawalpur, which hosts the headquarters of terror group JeMheaded by UN-designated terrorist, Massud Azhar, was among the most significant targets to be struck owing to its close association to JeM. Added to its significance is that fact that it is also one of the most prominent districts of Pakistani Punjab and holds huge political and military significance to Pakistan's deep state. It is also significant to note that India struck deep into Pakistan across the IB for the first time since the 1971 war. Not even during the Kargil War of 1999 did India cross the Line of Control (LC) or the IB.Immediately after the strikes, India went on a diplomatic offensive, briefing major countries like the US, UK, Russia, France, Saudi Arabia and China. It was made clear to them that India had struck only terror related targets, no civilian or military infrastructure was harmed and that it is a non-escalatory response from India to the terror attack in Pahalgam. Most significant among the calls was perhaps the call from AjitDoval, India's National Security Advisor to the Chinese Foreign Minister. China, which is considered by Pakistan as its all-weather friend, may find it difficult to openly support any retaliatory move by Pakistan, at least directly, given the global context of Operation Sindoor framed by India in double quick time.Also significant is the kind of endorsement and support that India has got from three significant Arab countries, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Qatar who were briefed on the military strikes. Just two decades back, it would have been unthinkable that India could get such unequivocal support from Arab countries as Pakistan enjoyed their support in the name of Muslim solidarity. But the 26/11 Mumbai attacks and pro-active diplomacy by India in the past decade has left Pakistan globally largely isolated.Operation Sindoor is a significant statement of intent from India, an announcement that its era of strategic patience is over. It has also helped India call out Pakistan's boggy of nuclear threat by launching strikes deep into Pakistan across the IB and daring Pakistan to call the nuclear bluff. It is also a clear message from India that going forward, the war against terror can only intensify in its scope and execution and that there is no escape for Pakistan.For Pakistan and specifically its Army, this is a moment of existential threat. It is still smarting from recent setbacks like the Jaffer Express hijacking and killing of Pakistani soldiers in cold blood by the Baluch Liberation Army in March 2025. Its battles against the Taliban in Afghanistan are sucking in troops and are inflicting huge costs. News of internal dissents within the Army too are appearing more frequently than ever. For an 'Army which possesses a nation', and an Army Chief who is acting more like a mad Mullah with every passing day, the days of Army running the state are under grave threat.In such a scenario, the Pakistan Army's retaliation cannot be ruled out. With its forces already mobilized across the borders and LC over the past 14 days, a misadventure or a miscalculation is possible, especially if the Army is fighting for its existence in Pakistan with its back to the wall. India will have to remain vigilant and counter the threat as it manifests. While estimates suggests that Pakistan has the money, ammunition and military equipment to fight a war of only 3-4 days, the war fighting capability of India is much stronger, with much larger reserves, better equipment and more modern technology. Also 'Uncle Sam' is unlikely to come to Pakistan's help except from perhaps securing the nuclear assets from falling into rogue hands.In the long run however, the momentum generated by Operation Sindoor cannot be allowed to slow down like it happened after the solitary strike on Balakot in February 2019. The fight against terror will have to continue and the 'head of the snake' crushed wherever and whenever it raises its head. The bottom line is, Pakistan cannot dare dream of another Pahalgam, ever.(The author is a senior research consultant at Chintan Research Foundation)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"
US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"

NDTV

time14 minutes ago

  • NDTV

US Again Claims It Stopped India-Pak War Using "Trade Leverage"

New Delhi: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Tuesday once again claimed that US President Donald Trump has ended the military conflict between India and Pakistan. "The President is using the might of American strength to demand that respect from our allies, our friends, our adversaries all around the world," Leavitt said at a press briefing. She said that it was seen not only in the progress with Russia and Ukraine but also "in the closing of seven global conflicts around the world." "We've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war if we had not had a President who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the President of the United States of America," Leavitt said. In an answer to another question, Leavitt said that Trump used trade "in a very powerful way as leverage" to bring the India-Pakistan conflict to an end. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over 40 times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. India has been consistently maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said in Parliament that no leader of any country asked India to stop Operation Sindoor. Meanwhile, replying to one more question, Leavitt said that Trump has imposed sanctions on India to bring an end to the Russia-Ukraine war. "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end," she added. Earlier in an interview to CNBC, US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also accused India of "profiteering" by reselling Russian oil. US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs totalling 50 per cent on India including 25 per cent for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil that will come into effect from August 27. India has called the tariffs "unjustified and unreasonable". India said that, like any major economy, it will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.

France Calls Netanyahu Antisemitism Claim "Erroneous"
France Calls Netanyahu Antisemitism Claim "Erroneous"

NDTV

time29 minutes ago

  • NDTV

France Calls Netanyahu Antisemitism Claim "Erroneous"

Washington: France on Tuesday slammed as "abject" and "erroneous" an accusation from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that President Emmanuel Macron's move to recognise a Palestinian state was fuelling antisemitism in his country. France "protects and will always protect its Jewish citizens", Macron's office said, adding that a letter from Netanyahu containing his allegation "will not go unanswered". "This is a time for seriousness and responsibility, not for conflation and manipulation," the French presidency added. Last month, Macron said France would formally recognise a Palestinian state during a UN meeting in September, the first G7 country to do so. The move drew a swift rebuke from Israel. In a letter sent to Macron, seen by AFP, Netanyahu claimed that antisemitism had "surged" in France following the announcement. "Your call for a Palestinian state pours fuel on this antisemitic fire. It is not diplomacy, it is appeasement. It rewards Hamas terror, hardens Hamas's refusal to free the hostages, emboldens those who menace French Jews and encourages the Jew-hatred now stalking your streets," Netanyahu wrote in the letter. France is among at least 145 of the 193 UN members that now recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state, according to an AFP tally. Australia joined the list earlier this month, announcing its intention to recognise a Palestinian state in September. "Violence against the (French) Jewish community is intolerable," the French presidency said. "That is why, beyond criminal convictions, the president has systematically required all his governments since 2017 -- and even more so since the terrorist attacks of October 7, 2023 -- to show the strongest action against perpetrators of antisemitic acts," it said. Macron's minister for Europe, Benjamin Haddad, separately said in reaction to Netanyahu's letter that France has "no lessons to learn in the fight against antisemitism". The issue "which is poisoning our European societies" must not be "exploited", Haddad added. France is home to Europe's biggest Jewish community. Reported antisemitic acts in France surged from 436 in 2022 to 1,676 in 2023, before dipping to 1,570 last year, according to the interior ministry.

Operation Sindoor a military success, tech breakthrough, political message all rolled into one: NCERT's new module
Operation Sindoor a military success, tech breakthrough, political message all rolled into one: NCERT's new module

Indian Express

time44 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Operation Sindoor a military success, tech breakthrough, political message all rolled into one: NCERT's new module

THE PAHALHAM attack was 'directly ordered by Pakistan's military and political leadership', and the Indian Air Force 'took out command and control centres, radars, surface-to-air guided weapons, runways, and hangars with aircraft' during Operation Sindoor, breaching Pakistan's air defence and 'creating visible gaps that the world saw', according to the NCERT's new module on Operation Sindoor for school students. It refers to Operation Sindoor as a 'military success, a technological breakthrough, and a political message all rolled into one'. Two modules have been released – one for the preparatory (classes 3 to 5) and middle stage (classes 6 to 8), and another for the secondary stage (classes 9 to 12). The NCERT's modules – separate from the textbooks — are short publications on specific topics that schools can use as an additional resource. In the form of a conversation between the teacher and students, the module for the secondary stage – 'Operation Sindoor – A Mission of Honour and Bravery' – states that since Independence, Pakistan 'has often tried to disturb peace in India – sometimes through war, and at other times, through terrorism'. In 2019, Article 370 was abrogated, paving the way for development in Jammu and Kashmir, including improved infrastructure, upgraded schools, and direct rail links connecting the region more closely with the rest of India, the module says, adding: '…by 2023, Kashmir saw the highest number of tourists ever. People were living in peace. But unfortunately, Pakistan was not ready to accept this progress.' 'After years of calm', in April 2025, terrorists attacked tourists in Pahalgam, killing 26 innocent people. The terrorists' 'goal' was to create fear and religious tension, going by the module, and Operation Sindoor was a 'strong and clear response to that cowardly attack.' Before it goes into Operation Sindoor, the module features a section on the 2019 Pulwama attack, and India's response in the form of the Balakot air strike. It specifies that India chose to target terrorist camps, not civilian areas. On the Pahalgam attack, the module states: 'TRF (The Resistance Front) first claimed responsibility, then denied it four days later. But India's National Investigation Agency confirmed the group was behind it— with solid evidence and eyewitness accounts. Indian agencies found that the attack was a well-planned conspiracy led by Pakistan's ISI and Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT). It was directly ordered by Pakistan's military and political leadership.' In addition to the details of Operation Sindoor, the module refers to 'a coordinated and extensive exercise' taken to 'reach out diplomatically by our missions abroad.' Pointing to Operating Sindoor as a strategic move that 'told the world – India will protect its people and values' and 'restored faith in our armed forces and reassured citizens that justice would not be delayed', the module refers to the Indian Armed Forces' planning – pinpointing terrorist infrastructure, choosing the right weapons for precision strikes, setting the date and time for the attack, and strategically moving naval assets forward. The armed forces were directed to identify multiple targets related to terrorism, minimise civilian casualties, and gather evidence after the strike. The nine targets that were attacked were directly linked to terror networks threatening India, it states. Pakistan then resorted to ceasefire violations all along the Line of Control, and 'escalated the conflict by attacking our bases, logistic nodes, forward posts all along the Line of Control and Army formation headquarters – some using Unmanned Aerial Systems, or UAS'. The module refers to India's defence systems: 'Our integrated air defence grid and Counter-UAS grid were already in place. These systems—like the S-400, MRSAM, AKASH, and traditional air defence guns—proved highly effective. Along with legacy platforms like Pechora, L-70, ZU-23 and OSA-AK, we created a layered defence.' On May 8, India targeted select Pakistani air defence systems and sensor networks using precision air launched munitions, and 'it was a calibrated response—sending a strong message while avoiding civilian population.' Pakistan's ceasefire violations continued on May 9, and they intensified attacks not only on military sites, but also schools, religious places, and civilian infrastructure, killing 14 Indian civilians, it added. The Indian army 'neutralized 35-40 Pakistani Army personnel.' In another attack on May 10, Pakistan targeted Indian Air Force bases, army ammo depots and cantonments, but 'not one critical Indian asset was damaged.' 'The Indian Air Force took out command and control centres, radars, surface-to-air guided weapons, runways and hangars with aircrafts. The response shook Pakistani establishment as our airstrike breached their air defence, creating visible gaps that the world saw,' the module reads. It also refers to the Indian Navy's contribution in asserting maritime dominance by deploying its Carrier Battle Group 'with Integral MiG-29K fighter jets, early warning helicopters, and surveillance systems in the North Arabian Sea, to protect Indian maritime interest and prevent any misadventure by Pakistan in the maritime domain.' Pointing to the use of Indian-made systems, the module states that Operation Sindoor was a symbol of technological self-reliance. '…it also shows we don't depend on foreign tech anymore. We are building our own systems, and they're actually working when it counts,' it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store