
Which are the subpostmaster redress schemes and what criticism have they faced?
– Who is eligible to apply for compensation under the scheme?
The GLO scheme was set up for the 555 people who took the Post Office to the High Court in order for the financial settlement from their case to better reflect the effect it had on their lives.
– Who was involved in the High Court case against the Post Office?
Lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates was one of the 555 subpostmasters who alleged the Horizon system had been at fault for shortfalls in their accounts and was a key figure in bringing the case to court.
– How many of the 555 claimants from the High Court are eligible for compensation under the scheme?
A total of 492 subpostmasters are entitled to apply for redress under the GLO scheme, with the remaining 63 ineligible to use the scheme due to their wrongful criminal convictions.
– How much money has been paid out by the Government under the GLO scheme?
As of June 30 2025, a total of £177 million had been paid out to the GLO claimants, including interim payments.
– How many of the claimants have accepted compensation offers from the Government?
From the 452 offers made to GLO claimants, 336 have accepted their compensation offers and 334 claims have been paid.
– What criticism has the GLO scheme faced?
Sir Alan has previously described the scheme as a 'mess' and accused the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) of ignoring advice on how to streamline and speed up the process 'out of hand with the feeblest of excuses'.
Sir Alan Bates has criticised the scheme (PA)
Overturned Convictions Scheme
– Who is eligible to apply for redress under the scheme?
Almost 1,000 subpostmasters were wrongfully convicted as part of the Horizon scandal and those who have since had their convictions quashed are able to apply to the scheme.
– What were subpostmasters prosecuted for?
A large proportion of wrongfully convicted subpostmasters were prosecuted by the Post Office for offences such as theft and false accounting after money went missing from their branch accounts.
– Is the scheme still running?
The scheme was closed by the Government last month in order to make way for the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme following new legislation which overturned all convictions related to the Horizon scandal.
– How much money was paid out as part of the scheme?
A total of £68 million was paid out to claimants, including interim payments.
– How many claims were made under the scheme?
According to Government data, 111 victims were eligible for redress under the scheme, with the Post Office fully settling 71 of the claims and paying a minimum of £200,000 as an interim payment to the remaining claimants.
The remaining 40 claims are now being administered through the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme.
Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme
– What is the difference between the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme and the Overturned Convictions Scheme?
Compensation administered through the Horizon Conviction Redress Scheme is paid out by the Government rather than the Post Office and comes following the blanket overturning of convictions related to the Horizon system.
– What money is on offer for those who have had their convictions overturned?
Victims eligible for the scheme are able to either accept a fixed sum of £600,000 or submit a more detailed individual claim.
All applicants are eligible for a £200,000 interim payment.
– How much money has been paid out under the scheme?
As of June 30 2025, a total of £252 million has been paid out under the scheme, including interim payments.
– How many claims have been settled as part of the scheme?
From the 416 final claims made, a total of 401 have been accepted and 397 have been paid.
– What criticisms has the scheme received?
Many subpostmasters have criticised the way in which the detailed individual claims are held as those who choose that method are no longer entitled to the fixed £600,000 sum and potentially face receiving less money.
Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS)
– Who is eligible to apply for the HSS?
The HSS scheme was set up for those who experienced shortfalls in their accounts due to the Horizon system but were not wrongfully convicted or part of the 555 who took the Post Office to the High Court.
– What are the claimants entitled to?
In March 2024, HSS claimants were made eligible for a £75,000 interim payment.
– What criticisms has the scheme received?
Many claimants have said they were forced to accept low offers without legal advice.
– Who administers the compensation?
The initial claims are paid out by the Post Office but appeals are dealt with by DBT.
– Were those who were eligible for the £75,000 fixed sum able to claim more money?
HSS claimants are able to send their claim to an independent appeals system called Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals.
– How much has been paid out as part of the scheme?
As of June 30 2025, a total of £601 million has been paid to claimants, including interim payments.
– How many claims have been settled as part of the scheme?
A total of 7,750 claims have been made as part of the scheme, with 5,160 offers made, 4,774 offers accepted by claimants and 4,732 paid in full.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Record
20 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Nicola Sturgeon 'besmirching a man now dead' with attacks on Alex Salmond in new book
Kenny MacAskill, who succeeded Salmond as Alba Party leader, claimed Sturgeon had "demeaned the office of First Minister". Nicola Sturgeon has been accused of "besmirching a man now dead" by attacking Alex Salmond in her new book. Kenny MacAskill, a former SNP Justice Secretary, claimed his former colleague had "demeaned the office of First Minister" with some of the contents in Frankly, her political memoir out this week. Sturgeon revealed in the book she had come to the realisation that her former friend and mentor 'wanted to destroy me' - and claimed her relationship with the late politician began to deteriorate as soon as she became first minister in 2014 in the wake of the independence referendum. Sturgeon also claimed in her book that Salmond had admitted to her that the 'substance' of one of the sexual harassment complaints had been true. The former Alba Party leader was acquitted of all charges relating to the allegations at court in 2020, while a judicial review found the Scottish Government's own investigation of him was tainted with apparent bias. Sturgeon said her former mentor had created a conspiracy theory about Scotland's core democratic institutions to shield himself from accountability - and insisted Salmond never produced a 'shred of evidence' to support these claims. In her book, she said: 'In his (Salmond's) efforts to turn himself into the wronged person, he demonstrated that nothing and no one was sacrosanct for him. There was never the merest hint of concern about the damage he did to the party he previously led. 'Indeed, it felt to me that he would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him.' She also accused her former boss of having 'impugned the integrity' of the institutions 'at the heart of Scottish democracy', including the Government, Police Scotland and Crown Office. Sturgeon went on: 'The fact that he never produced a shred of credible evidence that a conspiracy existed, because it didn't, wasn't enough to stop him seeking to damage the reputation of these institutions and shatter the morale of those who worked in them. 'He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all. A jury concluded that what they experienced wasn't criminal, but that does not mean those experiences didn't happen. 'Even if he never said so explicitly, he was accusing them of being liars, of making it all up.' The former SNP leader said Salmond had made his former allies and SNP colleagues 'mortal enemies' in the fallout over misconduct claims against him. 'In that regard,' she wrote, 'I was clearly public enemy number one. For a while, I told myself that the bonds between us would be stronger than his thirst for revenge. 'Eventually, though, I had to face the fact that he was determined to destroy me. 'I was now engaged in mortal political combat with someone I knew to be both ruthless and highly effective. It was a difficult reality to reconcile myself to. 'So too was losing him as a friend. I went through what I can only describe as a grieving process. For a time after we stopped speaking, I would have conversations with him in my head about politics and the issues of the day. 'I had occasional, but always vivid, dreams in which we were still on good terms. I would wake up from these feeling utterly bereft.' Alba Party leader Kenny MacAskill said: 'It is Nicola Sturgeon who has demeaned the office of First Minister and who has been shown to be without shame or honour in besmirching a man now dead. 'Alex Salmond was acquitted on all charges and it was Sturgeon's government which was found to have acted unlawfully unfairly and tainted with apparent bias. 'The break in friendship came from her when she turned on her mentor who had made her politically. Shamefully she continued to do so even when he is dead.'


STV News
35 minutes ago
- STV News
Is the ferry connecting Scotland to mainland Europe about to return?
Plans to reinstate a ferry link between Scotland and mainland Europe have moved a step closer with a solution to a key border control obstacle now in sight. Danish operator DFDS is aiming to launch a service between Rosyth, Fife, and Dunkirk, France, as early as spring 2026, carrying both passengers and freight. The route could handle around 51,000 passengers a year initially, rising to 79,000, and bring an estimated £11.5m annual boost to the Scottish economy. One of the main barriers has been the need for a Border Control Post (BCP) at Rosyth to process certain goods, particularly agrifood products. Building a new facility was deemed prohibitively expensive and unnecessary, with DFDS instead proposing to use the existing BCP at Grangemouth. The UK–EU deal agreed earlier this year will eventually remove the requirement for BCPs altogether, but an interim arrangement is needed if the ferry is to start before the rules change. In England, similar 'remote BCP' arrangements already allow sanitary and phytosanitary goods arriving at Dover to be checked over 20 miles away at Sevington. Scotland secretary Ian Murray has written to Steve Reed, the secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs along with the First Ministers of Scotland and Wales outlining how a ferry service between Rosyth and Dunkirk could proceed without a specific Border Control Point at Rosyth. In his letter, Murray said: 'I would like to propose that we urgently seek to agree that an amendment to the BTOM is made, as a transitional measure to allow the use of remote BCPs, within a short radius of the port of arrival…' While it is the Scottish Government who must amend the regulation to allow the use of a remote BCP at Grangemouth, this can only be exercised with a cross-GB consensus. Dunfermline and Dollar MP Graeme Downie, who has been working to resolve the issue, said: 'A regular passenger and freight ferry service from Rosyth to Dunkirk would be an incredible boon for the Dunfermline and Scottish economy, making trade easier as well as making it simpler for people from Europe to visit the Kingdom of Fife. 'These matters can be complex but we have taken a huge stride towards making this ferry service a reality. 'I want to thank the secretary of state for Scotland and his officials for their work and assistance in finding a way to ensure a BCP is not required at Rosyth. Their efforts make it more likely a passenger and freight ferry to Dunkirk could begin as soon as next year. 'We are not quite there yet and, in particular, a small amount of infrastructure is needed at the Port of Rosyth. However, as the ferry is one of the projects in the strategy of the Forth Green Freeport I am hopeful we can overcome this problem as well. 'I have spoken to both Forth Ports and the Green Freeport about this issue in the past and hope to meet with them very soon to discuss how speedy progress could be made in time for the ferry to begin next year.' The project also has the backing of major Fife employers, including Amazon and seafood company Mowi, and could remove 8.2 million kilometres of freight traffic from UK roads each year, cutting carbon emissions. The link would replace the previous service between Rosyth and Zeebrugge in Belgium. The passenger service ended in 2010 before becoming freight-only, and was ultimately axed in 2018 after a fire aboard one vessel made the route uneconomical. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Administration looks preferable to leaving Thames Water's debt sharks in charge, says ALEX BRUMMER
The timing couldn't be better. In the middle of an August heatwave, with drought warnings the order of the day, the message from the Government to Thames Water and its creditors is: sort yourself out or we put the whole caboodle into a special administration regime (SAR). Environment Secretary Steve Reed has lined up City insolvency consultancy FTI as administrators should Thames chairman Adrian Montague and a posse of debt investors fail to reach a solution. As much as one might abhor direct government involvement in business, SAR looks a far more attractive option than leaving the debt sharks in charge. SAR would enable an administrator to scythe the debt, suspend interest payments and bring in new equity investors. Thames claims to be seeking a solution which targets 'investment-grade ratings'. That is no more than a chimera in that the company would not qualify for a licence without. How much room does Reed have to manoeuvre? Keir Starmer is already taking the railways and chunks of the steel industry onto the Government books. He may soon also face calls from union paymasters to bail-out the UK's troubled Ineos-owned chemical plant at Grangemouth. Administration would allow Thames to free itself of much of its £16.8billion debt. But there would be a risk of a lingering state liability. That is the stuff of nightmares for Rachel Reeves and Treasury mandarins. Jobs tears Chancellor's budget for working people has already fallen as flat as a pancake. The latest data on the jobs market is a shade better than projected. But the trend is unmistakable with unemployment up 120,000 since last July's election Surveys show that the Government failed to truly grasp the impact of increasing employers' National Insurance Contributions and the minimum wage on jobs, particularly in the hospitality sector. Yet there is a pile of evidence, particularly from the US, showing that payroll taxes harm employment growth. Cutting job taxes, particularly after a calamity, helps nurse people back to work. The big economic theme of this summer, despite the Chancellor's promises not to come back for more, is speculation as to which taxes will go up in the autumn. Labour apparatchiks have sought to dismiss the forecast by economic think-tank NIESR of a £42billion shortfall in the public finances as an outlier. However, almost every other think-tank and City economist believes that new taxes will be necessary if the Chancellor's 'iron-clad' fiscal rules are to be met. That casts a pall over economic confidence. It doesn't help that the UK's biggest export market, the EU, is deep in gloom despite aggressive interest rate cuts by the European Central Bank. A plus for the Government at present is that wage settlements are outpacing inflation so real living standards, for those in work, should be rising. That's great, but job vacancies are vanishing before our eyes and somehow private sector employers need to fund the 4.8 per cent rise in pay, which means a potential wage price spiral. That's before one even considers the Government's difficulty in seeing off the ambitions of doctors and other public sector workers for inflation-busting deals. A split Bank of England interest rate setting committee is torn between its core job of returning inflation to target and making life easier for borrowers. The latest jobs data will give succour to Bank insiders cautioning against cuts until consumer price inflation is squeezed back to the 2 per cent target. Third rate deal On the eve of tomorrow's extraordinary general meeting of London listed fund Third Point Investors Limited (TPIL), voting advisory outfit PIRC joined the growing opposition to financier Dan Loeb's raid on UK-based investors. The New York sharpshooter is seeking to seize control of TPIL, swallow £500million of capital and merge it with Cayman Island based re-insurance outfit Malibu. The transaction would run roughshod over minority investors and enrich directors. It represents a low point for a City in danger of sacrificing integrity.