California launches wolf tracking tool to help prevent livestock conflict
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife announced the system's debut Thursday, emphasizing its purpose as a proactive measure to reduce wolf-livestock conflicts.
The Wolf Location Automated Mapping System displays the last known position of each collared wolf within a nearly 4.5-square-mile hexagonal area. Users can click on the map to view general location data, the pack's name and the most recent transmission date.
'California's rural livestock producers living near wolves have faced real challenges as the wolf population grows in California. This is one more tool in our shared toolkit to protect their herds from wolf-livestock conflict,' said CDFW Director Charlton H. Bonham.
Bonham vowed that the Department was focused on transparency and partnering with local communities and ranchers to ensure they 'have the knowledge they need to help prevent conflict.'
The tool only tracks wolves fitted with GPS collars, which currently number 14. Collared wolves transmit data several times daily, and CDFW updates the map every morning.
Specific sensitive data, such as den sites during pup season, will be withheld to help prevent harassment or illegal activity. Officials said the Department also reserved the right to shut down the system if the data is misused.
The Center for Biological Diversity welcomed the new system, noting its potential to improve coexistence between wolves and ranchers.
'I'm hopeful that livestock operators will responsibly use the map to head off conflict,' said Senior Wolf Advocate Amaroq Weiss. 'Livestock-wolf conflicts are rare but both ranchers and wolves will benefit if we make them rarer still by giving a heads up when wolves are in the area so ranchers can act responsibly.'
California's wolf population has been steadily growing since OR-7, a collared male from Oregon, crossed into the state in 2011. Wolves are listed as endangered under both state and federal law, and it is illegal to kill them except in defense of human life.
For additional information, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
13 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
How this Bay Area city is battling a goose invasion — and 300 pounds of poop a day
Welcome to Foster City, home to 24 parks and more than 160 acres of open space that collects some 300 pounds of goose poop a day. Foster City has received national attention for its troubles with Canada geese. Each goose — the city estimates it has between 300 and 400 of them — can produce one or two pounds of droppings a day, turning a park into a minefield. The goose poop requires regular power washings and has contributed to high E. coli levels in parts of the local lagoon. During nesting season the birds can become aggressive, even chasing off small dogs and children. 'We are at the front lines of dealing with this issue,' said Derek Schweigart, Foster City's parks and recreation director. Earlier this month, Foster City took its most comprehensive action yet, with the city council approving a roughly $400,000 contract with a wildlife company to deter the geese at seven 'high impact' parks. Starting sometime in the next month, the company will begin using drones, lasers, balloons and — eventually — dogs to scare or 'haze' the birds. The contract, which is active through June 2026, approved nonlethal measures only. Canada geese have long been a fixture of Foster City's grassy parks, residents say. But as the goose population has swelled, doubling between 2020 and 2022, so have the complaints. Susan Lessin, a 30-year resident of Foster City and member of the San Mateo County Bird Alliance, said she suspects the issue was also exacerbated during the pandemic as residents started spending more time outdoors — and quickly realized they have to be careful where they step. While research has indicated geese aren't a significant transmitter of disease to humans, parents have told the city council that they feel unsafe allowing their children to play in local parks. One man, according to a 2022 New York Times article, said his 2-year-old daughter became sick after putting goose feces in her mouth. And Foster City is far from alone. Wildlife experts say Canada geese are very good at adapting to humans, drawn by the green spaces humans create for themselves. Santa Clara, Redwood City, Oakland and other Bay Area communities have all reported issues with their goose populations. And unless cities want to keep spending the time and money to clean up after the birds, they may have to change, too. 'Frankly, they were here before we were,' Lessin said. 'And to a certain extent, the public has to adapt to the geese.' Once hunted to near-extinction in parts of the United States, Canada geese populations have exploded over the past several decades, thanks in large part to federal protections. In California, breeding geese have generally congregated in the northeast corner of the state. But over the past two or three decades, they've become more distributed throughout the state, said Melanie Weaver, an environmental scientist with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's waterfowl unit. In 1994, according to a partial count of California's waterfowl, nearly 99% of surveyed breeding Canada geese were in the northeast part of the state. By 2024, that had dropped to about 50%, while the share in the Sacramento Valley and other surveyed regions grew substantially. Like crows, gulls and other 'urban' birds, geese flock to cities because they offer easy food sources and few natural predators. Canada geese are also one of the few bird species that can digest grass, making Golden Gate Park in San Francisco and Lake Merritt in Oakland ideal resting spots for them. And because geese tend to return to the place they were born to build their own nests, they become much harder to scare away once they become established in a city. (It also doesn't help that, despite park officials' pleas, some visitors continue to feed the geese). Geese that stay roughly in the same place year-round, known as 'resident' geese, tend to reproduce more than their migratory peers, contributing to their rapid population growth. And because they prefer man-made environments, there's generally little competition with other waterfowl over resources, though you might see the occasional squabble with a gull. 'When humans decide, 'Let's have a park with grass surrounding it,' you've created the most perfect environment for those geese,' Weaver said. 'It's unfortunate, because they are really cool animals,' she added. 'But when they get in that environment, it's not so cool.' Foster City residents and officials alike are waiting to see whether their latest efforts will make the geese think twice about nesting at a local park. Previous attempts have been mixed. When the city tried strobe lights, residents seemed more bothered than were the geese. Adding fencing around the lagoon kept geese out for a while, but the geese eventually found ways around it. Egg addling — shaking or otherwise damaging newly laid eggs to prevent the embryo from developing — keeps the population from growing too rapidly, but that doesn't affect the living geese, which can survive for more than 20 years. Still, Schweigart, the parks and recreation director, said that the city hopes that by combining approaches, the geese will decide it's not worth sticking around. Some research has shown that these multi-pronged efforts can get groups of geese to change locations, but that they often simply move to nearby parks. Even if Foster City succeeds, hundreds of geese may show up in a neighboring community. Aside from the egg addling project, which is conducted between a few San Mateo County cities, each city is tackling its goose issue independently. A longer-term solution to the problem, some officials have suggested, would take a region-wide effort. Lessin, the longtime Foster City resident, said that while she has concerns about the cost of her city's new program, she supports the plan and hopes it will lead to more long-term solutions — as long as they're nonlethal, she emphasized. Plans to euthanize some of the geese in 2022 were dropped after opposition from activists and some residents. 'Everyone is very optimistic, but I think we're cautiously optimistic,' she said. Foster City's 24 parks may look different in the future, as part of a more permanent solution. The city is building a new recreation center at Leo J. Ryan Park and replacing much of the grass with native trees and shrubs. That change, which Schweigart said the city hopes to replicate in its other parks, leaves little food for the geese to eat, forcing them to go elsewhere. In other words, the best way to moderate the goose population may be to change what attracted them in the first place. 'We created this environment for' the geese, Schweigart said. 'And now, unfortunately, we're facing the consequences.'
Axios
2 days ago
- Axios
Wolf recovery in California still fragile amid efforts to restore population
Only three of California's 10 active wolf packs had pups this year, per new state data. Why it matters: Wolves restore ecosystem balance by keeping deer and elk populations under control, preventing "overbrowsing" — excessive plant consumption by herbivores — and allowing vegetation to rebound. State of play: Recovery remains fragile. Small pack numbers, high pup losses, limited breeding pairs, low prey availability and threats from disease and habitat change can all slow their rebound. What they're saying:"It's concerning that there's no indication the other seven packs have had pups," said Amaroq Weiss, a senior wolf advocate at the Center for Biological Diversity. "For recovery to stay on track there needs to be more wolves in more places." By the numbers: 22 pups in California were born among three packs this year, per an Aug. 11 quarterly report from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Between the lines: Some packs likely didn't breed because their alpha male and female are siblings. Other packs, which had recently bred in previous years, may have had pups the state hasn't confirmed yet, Weiss told Axios. A total of 50 to 70 wolves live in California, fluctuations that vary widely because pup mortality rates tend to be high — often 50% or more in the first year — due to various natural and environmental factors, she added. Zoom in: Most of the state's wolves roam in and around Lassen National Forest in the northeast, but their range stretches from the Oregon border to Sequoia National Forest in the south. Zoom out: Elsewhere in the West, there are about 1,800 wolves in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho combined; roughly 200 each in Washington and Oregon; around 280 in Arizona and New Mexico combined; and about 10 in Colorado, per Weiss. Catch up quick: Gray wolves were wiped out in California by the 1920s amid a nationwide extermination campaign. Repopulation efforts began in 2011, when OR-7 — the first wolf identified in California in nearly a century — crossed in from Oregon.
San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California's newest invaders are beautiful swans. Should hunters kill them?
On an early August morning, it didn't take long to spot the first pair of huge white swans with orange and black bills and graceful, curving necks as they swam in the marsh along the side of a Solano County levee road. They dabbled in the vegetation as a pickup drove through the Grizzly Island Wildlife Area. A short drive later, past a herd of a dozen tule elk, two more swans appeared in the marsh alongside the dirt road. Then four more. A few hundred yards down the road, out in the distance past a thicket of swaying reeds, dozens of swans swam in the water. For casual bird watchers, the sight of all these majestic animals might be a pleasure and bring to mind swan-themed works of literature, such as 'Leda and the Swan' and 'The Ugly Duckling.' But for wetland biologists and others with a stake in the health of the surrounding Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, the largest estuary on the West Coast, the birds represent the latest — and an exponentially growing — threat to the few remaining wetlands left in California. These are mute swans, native to Europe and Asia. Weighing up to 30 pounds and with a wingspan of up to eight feet, they're the biggest bird in the marsh, and they're not the least bit shy about throwing their weight around. Fiercely territorial, especially during breeding season, they've been known to drown smaller animals and have killed at least one American kayaker. They've displaced colonies of nesting native birds in other parts of the U.S. they have invaded. Mute swans also feed gluttonously on submerged vegetation, destroying the plant life on which other native wetland species depend. 'They might be a pretty, big, white bird … and they may be charismatic, but they can be pretty nasty,' said Brad Bortner, a retired chief of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's migratory bird management programs in Washington D.C. In 2008, California banned anyone without a special permit from keeping mute swans as pets or from importing them into the state. The hope was to head off yet another destructive invasive species taking hold in the state. It didn't work. The mute swan population exploded in just a few years. In 2022, state waterfowl biologists estimated there were 1,500 of them. This spring, they estimated more than 12,000, nearly double the year before. Most of the mute swans are in the Suisun Marsh, a sprawling complex of public wetlands, agricultural lands and private duck-hunting clubs on the outskirts of the Bay Area near Fairfield. 'We keep watching them climb and climb and climb,' said Melanie Weaver, waterfowl coordinator for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. A measure before the state Legislature aims to allow hunters and landowners to shoot the swans for the next five years to try to bring their numbers down to more manageable levels in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and beyond. The hunting groups supporting Assembly Bill 764 essentially ask: If Californians are OK with spending more than $13 million since 2018 to kill nearly 6,000 nutria, the 20-pound, orange-toothed South American rodents that have invaded the same waterways, why not let hunters and land owners do the same to mute swans — but for free? 'If the population gets too large and out of control, it may be beyond our ability then to really effectively manage them,' Mark Hennelly, a lobbyist for the California Waterfowl Association, told the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee this spring. 'So we want to get ahead of the problem.' Animal welfare groups object That argument has so far been a surprisingly easy sell in the Legislature, despite California's passionate and influential anti-hunting activists. Similar swan-killing proposals have led to protests in other states. The measure easily passed the Assembly without any lawmaker voting against it. It's now pending in the California Senate. No group has opposed the measure so far, according to the CalMatters Digital Democracy database, but that might soon change. Mute swans, unlike nutria, have a dedicated group of supporters, mostly on the East Coast. Nicole Rivard, a spokesperson for Friends of Animals, said she and fellow members of the animal welfare organization believe mute swans shouldn't be treated like vermin. The birds arrived here through no fault of their own, brought by humans, and they don't deserve to be killed for it, she said. Rivard believes the California legislation is motivated by hunters looking for an excuse to have yet another bird to legally shoot. Currently, mute swans can only be killed by landowners if the birds 'are found to be injuring growing crops or property,' according to state regulations. 'We're anti-hunting, so we don't like the idea that (hunting) might be, you know, part of the reasoning behind this,' Rivard said. Arguing that claims of mute swans' environmental damage and aggression are overblown, Friends of Animals and other groups opposed killing them decades ago, after Mid-Atlantic states proposed eradication when their populations began expanding dramatically in the 1990s and early 2000s. The groups protested, filed lawsuits and proposed legislation to try to stop the killing. They had mixed success. Some states began killing the nonnative swans over the animal welfare groups' objections. Notably, Maryland was able to knock the mute swan population down from around 5,000 birds in the early 2000s to around 200 by 2010. 'Continued control and maintenance operations have reduced that number to just a handful of birds today,' said Josh Homyack, the game bird section leader for the Maryland Department of Natural Resources. In Maryland, government agency employees raided mute swan nests and destroyed eggs, captured and euthanized swans when they were flightless during their feather-molting season and shot them in carefully coordinated operations, Homyack said. The state also issued a few permits to kill the birds to local landowners. In New York, the mute swan lobby got a law passed that made it harder to kill the birds, requiring state officials to 'fully exhaust non-lethal control measures' such as nest destruction and capturing birds and moving them to wildlife facilities ' prior to any lethal removal.' The mute swan population in New York has stayed steady at around 2,000 to 3,400 birds. Charisma matters with invasive species On the East Coast, mute swans have been around since before the turn of the last century. They were first imported as ornamental livestock for zoos, parks and estates. Some of California's mute swans likely came in the same way. Weaver, the California waterfowl coordinator, said others were likely brought in the past few years to chase away Canada geese that have increasingly become a nuisance at parks and golf courses. 'People were buying these (swans), and they were just throwing them out there,' she said. Weaver noted their owners didn't do the responsible thing and clip their wings to keep them from flying off. That's hardly surprising. It's no easy task to grab a hissing 25-pound swan, big and angry enough to swamp a kayaker. So with nothing to stop them, the birds flew to nearby marshlands and began reproducing. 'Here we are, not very many years down the road, with a population that is really increasing at a rapid rate,' Weaver said. So far, California's wildlife agency hasn't enacted a mute swan eradication plan similar to the one it started almost immediately — and publicly promoted — a few years ago, after nutria first started turning up in the San Joaquin Valley. Nutria are similarly destructive feeders on aquatic plants. The South American swamp rodents also burrow holes in levees, posing a threat to the state's flood-control and water-supply infrastructure. Dave Strayer, a retired invasive species expert with the Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies in New York, said he's not surprised state officials haven't been as aggressive with the beautiful mute swans, given the uproar over killing them in other states. He said research has shown that when it comes to invasive animals, charisma matters. The more attractive a problematic non-native species is, the less appetite there is to wipe it out. Stayer gave an example: Few complain about killing common nonnative rats, but you're apt to get death threats at even the suggestion of wiping out ecologically harmful feral cat colonies in the same habitats. He noted that no one has ever complained about efforts to eradicate one of his research subjects, the nonnative zebra mussels that have also invaded California. 'I never had even one person stand up for zebra mussels and say, 'No, these are beautiful, elegant God's creatures' and so forth,' he said. Few wetlands and too many mute swans Supporters of the swan-killing legislation say reducing the number of mute swans should be fairly easy since the giant white birds are easy to spot, identify and kill. Their size and the color and shape of their bills also reduce the risk they'll be confused with other protected bird species, they say. California's native tundra and trumpeter swans would still be protected and illegal to shoot if the bill becomes law. Despite their undeniable beauty, Weaver, the state waterfowl coordinator, sees mute swans similarly to nutria. The swans pose too great a threat to native species reliant on the few wetlands left in California, which has lost at least 90% of the habitats to agriculture and urban sprawl. 'They don't move around the state all that much, and they really like the Delta-Suisun Marsh area, so it's still easy to handle the issue,' Weaver said. 'The longer we wait, it won't be.'
