Police confirm second arrest in fatal Wynberg Magistrate's Court shooting
A 24-year-old suspect was arrested over the Easter weekend.
'Western Cape Serious Violent Crimes (SVC) detectives have arrested another suspect over the weekend on charges of murder,' police spokesperson Brigadier Novela Potelwa confirmed.
'The 24-year-old suspect is expected to appear in the Wynberg Magistrate's Court on Tuesday, 22 April.'
Potelwa added that Shireen Matthews, the alleged gang queenpin behind the fatal 'revenge' hit, will make her next court appearance on Wednesday, 23 April, when bail proceedings are expected to begin.
'With the investigation unfolding, the team has been questioning a number of individuals, and steady progress is being made in efforts to apprehend all those responsible for the murder,' concluded Potelwa.
Meanwhile, Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DJCOD) has ordered that security be strengthened at the Wynberg Magistrate's Court in Cape Town, following a fatal shooting inside the court building earlier this month.
A high-level delegation, led by DJCOD Director-General, Advocate Doc Mashabane, conducted an oversight visit to the court.
The delegation also included Acting Secretary-General in the Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ), Advocate Marelize Potgieter, and the Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions in the Western Cape, Advocate Nicolette Bell.
'The purpose of the visit was to ascertain the circumstances surrounding the incident and determine whether any security lapses had occurred. This intervention formed part of government's response, with the objective of reviewing and strengthening security protocols at court facilities,' the department said in a statement.
As part of immediate interventions, the Director-General has directed the installation of a security scanner, the tightening of access control to prosecutors' and magistrates' offices, and the enhanced vetting of court officials.
Furthermore, a report on the incident will be drawn up and submitted to DJCOD Minister, Mmamoloko Kubayi and Chief Justice, Mandisa Maya.
'The department reiterates its commitment to ensuring that courts remain places for the dispensation of justice and not places where crime is committed,' the department said.
Meanwhile, the Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) said it views the incident in a 'serious light'.
'The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, under whose delegation the Security of the Court falls, has been engaged on the enhancement of security in and around the court precinct.
'As the Head of the Judiciary in the Province, the Judge President of the Western Cape Division of the High Court wishes to convey condolences to the family of the deceased, and expresses regret and support to the Judicial Officers, officials and the public who witnessed the incident,' the OCJ said.
The incident is currently under police investigation.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
6 days ago
- IOL News
Pending criminal case costs applicant top court position in the Eastern Cape
The Labour Court ruled in favour of the Office of the Chief Justice for not recommending a candidate for a job as court manager. Image: File The failure to disclose a pending criminal case when asked to do so during a job application can have dire consequences, as an applicant who applied for the position of a court manager discovered. Siphephelo Luthuli applied for two posts in the Eastern Cape as court manager. He was recommended as he was deemed the best candidate. He denied on his application form that he had a criminal record or any pending cases against him. But it was later discovered that there was a pending case relating to alleged driving under the influence of alcohol. The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) then withdrew its recommendation that Luthuli get the job. Luthuli took the matter on review before an arbitrator, who ruled in his favour and found that the OCJ was guilty of unlawful labour practice. The OCJ was ordered to compensate him by paying him R61,000, but the office took the matter on review to the Gqeberha Labour Court. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The court was told that in 2019, the OCJ advertised two positions for court managers at the Bhisho and Mthatha High Courts. Luthuli applied, and he was required to indicate if he had ever been convicted of a criminal offence or whether any cases were pending, and his response was 'no'. The OCJ, however, subsequently established that he was arrested in respect of a case of driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Luthuli conceded that he knew about the matter but relied on the fact that the matter was not enrolled by the prosecutor's office. According to the police, the matter was still under investigation. The panel that interviewed him considered the matter and felt he had to disclose that the matter was still pending. As a result, they withdrew their recommendation for his appointment. The arbitrator found this to be irrational, arbitrary, and capricious and ordered that the OCJ compensate Luthuli. The arbitrator found that the definition of 'pending case' or 'pending' was not informed by an objective definition either provided for in legislation or policy.
IOL News
7 days ago
- IOL News
The risks of omitting pending criminal cases in job applications
The Labour Court ruled in favour of the Office of the Chief Justice for not recommending a candidate for a job as court manager. Image: File The failure to disclose a pending criminal case when asked to do so during a job application can have dire consequences, as an applicant who applied for the position of a court manager discovered. Siphephelo Luthuli applied for two posts in the Eastern Cape as court manager. He was recommended as he was deemed the best candidate. He denied on his application form that he had a criminal record or any pending cases against him. But it was later discovered that there was a pending case relating to alleged driving under the influence of alcohol. The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) then withdrew its recommendation that Luthuli get the job. Luthuli took the matter on review before an arbitrator, who ruled in his favour and found that the OCJ was guilty of unlawful labour practice. The OCJ was ordered to compensate him by paying him R61,000, but the office took the matter on review to the Gqeberha Labour Court. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad Loading The court was told that in 2019, the OCJ advertised two positions for court managers at the Bhisho and Mthatha High Courts. Luthuli applied, and he was required to indicate if he had ever been convicted of a criminal offence or whether any cases were pending, and his response was 'no'. The OCJ, however, subsequently established that he was arrested in respect of a case of driving a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Luthuli conceded that he knew about the matter but relied on the fact that the matter was not enrolled by the prosecutor's office. According to the police, the matter was still under investigation. The panel that interviewed him considered the matter and felt he had to disclose that the matter was still pending. As a result, they withdrew their recommendation for his appointment. The arbitrator found this to be irrational, arbitrary, and capricious and ordered that the OCJ compensate Luthuli. The arbitrator found that the definition of 'pending case' or 'pending' was not informed by an objective definition either provided for in legislation or policy.
IOL News
10-08-2025
- IOL News
Chief Justice Mandisa Maya unveils new sexual harassment policy for judiciary
Chief Justice Mandisa Maya announced a sexual harassment policy for the judiciary. Image: File As National Women's Day was celebrated on Saturday, Chief Justice Mandisa Maya has announced the introduction of a Sexual Harassment Policy for the South African Judiciary. The Office of the Chief Justice (OCJ) has described it as a historic step in safeguarding the integrity of the courts and protecting the dignity of all who serve within them. The OCJ said this policy reiterates the judiciary's unwavering commitment to the Constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and justice. It said this sends a clear message that sexual harassment has no place in the halls of justice. As custodians of the Constitution, Judges and Magistrates bear a profound responsibility to uphold the highest standards of integrity. The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct and South Africa's own Judicial Codes of Conduct demand nothing less, the office said in a statement. It added that where sexual harassment occurs within the judiciary, it is not only a personal violation; it is also an affront to the rule of law itself, eroding public trust and betraying the very principles the institution exists to defend and uphold. 'This Policy is a necessary and urgent intervention. The Judiciary cannot dispense justice to society if it does not first ensure it within its own ranks. Sexual harassment is a gross abuse of power, a denial of equality, and a stain on the legitimacy of the courts. We are going to tackle it head on and this policy will be a very useful mechanism in that battle,' Justice Maya said. The principles of the policy were set out in a 25-page document, which includes zero tolerance for sexual harassment by or against any judicial officer, staff member, or individual engaging with the judiciary. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ It also sets out guidelines for clear, confidential, and fair procedures for reporting and addressing complaints, with protections against retaliation. The policy calls for accountability, with disciplinary consequences for offenders, as well as for a safe and respectful workplace, free from discrimination and intimidation. The Chief Justice has directed all members of the judiciary to urgently familiarise themselves with the policy and ensure adherence. 'This is not merely a document; it is a covenant with the people of South Africa. We must lead by example,' the Chief Justice emphasised. The policy will further entrench a culture of accountability and respect, ensuring that the judiciary remains a beacon of justice for all, she said. In an annexure to the 25-page sexual harassment policy issued, some examples of verbal, non-verbal, and physical conduct that may be construed as unwelcome sexual harassment were given. These include "gestures, staring, leering, and indecent exposure". It also included the display, or sending by electronic or any other means, of sexually explicit pictures, videos, or messages. The sending of sexually suggestive pictures, including emojis or stickers, was also included. The judicial conduct tribunal, which is investigating complaints against Eastern Cape Judge President Selby Mbenenge, arising out of a sexual harassment complaint, has meanwhile concluded its hearing of oral evidence in the matter. Lawyers acting for the complainant, judges secretary Andiswa Mengo, and Mbenenge's legal team are due to present their final legal arguments before the tribunal in October. It is alleged by Mengo that the judge president had subjected her to sexual harassment, which made her very uncomfortable. This was denied by Mbenenge, who claimed it was consensual flirting between two adults.
