
I love the OnePlus 13, but the official wireless charger is just maddening
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
I'm a chaotic gadget charger, topping up my phone as and when rather than sticking to a rigorous overnight routine like a normal person. As such, you might think that wireless charging would be right up my street — pop the phone down, give it a little juice, and be back on my way.
Unfortunately, wireless charging is notoriously slow, meaning that even half an hour on the dock is seldom enough for me. Thankfully, a few brands, mainly from China, offer fast(er) wireless charging capabilities — including OnePlus. These bulky and often noisy docks put me off, but I've been testing out the brilliant OnePlus 13 and its tiny AIRVOOC 50W Magnetic Charger accessory for a few days to see if it can change my mind.
It's an interesting product to look at: think HAL 9000 meets hockey puck. There's a fan on one side and a magnetic pad on the back. It's not quite a charging pad, but certainly not a dock either. Still, as it's a magnetic setup, lining up the ideal charging position on the OnePlus 13 magnetic case or any other gadget with a magnetic placement ring or case is a cinch, ensuring it can charge as quickly as possible.
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Before we get to the vital charging bit, there are a few stars you have to carefully align before the OnePlus 13 will charge optimally with this official wireless accessory. After all, what sort of idiot (me) would simply plug the charger in, slap it on the back of the OnePlus 13, and expect it to pump out the juice?
Nono, for optimal results, you need a few things first. Exhibit A: a compatible power plug. Any old USB Power Delivery plug won't do, even if it's a high-end charger that works with basically everything else.
OnePlus told me you need a SuperVOOC plug with specific 5- 11V, 9.5A capabilities. Thankfully, I had a 100W SuperVOOC charger that shipped with the China-only OPPO Find X7 Ultra that meets the requirements. The chances of US consumers having one of these lying around are essentially zero, though OnePlus' latest dual-port 80W GaN charger should also do the trick. At least in theory, I don't have one to verify.
I also tried a 65W OnePlus USB-C charger and an Anker Prime 100W, which should deliver 45W to 50W via USB PD PPS at 11V. Unfortunately, that universal spec is not fully compatible, as neither provides more than 26W.
You have to jump through more hoops than Sonic to hit 50W charging.
Second, you need to put the OnePlus 13's magnetic case on — I couldn't exceed 36W without it. Currently, OnePlus is giving these away as a free gift with the phone, but that might not always be the case. The magnets help align the charger, and although you wouldn't think this is strictly necessary when placing it on a horizontal phone, it apparently is.
Third, and definitely most odd, owners of the Arctic Dawn or Black Eclipse colorways need to insert the supplied 'wireless charging cover' between the phone and case. It's essentially a black and transparent plastic hotel door hanger that I was about to throw in the trash. Bizarrely, the Midnight Blue doesn't need the insert, according to OnePlus.
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
I thought the insert would be complete hokum, but only with this little sheet in between could I hit the advertised 50W of wireless power and even exceed it, peaking at 73W. What does this sheet do? I have no idea. Perhaps it helps disipate heat or reduce signal absorption. Maybe it's magic. None of this is in the manual, by the way, it only vaguely hints at the charging specs and recommends using a case in instances where the phone isn't magnetic.
Once you've finally finished this Hokey Pokey, it's time for the little robot vacuum-looking charger to shine. It took my OnePlus 13 from empty to full in 83 minutes, just over the advertised 75 minutes. Heat is the limiting factor, charging power throttles back quickly once the 40°C mark is reached. The phone took over 100 minutes on a second charge, so it's rather temperamental.
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
The AIRVOOC 50W Magnetic Charger is not particularly fast, but it's not far off the pace of the Pixel 9 Pro or iPhone 16 Pro Max over a wire. However, I think that says more about their sorry state of fast charging. Still, if you want to charge the OnePlus 13 as quickly as possible, just use a cable — it takes only 35 minutes to fully charge.
50W wireless isn't exactly quick, but it's faster than Qi at least.
Returning to temperatures for a moment, the little fan is not exactly quiet during charging. It's suitable for my work desk, but having it whirr away for well over an hour is not ideal. I certainly wouldn't put it on my nightstand; it's far too distracting.
Robert Triggs / Android Authority
Equally annoyingly, you can't set the phone face-up to use it while charging, as the fan doesn't allow the puck to lie flat in this position. You can try it, but the whole setup wobbles about. You could lie the phone on its side, but a little kickstand would be nice to angle the phone more reliably. Coincidentally, OnePlus will happily sell you an additional stand for $20.
Instead, I suppose you're supposed to lie the phone face down and snap the charger on the back. But that means you can't see your screen while it's slowly charging, and risk scratching the display on whatever junk might be cluttering your desk. Given the puck is too small to remain fixed in place, you might as well grab a USB-C cable for faster wired charging and avoid these drawbacks.
Wireless charging is supposed to be convenient. This is anything but.
The AIRVOOC 50W Magnetic Charger looks the part, and I quite like its compact design, but it's just a nightmare to use. You need a proprietary charger, a case, and an insert before it delivers its full potential. Add that all up, and this setup could cost you $150 or so… yikes.
This all takes the shine off the supposed convenience of wireless charging. Although you can use it to charge your iPhone, OPPO Find X8 Pro, and many other smartphones too, OnePlus' magnetic charger is definitely not the answer to MagSafe.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
I've had Visible for a month, and this is the one thing I wish someone had told me before I joined
Joe Maring / Android Authority A little over a month ago, I made a big change in my cell phone world; after 10 years of being a T-Mobile customer, I jumped ship and joined Visible. Not entirely sure what to expect with such a dramatic transition, I've been very pleased with Visible so far. The sign-up process was easy, my service has been great, and I'm really happy with the price I'm paying. As well as things have gone, there has been one hiccup that I wasn't expecting. It's far from a dealbreaker, but it's something I didn't realize until after my first month with Visible — and I wish someone had told me about it sooner. Have a plan with HD video? You probably aren't using it Joe Maring / Android Authority Visible has three plans you can choose from: Visible, Visible Plus, and Visible Plus Pro. The last two plans are Visible's more premium options, offering features like faster 5G speeds, better hotspot performance, and more extensive international coverage. The plan you choose also dictates the kind of video streaming you can do on Visible's network. If you sign up for the basic Visible plan, video streaming is capped at just 480p SD. However, if you have Visible Plus or Visible Plus Pro, video streaming quality increases to 1080p HD or 4K UHD, respectively. Simple enough, right? You'd think so, but that's not all there is to it. While digging through the Visible app one day, near the end of my first month of service, I stumbled across something interesting. On the Account page under the Get the most out of Visible section, you can swipe through to see your various benefits, such as any Global Passes you have and your smartwatch service. At the end of the list is an option for HD Video. I assumed this would just be an informational page about the 4K UHD max streaming quality that comes with my Visible Plus Pro plan, but lo and behold, there was more to it — specifically, an option to enable said streaming quality. By default, Visible plans with HD/UHD video streaming quality apparently don't have this feature enabled by default. Instead, you have to manually enable it yourself … in a sub-menu buried deep in the Visible app … one that the company never tells you about. I really wish Visible had informed me about this itself. I started digging around online to see if I had somehow turned this off by mistake when setting up my account, but that's not what happened. As it turns out, a few users in the r/Visible subreddit have also reported needing to enable HD streaming for their accounts. It seems like something Visible added fairly recently (within the last six months or so), and as thankful as I was to find that Reddit thread, I really wish Visible had informed me about this itself. One of the main reasons I chose the Visible Plus Pro plan is for its 4K UHD video streaming, and to have gone a month without that because I didn't tap a toggle Visible never told me about is just silly. If you're a Visible customer, did you know about the HD Video setting? 0 votes Yes NaN % No NaN % A silly, unnecessary hoop to jump through Joe Maring / Android Authority In Visible's defense, it isn't the first carrier or MVNO to pull something like this. T-Mobile had a similar setting for my old ONE Plus plan, and Verizon and AT&T do this, too. It's annoying and unnecessary, but from the carriers' perspective, that's why they do it. They're still providing you with the high-quality video streaming you signed up for; they just aren't turning it on for you, and they're banking on the fact that you'll forget to do it or won't know how — thus saving them network resources and money in the process. I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that Visible also does this (it is owned by Verizon, after all), but it feels at odds with Visible's otherwise consumer-friendly approach to almost everything else it does. I'd expect an annoying hoop like this from one of the big carriers, but part of me thought Visible would be better. But hey, maybe that's what its owner, Verizon, is banking on. If so, you got me. Going a month without the best video streaming quality is ultimately just a small bump in the road, and once I realized what I had to do, it took all of five seconds to activate my plan's HD video capabilities. No harm, no foul. Still, I would have liked to have known about this sooner. If you're thinking about joining Visible or have recently signed up, at least I can give you the heads up I wish I had gotten. Visible - Plans starting at $25 a month for a limited time! Visible - Plans starting at $25 a month for a limited time! Aiming to simplify and reduce the costs of mobile connectivity, Visible by Verizon is a simplified carrier that offers limited plans, no hidden fees, and connectivity to the Verizon network. See price at Visible Save $5.00
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AMD's press conference won Computex 2025
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Of all the chipmakers at Computex, AMD had the most announcements for consumers and enthusiasts. But don't get too excited — Qualcomm, Intel, and Nvidia set a low bar. AMD's Jack Huynh, SVP and GM of Computing and Graphics, hosted the company's Computex press conference. While AMD's conference was held off-site, it just may have been the most interesting speech of the show. Huynh kicked off with gaming announcements, unveiling the Radeon RX 9060 GPU, new Ryzen AI Pro processors, and improvements to its FSR ("FidelityFX Super Resolution") upscaling and frame generation technology. So, what's new from AMD this summer? To set the stage for Redstone, Huynh recapped the success of the Project Amethyst partnership with Sony to improve FSR into the fourth iteration. FSR 4 was released earlier this year with the RDNA 4 Radeon RX 9070 GPUs and will be improved with FSR Redstone when it is released later this year. It is also currently supported in 60 games, with more to come. FSR Redstone will be available on all RDNA 4 GPUs, and at launch, 40 games will support Redstone super sampling. Redstone brings machine learning enhancements like advanced radiance caching, machine learning ray regeneration, and machine learning frame generation. These advanced features will become available as an update to AMD's FSR 4 super sampling software later this year. AMD's more budget-friendly Radeon RX 9060 XT GPU features RDNA 4 architecture and offers all the advantages of FSR 4 for just $349 for the 16GB model, and $299 for the 8GB variant. If you're hoping to get your hands on the latest AMD graphics card, the Radeon RX 9060 XT will go on sale on June 5, 2025. While the Radeon RX 9060 XT is a less powerful GPU than the Radeon RX 9070 and 9070 XT, it gets all the same benefits of FSR 4, including frame generation and the upcoming Redstone improvements. Huynh recapped the Ryzen AI 300 series' successes, though some of AMD's claims are a bit suspect. AMD claims the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is 15% faster than Apple's M4 Pro 12-core CPU. Based on our own testing, this is true on the Geekbench 6 multicore benchmark, but the M4 Pro wins in more real-world benchmarks, like the PugetBench for Adobe suite. As for new announcements in this segment, AMD has brought the power of the new Ryzen AI Pro 300 chipsets with new devices by Asus. 'If you're a fan of AMD technology,' Huynh enthused, 'you're a fan of Asus innovation.' Asus is expanding the ExpertBook P-series lineup to include AMD CPUs on desktops, mini-PCs, and laptops. It is also offering monitors with Free-Sync compatibility. While AMD's workstation Threadripper Pro 7000 series CPUs are relatively unmatched in terms of raw computing power, the company is upgrading the chip to a new generation on the 4-nanometer Zen 5 architecture. With up to 96 cores and 192 threads, the Threadripper 9000 series is the ultimate chip for those who believe 'bigger is better.' While Apple's Ultra processors and Intel's Xeon line are in a similar class, neither company has gone as heavily into the over-spec segment as AMD's Threadripper lineup. Of course, there are often diminishing returns by adding so many additional cores and threads, which is why Intel ditched hyperthreading on the Arrow Lake platform. However, there will always be exceptions. And that's the Threadripper gamble. Previous iterations of the chip have often proved AMD correct in the benchmark stakes, as the Threadripper 7980 outperforms even the Epyc 7773X data center CPU in Cinebench 2024. So if you want the most powerful workstation chip to power your special effects business, like AMD partner WetaFX, the Threadripper 9000 Series is worth the excitement. And if you need more endorsement than the facts, WetaFX's Daniel Seah told James Cameron 'who is like a god,' that he couldn't meet to talk about the next Avatar film because 'I have to go to Taipei for AMD.' AMD also announced the Radeon AI Pro 9700 GPU to further support the desktop workstation ecosystem. AMD has also announced ROCm support for the Radeon RX 9000 series and AMD Ryzen AI Max APUs, with support for additional hardware and Linux operating systems like RedHat coming later this year. ROCm is also expanding Windows support to Pytorch and ONNX-EP. AMD announced the most new chips and software support at Computex, thanks to its expanded gaming, professional, and workstation lineup. The Asus ProArt P16 nails local AI and beats MacBooks — but it doesn't come cheap The Acer Swift X 14, a favorite of creators, is being refreshed for 2025 Jensen Huang at Computex: "It's not because we don't love GeForce, GeForce got us here."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Sony's rumored plan to "downgrade" PS5 performance might actually be genius — here's why
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Worried about those PlayStation performance downgrade rumors? Things aren't quite as grim as they appear. Last week, reports surfaced that Sony is briefing developers on a new "low energy" mode for the PlayStation 5 and PlayStation 5 Pro consoles. While these rumors do appear a bit concerning for the future of Sony consoles, they could actually hint at the upcoming PlayStation 6 handheld. As we've previously reported, the PlayStation 6 is rumored to come in a home console and a handheld variant. Thanks to the initial report from Moore's Law is Dead and follow-up comments by veteran AMD leaker KeplerL2, we now know more about the AMD APU that will be powering the rumored PlayStation handheld. And it looks more cutting-edge than expected. But don't just take my word for it. Here are the PS6 handheld specs we know so far. The PlayStation handheld will be powered by an upcoming AMD APU that will have AI upscaling features, with 16GB of DDR5 onboard memory, and 4MB of L2 cache and 16MB of MALL cache on the APU's graphics tile. The unnamed AMD APU will allegedly be based on the gfx13 (RDNA5/UDNA) architecture. "But, Madeline", you ask, "what does that actually mean?" AMD's current-gen Radeon RX 9000 GPUs use RDNA 4 graphics architecture. The PlayStation 6 APU's use of the next generation of AMD architecture aligns well with the console's expected launch date in fall 2027. The AMD APU powering the current gen of PlayStation consoles (PS5 and PS5 Pro) has 4MB of L2 cache, but no MALL cache. So, even with a constrained 16GB of memory bandwidth, the PS6 handheld would have additional graphics power, thanks to the 16MB MALL cache, which can reduce the need for a large memory bandwidth on a GPU. Essentially, it gives the PlayStation handheld more leverage over its lower RAM specs. Based on these initial specs, it does not appear that the PS6 handheld will be powered by AMD's recently updated Ryzen AI Z2 lineup. Instead, this will likely be a next-gen chipset. Earlier reports pegged the PlayStation and Xbox "Gen 10" launch to 2028, though new rumors have moved that timeline up. Currently, the PlayStation 6 console is expected to launch in September 2027. The alleged PlayStation handheld is expected to launch in tandem with the home console. Of course, none of this is confirmed, and we're over two years from the expected launch date, so plans can always change. Sony could even go the same route as Microsoft and cancel its plans for a proprietary handheld console. However, Sony is far less likely to work with a PC manufacturer like Asus on a Windows handheld, so there is a higher chance that Sony will come out with a proper handheld console. It wouldn't be the first Sony handheld by far, after all. PlayStation fans can only dream — I hit 316 fps in 'Stellar Blade' on my RTX 5090 laptop I used the Asus ROG Strix G16 for a week, and it may be the best value in gaming laptops right now Should the new Maingear Ultima 18 laptop replace your gaming desktop? Just look at the specs.