Selena Gomez Makes a Blunt Confession About Taylor Swift: 'I Was Mortified'
Selena Gomez recently made a blunt confession involving Taylor Swift—and the interaction left her "mortified."
On March 19, Gomez and her music producer fiancé, Benny Blanco, appeared on Spotify's Countdown To ahead of the March 21 release of her album I Said I Love You First.
🎬 🎬
The couple, who got engaged in December after dating for more than a year, dished on their relationship, among other topics.
'What was our first party that we ever went to?' Blanco asked Gomez as he drove them in a convertible in Los Angeles.
'I don't know if this was the first but it was actually really funny," the "Lose You to Love Me" singer replied. "As a couple, we went to Taylor's party after some awards show."
Gomez then confessed, "I don't know it was kind of cute, but I was mortified. Apparently, cool people don't show up to parties on time."
"We're the first people at every single party when I go with you," Blanco pointed out. "You show up like when my mother shows up to a party."
He then explained that no one knew they were dating at Swift's party.
"So we didn't even touch each other or really even look at each other," he recalled.
Gomez and Swift's friendship dates back to 2008 when Gomez dated Nick Jonas and Swift dated Joe Jonas.
'We clicked instantly and, man, that was my girl,' Selena told WSJ. Magazine of Swift in 2020.
The "Shake It Off" songstress agreed with the sentiment.
'There has always been this quality of sisterhood, and I don't say that in a basic way. I knew from when I met her I would always have her back," Swift shared. "In my life, I have the ability to forgive people who have hurt me. But I don't know if I can forgive someone who hurts her.'
I Said I Love You First drops on Friday, March 21.
Next:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
OTTAWA — Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be "equitable." It said the contribution requirement is "inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues." Apple also said the regulator "acted prematurely" and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was "equitable." It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers "has any connection to news production" and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. "What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money," it said. "That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production." In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. "While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services," the broadcasters said. "For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade." A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. "The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants," the office of the attorney general said. "Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters." The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve "an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden." "This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament" and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Anja Karadeglija, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spotify Takes Flight on United Airlines: Here's What You Get
PCMag editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing. has taken flight on United Airlines–but its 1.0 appearance on the seatback screens of United's planes is more like a Little Free Library with wings than a jukebox in the sky. The Chicago-based carrier that it's bringing the to the on-demand entertainment displays aboard 680-plus aircraft. On Friday, I gave it some extended listening and viewing on a United flight from San Jose to Houston. On the seatback screen of that Boeing 737 Max 9, a 'Spotify' category replaced the 'Audio' option on the home-screen menu. That offered selections of podcasts, what United's press release calls 'specially curated versions of Spotify's most popular playlists,' and audiobooks–all, United explained, cached locally for now instead of relying on . The selection was deepest in podcasts, with 31 available for a listen. Somebody at Spotify or United must be a fan of , because the studio had 18 of those slots. Instead of that, I listened to a Wall Street Journal recap of . I counted 15 playlists, and they proved to be more of a throwback listening experience than the for each suggested. The tunes in such playlists as 'Good Vibes,' 'Jazz Classics,' 'Sunny Day,' and decade-specific mixtapes from the 1960s to the 2010s played on a loop, with no option to jump to a particular song or see which one was playing–an experience not that different from the inflight soundtrack options of two decades ago. The audiobooks category had 13 titles, many of which would require more than one flight to listen to. , the 2023 deep dive into by Ben McKenzie and Jacob Silverman, would have run 633 minutes, so I had to content myself with hearing one chapter. That part will become more useful next year, when United plans to add a feature that will allow passengers with Spotify's app on their devices to log into their accounts within the seatback screen. That should make it easier to resume and pause listening to Spotify's longer-form content. The video podcasts that , however, lurked under the home-screen menu's 'TV' heading. The 13 video podcasts available included a handful of Joe Rogan's episodes, but not any of the more notorious or guests of Spotify's ; other video hosts include Amy Poehler and Trevor Noah. The United aircraft with Spotify onboard include international-service planes with Polaris business-class cabins (which also feature screens throughout economy) as well as an increasing number of narrowbody planes that have received that include screens at every seat for . A database maintained by aviation enthusiasts shows that the airline has brought those 'United Next' interiors to . United's announcement also notes that streaming to your own devices via is an option on United's small but growing set of –27 aircraft Thursday, . But on Friday, The Points Guy, a travel-news site, that United had turned off Starlink on those planes to fix a radio-interference glitch. When that returns (which TPG's Zach Griff quoted United as saying will be "soon"), that will be your best inflight connectivity for streaming United's longtime theme music, George Gershwin's 'Rhapsody in Blue.' To my surprise and dismay, that Jazz Age classic isn't in any of the prefab playlists. If the airline feels inspired to create one based solely on , it has options: A search of Spotify Friday found dozens of versions of that work, the most interesting being a bluegrass adaptation titled 'Rhapsody in Blue(grass).' Editors' note: We revised this post extensively after giving the service an audition in the sky.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Taylor Swift Announces Exciting Album Update on Friday
Taylor Swift Announces Exciting Album Update on Friday originally appeared on Athlon Sports. After a relatively quiet start to 2025, Taylor Swift shook things up with a major announcement on Friday. In a heartfelt letter posted to her website—prompted by a recent Instagram post encouraging fans to read it—Swift shared some significant personal news. At the core of the letter was the exciting news that she has regained full ownership of all her masters and music, a long-awaited milestone she has been working toward for years. She purchased her masters for roughly $360 million, according to Billboard. Additionally, Swift revealed a major update about her self-titled debut album, Taylor Swift. She has officially completed the re-recording of the entire album, which will be titled "Taylor Swift (Taylor's Version)," which will likely include all 16 original tracks. 'I've already completely re-recorded my entire debut album, and I really love how it sounds now," Swift said. "Those 2 albums can still have their moments to re-emerge when the time is right, if that would be something you guys would be excited about. But if it happens, it won't be from a place of sadness and longing for what I wish I could have. It will just be a celebration now.' While there's no official release date yet, fans were instantly ecstatic to learn that the 35-year-old has added her signature touch to the debut album that first put her on the map back in 2006. "not her giving debut the soft launch of the century," a fan said. Someone else added, "It will be great to hear her new take on her debut album." Another fan posted, "Taylor is giving us one last storm before peace. And we're so ready!" One morefan commented, "She should drop it on their respective release dates as celebratory editions actually." Swift was spotted in New York City on Thursday night out to dinner in a stunning dress. While fans were already anticipating some news about her music, she unexpectedly dropped a bombshell on Friday — setting social media ablaze for all the right story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on May 30, 2025, where it first appeared.
