Wildlife trust criticises new biodiversity net gain proposal
Under the government's new plans which is out for consultation, smaller development which make up 70% of all housing projects in England, could be exempt.The trust said: "This would cause widespread damage to local wildlife, green spaces and community health."
Ms Bailey explained that in the three counties smaller housing developments often take place near "treasured wild space" which is home to declining species like hedgehogs, bats and bees.She said: "Removing BNG requirements would not only jeopardise the survival of these habitats, without any obligation to restore or replace them, but it would also see generations to come living in dwellings devoid of nature."
Currently, small sites are generally developments with nine houses or fewer, although the consultation is also looking at changing the rules for developments of up to 49 houses. If small sites are removed from BNG, potentially around 80% of demand for BNG units will be wiped out. Director of External Affairs and Land Recovery at BBOWT, Matthew Stanton said: "It tells communities that nature doesn't matter unless it's big or easy to quantify, which is the opposite of what we need during a nature and climate crisis.""Stripping BNG from small developments is a clear backward step that we urge the Government to reconsider," he added.A Defra spokesperson said: "This Government inherited a failed planning system that blocks infrastructure and does little for nature's recovery."We are fully committed to Biodiversity Net Gain and making it work even more effectively for developers and for nature."That is why our consultation explores easier, quicker, and cheaper routes for developers to deliver gains for nature."
You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Migration fuels second largest population jump in England and Wales for more than 75 years
The population of England and Wales has grown by the second largest annual increase in more than 75 years, largely due to international migration. Figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show the population grew by 700,000 in the year to June 2024, the second largest numerical jump since at least 1949, when comparable data began. The size of the increase is second only to the rise of 821,210 in the preceding 12 months from mid-2022 to mid-2023. The ONS found net international migration – the difference between people moving to the country and leaving – accounted for 690,147 of the estimated population increase of 706,881 people, or 98% of the total. It is estimated 1,142,303 people immigrated to England and Wales in the 12 months to June 2024, while 452,156 were likely to have emigrated. Meanwhile, natural population change, which is the difference between births and deaths, accounted for only a small proportion of the increase. There were slightly more births (596,012) than deaths (566,030) in the year to mid-2024, which added 29,982 to the population. In total there were an estimated 61.8 million people in England and Wales in mid-2024, up 1.2% from 61.1 million in mid-2023. Internal migration to England and Wales from other parts of the UK was lower (42,693) than people moving from the two nations to elsewhere in the UK (56,300). Nigel Henretty from the ONS said that 'the population of England and Wales has increased each year since mid-1982', but 'the rate of population increase has been higher in recent years. 'Net international migration continues to be the main driver of this growth, continuing the long-term trend seen since the turn of the century,' he said. Earlier this year, the UK population exceeded that of France for the first time on record after it rose to 68.3 million in mid-2023 – the population of France stood at 68.2 million. The ONS has predicted the UK population will grow to 73.7 million by mid-2036, hitting the 70 million mark a decade earlier than previously thought. Those projections assumed net migration would fall over the next few years from a peak of about 670,000 in the 12 months to June 2023, before settling at 315,000 from 2028 onwards. In May, the government unveiled its plans to cut immigration, which included cuts to legal migration routes, stricter English requirements and tightening the rules for some work visas. Keir Starmer faced heavy criticism for saying the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers' as he announced the plans, later saying he 'deeply regretted' using the language. The government has also expressed concern at the UK's falling birthrate, which is at 1.44 children per woman, the lowest since records began in 1938 and below the figure of about 2.1 needed to maintain a population. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, said she wanted 'more young people to have children, if they choose', saying the cost of living and housing was putting people off starting a family.
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
Labour-backing Gary Neville slams Rachel Reeves over crippling tax hikes on businesses
LABOUR-loving ex-footballer Gary Neville today tore into Rachel Reeves for hammering businesses with tax hikes. The ex-Manchester United ace, who campaigned and cast his vote for Sir Keir Starmer, admitted the Chancellor's national insurance hike on employers 'could have been held back'. 1 The businessman told Sky News: 'I honestly don't believe that, to be fair, companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people. 'So, I think the National Insurance rise was one that I feel probably could have been held back, particularly in terms of the way in which the economy was.' Mr Neville said he backs Labour's minimum wage hike – but warned that tax raids on businesses were becoming a serious 'challenge'. Responding to the stinging rebuke, Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty said: 'When even Gary Neville is critical of the National Insurance rises in the disastrous Labour budget, it's fair to say that Rachel Reeves has even lost the Labour changing room.' A Conservative insider added: 'Gary Neville is clearly discovering that if you play silly games, you win silly prizes.' Meanwhile, British business activity is forecast to shrink at its fastest pace since the 2020 pandemic. The Confederation of British Industry today revealed a 'wave of pessimism' has swept through industry since Labour took the reins. Economists warned the 'negative sentiment' shows no signs of easing, with the economy set to nosedive further over the next three months. The CBI's business barometer found bosses are still grappling with the fallout from the Chancellor's £25bn national insurance raid. Firms also remain wary of the ripple effects of global trade policies, even though the UK has dodged the worst of Donald Trump's tariffs. Alpesh Paleja, the CBI's deputy chief economist, said: 'Firms continue to face testing conditions, with expectations pointing to another quarter of falling activity across the economy. 'While not worsening, the persistently negative outlook underlines the fragility of demand conditions. 'Against this backdrop, businesses continue to cite headwinds from adjusting to higher employment costs, energy prices and continued uncertainty from a volatile global environment. 'With few signs of recovery on the horizon, firms are focused on managing costs and streamlining processes in what looks set to be a subdued second half of the year.'
BreakingNews.ie
35 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
UK minister doubles down on colleague's claim Farage on side of Jimmy Savile
Heidi Alexander has doubled down on her fellow Cabinet minister's claim that Nigel Farage is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile'. The Reform UK leader is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet', the Transport Secretary said, as she defended Peter Kyle's comments. Advertisement The Technology Secretary had accused Mr Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over Reform's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act. Asked if she agrees with Mr Kyle's statement, Ms Alexander told Sky News: 'Nigel Farage is, in effect, saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act. 'I think that the position of Reform in saying that they want to repeal the entirety of the Online Safety Act, which is one of the most important pieces of legislation when it comes to the protecting of our children and the safety of young people online, I think that, in effect, what Nigel Farage is saying is that he's totally happy for there to be a free for all on the internet. Heidi Alexander said Nigel Farage is 'happy for there to be a free for all on the internet'. Photo: James Manning/PA. 'That's not the position of the Labour Government. It's not the position of me. It's not the position of Keir Starmer or Peter Kyle, and that is the point that the Technology Secretary was rightly making yesterday.' Advertisement Mr Farage has demanded an apology from Mr Kyle, describing the remarks as 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'. Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday, the minister had said: 'We have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Following this, Clacton MP Mr Farage urged people to sign a petition calling for the legislation to be repealed. Advertisement Writing in the Telegraph, Mr Kyle said proposals to overturn the Act 'makes my blood boil', as he argued repealing it would benefit 'disgusting predators who contact children and groom them online'. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said repealing the Act would benefit predators. Photo: Stefan Rousseau/PA. He added: 'I make no apologies for putting the interests of vulnerable children ahead of the interests of predators and child abusers – and the Reform leader's ego.' Also writing for the newspaper, Mr Farage said 'all of this is of course a deflection from the real problem with the Online Safety Act', as he raised concerns over ID checks. He added: 'In the name of safety, the Act poses the biggest threat to freedom of speech in this country in our lifetimes. Advertisement 'In the name of protecting children, the law aims to regulate what adults are allowed to say or see – while doing nothing to make our children safer.' UK shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel said making statements about overturning the Bill is 'very lazy' and 'not responsible'. Under rules that came into effect on July 25th, online platforms such as social media sites and search engines must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. Sir Keir Starmer jumped to defend the legislation from its critics when he met Donald Trump on Monday, telling reporters: 'We're not censoring anyone. Advertisement 'We've got some measures which are there to protect children, in particular, from sites like suicide sites.' The UK prime minister added: 'I personally feel very strongly that we should protect our young teenagers, and that's what it usually is, from things like suicide sites. I don't see that as a free speech issue, I see that as child protection.'
