JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley Raise their PT on Teck Resources Limited (TECK)
Copyright: tomas1111 / 123RF Stock Photo
The analyst outlook remains mixed ahead of its Q2 earnings report that Teck Resources Limited (NYSE:TECK) is expected to release on July 24, 2025. For Q2 ended June 30, 2025, analysts expect a decline in the company's EPS and revenue by roughly 63% and 43%, respectively.
Citing higher copper prices and improved recession risks, JPMorgan, on July 9, 2025, increased its price target on Teck Resources Limited (NYSE:TECK) from $41 to $44, maintaining an 'Outperform' rating.
Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley increased its price target on Teck Resources Limited (NYSE:TECK) from $42 to $44; however, it downgraded the company's stock from 'Overweight' to 'Equal Weight' on July 15, 2025, citing the less compelling risk/reward dynamics in copper equities at the moment, following outperformance since April 2025.
Across Asia, the Americas, and Europe, Teck Resources Limited (NYSE:TECK) operates mineral properties, focusing on copper, zinc, and lead concentrates, as well as refined zinc, lead, and silver. It is included in our list of the Best Material Stocks.
While we acknowledge the potential of TECK as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock.
READ NEXT: and 11 Best Mineral Stocks to Buy According to Hedge Funds.
Disclosure: None.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
25 minutes ago
- CNBC
Under Trump, Uncle Sam is becoming an active investor at a scale not seen outside war or major crises
The Trump administration has taken direct stakes in companies on a scale rarely seen in the U.S. outside wartime or economic crisis, pushing a Republican Party that traditionally championed free-market capitalism to embrace state intervention in industries viewed as important for national security. Japan's Nippon Steel agreed to give President Donald Trump a "golden share" in U.S. Steel as a condition for the two companies' controversial merger. Trump now personally wields sweeping veto power over major business decisions made by the nation's third-largest steel producer. "You know who has the golden share? I do," Trump said at a summit on artificial intelligence and energy in Pittsburgh on July 15. The president's golden share in U.S. Steel is similar to nationalizing a company but without any of the benefits that a company normally receives, such as direct investment by the government, said Sarah Bauerle Danzman, an expert on foreign investment and national security at the Atlantic Council, a think tank focused on international affairs. But the Trump administration demonstrated earlier this month that it is also willing to buy directly into publicly traded corporations. The Department of Defense agreed to purchase a $400 million equity stake in rare-earth miner MP Materials, making the Pentagon the company's largest shareholder. This level of support by the federal government for a mining company is unprecedented, said Gracelin Baskaran, an expert on critical minerals at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "This is the biggest public-private cooperation that the mining industry has ever had here in the United States," Baskaran said. "Historically, DOD has never done equity in a mining company or a mining project." Trump's unique hold over the Republican Party gives him the ability to intervene in companies on a scale that would be difficult politically for a Democratic president, Danzman said. "The Democrat would have been accused of being a communist and a lot of other Republicans probably would not have felt comfortable moving in this particular direction because of their greater commitment to market principles," Danzman said. Trump is expanding the range of what is possible in the U.S. in terms of state intervention in markets, she said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. More interventions could be on the horizon as the Trump administration develops a policy to support U.S. companies in strategic industries against state-backed competition from China. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in April that the U.S. government might need to make an "equity investment in each of these companies that's taking on China in critical minerals." The Pentagon's investment in MP Materials is a model for future public-private partnerships, CEO James Litinsky said. "It's a new way forward to accelerate free markets, to get the supply chain on shore that we want," Litinsky told CNBC. The U.S. government is helping the mining industry fight "Chinese mercantilism," the CEO said. Meanwhile, the golden share in U.S. Steel is a potential model for foreign direct investment "transactions that really affect our national security but where it's going to be great for our economic growth," Sen. Dave McCormick, R-Pa., said in a May interview with CNBC. "Having taken a stake in US Steel and MP, we're now left to wonder where this administration will find its next investment," Don Bilson, an analyst at Gordon Haskett, wrote in a note to clients earlier this month. Trump proposed in January that the U.S. should take a 50% stake in social media app TikTok as part of a joint venture. China's ByteDance is required under a recently passed law to divest TikTok or the platform will be banned in the U.S. Trump extended ByteDance's compliance deadline until Sept. 17. The U.S. has a long history of intervening in industries, particularly where national defense is concerned, said Mark Wilson, a historian at the University of North Carolina, Charlotte, who studies the military-industrial complex. But past interventions were often temporary and typically happened during war, economic crisis or took the form of bailouts to prevent a major player in a critical industry from going bankrupt. The U.S. government bought a majority stake in General Motors to prevent the automaker from collapsing in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, ultimately selling off its shares at a loss to the taxpayer. In the 1970s, defense giant Lockheed and automaker Chrysler received government bailouts. During World War I, President Woodrow Wilson nationalized the railroads, but he returned them to private ownership after the conflict. The Roosevelt administration made sweeping interventions during the Great Depression and World War II, from establishing the Tennessee Valley Authority to making big investments in the nation's manufacturing capacity. The U.S. is not fighting an economic crisis or war today, but the return of great power competition with Russia and China and the supply chain disruptions of the Covid-19 pandemic have led to more nationalistic economic policies, said UNC's Wilson. The U.S. has increasingly recognized that China's economic model is based on manufacturing overcapacity that dumps products "onto global markets in ways that make it hard for other markets to compete," Danzman said. The threat posed by China's dominance of the rare-earth supply chain became apparent in April when Beijing imposed export restrictions against the U.S., Baskaran said. Within weeks, automakers warned they would have to halt production due to a rare-earth shortage, forcing the U.S. back to the negotiating table with Beijing, she said. "The historical moment we're in does seem to be one where there is this reassessment of assumptions of the previous generation about the efficacy of markets and free trade to solve all our problems in national security," Wilson said. The question is whether state intervention can solve the failure of the free market to address national security concerns in industries like rare earths, Danzman said. "When you step in to try to address one of these market failures with this kind of government intervention, you can have a cascade of new market failures," she said. "You're distorting the market more."
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
STMicroelectronics (STM) Falls 15.9% on Dismal Q2, Weak Outlook
We recently published . STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE:STM) is one of the worst-performing stocks on Thursday. STMicroelectronics fell by 15.86 percent on Thursday to close at $26.73 apiece as investor sentiment was weighed down by a dismal earnings performance and weak industry outlook amid tariff uncertainties. In its earnings release, STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE:STM) said it swung to a net loss of $97 million in the second quarter of the year from a $353 million net income in the same period last year. Net revenues were also lower by 14.4 percent at $2.766 billion from $3.232 billion year-on-year. Looking ahead, STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE:STM) remained cautious about its business outlook for the rest of the year, with revenues for the current quarter expected to decrease by 2.5 percent year-on-year to $3.17 billion, but increase by 14.6 percent on a sequential basis. Photo by Vishnu Mohanan on Unsplash 'While we expect Q3 revenues to show a solid sequential growth … we are still operating amid an uncertain macroeconomic environment. Given these external factors, our priorities remain supporting our customers, accelerating new product introductions, and executing our company-wide program to reshape our manufacturing footprint and resize our global cost base,' said STMicroelectronics N.V. (NYSE:STM) President and CEO Jean-Marc Chery. While we acknowledge the potential of STM as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the .
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Investors Should Still Avoid Verizon Stock Despite Rising Earnings. Here's Why.
Key Points Verizon's already massive debt has risen further this year. Verizon now has to balance expectations of dividend increases against its generous yield. Reducing or suspending its dividend to focus on debt reduction could help Verizon stock longer-term. 10 stocks we like better than Verizon Communications › On the surface, Verizon Communications (NYSE: VZ) released a solid earnings report for the second quarter of 2025. The company benefited from rising revenue, earnings, and free cash flow, and a raised outlook bodes well for the communications stock's progress. What the report did not do is alleviate concerns about one area of the balance sheet where the company has struggled for years. That strongly indicates that without one painful but critical move, Verizon stock will likely continue to struggle. Verizon's ongoing concern Verizon's situation worsened in one key area: total debt. As of the midpoint of 2025, Verizon's total debt now stands at almost $146 billion. This is up from $144 billion at the end of last year as its unsecured debt, which typically carries higher interest rates, rose by $2 billion. However, when factoring in the total equity, or book value, of $104 billion, it becomes apparent how much strain these obligations place on the balance sheet. Admittedly, Verizon and its main competitors, AT&T and T-Mobile, have also depended heavily on debt to finance the construction and maintenance of their telecom networks. Verizon's debt was more manageable until 2021, when the company spent $52.9 billion to acquire C-band spectrum. Spectrum is a sort of "RF real estate" that grants Verizon the exclusive right to use a specific frequency in a geographic area. This was prime spectrum, which enabled many of its wireless service offerings. So why is the debt an issue? Indeed, the debt level itself is not necessarily an issue. Over the previous 12 months, Verizon spent $6.6 billion in interest expenses. This amounts to a slightly more than 4% in interest costs when factoring in the $154 billion in total debt, a relatively low rate. Nonetheless, interest rates have risen since 2021. Even though only around $2 billion of Verizon's debt is due this year, it will likely have to refinance that debt at a higher interest rate, meaning investors should assume that the cost will rise over time if its financial situation remains the same. Another factor is its dividend sustainability. Verizon has built an 18-year streak of payout hikes and likely wants to avoid the fate of AT&T, whose stock suffered for years after it abandoned a 35-year record of annual dividend increases in 2022. Verizon's dividend returns are also significantly above those of its peers. At $2.71 per share, its dividend yield is 6.4%. That is more than 5 times the S&P 500 average of 1.2%. It is also significantly higher than the yields of AT&T and T-Mobile, which return 4.1% and 1.4%, respectively. That dividend cost Verizon nearly $11.4 billion over the last 12 months. In a sense, it can cover this cost since it generated just over $20.1 billion in free cash flow during the same period. Still, with a dividend cut, Verizon could also use some or all of that $11.4 billion to retire debt. So far, Verizon has not done that, as its high yield likely makes the stock a draw for income investors. Also, if AT&T and other stocks are any indication, a dividend cut could lead to stock price declines in the near term. Nonetheless, lower debt levels would help stabilize the balance sheet. Over time, this could make the stock more attractive, as it has underperformed the market despite trading at a P/E ratio of 10. Income investors would suffer from both lower dividend income and falling stock prices in the near term. Conversely, the low P/E ratio may limit the downside. The improved finances could draw investors to the stock, possibly compensating for the lost dividend income in the long run. Making sense of Verizon stock Even with the positive earnings report, Verizon stock is likely a hold for now. While its dividend is generous, its high cost to the company and heavy debt burdens likely make the dividend's current trajectory unsustainable. That will lead to more struggles for Verizon stock if it lowers the dividend to better service its debt. However, investors should also note that AT&T remains a solid dividend stock despite slashing the payout. That indicates that as investors adjust to a new reality, rising earnings, a stronger balance sheet, and a low P/E ratio could make Verizon stock an attractive holding if it works harder to lower reduce its debt. Should you invest $1,000 in Verizon Communications right now? Before you buy stock in Verizon Communications, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Verizon Communications wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $634,627!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,046,799!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,037% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Will Healy has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends T-Mobile US and Verizon Communications. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Investors Should Still Avoid Verizon Stock Despite Rising Earnings. Here's Why. was originally published by The Motley Fool
