logo
Equity responds to Trump's film tariff and says it is ‘industrial action ready'

Equity responds to Trump's film tariff and says it is ‘industrial action ready'

The leader of performing arts and entertainment union Equity said the threat from Donald Trump's proposed 100% tariff on international films will not lead to a change in their 'demands'.
General secretary Paul Fleming said the body is 'industrial action ready' during the trade union's annual conference in Londonderry on Saturday.
The union has put forward a claim for better pay, as well as regulation around the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) from the UK screen sector trade body, Pact.
'Trump's threat of tariffs on film was met with hysteria from producers, and sent Netflix's share price tumbling', Mr Fleming said at a speech during the conference.
'It revealed the fragility of our own industry – how it is more dependent on cash from the US than strategy from the UK.
'We're not changing our approach or our demands. The message is simple: we have put in the most ambitious claims for our TV and film agreements in a generation.
'Our union is industrial action ready. On dignity at work, on royalties, on artificial intelligence, on casting, and on pay: Pact and the streamers need to deliver.'
Pact, Producers Alliance for Cinema and Television, is the UK screen sector trade body for independent production and distribution companies.
Mr Fleming said: 'Our members will not wait for a global stability which will not come, or a government strategy which doesn't exist to save them.
'Our claims stand, tariff or no tariff, inflation high or low: Pact and the streamers need to meet their ambition, they don't have a choice.'
Also at the conference, members passed a motion to campaign to save Scottish soap River City after BBC Scotland announced it would be axing the drama in 2026.
Earlier in the month, Mr Trump said he had authorised the Department of Commerce and the Office of the US Trade Representative to impose a 100% tariff 'on any and all movies coming into our country that are produced in foreign lands'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Think tank: Glasgow should have directly-elected mayor
Think tank: Glasgow should have directly-elected mayor

Glasgow Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Think tank: Glasgow should have directly-elected mayor

The Centre for Cities said Glasgow could be missing out on billions in funding without the changes. A report, The Missing Piece In The Big Cities' Jigsaw, claimed Scotland's GDP would be 4.6% larger than it is now if Glasgow's economy performed in line with the average for cities of its size. In England, there are 10 combined local authorities which have a metro mayor. The process of local devolution began a decade ago with Greater Manchester. READ MORE: Major tenement refurbishment completed in Glasgow's West End READ MORE: 'Cutting-edge' technology doubles Glasgow's mobile network speeds Andrew Carter, chief executive of Centre for Cities, said: 'The UK is taking a city-region led approach to economic growth because cities are at the frontier of innovation and economic growth. 'Glasgow has an important role in this, with the potential to make an added economic contribution the size of Scotland's oil and gas sector if it harnesses its size to generate more cutting-edge activity. 'English cities with metro mayors have, in the last week, been allocated billions to invest in local public transport networks and R&D. 'Scotland, too, needs its big cities to make a greater contribution to the economy. 'A directly-elected mayor for the Glasgow city region would bring much-needed leadership, accountability and the ability to shape growth around the city's needs.' READ MORE: Glasgow's rank on UK city wellness list revealed Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes said: 'Glasgow is key to driving the Scottish economy, which is why the Scottish Government is partly funding the city-region's £1.13 billion growth deal. 'We have also supported Glasgow city region's £160 million investment zone, with additional funding for electric vehicle infrastructure and skills development. 'We are working with partners to explore ways of devolving further powers to regional economic partnerships, including Glasgow city region, with the aim of presenting options to Ministers by the end of this Parliament.'

Trump orders Ice to expand deportation of migrants
Trump orders Ice to expand deportation of migrants

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Trump orders Ice to expand deportation of migrants

US President Donald Trump has ordered an expansion of the detention and deportation of migrants across the country as protests against his policies a post on Truth Social, Trump called on federal agencies to "do all in their power" to deliver "the single largest mass deportation programme in history", naming Los Angeles, Chicago and New York as specific cities are among the many where large-scale protests have broken out against raids on undocumented migrants since 6 has faced legal challenges and criticism for his response to the protests - particularly his deployment of the military to quell the demonstrations. Trump said he had directed the "entire administration to put every resource possible behind this effort". He also promised to prevent "anyone who undermines the domestic tranquility of the United States" from entering the various federal offices including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice), he wrote "you have my unwavering support. Now go, get the job done!"The post came at the end of a day that saw a new wave of protests against Trump's policies across the 15 June, the "No Kings" movement demonstrated in cities stretching from Los Angeles to New York. Those demonstrations also coincided with a military parade in Washington DC to mark 250 years of the US army, which was held on the president's 79th person suffered life-threatening injuries after a shooting at a No Kings march in Salt Lake City, Utah. Police say it's not clear if this incident was politically also ordered immigration authorities to focus their efforts on sanctuary cities - those that limit their assistance to federal immigration authorities - which during the protests have become a source of tension between federal and state in these places have defended their legal rights to protect undocumented command to expand deportations signals a follow-through on Trump's campaign promise to provide the "largest deportation programme of criminals in the history of America".Opinion polls suggested this policy had widespread support in the build-up to the 2024 US election. Since the deportation programme has grown, however, protests have only new order came just hours after the Trump administration directed immigration officials to largely pause raids on farms, hotels, restaurants and meatpacking plants, according to the Reuters news agency.

Is it really all over for the Scottish Conservatives? Why Russell Findlay must fight against populism
Is it really all over for the Scottish Conservatives? Why Russell Findlay must fight against populism

Scotsman

time28 minutes ago

  • Scotsman

Is it really all over for the Scottish Conservatives? Why Russell Findlay must fight against populism

Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... For as long as I can remember, the Scottish Conservatives have allegedly been on the cusp of ruin. But is it actually true? Ahead of the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections, the Scottish Conservatives should, in theory, provide a comprehensive economic alternative to the incumbent SNP and the populist broad strokes of Reform UK. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, key policy announcements at this weekend's party conference look more interested in competing with Reform than solving Scotland's endemic social and economic problems. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay | PA Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay rejected Scotland's 2045 net-zero target and pledged a Taxpayer Savings Act "to get the books in order" while cutting government spending and reducing the number of civil servants. He called it a "blueprint for a common‑sense future for Scotland'. There are even proposals for a new Scottish Agency of Value and Efficiency - "run by business leaders" - and an "Accountability and Transparency Index" to scrutinise organisations receiving public money, which sounds painfully like Elon Musk's former plaything, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Scotland has, does and always will need a centre-right electoral force. Now is the moment the Tories need a Ruth Davidson, and the question is whether Findlay has the same magnetism to draw together a tacit coalition of pro-union, pragmatic voices tired of rhetorical indulgence who can present that alternative without descending to a populist Reform-lite level. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Reform UK leader Nigel Farage is charismatic, but his proposals for Scotland are next to non-existent. And if there's one thing Farage should be wary of, and parties in Holyrood should have realised by now, it's that they pay the price for whatever happens at Westminster – something Scottish Labour and the Conservatives know extremely well, and the SNP has used to its advantage for decades. The Scottish Conservatives need to give voters a clear, demarcated choice between a populist clown show and centre-right policy. The trench between the two parties should be so profound that any speculation of merging or operating with a confidence and supply agreement at Holyrood is dismissed as patently absurd. Scottish Conservative leader Russell Findlay | PA Admittedly, the polls for the party ahead of the 2026 Scottish Parliament elections are not good. But only a fool would discount the party that has refused to evaporate since devolution and even longer in Scotland before that. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In the 19th century, the Liberals were the dominant political force in Scottish politics. From 1912 to 1965, the Unionist Party combined the pre-1912 Conservative Party in Scotland and the Liberal Unionists. In 1955, they achieved the only popular majority ever achieved by any party in Scotland, with over 50 per cent of the vote and 36 of the 71 seats at Westminster. After a staggered decline in the 1964 general election, several reforms amalgamated the Scottish Unionist Party with the Conservative and Unionist Party in England and Wales in 1965. The rhetoric that it is all over for the centre-right in Scotland and the Tories is hyperbolic and extremely unlikely. The Unionist Party relegated the Liberals at the start of the 20th century, and Labour, in turn, overtook them by the late 1950s until the SNP did the same by the 2010s. The key distinction here is that this shift was from a position of government-yielding power. The Scottish Conservatives' influence and importance are not in getting the keys to Bute House, but in ensuring that Reform does not beachhead populist nonsense at Holyrood and beyond. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Reform UK leader Nigel Farage speaks during a press conference at Church House in Westminster, London. Picture: Jeff Moore/PA Wire This seems a plausible ambition in a historical context. Between 1999 and 2016, the Scottish Tories achieved a low of 15 (2007) and a high of 18 (1999 and 2003) Members of Parliament out of 129 available seats. Until 2016, they were the third largest party at Holyrood, a record broken by the seismic mood change under Davidson's leadership. This propelled them to second place, overtaking Scottish Labour, and gave them a devolution high of 31 seats. In 2021, then-leader Douglas Ross broke even with Davidson's win. The years since have not been as kind - the Tories have endured defections to Reform UK and the Liberal Democrats. Reform UK is now a serious electoral challenge in Scotland, as evidenced by the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election on June 5, which Labour gained from the SNP. A more worrisome barometer was Reform taking a 26 per cent vote share, relegating the Tories from third to fourth place with 6 per cent, down from 11 per cent. Polling suggests the Tories will keep their constituency seats, but lose around 15 list seats. Reform UK is expected to split the vote, halving Conservative seats, with the new party gaining a projected 15 seats thanks to Holyrood's proportional representation list system. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the 2024 general election last year, Reform UK won five seats and 14 per cent of the vote, the third-highest vote share across the UK, and 7.0 per cent in Scotland (to the Tories' nearly 13 per cent). The Scottish Tories hold five of the 57 Scottish seats in the House of Commons, 30 of the 129 seats in the Scottish Parliament, and 206 of Scotland's 1,226 local councillors. If power is neither realistic nor tangible, the next best thing is to ensure a cemented intellectual home of centre-right thinking, creating a bulwark against ascending populism and stagnating nationalism. The Scottish Conservatives must play to the party's strengths in Scotland and not be anchored by the broader party's collapse at Westminster, or the temptation to fight populism with populism.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store