Toilet charging may increase 'public fouling risk'
The council's report also said it recognised a potential "impact on tourism and businesses" and that "a reduction in public convenience provision could deter visitors". Several petitions have been launched by campaigners who want to keep services open, gathering thousands of signatures between them.The local authority said it was a "difficult" decision to "reduce any valued service" but the impact of closures or charging "must be balanced with the council's requirement to remain financially viable".A decision on whether or not to go ahead with the plans is expected to be made by members at a full council meeting on Tuesday.
Petitions have been launched by campaigners who want to keep the blocks at those locations open.Alan Connett, Lib Dem councillor for Exminster and Haldon at Devon County Council, set up a petition to save the public toilets in Starcross, which is in his ward.He said the number of petitions launched showed how important the facilities were to many."They may not use them every day or indeed every week but they like to know they are there," Connett said."I hope Teignbridge think again and abandon this plan."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on England's riverbanks: landscapes that everyone should be able to enjoy
In a country often said to be racked by division, criticising the condition of rivers is one of England's few unifying pastimes. Sewage dumping, which occurred for nearly 4m hours in English rivers and coastal waters last year, has become a potent source of anger, inspiring campaigners to push for cleaner water. Despite the concern that people show for England's rivers, however, it is remarkably difficult to stroll along their banks, let alone take a dip. The Guardian's recent reporting on the River Dart in Devon has shown that large stretches of its bank are privately owned, and many of these are difficult to access. The researcher Lewis Winks, who used Land Registry data to map the Dart's ownership, found the 47-mile long river has no fewer than 108 separate owners. The Duchy of Cornwall owns 28 miles of riverbank; two aristocratic estates own a further 13; 11.6 miles are owned via offshore companies. Wilks's map gives a snapshot of a national problem. Only 4% of English rivers are open to the public. As the demand for swimming spots has surged, many paddlers and kayakers have been reprimanded for trespassing. Paths alongside rivers often meander far from their banks to avoid privately owned land; one can 'walk' along the River Test in Hampshire, for example, yet much of its bank is inaccessible. In 2020, visitors to one of its few access points found it blocked by a barbed wire gate. The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs told the Guardian that England is a 'nation of nature lovers'. But the nation's feudal patterns of land ownership put much of nature off limits. Forming a deeper connection with the environment can inspire people to care for it. Campaigns for bathing water status, which compel the Environment Agency to improve water quality in rivers designated for swimming, are testimony to this. They are driven by people who directly experience these landscapes, and so want to protect them. Labour pledged to improve access to nature and protect wildlife in its 2024 manifesto, but its ministers have since diluted both promises. The government's new planning bill will weaken environmental protections by allowing developers to offset their destruction of natural habitats, rather than avoiding such destruction to begin with. In opposition, Labour vowed to introduce a right to roam. In government, it U-turned on this promise, bending to pressure from landowner groups. Its plan to create nine new 'river walks' is a paltry compensation. The government has given no detail on where these walks will be located or how it will create them, and its plan will probably be thwarted by the same 'permissive' model of access that campaigners object to, where rights of way depend on the goodwill of individual landowners. To create a walk along the length of the Dart, each of its 108 landowners would have to voluntarily allow the public to use their land. The Dart is small: longer rivers will pose even greater challenges. Landowners have long attempted to shield their estates from public view. 'Concealing wealth,' writes the land campaigner Guy Shrubsole, 'is part and parcel of preserving it.' A plan by the housing minister Matthew Pennycook to open up the Land Registry will make it easier to see who owns England's riverbanks. But this doesn't go far enough, since there is no guarantee that landowners will allow the public to enjoy these landscapes. This, surely, has to change.
Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Millions of UK homes still powered by Russian imports after Ukraine invasion
Critics are calling for action amid fears that UK imports could be used to fund President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine - Sizewell B in Suffolk is still using Russian uranium Millions of UK homes are still being supplied with electricity from a nuclear power station fuelled by Russian imports. The Mirror can reveal that Sizewell B in Suffolk continues to use imported uranium from Russia - three years after President Vladimir Putin 's deadly invasion of Ukraine. It comes despite French owner EDF previously indicating it would switch to an alternative source. The company has admitted it could take another three years to end its use of Russian uranium. The discovery comes as the UK government has thrown its weight behind nuclear to help power the UK in the future, partly in an effort to reduce the country's reliance on imports in the wake of Russia's war, which has led to household energy bills soaring. Last week saw the go-ahead given for Sizewell C, a new £38billion nuclear plant that will sit alongside the existing station on the Suffolk coast. Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire, said: 'It is incredibly concerning that EDF is still using Russian uranium, despite indicating that they were going to look for an alternative source. Three years on from Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, this is simply unacceptable. 'The Government should do everything in its power to ensure that no UK company is using uranium, liquefied natural gas or any other resources from Russia - and they should also urgently look to address the use of Russian uranium at Sizewell B. The UK must close every possible avenue that could be used to fund Putin's imperialism.' Dr David Lowry, a former member of the independent advisory panel for the Chief UK Nuclear Safety and Security Inspector and a nuclear policy consultant, said: 'It is sheer hypocrisy for energy ministers to say we need new nuclear to stop being dependent on imported Russian energy, when our biggest and newest nuclear plant is fully fuelled by Putin's uranium.' Sizewell B is the UK's newest existing nuclear power station, despite having been completed 30 years ago. It has an operating pressurised water reactor, capable of supplying 2.5 million homes, or around 3% of the UK's entire electricity needs. The plant uses enriched reprocessed uranium sourced from Russia by EDF's fuel supplier Framatome. Sources say Sizewell B is unique in the UK and that Russia is home to the only facility in the world which can prepare the required material. EDF says it has the potential to generate for at least a further 20 years beyond its current end of generation date of 2035. Alison Downes, from the Stop Sizewell C campaign group, claimed the limited sources for uranium called into question the rationale for backing nuclear. "It is a major stumbling block," she said. Estimates vary on how much money Russia is raking from uranium exports. The Royal United Services Institute has pointed to a range of sources showing $2.7billion (£2billion) of enriched uranium imports from Russia in 2023. An EDF spokesperson said: 'EDF remains in full compliance with all sanctions placed by the EU, UK and French Governments, regarding business with Russia. We have removed Russian input to the nuclear fuel supply chain for all UK plants except Sizewell B, due to long term commitments struck years before Russia invaded Ukraine. 'The fuel assemblies we load into our reactor come from our fuel supplier, Framatome, from a facility in western Europe, and the aim is to remove all Russian involvement from Sizewell B's fuel supply chain by 2028. EDF continues to work closely with UK companies, and the government, to create facilities which will be central to the future of the UK and Europe's long term energy infrastructure.' The Department for Energy Security and Net Zero said: 'While the procurement of nuclear fuel, including uranium and enrichment services, is a commercial matter for operators, we have committed to prevent the import of nuclear fuels from Russia by 2030.'
BBC News
3 days ago
- BBC News
Plans approved to prevent unauthorised camps in Teignbridge
A council is to spend more than £70,000 on a range of measures to try to stop unauthorised Gypsy and traveller District Council said it had to clean up sites and repair damage following the unauthorised use of council-owned land, with eight cases requiring legal action in 2024.A report discussed on Tuesday proposed installing boulders, barriers and a new fence at six parks across the district. The council approved all the plans to make access more difficult for unauthorised council said there was no transit provision for Gypsy and traveller groups at the moment in Devon and it would work with other local authorities to identify possible sites. The report which was considered by the council's executive committee said unauthorised encampments created "significant demands" on resources through "the requirement to clean the site and surrounding areas, repair any damage caused and deal with complaints from residents and businesses that have been impacted".The plans include a new rail with steel posts at Osborne Park, boulders at access points to Sandringham Park and Bakers Park, lockable bollards at Courtenay Park and Forde Park and a barrier at Dawlish Countryside council said there were "no real alternatives" other than "to continue to reactively manage the unauthorised occupation of the parks and accept the associated costs, complaints and impacts on local residents and businesses".However, the council also acknowledged the risk that "the measures proposed will not guarantee a stop to further unauthorised encampments at these sites" and that encampments may move to other, more accessible, council-owned land.|About 20 members of the public attended the executive meeting which heard there had been an unprecedented number of encampments this year.
