Can't decipher FIR, 1984 murder unsolved
Sketchy details of the FIR, provided by UP govt standing counsel Ruchira Goel to a bench led by Justices Surya Kant in January this year had revealed that on Nov 1, 1984, a day after the assassination of PM Indira Gandhi, around 150-200 persons barged into the house of retired Army personnel Diwan Singh at Yashoda Nagar in Naubasta, Kanpur, murdered him and looted his house.
The bench had ordered the state to take assistance of CFSL in reconstructing the FIR to attempt bring to book the culprits who unleashed a massacre virtually backed by the then governing political party.
However, the counsel informed a bench of Justices Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that the FIR remains illegible despite the best efforts of CFSL.
Unwilling to give up the pursuit of delivering justice, the bench asked the
Special Investigation Team
(SIT) it had constituted to re-investigate anti-Sikh riot cases and UP police to keep the case open and pursue it further whenever they get hold of additional information relating to Diwan Singh's cold-blooded murder.
For PIL petitioner Manjit Singh GK, advocate Jagjit Singh Chhabra told the bench though chargesheets were filed by SIT in nine anti-Sikh riots cases in Kanpur, HC has stayed trial in three cases on appeals filed by the accused seeking quashing of the final probe reports.
The SC bench said, "While we do not want to impact the rights of the accused, including their right to seek quashing of chargesheet, we would request HC to take up these appeals out of turn for expeditious adjudication."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Ludhiana: Man duped of ₹31.5 lakh, travel agent booked
A city resident lost a staggering ₹31.5 lakh to a fraudster posing as a travel agent, police said on Friday. The accused, identified as Amritpal Singh of Dairy Complex, Haibowal, allegedly promised the victim a permanent residency (PR) visa to Canada but disappeared after receiving the payment. The accused allegedly claimed he could arrange a PR visa for Canada and demanded ₹ 31.5 lakh to complete the process. (HT Photo) The victim, Gurveer Singh, a resident of Rajouri Garden in Barewal, filed a complaint with the Sahnewal police, following which a case of cheating has been registered against the accused under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). According to Gurveer's statement, he came in contact with Amritpal through a mutual acquaintance. Amritpal allegedly claimed he could arrange a PR visa for Canada and demanded ₹31.5 lakh to complete the process. Gurveer, trusting the assurances, paid the amount in multiple installments. However, after receiving the full sum, Amritpal repeatedly delayed the visa process, offering only vague explanations and failing to deliver any official documentation. When Gurveer asked for a refund, the accused refused, the complainant mentioned who eventually approached the police with his complaint on June 2. Assistant sub-inspector Sadhu Singh, the investigating officer from Sahnewal police station, said that a case under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) has been registered against the absconding travel agent. 'The accused is currently on the run and efforts are underway to track him down,' he said.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
New Delhi rejects British Parliamentary report naming India among countries engaging in transnational repression
India on Friday (August 1, 2025) categorically rejected as "baseless" a British parliamentary report that named it among countries engaged in "transnational repression" in the UK. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said the allegations stemmed from "unverified" and "dubious sources" predominantly linked to proscribed entities and individuals. "We have seen the references to India in the report and categorically reject these baseless allegations," MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said. "These claims stem from unverified and dubious sources, predominantly linked to proscribed entities and individuals with a clear, documented history of anti-India hostility," he said. Mr. Jaiswal said the "deliberate reliance on discredited sources calls into question the credibility of the report itself." The report made by the British Parliament's Joint Committee on Human Rights listed India along with China, Egypt, Eritrea, Iran, Pakistan, Russia, Bahrain, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates as countries allegedly engaging in "transnational repression" in the UK. The report titled "Transnational repression in the U.K." was made public on July 30. Some of the details related to India cited in the report was provided by Sikhs for Justice (SFJ), a pro-Khalistan organisation banned in India under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and other U.K.-based Sikh groups.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Nationalist agendas fuelled the border fight between Thailand and Cambodia
On the morning of July 24, Thai and Cambodian troops clashed at multiple locations along their 800-km border. Following five days of fighting that resulted in 43 deaths (including civilians) and the displacement of more than 300,000 people, both sides arrived at a ceasefire that took effect on July 29. Mediated by ASEAN chair Malaysia, with help from China, and under the looming threat of U.S. tariffs, the truce appeared to largely hold despite claims of breach by both parties. After the agreement came Cambodia's call on July 31 for the release of its 20 soldiers detained for crossing into Thai-held territory after the truce. Bangkok has acceded, but only upon the fulfilment of legal procedures — proof that the peace deal, despite putting a temporary halt to the fighting, is a minor respite at best. For the roots of the conflict can be traced back to pre-colonial times; and with domestic politics, international scam centres and nationalism coming to the mix, multiple interests are at stake, complicating matters further. Rise of tensions Prior to the latest clashes was the May 28 incident in which a Cambodian soldier was killed. Tensions ran high, forcing the then-Thai Prime Minister, Paetongtarn Shinawatra, to ring up strongman and Cambodia's former Premier Hun Sen on June 15 to placate the situation. As a leaked version of their conversation showed, Ms. Paetongtarn, whose family shares close ties with the Cambodian leader, sounded deferential by referring to him as 'uncle' and labelling a Thai military General as 'opponent'. The ensuing fallout, which cost Ms. Paetongtarn her job, is widely believed to have been orchestrated by Mr. Hun Sen to deflect attention from the international cyberscam centres operating in his country. Apart from inviting global scrutiny, these scam offices are also alleged to be run by the Cambodian government's allies and possess links to China — Phnom Penh's biggest benefactor. Another incentive for Mr. Hun Sen to stir the pot is to whip up nationalist sentiments and boost the credentials of his son Hun Manet, sworn to office in 2024, 33 years after his father relinquished power. For Mr. Hun Sen — who once called Ms. Paetongtarn's father and former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra his 'god brother' — Thailand, with its delicate political landscape owing to the presence of the monarchy and the military, presents itself as a soft target. Separately, Mr. Hun Sen is also accused by his opponents of adopting a soft stance towards Vietnam, whose Army in 1979 overthrew the Khmer Rouge and installed the 72-year-old Cambodian People's Party in power. Also on Mr. Hun Sen's mind is the Thai government's proposed casino legalisation Bill, which may adversely impact Cambodia's gambling sector. Thus, bringing down the Shinawatras' Pheu Thai party is a one-stop solution to all his problems and seemed plausible too, given that, with Ms. Paetongtarn suspended from duty and Mr. Thaksin facinglese majestecharges for 'insulting the monarchy', the Shinawatras are already out of favour with the Thai citizens. Nationalist rhetoric However, nationalist rhetoric is not restricted to Cambodia alone but is an overarching sentiment in Thailand, too. A 2003 remark by a Thai actress, in which she said Cambodia had 'stolen' Angkor Wat and that she would not visit the country until the monument was returned, sparked anti-Thai riots. Taken in isolation, the statement may not carry much weight. But when placed in the larger context, it reflects the overall mood of a country, which, while priding itself as the only one in the region to be not subjected to Western colonisation, still perceives itself as a victim. This is because history has been equally unkind to both Cambodia and Thailand. Between the 7th century and the 14th century, the Khmer Empire ruled over a vast tract of the mainland in Southeast Asia. During its heyday in the 12th century, the Khmer empire comprised Cambodia as well as parts of present-day northeastern Thailand and southern Vietnam. The power structure was based on the Mandala system, which consisted of concentric circles of centre-peripheral relations. Weak territoriality and a loose central authority marked the setup, writes Path Kosal in a chapter in the book,Cambodia's Foreign Relations in Regional and Global Contexts. This ensured that Angkor kings were able to rule unchallenged over their allies and vassals who presided over the periphery independently. Trouble began to brew for the Khmer empire from the time of Angkor's fall in 1431. It faced threats from Siam (Thailand), which began conquering land from the northeast, and Annam (Vietnam) from the southeast; to the point that King Norodom turned Cambodia into a French protectorate in 1863 in the hope of security. While Cambodia's apprehensions of shrinking boundaries and constant threats have roots in pre-colonial times, Thailand's fears partially stem from the happenings that followed the establishment of the French protectorate. Though the multiple treaties signed between the French and Siamese in 1904 and 1907 serve as the bases for the present-day border between Cambodia and Thailand, many discrepancies exist to date; one of the prime examples being the tussle over the Preah Vihear temple — a 12th-century monument claimed by both countries. While the temple and a 1 sq. km area around it were ruled in Cambodia's favour by the International Court of Justice, a 4.6 sq. km patch near it is still contested territory. The verdict spurred a conflict between the two nations over the area in 2011, resulting in 28 casualties, including both military personnel and civilians. Preah Vihear is merely emblematic of the crisis. Similar temples, such as the Ta Moan Thom around which the latest shootout transpired, exist as bones of contention. The temples were built during the reign of the Khmer Empire. As is the case with empires, they rise and fall. And wars fought among the neighbouring kingdoms have seen the borders shift and temples change ownership. Like in many other conflicts, here too, the fire may have been lit during the time of conquests and colonialism. However, the nationalists and the ruling class of both countries – Cambodia has an authoritarian regime and Thailand's is a coup-prone establishment — have seen to it that the flames were fanned throughout history to suit them.
