logo
Why renters like me shouldn't be tempted by a shortcut to homeownership

Why renters like me shouldn't be tempted by a shortcut to homeownership

Telegraph02-06-2025
In 2025 it is notoriously difficult to buy your own property. House prices are now almost eight times the average full-time salary, having risen by 23pc over the pandemic according to official data.
In response, lenders are offering innovative products to help first-time buyers get a foot on the property ladder. The most eye-catching among these is the 100pc mortgage – where you don't need a deposit in order to buy.
These loans aren't new. Before the global financial crash, they were more readily available when lenders were happier shouldering the risk.
However, they're back. In 2023 Skipton announced its Track Record Mortgage, which allows renters to use their record as a tenant to get a loan to the full value of a property. In the last month Gable Mortgages and April Mortgages have both launched no-deposit loans. There are also guarantor and family deposit mortgages where a friend or family member agrees to make up any shortfall in payments if necessary or places the equivalent of a deposit in a savings account linked to the loan.
As a renter for more than a decade, this should be welcome news; a chance to own my own place without the hurdle of saving a deposit. However, I wouldn't dare. A whole property loan is a terrible proposition. The ramp up in no deposit mortgage options also comes as the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), with support of the Chancellor, is looking at loosening the rules around mortgage lending for first-time buyers, increasing the risk of borrowers ending up with mortgages they cannot afford.
The biggest and most obvious risk is that you could wind up in negative equity – where the amount you owe is greater than the value of your property.
House price growth has fluctuated significantly over the past few years, with values falling 2.7pc in December 2023 but rising 6.4pc in March this year. While interest rates are slowly falling there is no major impetus on the horizon, such as the stamp duty relief we saw during the pandemic. My colleague Josh Kirby has written about why homeowners face a hangover after the frenzied activity during the pandemic.
If you have a solid 10pc of equity in your property you're likely to be keeping half an eye on values but you can weather the usual ups and downs of the market. Without it, unless you are confident you can buy equity in the property rapidly, you risk becoming trapped. Gable Mortgages' 100pc loan even includes options for new-build properties that have traditionally not been eligible under these loans, in part due to the lack of certainty around their values.
You will also probably be paying a higher interest rate than other borrowers with similar sized loans. While rates have been very gradually falling over the past 12 months, those for 100pc mortgages are notably higher making it an expensive way to borrow.
Buying over renting will usually involve a calculation about whether you are paying more to your landlord or the lender in interest payments. If you increase the cost of your borrowing you may be losing more than if you were renting, and reduce the amount you can put either into you property to gain some equity or a deposit savings account to be invested into a home later on.
Currently providers are offering rates of between 5.3pc and 6pc, whereas average rates in the market sit between just under 4pc and 5pc, according to The Telegraph's Best Buy data. What is more, some lenders demand you lock in these rates for up to 15 years leaving you at risk of paying substantially more than other borrowers if rates fall.
These higher rates mean you eat into the money you have available to pay down the loan itself, as well as paying more overall. It also leaves you with less financial flexibility if something goes wrong such as illness or losing your job. That said, some lenders do offer rates that drop as you increase your equity in recognition of the reduction in the risk they are taking.
Then there is the issue of remortgaging. There are a limited number of lenders offering 100pc or even 95pc loans so when it comes to the end of your mortgage term you may struggle to find a better option. It means you will need to make a significant dent in your equity in order to be confident you can move to a better rate.
There is also the risk that you cannot remortgage and are forced on to your lender's standard variable rate which will be much higher. Currently the average five-year fixed rate is 5.08pc while the average SVR is sitting at 7.58pc. While renting contains the obvious element of uncertainty if your rent becomes affordable you can move (I appreciate it isn't always quite that easy), whereas with mortgage rates you are trapped unless you wish to sell, which comes with its own list of issues and uncertainties.
If you want to sell your property and you're in negative equity or haven't been able to build up a meaningful sum of equity yourself, you risk falling into debt in order to cover the difference, or no better off than when you started.
At a time when costs are continuing to rise (a drop in the rate of inflation just means prices are rising slower, not dropping) that is no small task. Particularly when you consider the inevitable costs you incur from the wear and tear of owning a property that will eat into your savings, something renters live without.
It is also worth remembering that 100pc mortgages do not mean you can simply own a property tomorrow, far from it.
Rightly the loans have strict eligibility requirements you will have to meet, requiring a strong credit score and a reliable long-term income often above and beyond the criteria for other mortgages. And while you avoid having to put together a deposit you will still face the substantial costs associated with home buying including stamp duty land tax as well as legal, survey and moving costs all of which will likely total thousands.
I would rather take the time to build up a lump sum that includes the estimated costs of buying and moving rather than only saving enough to cover the practical costs of buying that leaves you exposed if something goes wrong and you need more money.
When Skipton first launched its 100pc mortgage a mortgage broker told me the ideal candidate was a newly qualified city lawyer on a salary of more than £100,000 (before bonus) looking at a rapid upward earnings trajectory. That makes sense.
They won't have had time to save but can be close to certain they'll be able to overpay and own a substantial part of their property by the time they come to remortgage.
However, for the rest of us the risk is too great. It may take you (and me) longer to save but when you buy your own home, you will do so knowing it's yours and unlikely to be taken away from you.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements
Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements

The Independent

timea few seconds ago

  • The Independent

Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements

Musician Paul Weller is suing his former accountants after they stopped working with the singer after public statements alleging Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, according to a legal letter. The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included: 'It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide. 'Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views.' Lawyers for Weller claim that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said: 'I've always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide. What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe. 'I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. 'Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship – it's complicity. 'I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people.' Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter also states. Cormac McDonough, a lawyer at Hodge Jones and Allen, representing Weller, said that his case 'reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights'. Mr McDonough added: 'Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza.'

The real difficulty ministers face is that the Epping hotel judgment is a clean and fair application of the law: ANDREW TETTENBORN
The real difficulty ministers face is that the Epping hotel judgment is a clean and fair application of the law: ANDREW TETTENBORN

Daily Mail​

time31 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

The real difficulty ministers face is that the Epping hotel judgment is a clean and fair application of the law: ANDREW TETTENBORN

There's a beautiful irony in the Epping hotel injunction. The Government's immigration policy of putting asylum seekers in hotels in some of the less well-off parts of the country has received a major blow from the legal class that Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and many of their learned friends themselves inhabit. And it's a blow that sees the long-term viability of the Government's immigration policy unravel, as councils up and down the country will seek to use this ruling to shut down their own troublesome migrant hotels. The difficulty for the Government is that Mr Justice Eyre's decision is a clean, fair, straightforward application of the law. He has ruled that, if planning permission exists for a hotel, it's a blatant breach of planning law to use the premises as a long-term asylum reception centre. Who'd have thought it? At bottom, it's no different from a convoy of travellers breaking planning law by parking caravans on a public recreation ground, or a farmer building a holiday camp on an arable field. The courts regularly issue stiff injunctions in cases like these, and rightly so. But Starmer and the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, were surprisingly complacent, imagining that somehow this didn't apply to their own activities. When the penny dropped at the last minute, they scrambled to influence the result, sending barrister Edward Brown KC to argue that the local authority 'should, in fact, have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application'. In other words, that an injunction should not be allowed because it would make life very difficult for the Government. Counsel for the hotelier took much the same line, effectively ignoring the concerns of the local people who had been protesting outside The Bell ever since an Ethiopian asylum seeker lodging there was charged with sexual assault against a 14-year-old schoolgirl. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common,' he said. 'But that does not make them well founded.' The hotelier's barrister was, of course, doing his job. Nevertheless, such legal arguments blithely take no notice of local problems caused by uncontrolled immigration and the small boats crisis, which has seen more than 50,000 undocumented illegal migrants crossing the Channel to Britain in the 13 months since Labour came to power. Until now, the Home Office has seemed content to dump the problem on councils such as Epping, where voters traditionally mistrust Labour. Now those voters have rightly dumped it back on the Government. What seriously spooks the Home Office is that Epping will not be a lone case. Across the kingdom we could now see multiple injunctions, forcing the Home Secretary in short order to relocate tens of thousands of asylum seekers currently in hotels – there are more than 32,000 according to figures released in March. And it is urgent: The High Court has given the Government only three weeks, until September 12, to vacate The Bell. The Government must act, and fast. One option might be to set up more dedicated reception centres, as in Germany and France. Another is to deter small-boat crossings by making it more difficult for illegal migrants to enter the black economy. The ball is firmly, and legally, in its court.

Government strikes returns deal with Iraq in latest bid to deter small boats
Government strikes returns deal with Iraq in latest bid to deter small boats

Rhyl Journal

time40 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Government strikes returns deal with Iraq in latest bid to deter small boats

The deal, signed by Home Office minister Dan Jarvis, will set up a formal process to return Iraqis who have arrived in the UK with no right to stay in the country. It comes after an £800,000 deal last year with Baghdad to help the country crack down on smuggling networks and organised crime. Earlier this year Sir Keir Starmer and Iraq's prime minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani agreed to strengthen co-operation on migration. Mr Jarvis signed the agreement during a visit to the UK by Iraq's deputy foreign minister Faud Hussein. The Home Office said the accord would allow the 'swift' return of illegal migrants. Home Office statistics said since previous deals, the number of Iraqis arriving in the UK by small boat has fallen to 1,900 in the year to March 2025, down from 2,600 in the previous year. Mr Jarvis said: 'By working together on security, development and migration challenges, we are building stronger relationships that benefit both our countries whilst tackling shared challenges like organised crime and irregular migration.' The returns deal is the latest as part of the Home Office's policies to stop small boats crossing the channel. Similar agreements have already been made with Albania and Vietnam since Labour came into power. Another deal with France recently came into force, where small boat migrants who have arrived over the English Channel from the French coast can be returned to the country. The small boats migrant will then be exchanged for a legitimate asylum seeker in France who can demonstrate a genuine family link to the UK. The number has been capped, but it is hoped it will act as a deterrent to those crossing the Channel. The latest figures from the Home Office showed 116 migrants arrived aboard two small boats on August 15. Mr Jarvis said: 'This visit reinforces the strength of the UK-Iraq partnership and demonstrates our government's commitment to serious diplomacy that delivers real results. 'As someone who served in Iraq, I understand first-hand the importance of building enduring relationships in the region, and the new agreement we have signed is a testament to the trust and co-operation we've built with our Iraqi counterparts.' However, the announcement was criticised by Conservative shadow home secretary Chris Philp. He said: 'Over 50,000 illegal immigrants have crossed the Channel in Labour's short time in power, the worst illegal immigration crisis in our history. 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'Now they boast about a measly returns deal with Iraq, but barely any small boat arrivals are Iraqi, and most would qualify for asylum anyway. It's a sham designed to look tough while crossings keep soaring. 'Labour has scrapped Conservative deterrents and created the conditions for chaos, leaving the British people to foot the bill. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store