Electric vehicle warning as BYD records biggest month of sales in Australia: ‘Race to the bottom'
Pape's warning was sparked by his father buying a new car and him suggesting that he should look at buying a Tesla Model Y. But his dad wasn't a fan of the suggestion and pointed out practical concerns with buying an electric car, including where he would charge it, how much it would cost to fix and what it would be worth in a few years.
Pape said cars had 'always been a terrible investment' and 'EVs just let you feel morally superior while you do it'. Cars are a depreciating asset, meaning they decline in value over time.
RELATED
BYD fast-charge curveball as Chinese EV takes on Tesla in Australia
ATO reveals highest paying jobs that don't require university degree: '$130,000 a year'
Superannuation 'red alert' for millions as $1 billion in retirement savings feared lost
With cheap electric cars from China flooding the market, Pape said prices were only going one way.
'In China, BYD — the world's biggest EV maker – recently slashed its local car prices by 34 per cent overnight,' Pape wrote in his weekly column.
'I grew up choosing between a Ford or a Holden (OK, and Toyota and Mazda). I'm convinced that, for my kids, cars will be like shopping for a TV at JB Hi-Fi: lots of weird-sounding Chinese brand names that get better and cheaper every year.
'In other words, it's an electric race to the bottom … with no one at the wheel.'
The cheapest EV for sale in Australia is the BYD Dolphin Essential, according to RACV, which is available from $32,138 driveaway.
The GWM Ora is in second place with a driveaway price of $33,990, followed by the MG4 51hWh Excite with a list price of $36,990 driveway.
Recent research from NRMA found the key reasons Aussies lacked confidence in EVs included doubts over owners' ability to find qualified EV technicians and concerns about the viability and safety of second-hand EV parts.
BYD recorded its best month of sales in Australia in June with more than 8,000 vehicles delivered, a 368 per cent increase from the same month last year.
This put it behind Toyota (20,225), Ford (10,103), Mazda (9,405) and Hyundai (8,407), but ahead of Kia (7,810), GWM (5,464) and Mitsubishi (5,336).
Driving BYD's growth is the launch of the BYD Shark, which has become one of the best-selling utes in the country behind the Ford Ranger and Toyota HiLux.
The car retails for $57,900 before on-road costs, with Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries data revealing it was snapped up by nearly 3,000 motorists in June, representing more than double its sales in May.
'With each month, you can see just how popular BYD vehicles are becoming in Australia because you can see them on our roads,' BYD chief operating officer Stephen Collins said.
'As we continue the transition to a fully-factory backed operation, we commend the foundation laid by our distribution partners as we strive to ensure this strong growth continues.'
Electric vehicles and plug-in hybrids now account for nearly 10 per cent of new Australian car sales.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
How The Sydney Opera House Became A Symbol Of Sustainability
The Sydney Opera House has embarked on a journey toward sustainability. Christopher Elliott The Sydney Opera House is more than just an architectural marvel. It's more than the gleaming white sails that grace postcards, Instagram feeds, and travel documentaries. It's more than the iconic backdrop to Australia's New Year's Eve fireworks. The UNESCO World Heritage site is trying to redefine what it means to be sustainable in the 21st century. 'Sustainability is in our DNA,' says Jess Gooch, the Sydney Opera House's director of strategic engagement and impact. She's not exaggerating. An innovative seawater cooling system was built into the performing arts center from the start. But can this iconic landmark, once a symbol of modernist ambition, also learn a few new tricks about sustainability in the 21st century? And can visitors become part of its green journey? Jess Gooch, the Sydney Opera House's director of strategic engagement and impact. Aren Elliott "Embedded" sustainability in Sydney When Danish architect Jørn Utzon designed the Sydney Opera House in the 1950s, sustainability wasn't a thing. Yet, his vision was remarkably forward-thinking. The building's self-cleaning tiles and seawater cooling system were groundbreaking. 'Utzon was way ahead of his time,' Gooch explains. 'He embedded sustainability into the design from the very beginning.' But the Opera House's sustainability journey was just getting started. Fast-forward to 2019, when the organization adopted the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, committing to achieve them by 2030. This wasn't just a PR move, says Gooch. It was a call to action. 'We realized we had to bring all our efforts under one umbrella,' Gooch says. 'Environmental sustainability, equity, inclusion, accessibility — they're all interconnected.' To streamline its efforts, the Opera House restructured its teams, creating an 'impact function' that combines these previously siloed areas. 'We wanted to think about sustainability holistically,' Gooch adds. 'It's not just about reducing emissions; it's about creating a stage for diverse voices, preserving heritage, and inspiring others to take action.' How the Sydney Opera House became more sustainable The Sydney Opera House's sustainability efforts are as diverse as its programming. Here's a snapshot of what's happening behind the scenes: Improved building operations. The Opera House has reduced its emissions by 26 percent and now runs on 100 percent renewable energy. It's also achieved a 6-star Green Star Performance rating from the Green Building Council of Australia, which means it officially uses 10 to 40 percent less energy than a comparable facility. The Opera House has reduced its emissions by 26 percent and now runs on 100 percent renewable energy. It's also achieved a 6-star Green Star Performance rating from the Green Building Council of Australia, which means it officially uses 10 to 40 percent less energy than a comparable facility. Better waste management. Over 90 percent of event waste is diverted from landfills, thanks to robust recycling and composting programs. Over 90 percent of event waste is diverted from landfills, thanks to robust recycling and composting programs. Biodiversity. The Opera House has installed an artificial reef to promote marine biodiversity. 'We've even spotted a rare white seahorse there,' Gooch notes. There are also improvements outside the traditional sustainability discipline. For example, the Opera House wants to make more of a social impact, and it is committed to showcasing diverse voices, from First Nations artists to contemporary performers. Its collaboration with the Sydney Festival on projects like Thaw — a melting iceberg installation highlighting climate change — shows how art can drive meaningful conversations about sustainability. The facility is also trying to be more accessible. It has invested heavily in new pathways, elevators and escalators. 'This building wasn't designed with accessibility in mind,' Gooch admits. 'But we're changing that.' Can visitors see the Sydney Opera House's sustainability when they visit? You don't have to be a sustainability expert to notice the Opera House's green initiatives. If you visit Sydney, you can see the building's sustainability mission on display in big and small ways. For example, during events like Vivid LIVE, the Opera House's annual contemporary music program, the facility offers guests reusable cups to reduce single-use plastic. Once a month, the facility also offers a sustainability tour, where guests can see the Opera House's green initiatives behind the scenes, including its original cooling system. It also runs a digital sustainability tour exclusively for schools to educate kids about its sustainability efforts and to foster environmental awareness. You can also see art, which is a key part of the Opera House's cultural sustainability program. The Balu Gilly projection on the building's sails is a nightly First Nations artwork that connects visitors to the land's cultural heritage. What's the future? Electrification — and adaptation The Opera House isn't resting on its laurels. Its next big focus is decarbonization. 'We're looking at electrifying everything — our kitchens, our venues, even our shuttles,' Gooch explains. 'We want to remove any reliance on fossil fuels.' But the challenges are real, too. Rising sea levels pose a threat to the Opera House's harborside location. Indeed, when the building was constructed in the late 1960s and early 70s, no one was concerned about rising sea levels — or that the building might someday be under water. 'We're closely monitoring sea levels and working on a climate adaptation plan,' Gooch says. 'We're also thinking about how to future-proof the building against extreme heat and wind.' The Sydney Opera House is an example of what's possible when art, culture, and sustainability intersect. 'We want people to see, touch, and feel what we're doing,' Gooch says. 'We want to make sustainability real for everyone.' As the Opera House continues its journey toward sustainability, its impact will extend far beyond Sydney Harbour. It's an example of what's possible and perhaps proves that even the most iconic landmarks can adapt and innovate. So, the next time you visit Sydney, take a moment to appreciate not just the beauty of the Opera House's sails, but the futuristic vision behind them.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's rule-breaking board expressing ‘almost a contempt for lawful and accepted procedure', says governance expert
Under pressure from a group of shareholders, Tesla's board of directors said it will convene the annual general meeting on Nov. 6, nearly four months later than required under Texas state laws. The company had warned at the end of April it would fail to meet the usual deadline, but did not cite a reason for the delay. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance, says this attitude represents a lack of accountability toward shareholders. An admission by Tesla's directors that investors will be forced to wait until November before voting on key issues has come under sharp criticism fire from a leading U.S. expert on corporate governance. This week, the company finally lifted the secret surrounding the date of its much-delayed annual shareholder meeting. According to state laws in Texas, Tesla was obligated to hold the meeting by July 13—one year and one month after its previous meeting. 'They can't even have an annual meeting annually? That's ridiculous—it's almost expressing a contempt for lawful and accepted procedure.' Charles Elson told Fortune. 'Shareholder voting is a core principle in our system of capital formation, and if you abrogate that, then you punch a hole in the system itself.' Elson serves as a subcommittee chair on the American Bar Association's Business Law Section and is the founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. In 2024, he resigned from a consulting role with the law firm Holland & Knight—which counted Tesla as a client—after a nearly 30-year relationship in order to avoid interest conflicts when filing a legal opinion on the issue of CEO Elon Musk's pay package, dubbed 'the largest in human history.' The announcement of the Nov. 6 annual general meeting came just hours after a group of institutional investors representing $1.5 trillion in assets under management expressed their 'deep concern' over the delay and called on the board to 'immediately' disclose the date. 'Tesla's ongoing silence on the AGM is cause for concern,' they wrote to Tesla's directors in an open letter published Wednesday. The company had first admitted at the end of April that it had failed to file its definitive proxy statement within the normal time frame, citing no reason. Elson said there were only very few legally defensible justifications for pushing back an annual meeting, such as the lack of audited financial statements. Delaying its meeting in order to hold a vote over a new pay package for Musk or a potential investment in his latest startup xAI—the two most commonly cited theories in the Tesla community—did not meet that threshold in his view. 'The law has to be equally and neutrally applied. There aren't special exceptions for special people,' Elson said, referring to Musk. Tesla did not respond to a request from Fortune for comment. Unless shareholders mount a legal challenge to the later date, however, there are no repercussions for the company. Nevertheless, Elson fears this attitude waters down the spirit of capitalism. If a company's owners don't feel like they have a say, it lessens the likelihood of investing in equities. 'It's the one time of the year where every shareholder has the chance to voice their concerns to management in an open forum. It's a natural part of the corporate calendar that ensures accountability—you can't deny shareholders their fundamental suffrage right,' he said. If more companies follow Tesla's example, disenfranchised investors could increasingly seek the contractual protection of a debt-based financing system. This constrains economic growth, however, since it diminishes the appetite for risk that distinguishes the United States from a sluggish Europe. Elson argued that a recent proposal by Wedbush analyst Dan Ives to erect a special board oversight committee tasked with exercising influence over the CEO showed just how toothless the current slate of directors led by chair Robyn Denholm really is. 'Shut up,' Musk responded to Ives, immediately shooting down the proposal. 'I don't think this board is capable of acting outside of Musk's interests. So the question then is what exactly does it do?' Elson asked. 'Why are these individuals being paid hundreds of millions of dollars?' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Tesla's Robotaxi Launch Was Underwhelming. That's Good News for This 1 Stock to Buy.
Lyft (LYFT) now looks more compelling to investors after Tesla's (TSLA) subdued robotaxi launch in Austin because the latter's relatively weak debut eases worries about the potential for disruption in the ride-hailing industry by robotaxis. The soft launch, according to analysts at Oppenheimer, might just give Lyft some room to catch up with rival Uber (UBER) and even pursue 'meaningful EBITDA margin expansion' in chasing its own robotaxi objectives. Other than Tesla's high-profile blunder, the broader ride-hailing industry landscape remains healthy, catalyzed by ongoing demand and the ongoing shift in customer purchasing behaviors with increasing costs of auto ownership. Coupled with record-breaking Q1 2025 financials from Lyft and planned expansion in Europe, the stock offers investors the opportunity for tactical entry as the company scales growth with the potential for improving profitability. Creating a 38% 'Dividend' on SOFI Stock Using Options Nvidia Stock Regains Momentum. Is It Time to Buy, Sell, or Hold NVDA? Joby Aviation Just Hit a New 52-Week High. Should You Buy the Flying Car Stock Here? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Based in San Francisco, California, Lyft (LYFT) is one of the major ride-hailing platforms in the United States, with multimodal transport modes such as scooters and bicycles. The company is worth around $6.5 billion. Lyft shares are up 19% in the year to date, and in an even more encouraging sign, are up more than 40% in the past three months. From a valuation standpoint, Lyft's forward price-earnings ratio is around 66.7x and its price-sales multiple is 1.19x, figures that reflect investor excitement about its return to normalized profitability. Although the price-earnings ratio is high, the company's widening profit margins and near $1 billion in trailing 12 month cash flow generation warrant a premium multiple. Lyft posted its strongest first quarter on record, with Q1 2025 gross bookings of $4.2 billion, 13% more than the prior year, and revenue growth of 14% $1.5 billion. The company swung to net income of $2.6 million from last year's loss of $31.5 million in the same period. Adjusted EBITDA grew to $106.5 million with maargins expanding to 2.6% of gross bookings. Free cash flow more than doubled to $280.7 million, backing an increase in Lyft's share repurchase authorization to $750 million. Management expects Q2 rides growth in mid-teens, gross bookings of $4.41 billion to $4.57 billion, and adjusted EBITDA up to $130 million, showing continued momentum and cost management. New product releases such as Lyft Silver for elderly riders and early AI-powered solutions for drivers should support its growth and productivity in futures quarters. Analysts have a consensus 'Hold' rating on Lyft stock. Oppenheimer revised its price target upward by $3 to $20, indicating potential gains of nearly 25% from recent levels. Overall, the mean price target for Lyft stock is $17.20 per share, implying roughly 12% upside potential. The range of price targets is very large, from the high end at $28 to the low end at $10, and accounts for persistent skepticism about longer-term robotaxi competition and execution risk in the company's expansion in overseas markets. On the date of publication, Yiannis Zourmpanos did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
