Dubai developers bring construction in-house as demand surges
A growing number of major UAE developers are setting up in-house contracting firms, after long relying on third-party contractors. The move is aimed at increasing control over construction timelines, costs and quality standards, and ultimately, securing a larger share of profits, though it could also carry risks.
In a previously unreported sign of the trend, Emaar Properties (EMAR.DU), opens new tab, which developed the Burj Khalifa, has established Rukn Mirage under its subsidiary Mirage, a spokesperson told Reuters. Emaar joins developers such as Samana Developers, Ellington, and Azizi, all of which have launched in-house contracting units in the past two years.
Arada, the developer co-founded by Saudi Prince Khaled bin Alwaleed bin Talal Al Saud, also confirmed in a statement to Reuters that they acquired part of an Australian contractor this year and plan to integrate it into UAE operations by 2027.
The shift comes as Dubai's real estate surges, with prices up 70% over four years to December 2024 and a government plan to double the population to 7.8 million by 2040.
Property launches rose 83% in 2024, though completions fell 23%, industry data shows.
The boom has fuelled a new influx of workers, including migrant labourers mainly from South Asia, with high rates of turnover among expatriate staff. It has also led to fears of a downturn in a sector that remains crucial to the UAE economy.
Developers have been struggling to attract bids from outside contractors, amid stiff competition.
Samana Developers had initially planned to allocate 20% of its projects to its new in-house arm, launched in September. Now 80-90% of its new projects are being handled internally, Chief Executive Imran Farooq told Reuters.
"We used to get 25 or 30 contractors bidding for a project. Today you get hardly two or three," Farooq said.
Emaar, meanwhile, is taking a hybrid approach. While some projects — such as a recently announced residential development — will be executed by their in-house construction arm Rukn Mirage, they will continue to outsource others, founder and Managing Director Mohamed Alabbar said.
Developers are also tapping debt markets to fund land purchases and operations, as billions of dirhams in buyer payments remain in escrow until handover. Funds are released only after final inspections, with a one-year delivery grace period before buyers can claim refunds.
Developers, whose ownership varies and includes founding families, public investors and Emirati sovereign wealth funds, want to complete projects on time to unlock cash needed for shareholder distributions and to pay for expansion in the UAE and beyond.
Developers also want to avoid penalties for delays, which are not disclosed publicly but occasionally reported by local media.
In March, a Dubai court ordered a developer to repay 12.4 million dirhams ($3.38 million) plus interest over an undelivered floating villa, Al Khaleej reported, opens new tab.
Developers say owning the full pipeline — from land acquisition to handover — provides greater certainty in an unpredictable market and aligns with the UAE's push for self-reliance in strategic sectors.
But bringing construction in-house may also carry risks.
"When developers try to become builders, they start splitting focus — and that's when things can get muddy," said Gordon Rodger, founder and managing partner at construction consultancy Stonehaven.
"They end up with teams stretched between land acquisition, sales, marketing, events, PR, funding… and now also procurement, site logistics, health and safety, and huge amounts of sub-contractor management."
Rodger also cautioned that developers could be left with idle construction capacity in a downturn.
"You've got a big factory, a pre-cast yard, a huge joinery division, in-house plant, in-house equipment all sitting idle and you've got no work because your master developer can't sell any real estate," he said.
As a result of the shift, independent contractors may seek more work outside real estate in sectors such as in government infrastructure, manufacturing or oil and gas, industry sources said.
($1 = 3.6728 UAE dirham)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I've just bought my second one euro house in Italy - this is how much it REALLY costs to own one
A man who has just bought his second house for €1 in Italy has revealed exactly how much it costs to own one. George Laing, 32, made headlines after he purchased his first €1 home in Mussomeli back in 2022. Since then, he has been working on renovating it and has so far managed to stick to a tight budget. The antiques trader purchased the bargain property through a government-backed scheme which was launched in 2017. It was created with the aim to help boost local economies and attract new residents to towns and villages with a declining population. Now, having just bought his second €1 home, George exclusively reveals to the Daily Mail exactly how much it costs to own one of the bargain properties, and his estimated costs to completely fix up both by hand. He explains that, while the €1 secures the freehold of the property, there are other costs that total to around £4,000. 'So in total, with all the €1 houses, you pay €1 for the freehold,' George says. 'You then have to pay an agency fee of about £500, you then have to pay the local notary to act as your sort of legal representative to transfer the deeds over from the owner to you, that costs about £2,800.' In addition, George shares there's agency fees of around 100 to 200 euros, as well as an energy certificate which costs around €200. George adds, 'Then you need to pay for the floor plans, which is another €80.' A lot of the €1 properties also don't have water connected, according to George. 'To get a new water meter €700 and then usually you need a new mains pipe into the the mains water, which is another €700. 'So all in all, I tell people a €1 house costs roughly £4,000.' George's first €1 property 'needed a complete, complete refurb,' including work on the electrics, plumbing, roof, bathroom and kitchen. He gutted out five vanloads of rubbish before the house was clear. 'It's a shell which is going to be turned into a self contained one-bedroom flat,' George adds. However his second property 'is in a slightly better condition'. He says: 'Both have issues with the roof and need a new roof, but it's a little bit smaller. 'But generally, the first one had a quite a few major cracks from an earthquake in 1968, the second one had no cracks at all, which is one of the reasons I snapped it up, because the condition was pretty good for being a €1 house.' Despite the range of renovations needed on both abodes, George has taught himself a lot of skills and plans to complete the work - mostly himself - within a tight budget. 'I'm getting pretty good at doing it pretty cheap,' George reveals. 'The first property I bought, my budget initially was £15,000 to renovate the entire property, but I've only spent £1,000 so far, and I'll do the entire property for under five grand.' The Brit has witnessed other €1 property buyers complete similar renovations for thousands of pounds more. View this post on Instagram A post shared by George Laing (@george_laing_) 'I know someone who's done the exact same job as me, and they spent 50 grand,' he adds. George says he has become skilled at making 'a pound go about £100'. He has received a little help along the way in the form of 'free stuff' and 'free materials'. 'A lot of people come here, they do one building, building jobs, and then they've got loads of materials and they just don't want them anymore, and they just give them away,' he shares. As for his newest house, which he purchased in July, George has an even lower price tag in mind. 'The second property, I'm budgeting about €10,000, but I'll likely end up doing it for half of that,' he explains. George brings down the price by doing a lot of the work himself, including roofing. He says: 'I'm doing the roof myself. I'll be replacing any beams that needs replacing. George brings down the price by doing a lot of the work himself, including roofing. He says: 'I'm doing the roof myself. I'll be replacing any beams that needs replacing' 'I was just on the roof a minute ago, replacing about 40 tiles on the first house I bought. 'You can pay five grand, six grand, for someone to replace a roof, but I just go to the local building merchant and I get a trader's discount on the tiles. 'It may not look perfect, but it will cost me a fraction of the price.' Once the transformations are complete, George plans to rent the houses out and purchase properties. Though George has had great success so far with his renovations, he admits it isn't always easy. He reveals one of his biggest challenges is funding the projects and travelling between the UK and Italy constantly. 'It's constantly a bit of a money pit,' he explains. 'I've got to travel back and forth because of Brexit. I can only stay in Italy 90 every 180 days. 'So I'm effectively only here every two weeks, every month, because I don't have a visa.' He adds: 'It's been very difficult saving any money, but I managed to do it just by working seven days a week. 'So there's been a bit of financial struggle, but we're getting on with it because the flights add up, you've got to pay for food. Everything sort of quickly adds up.' George has also struggled with language barriers at times, and has found it difficult to learn Italian. 'I speak absolutely no Italian, and I find learning Italian incredibly difficult,' he shares. 'I've got ADHD, so I find it very hard to focus on things sometimes and retaining certain information.' Instead, George has found himself relying on Google Translate to communicate with locals, butt admits it can be 'quite lonely at times'. Aside from the struggles, George feels his €1 venture has added more value to his life. 'It's bought so many opportunities and it's created so much more money for me, and my life has got so much better since leaving London and leaving the nine to five struggle,' he explains. George has big plans for his future endeavours, including buying another €1 house, opening an antiques shop, and completing a sponsored walk. 'By the end of this year, I will acquire another €1 house. So I'll have three €1 houses,' he says. 'In addition to that, I'm going to open up an antique shop in Mussomeli,' he adds, explaining he has acquired lots of items from house clearances that he has been selling. George goes on, 'Later this year, or maybe start of next year, I'm going to do a sponsored walk from London to Sicily. 'I'm going to try and crowdfund a couple of 100 grand, and I want to start buying some really big properties and start doing big projects, a lot bigger than ones I'm doing now.'
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Mark Zuckerberg's property empire unmasked. Here's everything we know, from where they are to how much he splurged on them
Meta mogul Mark Zuckerberg, the world's third richest man, boasts an enviable portfolio of properties across the U.S, from Silicon Valley, Hawaii, and one just minutes away from the White House in D.C. In Palo Alto, California, Zuckerberg has splurged over $110 million on properties since 2011 — and created a compound of 11 properties by purchasing adjoining houses. He purchased a $7 million home in Crescent Park and later took on four more for an estimated $43 million. Security is tight around the estate, which features a saltwater pool, a sunroom, multiple guest houses, and even a private school operating under disputed legality. Neighbors in the area, however, are rattled by the technogarchs' overwhelming presence and feel that the area has dramatically transformed since his takeover, according to The New York Times. In keeping with his fellow billionaire tech bros, Zuckerberg has also cozied up to Trump over the past few months, after being unveiled as the mystery buyer paying $23 million – in cash – for a tree-lined mansion nestled in the D.C. suburbs of Woodland Normanstone. One premium D.C. real estate broker told Politico that Zuckerberg's purchase in the nation's capital had everything to do with politics. 'It's the ultimate bow to the man in the White House [...] He notices who's there. It's an easy way to say, 'Hey, we're with ya. Here we are,'' Tom Daley said. A monopoly of homes in Palo Alto, California Zuckerberg's Silicon Valley purchases have recently caused a stir locally. Along two streets in Palo Alto, Edgewood Drive and Hamilton Avenue, the $270 billion mogul now owns 11 properties. Some of the houses lie dormant, while five others have been merged into a compound. Nine neighbors in the Crescent Park area spoke recently told The Times about their frustration with the Zuckerberg expansion. 'It's a mystery why the city has been so feckless,' said Michael Kieschnick – whose home on Hamilton Avenue is bound on three sides by property owned by Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg reportedly offered neighbors as much as triple the market value to buy them out, The Times reports. Just a 10-minute drive from Meta HQ in Menlo Park, Zuckerberg's homes are said to be kitted out with the latest AI-assisted modifications. The main Zuckerberg family estate comes with a saltwater pool, a decadent sun room, five bedrooms, and five bathrooms, according to Architectural Digest. Private security guards have been spotted lingering in cars, filming visitors, and even questioning passersby along the sidewalk, according to The Times. Aaron McLear, Zuckerberg and Chan's spokesman, recently told the Times that the couple fought hard to appease their neighbors. But credible threats to Meta, Mclear argues, require the homes to be heavily surveilled. 'Billionaires everywhere are used to just making their own rules — Zuckerberg and Chan are not unique, except that they're our neighbors,' Kieschnick added. The $23 million Washington, D.C., mansion Months earlier, Zuckerberg snapped up a $23 million mansion in the upscale Woodland Normanstone neighborhood of Washington, D.C. Zuckerberg's 15,000-square-foot home along 30th Street is nestled between embassies and luxury homes, and located just steps from Woodland-Normanstone Terrace Park and the U.S. Naval Observatory. Photos of the palatial home reveal big windows allowing for ample natural light, high ceilings, and warm features. Enveloped by trees, the modern home was designed 'to maintain the rhythm of the street and to respect the traditional Architecture found in the neighborhood,' according to architect Robert Gurney. Its new buyer was kept under wraps for months until a Politico spilled the beans. A Meta spokesperson confirmed that the home will 'allow Mark to spend more time [in D.C.] as Meta continues the work on policy issues related to American technology leadership.' The Hawaii megacomplex The most controversial jewel in Zuckerberg's property crown lies thousands of miles away in Hawaii. On the island of Kauai, he has spent over $100 million assembling a 1,400-acre mega-compound known as Ko'olau Ranch, according to WIRED. Beginning in 2014, the estate has expanded to include at least two mansions with 57,000 square feet of combined floor space, a 5,000-square-foot underground bunker, and over 30 bedrooms and bathrooms. Cloaked by 6-foot walls, the tech baron's sprawling tropical estate is shrouded in secrecy and designed to be self-sufficient in case of extreme emergencies. Yet, his Hawaiian venture has attracted fierce criticism from the local community. The island's 74,000 residents, many of whom are Native Hawaiian or descendants of plantation workers, have witnessed the building of his passion projects with mounting frustration. In June 2020, over a million people signed a petition accusing Zuckerberg of 'colonizing Kauai,' citing a series of lawsuits and land disputes. The secrecy surrounding the compound became more controversial following a string of tragic workplace incidents. In 2023, a 53-year-old crane operator was severely injured on site. Even more troubling was the death of 70-year-old security guard Rodney Medeiros in 2019, who collapsed after a 12-hour shift. His family filed legal claims, citing poor conditions and the restrictive non-disclosure agreements that kept his death tightly under wraps. The ordeal grew more complicated over time, as the family became frustrated by the omission of detail regarding their loved ones' death and the NDA's limits, according to Wired. A glittering Lake Tahoe retreat Zuckerberg also owns luxury estates on Lake Tahoe's west shore, acquired for $59 million in late 2018 and early 2019, according to San Francisco Gate. The properties, named Carousel and Brushwood, were purchased through NDAs and are located on pristine lakefront land. Both are used as vacation getaways for his family. From Silicon Valley to D.C., Kauai to Lake Tahoe, Zuckerberg's real estate acquisitions reflect not only his saturated wealth status but also a strategic and controversial power play when it boils down to seeking power and influence.
Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Telegraph
Spiralling building costs are wrecking Britain's prospects
It will provide the water for tens of thousands of homes, allow supply to catch up with a huge rise in the population, and it might even allow resource-hungry data centres to finally get built in the South East of England where they are most needed. There are lots of reasons to welcome the planned new Abingdon Reservoir in Oxfordshire. There is just one catch. The cost has tripled from the initial estimates, and will now come in at £7.5bn. In reality, from nuclear power stations, to rail lines, to runways, this is happening time and time again. Everything costs far more to build in Britain than it does in comparable countries. And until we work out how to fix that, there is no hope of the economy ever recovering. When, or rather if, it is finally opened in 2040, the Abingdon reservoir will be the first major new piece of water infrastructure the UK has built in more than 30 years. Even though we have added 11m people to the total population since 1995, and total output has almost doubled, at least in nominal terms, we have been squeezing every last drop of water out of a largely Victorian water system. The locals may not like it, but we desperately need some new reservoirs, and Abingdon is as good a place as any to start. The problem is the cost. From initial estimates of around £2bn, Thames Water said this week the bill was likely to rise to £7.5bn, and perhaps even more. We can add it to the list of escalating infrastructure costs. Last month, Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, in a rare example of a sensible decision, gave the go-ahead for the Sizewell C nuclear power station. Again, however, the price was shocking. It will come in at £38bn, almost double the £20bn that was estimated when it was first discussed five years ago. If anyone believes that will be the final figure, if I have a pre-loved windmill I would like to sell them. The estimated cost of a third runaway at Heathrow has risen from £14bn to close on £50bn; the cost of the HS2 rail link has already gone up to close on £100bn, and that is after we have halved its length; the cost of the Lower Thames Crossing connecting London and Kent has risen to £10bn, and work hasn't even started yet. The list goes on and on. It makes no difference whether a project is large or small. In my corner of south-west London, Hammersmith Bridge has been closed for years, clogging up traffic for miles, but now that the cost of fixing it has doubled to £250m, the money is not available to start work. Our rivals are far better at keeping costs under control. France is not a cheap country to do business in, but nuclear plants cost less than £10bn each. According to Britain Remade, nuclear power plants cost an estimated £9.4bn per megawatt in the UK compared with £4.4bn in France and £2.2bn in South Korea. Reservoirs are hard to compare precisely because the size and the value of the land varies so much. But the huge new Bassin d'Austerlitz built to clean up the Seine for the Paris Olympics cost only €1.4bn (£1.2bn), far less than Abingdon. As for high-speed rail lines, everyone else builds them for a fraction of the cost in the UK. The trouble is, the soaring cost of building anything is turning into a catastrophe for the economy. There are three big problems. First, hardly any new infrastructure projects get started because the costs are so horrendous. Thames Water was already in dire financial trouble, and adding billions to the cost of new reservoirs is not going to help fix that. Meanwhile, the Government is already so deeply in debt and so strapped for cash, it can't afford to fund them either. Next, the huge bills and the endless escalation of prices deter investors. After all, why bother with infrastructure investments in the UK when you can build the same kit somewhere else for half the price, and earn far better profits? Finally, it means the prices that have to be charged soar out of control. Energy from Sizewell C will cost a lot more than it would have done if it had been built more efficiently. Presumably, anyone planning to travel on HS2, if it ever gets finished, will have to take out a second mortgage to pay for the cost of the ticket to Birmingham. Expensive infrastructure pushes up the price of everything else. The Labour Government was meant to be cutting the costs of building projects. But so far it has failed dismally. We can see that from the way estimates for projects such as Abingdon and Sizewell C keep going up when they should be coming down. We could fix the crisis if the political will were there. Like how? The UK needs to streamline its planning rules so that a single minister could give the green light for a project, without local consultation, without endless reports, and most of all, without any right to judicial review. Likewise, we need to scrap the environmental rules that prioritise wildlife over people and the economy. And we need to train more engineers and skilled construction workers so the labour is available once a project is approved and the finance has been secured. The cost of building anything in Britain is an issue that has been growing for years, but it is now reaching crisis proportions. In the 19th century, Britain was a world leader in creating infrastructure. Until we can build again, at reasonable cost, there is no hope of the economy recovering – and eventually the water, and the power, will just run out.
