Trump Seeks To Change How Census Collects Data And Wants To Exclude Immigrants In US Illegally
The census' data collections will be based on 'modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024,' the Republican president said on his social media platform, an indication he might try to inject his politics into a head count that determines political power and how federal funding is distributed.
Trump stressed that as part of the changes people in 'our Country illegally' will be excluded from census counts.
Experts said it was unclear what exactly Trump was calling for, whether it was changes to the 2030 census or a mid-decade census, and, if so, whether it would be used for a mid-decade apportionment, which is the process of divvying up congressional seats among the states based on the population count.
Any changes in the conduct of a national census, which is the biggest non-military undertaking by the federal government, would require alterations to the Census Act and approval from Congress, which has oversight responsibilities, and there likely would be a fierce fight. While the Census Act permits a mid-decade census for distributing federal funding, it can't be used for apportionment and must be done in a year ending in 5, said Terri Ann Lowenthal, a former congressional staffer who consults on census issues.
'He cannot unilaterally order a new census. The census is governed by law, not to mention the Constitution,' Lowenthal said. 'Logistically, it's a half-baked idea.'
It would be almost logistically impossible to carry out a mid-decade census in such a short period of time, New York Law School professor Jeffrey Wice said.
'This isn't something that you can do overnight,' said Wice, a census and redistricting expert. 'To get all the pieces put together, it would be such a tremendous challenge, if not impossible.'
Trump's Truth Social post fits into an overall pattern in which he has tried to reshape basic measures of how U.S. society is faring to his liking, a process that ranges from monthly jobs figures to how congressional districts are drawn going into the 2026 midterm elections. But there could be legal challenges if he were to reshape the census, which also guides the distribution of $2.8 trillion in federal funds to the states for roads, health care and other programs.
In a 2019 decision, the Supreme Court effectively blocked Trump from adding a citizenship question to the 2020 census. The 14th Amendment says that 'the whole number of persons in each state' should be counted for the numbers used for apportionment, the process of allocating congressional seats and Electoral College votes among the states based on population.
The last time the census included a question about citizenship was in 1950, and the Census Bureau's own experts had predicted that millions of Hispanics and immigrants would go uncounted if the census asked everyone if he or she is an American citizen.
Changes to the census could also play into the efforts by Trump to urge several Republican-led states, including Texas, to redraw their congressional maps ahead of schedule in ways that would favor GOP candidates.
Redistricting typically occurs once every 10 years following the census, as states adjust district boundaries based on population changes, often gaining or losing seats in the process.
Despite Texas having redrawn its maps just a few years ago, Trump is pressuring Republicans in the state to redistrict again, claiming they are 'entitled' to five additional Republican seats. Texas Republicans have cited population growth as justification for redrawing the congressional map. The state currently has 38 House seats, 25 held by Republicans.
Trump's team is also engaged in similar redistricting discussions in other GOP-controlled states, including Missouri and Indiana.
Last Friday, Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Erika McEntarfer, after standard revisions to the monthly jobs report showed that employers added 258,000 fewer jobs than previously reported in May and June. The revisions suggested that hiring has severely weakened under Trump, undermining his claims of an economic boom.
The White House insists that the problem was the size of the revisions and that it wants accurate numbers.
After the citizenship question was stopped by the Supreme Court in 2019, Trump made another effort in 2020, announcing a plan to exclude people living in the country illegally from the apportionment figures.
After states, cities and organizations sued, lower courts ruled the plan was illegal. By the time the Supreme Court weighed in, Trump had lost his reelection bid. The justices sidestepped a decision on the legality of Trump's plan, throwing out the case on technical procedural grounds. The court said in an unsigned opinion that spoke only for the six-justice conservative majority that 'we express no view on the merits of the constitutional and related statutory claims presented. We hold only that they are not suitable for adjudication at this time.'
The three liberal justices dissented, saying the effort to exclude people in the country from the population for divvying up House seats is unlawful.
'I believe this Court should say so,' Justice Stephen Breyer wrote, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor.
___
AP writer Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report. Schneider reported from Orlando, Fla.
Related...
U.S. Census Changes Race Categories To Include Middle Eastern, North African Options
GOP Rep. Mocks Party's Hypocrisy Over Texas Gerrymandering Chaos
Obama Slams Texas GOP's Gerrymandering Plot As 'Power Grab'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Everyone Is Laughing At JD Vance's Response To His Character In The New "South Park" Episode
Remember when the White House had a complete meltdown over South Park airing an episode about Donald Trump getting into bed with Satan and unveiling a micropenis? Well, the show aired its second episode of Season 27 last night, along with JD Vance's character debut. Related: JD is depicted as Trump's brown-nosing lackey who the president calls "stupid"... ...and literally kicks around. At one point, when Trump bursts into Satan's bedroom and immediately takes off his pants, JD appears with a bottle, asking, "Would you like me to apply the baby oil to Satan's asshole, boss?" Now, the real JD Vance has responded (and he's opting for a different approach in his public statement than the White House). Related: "Well, I've finally made it," the 41-year-old shared on X alongside an image from the episode. His post has been viewed by over 14.7 million a lot of them aren't buying his attempt to brush it off. Related: "This is JD pretending he's cool with it," one person wrote. Someone questioned why JD chose the image of him and Trump standing next to each other, instead of the one inside Satan's room. Another mocked him for "making it." A TON of people left comments saying something like, "we're not laughing with you. We're laughing AT YOU." Related: Or they suggested he may just not understand that the depiction is no laughing matter. Regardless, commenters insisted, "The likeness [of the character and JD] is exquisite." What are your thoughts on JD's response? Let us know in the comments. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration will end $7 billion solar energy grant program
(Reuters) -The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will end a $7 billion Biden-era grant program to expand solar energy to low-income communities, Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a post on X on Thursday. "EPA no longer has the authority to administer the program or the appropriated funds to keep this boondoggle alive," Zeldin said in a video post. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act signed into law by President Donald Trump last month eliminated the program's source of funding, Zeldin added. Cancellation of the Solar for All program had been widely expected. The grants were awarded in 2024 during the administration of former President Joe Biden to 60 nonprofit groups, tribes and states.


USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
ICE drops age limit to boost recruitment. Charts show how agency is growing under Trump
You can be as young as 18, older than 40 if you pass the physical fitness test, and you'll get a signing bonus of $50,000 to join the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, which has revised its hiring standards to boost deportations. The ICE budget rose to $75 billion over four years after President Donald Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act into law on July 4. Those funds came from the $170 billion allocated to the Department of Homeland Security for immigration and border enforcement. ICE is using some of that money to hire 10,000 recruits, for a total staff of about 30,000. The move comes as the administration seeks to fulfill a goal to deport 1 million immigrants every year. Can't see our graphics? Click here to reload the page. The federal spending plan will help make ICE the single-largest law enforcement agency in the country, larger than the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and other agencies combined, USA TODAY reported. For comparison, the FBI has only about 13,700 special agents, according to the Department of Justice. DHS Secretary Kristi Noem now says anyone over 18 can apply to work for ICE, as the Trump administration ramps up immigration enforcement across the country, according to USA TODAY. Noem told Fox News on Aug. 6 that the DHS had already received 80,000 applications. How Biden's ICE budget compares with Trump's President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act allocates $75 billion to ICE over the next four years, equaling about $18.75 billion per year. Combining the $75 billion with fiscal year 2025's budget means that Trump will spend $84.7 billion on ICE through 2029. That's over double the amount Biden spent during his term ‒ $35.9 billion from 2021-2024. What are ICE's physical fitness requirements? Even with the removal of the age limits, applications still need to pass a fitness test consisting of four timed events. Recruits – including seniors – must complete the following events: ◾ Sit-ups: 32 in one minute or less. ◾ Push-ups: 22 in one minute or less. ◾Sprint: 220 yards in 47.73 seconds or less. ◾Run: 1.5 miles in 14 minutes, 25 seconds or less. Some local sheriffs aren't happy with ICE's latest recruiting efforts, USA TODAY reported. They worry that deputies in already understaffed offices will be lured away by the big bonuses and higher pay. "It is tone-deaf and reflects a total lack of judgment and character on their part," Jonathan Thompson, executive director and CEO of the National Sheriff's Association, said of a recruiting offer emailed to local deputies nationwide. CONTRIBUTING Lauren Villagran, Trevor Hughes, Shawn J. Sullivan SOURCE USA TODAY Network reporting and research; Reuters;