logo
Rhoden's inaugural speech: SD is ‘open for opportunity'

Rhoden's inaugural speech: SD is ‘open for opportunity'

Yahoo09-02-2025
South Dakota Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden delivers his inaugural address Feb. 8, 2025, at the Capitol in Pierre. (Courtesy of the Governor's Office)
South Dakota Republican Gov. Larry Rhoden delivered his inaugural address Saturday at the Capitol in Pierre.
Rhoden, formerly lieutenant governor, took over as governor last month after then-Gov. Kristi Noem departed to become secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Following is the video and prepared text of Rhoden's speech.
Video footage of the inauguration of Gov. Larry Rhoden. (Courtesy of South Dakota Public Broadcasting)
Mr. Chief Justice, honorable members of the Supreme Court, Lt. Governor Venhuizen, senators, legislators, constitutional officers, family, friends, and my fellow South Dakotans:
Good afternoon! Before I begin, I want to thank our people for this honor. Our state is great because 'Under God, the People Rule.' It is truly an honor to serve our people as Governor. And as a former Guardsman who served for six years, it is a great honor to serve as Commander-in-Chief of the South Dakota National Guard.
South Dakota has given so much to me and my family. I'm a fifth-generation South Dakotan on my mom's side and a fourth-generation South Dakotan on my dad's. My roots are in South Dakota – and I'm never leaving.
About a week ago, I was at Longhorn Steakhouse out in Rapid City. An older rancher walked up to my table and asked, 'you Larry Rhoden?' I said, 'Yes I am.' He said, 'Well, it's good to meet you. You built me a couple sets of branding irons a few years back, and they work great!' I can think of very few things that he could have said that would have made me feel better.
The truth is, we are all called to serve one another. Everything that we do for each other should be done to the best of our ability. If we work hard and put others first, things tend to work out. If we do a great job, it will stick with people. But we don't do these jobs to be remembered. We do them because it's right. Public service requires someone to step up and do the right thing on behalf of the people.
100 years ago, another governor gave his inaugural address to the South Dakota Legislature. Carl Gunderson had grown up a farmer. Before he became Governor, he served five terms in the South Dakota Senate, then as Lieutenant Governor for four years. Does that sound familiar to any of you? When he delivered his inaugural address, he spoke of many things that might be familiar to us. He talked about the ups and downs of agriculture; how property taxes are too high; how we need to find ways to make government more efficient. Some of the specifics are different today, but the basic needs facing our state are very much the same. I want to read you one paragraph from the end of his speech:
'The solution of South Dakota's problems will not come through legislation. The tendency toward state and federal supervision, inspection, and regulation has resulted in a lessening of the spirit of self-reliance. We look to government for too much aid. We need a revival of the spirit of the 'covered wagon.' The spirit that traveled by covered wagon in the early sixties across the prairies of Iowa to the Dakotas; the spirit that made its home temporarily in the 'dugout,' the 'sod shanty,' and the log cabin along the streams. It was the spirit that came more to give, than to receive; the spirit that served humanity and the future of a great state.'
My goodness, those words still ring true today. That same spirit of the 'covered wagon' brought my own family west to South Dakota more than 100 years ago. Through the generations, my family passed down that same spirit that 'came more to give, than to receive.' Service runs strong in our veins. And it runs every bit as strong in the veins of my own children.
Governor Gunderson's statue sits out in front of the Governor's Residence. He's sitting on a hay bale fixing a wagon wheel. He was a down-to-earth South Dakota man. And when his time serving as Governor was finished, he went back to farming.
Many of you probably didn't know who Carl Gunderson was. And 100 years from now, folks might not remember who Larry Rhoden is. If we remember that, making the best decisions for our people suddenly becomes a lot easier.
I promise to be a Governor who remembers that the solution to our problems will not come through legislation. Rather, it will come from providing our people the opportunity to do right for their families. I promise to set a tone of civility and respect, and the example will start from the top. I pledge to govern with openness and responsiveness.
My focus will always be to keep South Dakota strong, safe, and free. I want to keep South Dakota strong – strong families, strong businesses, and strong institutions. I want to keep South Dakota safe – with low crime and respect for law enforcement. And I want to keep South Dakota free – freedom will continue to be our calling card as long as I am governor.
I will extend a renewed hand to everyone in our state: East River and West River; small towns and big cities; and yes, our tribal communities. I will be available to discuss the challenges that you face and how we can turn them into opportunities.
I believe that the distinction between challenges and opportunities is largely one of perspective. A challenge is many times an opportunity not yet recognized or realized. Whenever I have a task in front of me, I try not to look at it as an obstacle to be overcome. Rather, if I look at it as an opportunity to achieve something, the task at hand becomes a lot easier.
I want that same mindset to be the foundation of everything that we do during my administration. Five years ago, Governor Kristi Noem declared South Dakota 'Open for Business.' That bold stand was put to the ultimate test during COVID. We overcame that challenge and turned it into South Dakota's greatest opportunity. Now, I want to apply that same approach to all of our work.
I want to keep South Dakota 'Open for Business.' But more than that, I want our state to be 'Open for Opportunity.' That means opportunity for families to do what is best for their kids; opportunity for our communities to respond to whatever unique situations they're facing; opportunity for kids graduating high school to go into whatever college or career field is right for them; opportunity for farmers to be able to keep earning a strong living so that they can pass that farm down to their kids; opportunity for every hard working South Dakotan to seek out better and higher paying jobs; opportunity for our businesses to keep growing at a tremendous rate.
When we protect opportunity in South Dakota, we pave the way for better jobs for my children and grandchildren – and yours. We create new educational opportunities that don't pit this group against that group, but instead allow every child to succeed. We don't build new prisons just to lock more people up; instead, we use those facilities as an opportunity to get people back on their feet and contributing to our society.
Opportunity is not limited by my vision, or even the vision of anyone in this Rotunda today. It is as broad as the South Dakota prairie and as high as Black Elk Peak. If we all link arms and pledge to chase down opportunities together, our state will be in pretty good shape. And if years from now, someone remembers the work that we did together, then that's just a bonus.
I want to thank my family for giving me this opportunity to serve. I especially want to thank my wife, Sandy. She has been my most loyal supporter and chief confidant for almost 44 years. I would not be here today without her love and support. I want to thank the Good Lord for putting me in the position to serve as your Governor. And I want to thank the people of South Dakota. Thank you for trusting me with this honor. And thank you for celebrating with me and my family.
Thank you. May God bless you all. And may God continue to bless the great state of South Dakota.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Illinois judge rejects Texas' request to enforce arrest warrants in map row
Illinois judge rejects Texas' request to enforce arrest warrants in map row

UPI

timean hour ago

  • UPI

Illinois judge rejects Texas' request to enforce arrest warrants in map row

A judge in Illinois on Wednesday denied Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's request to enforce civil arrest warrants for Democrats who fled the Lone Star State. Pool File Photo by Justin Lane/UPI | License Photo Aug. 14 (UPI) -- A federal judge in Illinois has rejected Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton's request to enforce arrest warrants for Democrats who fled the Lone Star State earlier this month to block Republican redistricting plans. Paxton has filed a slew of lawsuits in the nearly two weeks since state Democrats left Texas early this month to deny Republicans quorum to pass controversial redistricting maps that will give the GOP five extra seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. The Democrats went to Democratic strongholds, including Illinois, and Texas state House Speaker Dustin Burrows issued civil arrest warrants to force their return to Texas. On Aug. 7, Paxton and Burrows filed a lawsuit seeking Illinois to enforce the return of the Democratic lawmakers. In his ruling Wednesday, Illinois Judge Scott Larson rejected the Texans' request, stating it is outside his court's jurisdiction to compel the Democrats' return. "This Illinois circuit court, under a petition to show cause, does not have the inherent power to direct Illinois law enforcement officers, or to allow the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Representatives of the State of Texas, or any officers appointed by her, to execute Texas civil Quorum Warrants upon nonresidents temporarily located in the State of Illinois," Larson said in his ruling, which was obtained by Democracy Docket and a portion of which was published on BluSky. The warrants issued by the Texas House of Representatives are "geographically limited," Larson said. Paxton and Burrows have yet to comment on the ruling, which marks a blow in their efforts to compel Democrats to return to the state. Congressional redistricting generally occurs every decade following the publication of U.S. Census Bureau data. Texas has taken the unusual step to redraw its maps at the urging of President Donald Trump ahead of midterm elections next year The maps are expected to produce an additional five GOP districts in the U.S. House of Representatives where the Republicans hold a narrow 219 to 212 majority. Critics and Democrats accuse the Republicans of conducting a power grab in an attempt to rig control over the ongressional branch, and have backed their Texas colleagues who have left their home state to prevent the passing of the maps during the special session. Democrats in other states have also come to their support, and California Gov. Gavin Newsom has vowed to respond by redistricting his state to produce an additional five Democratic seats to neutralize those GOP seats being created in Texas.

GOP lawmakers, including Sen. Mike Lee, renew threats to take over D.C. after DOGE staffer assault
GOP lawmakers, including Sen. Mike Lee, renew threats to take over D.C. after DOGE staffer assault

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

GOP lawmakers, including Sen. Mike Lee, renew threats to take over D.C. after DOGE staffer assault

Republican lawmakers are pushing President Donald Trump to take control of Washington, D.C., reiterating previous threats to federalize the nation's capital after a prominent ex-member of the Department of Government Efficiency was assaulted by teenagers over the weekend. Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, posted to social media several times Tuesday evening pressing for the passage of his BOWSER Act, a bill to repeal local control over Washington, D.C., and place it under federal jurisdiction. The bill, named after Mayor Muriel Bowser, would overturn what is known as the D.C. Home Rule Act, which allows the city to operate as a self-governing entity. 'This attack on a young man who came to Washington to help fix America's government is simply the latest outrage in a series assaults and murders that have made our nation's capital a national embarrassment,' Lee told the Deseret News in a statement. 'We should pass my BOWSER Act, which revokes DC Home Rule, as well as bills preventing the DC Council from avoiding accountability through secret meetings. I will be working with my GOP colleagues and President Trump on every avenue possible to restore a safe, clean Washington Americans can be proud of.' Rep. Andy Ogles, R-Tenn., who leads the BOWSER Act in the House, similarly pushed for the bill's passage, telling the Deseret News he texted Trump on Tuesday evening about the legislation. Ogles said he also contacted House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to remind him of his legislation, noting a vote on the matter 'needs to happen.' Trump in recent days has already reupped his threats to seize control of the district, citing the most recent attack of a government worker as evidence the city is 'totally out of control.' The recent threats come after Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old famously known as 'Big Balls' online who became one of the most high-profile DOGE staffers earlier this year, was attacked by a group of 10 juveniles over the weekend, according to a D.C. police report obtained by the Deseret News. Coristine was attacked during an attempted carjacking after he pushed his significant other into the car to protect her from the group. Police officers who observed the attack attempted to chase the juveniles and managed to arrest two 15-year-old suspects, both of whom reside in Maryland, according to police. Trump posted about the attack on Tuesday, sharing a photo that showed a bloodied Corstine lying in the street, seemingly after the attack. The president decried the incident and called for a change in city law to charge minors as adults in cases of assault. Trump claimed the teenagers are unafraid of law enforcement because 'they know nothing ever happens to them.' 'The Law in D.C. must be changed to prosecute these 'minors' as adults, and lock them up for a long time, starting at age 14,' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social. 'If D.C. doesn't get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they're not going to get away with it anymore.' The latest threats highlight an ongoing challenge for D.C. officials, who have been working for months to crack down on rising rates of youth crime. Since the beginning of 2025, juveniles have made up more than 50% of arrests related to carjacking, according to D.C. police. A majority of those arrests are made up of teens who are 15 and 16 years old. Bowser has acknowledged the recent trends, even going so far as to create a special police unit in April tasked with responding to juvenile crime. It's not clear whether GOP leaders in Congress will prioritize efforts to pass legislation cracking down on D.C. autonomy. The Deseret News contacted the offices of both Speaker Johnson and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., for comment.

Federal judge refuses to block Alabama law banning DEI initiatives in public schools

time2 hours ago

Federal judge refuses to block Alabama law banning DEI initiatives in public schools

A federal judge on Wednesday declined a request to block an Alabama law that bans diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives in public schools and the teaching of what Republican lawmakers dubbed 'divisive concepts' related to race and gender. U.S. District Judge David Proctor wrote that University of Alabama students and professors who filed a lawsuit challenging the law as unconstitutional did not meet the legal burden required for a preliminary injunction, which he called 'an extraordinary and drastic remedy.' The civil lawsuit challenging the statute will go forward, but the law will remain in place while it does. The Alabama measure, which took effect Oct. 1, is part of a wave of proposals from Republican lawmakers across the country taking aim at DEI programs on college campuses. The Alabama law prohibits public schools from funding or sponsoring any DEI program. It also prohibits schools from requiring students to assent to eight 'divisive concepts' including that fault, blame or bias should be assigned to a race or sex or that any person should acknowledge a sense of guilt, complicity or a need to apologize because of their race, sex or national origin. Six professors and students at the University of Alabama filed a lawsuit arguing that the law violates the First Amendment by placing viewpoint-based restrictions on what educators teach. The lawsuit also said the law unconstitutionally targets Black students because it limits programs that benefit them. Professors said they had altered what they taught in their classes in the wake of the law and the university's guidance about it. A professor said he reduced coverage of the Black Power movement, the Black Lives Matter movement and the white nationalist movement in the wake of the law. Another said five students had made complaints suggesting that the interdisciplinary honors program she administered had potential conflicts with the new legislation. The university also shuttered designated spaces for the Black Student Union and a resource center for LGBTQ+ students in the wake of the law. Proctor wrote that a professor's academic freedom does not override a university's decisions about the content of classroom instruction. 'Importantly, SB 129 does not banish all teaching or discussion of these concepts from campus or, for that matter, even from the classroom," Proctor wrote. 'To the contrary, it expressly permits classroom instruction that includes 'discussion' of the listed concepts so long as the 'instruction is given in an objective manner without endorsement' of the concepts.' He added that the law appears to give notice about what is a violation. For example, he said a professor could not 'indoctrinate' students to believe that racial health disparities were the fault of one race of people but could still discuss the role of racism in health disparities. 'If, alternatively, the theory she teaches about is that there is empirical evidence that racism may be a cause for health disparities, or if she frames such teaching as merely a theory, she would not violate SB 129,' Proctor wrote. Will Creeley, legal director of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a nonpartisan First Amendment group, criticized the decision as dangerous and at odds with decades of Supreme Court precedent on academic freedom. 'Academic freedom protects the search for knowledge and truth from political pressure. That's the whole point," Creeley wrote in a statement. 'Faculty are hired to share and hone their expertise in a given field of study, not to read from a government script.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store