logo
Spanish holiday destination under investigation after eight people struck down by food poisoning

Spanish holiday destination under investigation after eight people struck down by food poisoning

Daily Record29-07-2025
The Canary Islands have issued an alert saying eight people have been struck down by food poisoning in the popular Spanish holiday destination
A beloved holiday hotspot for British travellers has been struck by a severe health scare, prompting authorities to issue an urgent warning.

The Canary Islands have raised the alarm after eight individuals were affected by the outbreak.

Officials from the Canary Islands Government's Department of Health have released a statement confirming that both the La Palma Health Area Directorate and the Canary Islands Health Service (SCS) Directorate-General for Public Health are "investigating a case of food poisoning on the island that has so far affected eight people".

The food-related illness, triggered by eating fish bought from unofficial suppliers outside regular distribution networks, has impacted eight individuals, with one person requiring hospital treatment at the University Hospital of La Palma.
Public health chiefs have launched their emergency procedures, begun the necessary epidemiological investigation, and are maintaining surveillance for any additional cases that might emerge, reports the Liverpool Echo.
Both the La Palma Health Area Directorate and the Canary Islands Health Service (SCS) Directorate General of Public Health, operating under the Department of Health, are conducting the inquiry.

The initial cases of this food-borne disease were identified on Tuesday July 22, just two hours following consumption of the tainted product.
Those affected received medical attention at the Emergency Service of the Los Llanos de Aridane Health Centre, where staff immediately implemented food poisoning protocols upon suspicion of contamination.
Tests conducted identified histamine contamination as the likely cause of the poisoning.

Common symptoms of this type of poisoning include a burning or itching sensation in the tongue and throat, a peppery taste in the mouth, facial and neck redness and swelling, hot flushes, hives on the palms, face, head and ears, headaches and dizziness, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea.
Officials have urged holidaymakers to verify the source of fish before consuming it.
The Canary Islands are a part of Spain.

In 2023, Spain reported 35 outbreaks of histamine poisoning affecting 275 individuals, with one major incident involving 154 patients.
Typically, symptoms appear within an hour of consumption.
Histamine production is often linked to improper food handling, particularly incorrect storage temperatures.
Once formed, histamine cannot be eradicated by standard cooking or freezing temperatures.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why walking further and faster could cut your risk of heart attack and stroke
Why walking further and faster could cut your risk of heart attack and stroke

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Why walking further and faster could cut your risk of heart attack and stroke

Walking further and faster could reduce the risk of heart attacks by almost a fifth – even if you don't reach the recommended target of 10,000 steps a day, a study has found. Analysis of more than 36,000 people with high blood pressure revealed walking more reduces the risk of major problems in the heart and blood vessels. The study published in the European Journal of Preventative Cardiology found that compared to a daily step count of 2,300 steps, every extra 1,000 steps was linked to a 17 per cent reduction in the risk of cardiovascular problems. This was the case up to a step count of 10,000 – walking more than this was associated with a lower risk of stroke. It's estimated that just over a quarter adults in the UK, around 14.4 million people, have high blood pressure, according to the British Heart Foundation. It increases the risk of heart disease, heart attacks, strokes and heart failure, according to the NHS. However, study authors say until now it has been unclear how much people with high blood pressure need to increase their physical activity to see a reduction in these risks. Professor Emmanuel Stamatakis, at the University of Sydney, Australia, who supervised the study, said: 'We found that, if you live with high blood pressure, the more you walk with greater intensity, the lower your risk for future serious cardiovascular events. 'These findings support the message that any amount of physical activity is beneficial, even below the widely recommended daily target of 10,000 steps.' Researchers analysed data from 32,192 people with high blood pressure who were part of the UK Biobank study – a cohort study of 500,000 people that collected data on diet, lifestyle, biomarkers, and health. As part of the study these participants agreed to wear an accelerometer on their wrist for seven consecutive days to measure how far and how fast they walked. The participants were followed up for eight years and during this time there were 1,935 cases of heart problems of stroke. After analysing this data researchers discovered for every 1,000 steps a day there was a 17 per cent reduction in overall risk, 22 per cent reduction in heart failure, 9 per cent reduction in risk of heart attack, and 24 per cent reduction in risk of stroke. Researchers also tracked how fast participants walked a day and recorded their fastest 30 minutes at an average of 80 steps a minute which was associated with a 30 per cent reduced risk of heart problems. However, it's not just people with high blood pressure that could benefit. Researchers also found similar results when they looked at 37,350 people without high blood pressure. Every 1,000-step increase in daily step count led to an average lower risk of overall heart problems (20.2 per cent), heart failure (23.2 per cent), myocardial infarctions (17.9 per cent) and stroke (24.6 per cent). Professor Stamatakis said: 'Clinicians should promote physical activity as standard care, especially in patients with high blood pressure. Our results can inform new, tailored public health recommendations for these patients.'

FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence
FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

FACT FOCUS: RFK Jr.'s reasons for cutting mRNA vaccine not supported by evidence

Although mRNA vaccines saved millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. incorrectly argued they are ineffective to justify the Department of Health and Human Service's recent decision to cancel $500 million in government-funded research projects to develop new vaccines using the technology. The longtime vaccine critic said in an X video posted Tuesday evening that mRNA vaccines do not adequately prevent upper respiratory infections such as COVID-19 and the flu, advocating instead for the development vaccines that use other processes. COVID-19 is the only virus for which real-world data on mRNA vaccine effectiveness is currently available, as mRNA vaccines for other diseases, including the flu, are still under development. The two scientists whose discoveries enabled the creation of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 won a Nobel Prize in 2023 for their work. Kennedy's claim ignores how mRNA vaccines work, according to experts. They prevent against severe infection and death, but cannot completely prevent an infection from occurring in the first place. Plus, years of research supports the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines that use mRNA technology. Here's a closer look at the facts. KENNEDY: 'As the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract.' THE FACTS: His claim is contradicted by scientific evidence. Countless studies show that vaccinated individuals fare far better against COVID-19 infections than those who are unvaccinated, while others have estimated that COVID-19 vaccines prevented millions of deaths during the global pandemic. The mRNA vaccines do not prevent respiratory diseases entirely, experts say. Rather, they can prevent more serious illness that leads to complications and death. For example, an mRNA vaccine against COVID-19 may prevent an infection in the upper respiratory tract that feels like a bad cold from spreading to the lower respiratory tract, where it could affect one's ability to breathe. 'A vaccine cannot block a respiratory infection,' said Dr. Jake Scott, an infectious diseases physician and clinical associate professor at Stanford University School of Medicine. 'That's never been the standard for a respiratory virus vaccine. And it's never been the expectation, and it's never been that realistic.' He called Kennedy's claim 'misguided.' Jeff Coller, a professor of RNA biology and therapeutics at Johns Hopkins University, had a similar outlook. ' Vaccinations don't have to be neutralizing, meaning that you're not going to get COVID,' he said. 'But the important part of a vaccination is that they reduce hospitalization and death. And a reduction in hospitalization and death is proof of an effective vaccine.' Vaccines have traditionally required growing viruses or pieces of viruses called proteins and then purifying them. Then a small dose of the vaccine is injected to train the body how to recognize when a real infection hits so it's ready to fight back. But this method takes a long time. The mRNA technology speeds up the process and allows existing vaccines to be updated more quickly. The 'm' in mRNA stands for messenger because the vaccine carries instructions for our bodies to make proteins. Scientists figured out how to harness that natural process for vaccines by making mRNA in a lab. They take a snippet of the genetic code that carries instructions for making the protein they want the vaccine to target. Injecting that snippet instructs the body to become its own mini-vaccine factory, making enough copies of the protein for the immune system to recognize and react. Scott explained that mRNA vaccines are not a 'magic force field' that the immune system can use to block an infection, as it can't detect whether a virus is nearby. It can only respond to a virus that has already entered the body. In the case of COVID-19, this means that the virus could cause an upper respiratory tract infection — a cold, essentially — but would be significantly less likely to cause more severe consequences elsewhere. Myriad studies on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines have been published since they first became available in late 2020. Although protection does wane over time, they provide the strongest barrier against severe infection and death. For example, a 2024 study by the World Health Organization found COVID-19 vaccines reduced deaths in the WHO's European region by at least 57%, saving more than 1.4 million lives since their introduction in December 2020. A 2022 study published in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases found that nearly 20 million lives were saved by COVID-19 vaccines during their first year. Researchers used data from 185 countries to estimate that vaccines prevented 4.2 million COVID-19 deaths in India, 1.9 million in the United States, 1 million in Brazil, 631,000 in France and 507,000 in the United Kingdom. The main finding — that 19.8 million COVID-19 deaths were prevented — is based on estimates of how many more deaths than usual occurred during the time period. Using only reported COVID-19 deaths, the same model yielded 14.4 million deaths averted by vaccines. Another 2022 study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine, reported that two mRNA vaccines were more than 90% effective against COVID-19. Operation Warp Speed, the federal effort to facilitate the development and distribution of a COVID-19 vaccine, began under the first Trump administration. 'What I don't understand is why is President Trump is allowing RFK Jr. to undermine his legacy that led to a medical intervention that literally saved millions of lives?' Coller said. 'Why is Trump allowing RFK to undermine U.S. leadership in biomedical research and drug development?' ___

Potatoes ‘increase your risk of type 2 diabetes by 20%' – but it all depends how you cook them
Potatoes ‘increase your risk of type 2 diabetes by 20%' – but it all depends how you cook them

Scottish Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Potatoes ‘increase your risk of type 2 diabetes by 20%' – but it all depends how you cook them

Spuds feature in two of Brits' three favourite meals FOOD FOR THOUGHT Potatoes 'increase your risk of type 2 diabetes by 20%' – but it all depends how you cook them Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) POTATOES are a British kitchen staple but cooking them a certain way might raise your risk of diabetes, a study has warned. Researchers at Harvard University in the US said 'not all carbs are created equal' and the way you prepare food is key. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Potatoes might be linked to type 2 diabetes (stock image) Credit: Alamy Their study of more than 200,000 people found those who ate three or more servings of French fries per week were 20 per cent more likely to have type 2 diabetes. The condition affects four million Brits and is linked to excess weight and sugary diets. Results showed that boiling potatoes, mashing them or having jacket potatoes was not linked to the same risk. But diabetes was even less likely in people who ate more grains, such as pasta and bread, than spuds. Read more on healthy eating FOOD FOR THOUGHT Fizzy pop, ice cream & instant noodles could up risk of LUNG cancer by 41% Spuds are one of UK's favourite foods YouGov polling shows chips are Brits' second favourite food, behind only roast chicken, and fish and chips ranks third. Luckily mashed potato – not linked to diabetes in the study – ranks sixth. Harvard study author Professor Walter Willett said: 'Not all carbs – or even all potatoes – are created equal. 'The distinction is crucial when it comes to shaping effective dietary guidelines. 'The public health message here is simply that small changes in our daily diet can have an important impact on risk of type 2 diabetes. 'Limiting potatoes, and especially limiting French fries, and choosing healthy, whole grain sources of carbohydrate could help lower the risk.' Diabetes symptoms and the signs of all types of diabetes The NHS says people can reduce their chances of type 2 diabetes by staying slim, eating healthily and doing regular exercise. Separate research by the University of Cambridge has found that basic healthy eating can reduce the risk of diabetes across all groups of people. The analysis included 826,000 people across 33 studies on three different diets. They included the Mediterranean, the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) and Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (Dash) diets. Researchers suggest the eating habits, all of which place a focus on consuming more fruits, vegetables and whole grains, 'can be promoted across all populations'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store