Remarks against Col Sofiya Qureshi: SC raps MP minister over public apology
A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi said the conduct of the minister was making the court doubt his intentions and bonafide.
Senior advocate K Parmeshwar, appearing for Shah, said he had issued a public apology, which was online, and would be placed on court's record.
The bench asked the special investigation team (SIT) constituted to probe the statements made by the minister to submit its report by August 13.
The top court noted 87 people were examined by the probe team, which was currently examining the statements.
The bench also refused to examine a plea filed by Congress leader Jaya Thakur seeking Shah's resignation but said some of the allegations made in the writ petition about the past instances would be looked into by the three-member SIT.
The top court posted the hearing for August 18.
The SIT constituted by the Madhya Pradesh government was in compliance with the top court's order.
On May 19, the top court chided Shah and constituted the SIT to probe the FIR lodged against him.
Shah came under fire after a video, which was circulated widely, showed him allegedly making objectionable remarks against Col Qureshi, who gained nationwide prominence along with another woman officer, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, during the media briefings on Operation Sindoor.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court rebuked Shah for passing 'scurrilous' remarks and using 'language of the gutters' against Col Qureshi, and ordered police to file an FIR against him on the charge of promoting enmity and hatred.
After drawing severe condemnation, Shah expressed regret and said that he respects Col Qureshi more than his sister
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Chidambaram questions Pahalgam terrorists' identity, BJP hits back
As Parliament debates Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, former Union Minister P Chidambaram's recent remarks on the terrorists involved in the killings have kicked up a row. In an interview to The Quint, uploaded on Saturday (July 26), Chidambaram said the Pahalgam attackers 'for all we know could be homegrown terrorists' and 'why do you assume that they came from Pakistan'? He also said that 'there is no evidence' that the terrorists came from Pakistan. To a question on 'what they (government) are trying to hide', Chidambaram said: 'They are hiding the fact. I think. And this is speculation. The CDS hinted at that – that we made tactical mistakes, we restrategised. So, what tactical mistakes were made? What was the re-strategising? Those questions either they (government) are incompetent to answer or they are unwilling to answer… They are unwilling to disclose what the NIA has done all these weeks.' 'Have they identified the terrorists, where they came from? For all we know they could be homegrown terrorists. Why do you assume that they came from Pakistan? There is no evidence of that. They are also hiding the losses,' the Congress leader said in the interview. He said he wrote in a column that in a war, losses occur on both sides. 'I understand that India would have suffered losses. Be upfront. Winston Churchill in World War 2 made a statement every other day. Whatever losses Britain suffered, they made it plain… They (government) are reluctant to admit the losses… I think they think they can put a large shroud on Operation Sindoor.' BJP's national information and technology department in-charge Amit Malviya hit out at Chidambaram over his statement. 'P Chidambaram, former UPA-era Home Minister and the original proponent of the infamous 'saffron terror' theory, covers himself with glory yet again.' Quoting his interview, Malviya said: 'Once again, the Congress rushes to give a clean chit to Pakistan — this time after the Pahalgam terror attack.' 'Why is it that every time our forces confront Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, Congress leaders sound more like Islamabad's defence lawyers than India's Opposition,' asked Malviya. 'When it comes to national security, there should be no ambiguity. But with the Congress, there never is — they always bend over backwards to protect the enemy,' Malviya said on X. Asked about BJP's reaction, Chidambaram said: 'I saw a troll and I have responded to the troll.' In a post on X on Monday, the Congress leader said: 'Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation. The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!'
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
There was no talk between PM Modi and President Trump from April 22 and June 17: EAM in Lok Sabha
New Delhi, July 28 (UNI) External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar today asserted in the Lok Sabha that there was no talk between Prime Minister Modi and President Trump between April 22 and June 17, amid continuing claims by President Trump that he stopped the conflict between India and Pakistan. In his remarks to the Lok Sabha on a special discussion on Operation Sindoor, the EAM said: '….at no stage, in any conversation with the United States, was there any linkage with trade and what was going on. Secondly, there was no talk between the Prime Minister and President Trump from the 22nd of April when President Trump called up to convey his sympathy, and the 17th of June, when he called up Prime Minister in Canada to explain why he could not meet.' He also took on the opposition parties, asking if any of them had ever imagined that terror hubs like Bahawalpur and Muridke could be hit the way they were. 'So, today when I hear many questions from across the aisle, I want to say – which one of you imagined that Bahawalpur and Muridke would be brought down the way it was? Which one of you thought, when did you even think of it during your tenure, did it even cross your mind. 'In fact, on the contrary, you ruled it out after 26/11. So, I think our objectives were very clear. We wanted to send a message to the terrorists, we wanted to send a message to Pakistan, that do not continue this support for terrorism, and I think on the morning of 7th of May, that message went home loud and clear.' Jaishankar said Operation Sindoor reflects a new normal in India's anti-terror response: "I want Sir to conclude by saying this. The challenge of cross-border terrorism continues but Operation Sindoor marks a new phase. There is now a new normal. The new normal has five points: ● One, terrorists will not be treated as proxies. ● Two, Cross-border terrorism will get an appropriate response. ● Three, Terror and talks are not possible together. There will only be talks on terror. ● Four, Not yielding to nuclear blackmail. ● And finally, Terror and good neighbourliness cannot coexist. Blood and water cannot flow together. UNI RN
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Shubham's kin question PC's remarks, seek martyr status for him
Kanpur: As the Lok Sabha debated 'Operation Sindoor' on Monday, Aishanya Dwivedi, the wife of victim Shubham Dwivedi, demanded 'Martyr' status for all 26 victims of the horrific incident. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She also accused political leaders of undermining the gravity of the April 22 attack this year and reminded them that "terrorists didn't ask for anyone's caste or political party – they attacked Indians". Reacting to the remarks of P. Chidambaram who raised suspicion that this could have been the handiwork of homegrown terrorists, Aishanya said, "I fail to understand why some people -- XYZ or anyone -- are making such insensitive statements. Do they forget that they are Indians first? "You are not thinking like an Indian; you are politicising the issue. It is disrespectful to those who died in Pahalgam, and you are, in a way, siding with Pakistanis. Many families mourned after the Pahalgam attack, and you are undermining their feelings," she said. She called for unified national solidarity, emphasising that this wasn't a political matter. "My husband Shubham was a son of this soil. If this country truly stands by its citizens, this is the time to show it," she said. She stressed the need to address counter-terrorism strategies: "What is the govt doing to eradicate this from the root? What are we doing to fight terrorism? What strategies are in place? What action will we take moving forward? These are the questions that matter most to me today." Pursuing martyr status for Shubham Dwivedi and 25 others remains her priority: "Shubham didn't just die; he gave his life for the country. What more does it take to be called a martyr?" She also questioned the approval of the India-Pakistan cricket matches and announced to boycott them. Suham's father Sanjay Dwivedi expressed anger over Chidambaram's remarks. He said that politics should never be placed above national interest.
