Crypto hails Senate vote on stablecoin bill as a major victory
Though passage of the GENIUS Act in the upper chamber won't yet make the new legislation law — it still needs approval from the House and President Trump — the crypto world is already lauding the bill's swift progress as a major step.
'I feel really good about [this bill],' said Dante Disparte, chief strategy officer and head of global policy and operations at Circle, (CRCL) the largest US stablecoin issuer.
Circle's stock has soared roughly 400% since its debut day of trading on June 5, a sign of growing investor enthusiasm for stablecoins as the legislation advances in Congress.
'I think with the GENIUS Act, we actually have the right thing,' Disparte said. 'You have every issuer whether a bank, a credit union or a non-bank would have a common regulatory floor under which they would operate.'
The GENIUS Act — which stands for 'Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins' — sets a framework for how US companies can issue and manage dollar-backed stablecoins for payments.
It bans members of Congress and their families from earning profits from stablecoins but not President Trump and his family, an omission that has irked some Democrats and slowed progress on the legislation this spring.
Trump is deepening his own financial involvement in stablecoins as the legislation advances. World Liberty Financial, a new crypto startup backed by President Trump and his sons, has launched its own US-dollar-pegged stablecoin (USD1) in partnership with BitGo.
If the legislation clears the House, it is expected to unleash a wave of new stablecoin entrants as traditional companies ranging from reportedly giant lenders to mega retailers are already considering whether to issue their own coins.
'We're working with the industry, working individually,' Bank of America (BAC) CEO Brian Moynihan said of BofA's stablecoin prospects last week at a Morgan Stanley conference.
Earlier this month, Bank of America and other big banks convened to explore prospects for launching a collaborative stablecoin network. The Wall Street Journal also reported last week that Amazon (AMZN) and Walmart (WMT) are also exploring stablecoin opportunities.
The new wave of competition could upend the traditional payment system, especially if merchants look to get around conventional card-based networks such as Visa (V) and Mastercard (MA).
'While we continuously explore new payment technologies in efforts to support our customers, we are not piloting any programs and do not currently have any plans in place to issue our own stablecoin,' a Walmart spokeswoman told Yahoo Finance.
The legislation currently before the Senate would empower the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) with overseeing stablecoin issuers that hold $10 billion or more in assets while smaller issuers would be under the purview of state regulators.
All issuers would be required to hold reserves in cash or US Treasuries, undergo regular audits, and publicly disclose their holdings and redemption processes.
Like money market funds, the tokens must aim to be redeemable at face value. But unlike money market funds, stablecoins under this bill cannot pay interest.
Stablecoins are touted by their proponents as a haven from crypto's wild volatility and a safer place for traders to store their gains because they can be pegged to non-crypto assets like the dollar.
Their near-instant settlement and programmability also carry advantages proponents believe could enhance cross-border transactions and wider access to the US dollar.
"To be able to sort of give the US dollar when it is native on the internet legal clarity, there is no substitute for that,' Circle's Disparte said.
But there are still concerns among detractors that there could be risks with stablecoins, including the possibility of panic runs among investors.
Circle's Disparte says the bill will 100% protect financial stability, citing criminal penalties if you fail to report transparently and submit to an audit or a review or an attestation of your reserves.
Consumer protection issues, he added, are addressed "through and through" in this bill.
Some Democrats, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, have expressed concerns that the bill would allow giant tech companies such as Amazon or Meta to launch their own stablecoins.
But Disparte noted that the bill stipulates that any tech company wanting to issue a stablecoin would have to go through a special committee at the Treasury Department to get approval.
The head of that department, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, has high hopes for what this legislation may mean.
He told lawmakers last week that the legislation could help push the U.S. stablecoin market beyond $2 trillion by the end of 2028. The global stablecoin market currently sits around $250 billion, according to data provider DeFiLlama.
If the bill passes the Senate, there may be an effort in the House to attach it to a wider bill offering more sweeping regulation of all crypto assets.
And that may complicate matters. Trump has said he wants to sign stablecoin legislation before Congress leaves for its August recess.
Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A MAGA Voter's Reddit Post Breaking Down 5 Reasons They'll Be Voting "All Blue" In The Midterms Is Going Viral
As of late, Donald Trump's MAGA base has NOT been happy with him. From his mishandling of the Epstein files to bombing Iran, Trump seems to be backtracking on many of his campaign promises, and his support, even from high-profile names, is slipping. A Reddit post by a MAGA voter has recently gone viral for breaking down five reasons why they are abandoning Trump and planning to vote blue in the 2026 midterms. Related: At the start of the post, the MAGA voter explained their last-minute decision to vote for Trump on Election Day... They described feeling that Trump "got his ass beat" by Kamala Harris in the presidential debate, but did not like that the DNC was "open to big corporations and corporate donors." Their decision to vote for Trump also was inspired by Trump joining forces with RFK Jr., which they felt could improve nutrition policies. "Nutrition is a huge thing for me..." Related: The MAGA voter also assumed that Trump could end the Ukraine/Russia war due to his close relationship with Vladimir Putin. "I felt Trump would calm down the Ukraine/Russia basically say 'stop this shit' and create a calmer world for us." But, according to the MAGA voter, everything went south with the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files. "Guy thinks we're stupid. He campaigns on the Epstein files, realizes he's on there and now is telling us to stop worrying about it." The White House has called the Wall Street Journal's claim that Trump was notified by the Attorney General that his name was in the Epstein files a "fake news story." Related: The MAGA voter also called out Trump's attempts to get rid of the Department of Education. "I know he brought this up during his campaign, but I thought he'd be sensible enough to work across the aisle with Democrats on this matter, but this is insane." They also called out Trump's "Big, Beautiful, Bill" that they described as "abhorrently terrible." As well as Trump's tariffs increasing costs for young people. "Wtf is this guy thinking other countries will pay more. We're the ones having to foot the cost." They took issue with Trump's immigration and deportation policies call them "messed up," because Trump has given ICE "free will to do whatever." Related: And finally, the post ended with a promise to abandon Trump in the midterms. "I will absolutely be voting all blue come the midterms and will be voting for a sensible democrat next election." After reading the post, most people in the comments were not exactly applauding the MAGA voter for their switch-up. "Wow, this is someone who even seems to have paid more attention than most, but also somehow discounted 99% of things Trump said he'd do. I just can't with that level of cognitive dissonance," one user said. "'She didn't have any ideas that I considered fresh and new, so I figured I may as well vote for the guy who babbled utter nonsense instead,'" another user wrote sarcastically, referencing the voter's comments on the presidential debate. "This sounds like a lot of people in my family's rationale for voting Trump, who should have had enough common sense to think things through. They'll never admit they're wrong and vote democrat though. At least this person realized they were wrong, albeit way too late," this user wrote. "They really give him too much credit thinking these pie in the sky thoughts that'd he abolish everything he said he would, and replace it all with something way better, which he never had a plan to do." What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments below. Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds: Also in Internet Finds:
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This CEO explains how the trade war upends global supply chains
Tariff uncertainty has companies doubling down on supply chains. Eric Clark, CEO and president of supply-chain technology provider Manhattan Associates (MANH), joins Market Catalysts to discuss how companies are leaning into supply chain technology to navigate uncertainty and maintain strategic operations. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Supply chain technology provider Manhattan Associates reporting second quarter results earlier this week boosted by demand for its cloud services. Joining me now is Eric Clark, Manhattan Associate CEO and president. Good to see you, Eric. Thank you for joining us. Before I sort of dive into your numbers, I do want to talk about tariffs and the trade war because obviously, your clients are sitting at the intersection of all of those cross currents. What are you hearing from clients right now as to sort of how they're navigating the tariffs? Yeah. Well, first of all, thanks for having me. And what we're seeing is early days when these tariffs were announced right after Liberation day, lots of customers maybe went into a little bit of a pause mode to try to predict what was going to happen or to try to understand the uncertainty. Since then, I think people have understood that this isn't going to be quick, and some of these deadlines are going to move. And it's going to take some time. So the forward leaning companies are really getting back to their strategies and executing their strategies. And I think it's not too dissimilar to what we've seen with other supply chain disruptions like COVID and bridge collapses, et cetera. While there's a little bit of a pause in the beginning, I think it very quickly confirms the fact that supply chain is mission critical software. And this is not an area that companies are going to pause or delay for a long time. This is an area that they consider not only mission critical, but strategic. At the beginning of the year, we were also seeing not just some contracts being paused, but the opposite in some cases, right? Orders coming in to try to sort of front run the tariffs to build up inventory. Is that inventory now? Has it been worked down? Are we how, in other words, I guess right now, how would flows compare to normal conditions? Yeah, it varies across industry, and, you know, what we're seeing from our customers is they're trying to be prepared for whatever might come next. And from a software perspective, that's what we do. You know, we can help them be prepared and make sure that they can react and have their correct strategies and agility so that they can do the things that they need to do in real time. And so when it comes to your business, I know that a lot of the contracts that you all sign are sort of longer term contracts, right? Have you seen any disruption to that? Have you seen any of your customers sort of pulling back on spending amidst all of this? You know, it's interesting, as you mentioned, we announced earnings earlier this week, and we had a strong Q2 and a strong first half. It was a beaten raised quarter, and with really strong margin expansion. And when you look at, you know, the difficult and uncertain macroeconomic environment, the past three quarters at Manhattan have been our strongest bookings, sales quarters in the history of the company. So you can argue that all three of those quarters were, if not challenging, at least changing macro environment, and we continue to do well from a bookings performance. And not only that, but new logo bookings has been the strength of our bookings performance. So we're able to actually go out there and take market share from our competitors. And you know, that also gives us opportunity to continue to expand and cross-sell into those customers in the future. So we're feeling really good about the commitments that our customers are making and that customers in the supply chain space are making with their supply chain software. And Eric, would you say I think sort of during the pandemic, we all paid a lot more attention to supply chains than we ever had, of course, because they were affecting us directly. But there was also a lot of discussion about how antiquated the systems were, both the actual physical infrastructure, but also sort of the things that you help people do now, right? That that stuff was sort of obsolete in many cases. Where are we now? And how much further does supply chain modernization need to go? Well, I think we're in the early days of supply chain modernization. And at Manhattan, I think we're rated a leader across our product portfolio, and I think we're really the only true cloud-based SAS provider across the supply chain space. And that's why we continue to have high win rates in the market, and that's why we continue to drive that expansion with these strong bookings quarters. Again, I point to with this uncertainty in the market, it is confirming the fact that this is mission critical software and confirming the fact that this needs to be part of the strategy. And that's why people are really leaning into the modern technology that we can offer. Eric, thanks so much for joining us. Appreciate it. Yeah, thank you. Related Videos BlackRock's Rick Rieder: I Think Rates Can Come Down Elon Musk's 'master plan': Is Tesla an EV maker or AI play? How meme stock mania is a 'sign of the times' 'We ask for more data' than FICO: VantageScore CEO Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How to Track Driver Hours Without Drowning in ELD Reports
Running a small fleet means you're stretched thin—dispatching loads, chasing payments, and keeping trucks rolling. Then ELD reports hit you like a brick wall, piling on data you barely have time to read, let alone understand. Hours of service rules aren't optional, but you don't need to drown in reports to stay compliant. If you're running one to five trucks, every minute spent decoding logs is a minute you're not booking better loads or building broker relationships. This is about tracking driver hours efficiently, staying FMCSA-compliant, and focusing on what keeps your business alive—hauling freight. Here's how small fleet owners and owner-operators can cut through the noise and keep their trucks where they belong: on the road. Why ELD Reports Are a Small Fleet's Nightmare ELDs were sold as a time-saver, but for small carriers, they're often a headache that eats your day. You're staring at dense logs, sifting through alerts for minor violations, and chasing drivers who log wrong—or don't log at all. FMCSA rules feel like they change every time you blink, and one slip can mean a fine that wipes out a week's profit. Here's what you're up against: Logs so complicated they take an hour to review Alerts flooding your inbox for every 5-minute overage Drivers forgetting to switch to 'off-duty' or logging yard moves wrong Rules that seem designed for big fleets with compliance teams If you're a five-truck operation, you're not staffed to play data analyst. Every hour spent untangling ELD reports is an hour you're not negotiating rates or planning lanes. A one-truck operator in Indiana lost $3,000 last year on a single HOS violation because he didn't catch a logging error. The goal isn't just staying legal—it's doing it without sacrificing your bottom line. Build Systems That Work for You You don't need a degree in tech to track hours right. It's about setting up lean, practical systems that save time and keep you compliant. You're a small fleet owner, not a corporate desk jockey—focus on what moves the needle. Here's how to make it happen. 1. Choose an ELD That Fits Your Fleet Not every ELD is built for small operations. Some are bloated with features for mega-carriers, not for you. Pick one that's simple, mobile-friendly, and doesn't bury you in menus. Look for: Real-time hours tracking, you can check from your phone Clean dashboards that show available hours at a glance Syncing with your TMS or load board for seamless planning Motive and Samsara are good bets—starting at $25-$40 per truck monthly, they give you what you need without the fluff. Avoid systems that cost $100 per truck or push features you'll never touch. A three-truck fleet in Oklahoma switched to a simpler ELD and cut their log review time from 2 hours to 20 minutes a day. Test the app yourself before signing up—make sure it's built for someone who's always on the move. 2. Train Drivers to Log Like Pros Your ELD is only as good as the driver behind it. Most violations come from simple mistakes—drivers logging drive time as on-duty, forgetting breaks, or messing up personal conveyance. Don't let bad habits tank your compliance. Set your drivers up to win: Spend 15 minutes (not an hour) walking them through the ELD app's key features Make a one-page cheat sheet for logging breaks, yard moves, and pre-trips Review logs daily for the first two weeks to catch errors early Real-world example: A two-truck operator in Ohio cut HOS violations by 80% after one afternoon training his drivers to log pre-trip inspections right. He printed a laminated checklist and stuck it in the cab—problem solved. That's less time fixing reports and more time hauling $3/mile loads. 3. Zero In on Metrics That Keep You Legal ELD reports spit out enough data to fill a book, but you don't need it all. Focus on the numbers that keep you out of trouble: Available drive time per driver 14-hour duty window status 70-hour weekly limit HOS violations (and what caused them) Set your ELD dashboard to highlight these upfront. Ignore the rest unless you're digging into a specific issue. Most ELDs let you tweak alerts—turn off the spam for minor 5-minute overages and focus on big risks, like 11-hour drive limit violations. A four-truck fleet in Virginia saved 6 hours a week by customizing their dashboard to show only critical metrics. That's time you can spend chasing direct shipper contracts. 4. Automate Compliance to Save Your Sanity You're not a machine, so stop doing machine work. Your ELD can handle the heavy lifting if you set it up right. Use automation to catch issues before they cost you: Set alerts for when drivers hit 90% of their drive time or duty window Schedule weekly summary reports instead of daily email floods Use geofencing to auto-log yard moves at docks you hit often This cuts your review time to 10-15 minutes a day. A five-truck fleet in Texas went from 8 hours a week on compliance to under 2 by automating HOS alerts and only checking flagged logs. That's a full day back for dispatching or negotiating better rates with brokers. 5. Plan Loads Around Hours, Not Hopes Tracking hours isn't just about staying legal—it's about making money. Smart hours management lets you maximize freight without pushing drivers past their limits. Use load boards like DAT or Truckstop to match loads to your drivers' clocks: Filter for loads that fit the remaining drive time Save short-haul runs for drivers low on hours Reserve high-mileage loads for drivers with fresh clocks Check lane history to find shippers with quick turnarounds. Avoid docks known for detention unless the rate covers the wait—$100/hour minimum. A two-truck fleet in Illinois boosted revenue by 15% by picking loads that matched their hours instead of chasing tight deadlines. Keep your trucks moving and your drivers legal. 6. Build a Routine That Sticks Consistency is your edge. Set up a daily and weekly routine to stay on top of hours without losing your mind: Daily: Spend 10 minutes checking ELD alerts and driver logs Weekly: Run a 70-hour report to plan loads for the next week Monthly: Audit one driver's logs to spot patterns (wrong status, missed breaks) A one-truck operator in Nevada caught a recurring logging error by spending 20 minutes a month reviewing logs. That saved him $1,500 in potential fines. Routines don't have to be complicated—just consistent. The Load Board Trap Load boards are a lifeline, but they can make hours tracking harder if you're not careful. Brokers post loads with sometimes tight deadlines, tempting you to stretch driver hours to grab them. Don't bite. A $2,000 load isn't worth a fine or a sidelined OOS driver. Always check available hours before bidding. Build a 1-2 hour buffer into every load for delays—detention, traffic, or breakdowns. Use load boards to: Find lanes that fit your drivers' clocks Spot shippers with consistent freight for direct outreach Avoid brokers with a history of unrealistic schedules (check Carrier Assure for reviews) A three-truck fleet in Florida stopped taking last-minute spot loads with tight windows and saw violations drop to zero. Focus on freight that fits your operation, not the other way around. Tech That Doesn't Break the Bank You don't need a high-dollar setup to track hours like a pro. Stick to tools that save time and money: ELD with a mobile app for real-time updates ($25-$40/truck/month) TMS integration to tie hours to load planning ($50-$75/month) Free spreadsheet or app (like Trucker Tools) to track weekly hours across drivers Spend $100-$150/month total for a two-truck fleet. That's less than one HOS fine or one missed load. A four-truck operator in Michigan switched to a $120/month ELD-TMS combo and saved $6,000 a year by avoiding compliance penalties and picking better lanes. Double-Check Your Drivers' Habits Drivers aren't perfect, and neither are you. Even with a great ELD, human error can creep in. Common mistakes: Logging 'on-duty' instead of 'off-duty' during breaks Forgetting to log pre-trip or post-trip inspections Misusing personal conveyance for non-personal trips Spot-check logs weekly to catch these early. A two-truck fleet in Georgia found one driver was logging 30 minutes of drive time daily as on-duty by mistake. Fixing it saved 10 hours of drive time a month—enough for an extra $1,500 load. Final Word Tracking driver hours doesn't have to bury you in ELD reports. Pick a simple ELD, train your drivers to log right, focus on the metrics that keep you legal, and automate the grunt work. Tie your hours tracking to load planning so you're not just dodging fines—you're making money. Small fleets don't win by working harder; they win by working smarter. Get your systems tight, train your drivers, and keep your trucks hauling freight where they belong. The post How to Track Driver Hours Without Drowning in ELD Reports appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
