Local GAA club among objectors to controversial north Mayo forestry plantation
There has been widespread public opposition to the proposal, with public demonstrations and public meetings taking place there in recent days.
A public meeting on Saturday heard calls for the development to be halted immediately and for a meeting with Coillte or the relevant government minister to resolve the matter.
Local county councillor Jarlath Munnelly said there was 'a lot of concern' in the locality about the project.
Cllr Munnelly said that locals were not against forestry but were strongly opposed to it being located near the GAA grounds and several houses.
'This is land that is suitable for farming, this is land that is not suitable for forestry,' the Fine Gael councillor told Midwest Radio.
The Department of Agriculture's Forestry Appeals Committee (FAC) reinstated the forestry license on December 24, 2024 after considering three appeals. Planting of the site has already commenced, and the contractor is currently not on site.
Thirteen submissions were made regarding the forestry license in 2022 prior to its approval.
One of these submissions was from Ballycastle, whose grounds are located beside the proposed site.
Eilis Ormsby, Chairperson of Ballycastle GAA Club, said the development could damage their training grounds due to potential flooding.
ADVERTISEMENT
The club, which competes in the Mayo Junior Championship, opened new a new clubhouse at Tom Langan Park in 2022.
Ms Ormsby said the applicant had given 'undue regard' to the aesthetic impact on the clubhouse viewing area and the loss of natural light to the adjoining pitches.
She warned that the development could potentially increase the club's insurance costs due to the risk of fire and flooding.
'The proposed afforestation would be an ideal habitat for wild animals such as foxes, deer and badgers, who are known transmitters of disease i.e., TB and as a habitat for deer could cause damaged to boundary fence and damage to our ground,' she added.
Ms Conway concluded by saying that the club were 'very disappointed' that that they were not consulted with prior to the application being submitted to the Department of Agriculture.
The appeals against the license listed various other concerns, including an increased number of midges, traffic issues, sediment runoff into a nearby river and the existing wet grassland being home to the marsh fritillary, a protected species of butterfly.
Addressing these concerns, the Forestry Appeals Committee said that herbicide would be applied by ''spot spraying' thus not allowing any of the herbicide to become airborne and effecting air quality'.
'The site is stated to be improved agriculture land and DAFM do not consider afforestation on this land type to increase fire risk. It is stated that there is no evidence that an increase in biodiversity and wildlife will have an adverse effect on the farming community. The proposed project area is stated to be to the east of the Wild Atlantic Way thus not hindering any views,' it continued.
The FAC said there would no increased flood risk for the GAA club as the development is located upstream from the club grounds.
Road safety matters were said to be a matter for Mayo County Council and An Garda Síochána. The application was referred to Mayo County Council and no response was received.
It was noted that the site fronts onto a public road and the level of traffic generated by the project would 'not be greater than current agricultural practice'.
The matter was raised in the Seanad this week by Ballina-based Senator Mark Duffy, who called on Minister of State with special responsibility for forestry, Michael Healy-Rae, to meet the community to discuss the issue further.
'Communities like Ballycastle on the western seaboard and the Wild Atlantic Way have been decimated by depopulation but have very gracefully welcomed international protection applicants within the community and are trying to lead the regeneration of buildings and make them better places for emigrants to return to. Measures like this fly in the face of a community that is trying to lead strong regeneration,' said Senator Duffy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
Farmers Need Clarity From Minister on New Derogation Assessments Sinn Fein
Minister Martin Heydon has been urged today (Tuesday, July 8) to "give clarity" to farmers on a European Commission requirement that Ireland 'must demonstrate compliance' with the Habitats Directive when granting farmers a nitrates derogation. The Sinn Féin spokesperson on agriculture, Martin Kenny, said the new requirement from the European Commission, is a "very concerning development for those farmers who require the derogation". The TD for Sligo-Leitrim also believes the direction from the European Commission "will have a serious impact on many farms throughout the country and could potentially in some cases prevent some famers from getting a derogation". There are 600 sites in Ireland designated under the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive. Sites range in size from 1ha up to 76,000ha. These sites are designated as either Special Conservation Areas (SAC) and/or Special Protection Areas (SPA). They are generally referred to as Natura 2000 sites. Under the Habitats Directive, any plan or project 'likely to have a significant effect on a designated site or species' must be subject to Appropriate Assessment of its implications for the site. The European Court of Justice has ruled that the 'grazing of cattle and or the application of fertilisers on the surface of land or below its surface' in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites may be classified as a project. According to the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM), the granting of nitrates derogations is considered by the commission to be 'authorisation of a project' and is therefore subject to the assessment requirements of the Habitat's Directive. The DAFM has confirmed that the first stage in the Appropriate Assessment process is screening, which determines if a project 'is likely to have a significant effect on a designated site'. If the project is likely to have an effect – or if it is unclear what the effect might be – then the project must be subject to an Appropriate Assessment, which is a detailed impact assessment of the implications of the project on the 'integrity of a Natura 2000 designated site'. DAFM plans to carry out any screening and Appropriate Assessments at a 'catchment and sub-catchment' scale to deal with the nitrates derogation compliance requirement. There are 46 catchments in Ireland. These catchments are further divided into 583 sub-catchments. According to Deputy Kenny, Minister Heydon needs to provide clarity "on what these assessments involve, how long they will take and what it will mean for farmers.'
Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
MEP tells commission 'stop moving goalposts' on derogation
An Irish MEP has called on the European Commission to clarify the specific conditions required for Ireland to maintain its nitrates derogation. The Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) yesterday (Monday, July 7) revealed that the commission has told Ireland it 'must demonstrate compliance' with the Habitats Directive when granting farmers a nitrates derogation. There are 600 sites in Ireland designated under the Habitats Directive and the Birds Directive. Sites range in size from 1 hectare up to 76,000ha. These sites are designated as either Special Conservation Areas (SAC) and or Special Protection Areas (SPA) and are generally referred to as Natura 2000 sites. Midlands North West MEP Ciaran Mullooly described the nitrates derogation as "essential to the viability of Ireland's grass-based farming model". The Independent Ireland MEP expressed frustration on behalf of Irish farmers for the additional European regulations that are now being demanded. 'The job of Irish farmers is getting tougher. After months of diligent work on water quality aimed at retaining our nitrates directive, comes yet another demand. "An assessment under the Habitats Directive was never part of this process up to now. It was never needed,' Mullooly said. The MEP said that in improving water quality and meeting existing environmental requirements, the Irish family farmers have delivered on those requests. He added that this has been confirmed by the latest water quality report from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) showing "significant reductions in nitrate levels'. 'It is the clear understanding of the Irish farming sector that adopting new technologies and strategies to protect water quality, particularly in areas with higher stocking rates per acre, would be sufficient to meet the required standards to retain the derogation. "This derogation is not optional, it's vital for the livelihoods of thousands of farm families. 'Farmers need clarity. I'm calling on the Irish agriculture minister [Martin Heydon] to engage with the commissioner and seek clear, concise guidelines and stop this ridiculous charade that's going on, before the commission moves the goalposts again," Mullooly said.
Agriland
a day ago
- Agriland
Farmers seek clarification on GAEC 2 appeals as 'concerns' raised
The Irish Farmers' Association (IFA) has urged the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) to address farmer concerns and "move quickly to clarify the scope of GAEC 2 appeals". DAFM has launched an appeals process for the Good Agricultural and Environmental Condition 2 (GAEC 2) with details released this week. GAEC 2 is the conditionality standard of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) related to the protection of peatlands and wetlands. It formally entered into force on May 1, which means that any works carried out before that date do not come under the scope of the condition. Under the condition, the maintenance of an existing drain is permitted and replacement is acceptable. However, new drainage on never-drained parcels of land will require planning permission or an exemption from the local authority, as is currently the case under national legislation. IFA rural development chair John Curran said details seem to "infer that appeals are restricted to those who plan new drainage works in 2025, with signed declarations and evidence of planned drainage works required to accompany applications". "This is very much at odds with what was briefed to us at both national and stakeholder meetings on this very emotive issue, and as I understand it, what has also been briefed to planners recently," Curran said. "It will cause consternation and annoy many farmers unless quickly clarified. 'We understood that soil samples; a planner's report; and geo-tagged photos may be required, but this is a curveball altogether." Curran said that all farmers must be given the opportunity to appeal the GAEC 2 status of individual parcels, "irrespective of whether lands were ever drained in the past or not, or whether new drainage is planned in 2025 or not". 'We have been getting calls from farmers for months now since indicative GAEC 2 maps were released saying there is no way individual parcels on their land are GAEC 2 and they will very much be contesting it," the rural development chair continued. "They have to be given that opportunity, and where backed by science and soil samples, have the GAEC-2 obligations removed." Curran said the IFA has engaged with DAFM seeking clarification on the matter, and will "continue to do until resolved".
