Trump reverses course on ICE raids at farms, hotels, restaurants
On one end was Brooke Rollins, Trump's Agricultural secretary, who relayed the farming industry's concerns to Trump about losing workers because of the president's mass deportations. But Stephen Miller, a deputy White House chief of staff and a top architect of Trump's immigration agenda, opposed the carveouts for certain industries, the Post reported.
More: Trump vows changes to immigration crackdown to protect migrant farmers, hotel workers
"The President has been incredibly clear. There will be no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE's efforts," Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at DHS, said in a statement to USA TODAY.
"Worksite enforcement remains a cornerstone of our efforts to safe guard public safety, national security and economic stability," she added. "These operations target illegal employment networks that undermine American workers, destabilize labor markets and expose critical infrastructure to exploitation."
More: 'Wave of panic': Businesses are in crosshairs of Trump immigration crackdown
Trump promised changes to protect migrants in the farming, hotel and leisure industries in a June 12 Truth Social post that acknowledged ICE officers have expanded arrests beyond just migrants convicted of violent crimes, who Trump officials have said are the primary targets of raids and deportations.
"Our farmers are being hurt badly," Trump said in remarks later that day, echoing the concerns raised by Rollins. "You know, they have very good workers. They've worked for them for 20 years. They're not citizens, but they've turned out to be, you know, great."
More: Illegal border crossings at record lows as Trump crackdown spreads
Trump's new posture seemed to undermine his long-touted policy of mass deportations, which was a hallmark of his 2024 campaign.
About 42% of farm workers in the United States between 2020 and 2022 lacked legal status, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
According to the Post, an DHS official sent an email June 12 telling agents to "hold on all worksite enforcement investigations/operations on agriculture (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and operating hotels."
But over the weekend, ICE and the agency's Homeland Security Investigations division started learning that the new policy would be reversed. ICE officials confirmed in a June 16 call to agency leaders that they must continue immigration raids at farms, hotels and restaurants.
Democratic critics of Trump's hardline immigration agenda mocked Trump's shifting positions. "Looks like Stephen Miller is the boss, after all. Trump got big footed by his own staff. Pathetic," California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a post on X.
A White House official confirmed the changed course, telling USA TODAY that anyone in the United States illegally is at risk of deportation.
More: President Trump orders ICE to expand deportations in large Democrat-run cities
Three days after Trump announced the short-lived carveouts for certain migrants, Trump on June 15 directed ICE officials to ramp up efforts to detain and deport migrants from large Democratic-run cities. It marked an escalation of his crackdown on illegal immigration despite millions of demonstrators rallying against the policy during recent "No Kings" protests across the country.
In a post on Truth Social, Trump challenged ICE officers to "do all in their power to achieve the very important goal of delivering the single largest Mass Deportation Program in History." He called on them to increase their activites in cities led by Democrats, singling out Los Angeles, Chicago, and New York.
A Trump administration budget document published last week said U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement aimed to deport 1 million immigrants per year, according to Reuters.
ICE arrested more than 100,000 people suspected of violating immigration law from January 20 to the first week of June, according to the White House. The figure amounts to an average of 750 arrests per day - double the average over the past decade.
Still, the pace of arrests remains far short of what Trump would need to deport millions of people. In late May, Miller set a quota for at least 3,000 arrests per day and told ICE leadership they should target anyone without legal status.
Contributing: Reuters
Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BREAKING NEWS Trump's 'Doomsday Plane' makes unusual trip as Iran war fears escalate
President Donald Trump 's emergency command aircraft was caught making a mysterious flight from Louisiana to a military base in Maryland on Tuesday. The Boeing E-4 'Nightwatch', also known as the 'Doomsday plane,' serves as a flying command post for key officials during times of crisis, particularly designed to survive a nuclear attack and coordinate military actions. The craft took off from Shreveport at 5:56pm ET, traveled along the coast, looped around the border of Virginia and North Carolina, before landing at Joint Base Andrews at 10:01pm. The flight lasted over four hours, sparking speculation online about its purpose. Some observers believe the mission may be linked to increased presidential security amid rising fears of nuclear escalation in the Middle East. Tensions have surged following reports that Trump is prepared to support Israel 's military efforts against Iran, demanding Tehran's 'unconditional surrender.' At least 224 people have been killed in Iran since Israel launched a bombing campaign last week, aiming to disrupt the country's nuclear ambitions. This is a developing story... More updates to come.
The National
28 minutes ago
- The National
Angela Rayner does not rule out following US into war in Middle East
Standing in for the Prime Minister as he attends the G7 Summit in Canada, Rayner was faced with questions in the Commons over the UK Government's stance on following president Donald Trump into war with Israel against Iran if he was to launch strikes. Trump has demanded 'unconditional surrender' and has warned Iranian leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that the US knows where he is but has no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now'. READ MORE: Donald Trump shares fawning message from extremist US ambassador to Israel Trump initially distanced himself from Israel's surprise attack on Friday that triggered the conflict, but in recent days has hinted at greater American involvement, saying he wants something 'much bigger' than a ceasefire. The US has also sent more warplanes to the region. Deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats, Daisy Cooper, said at PMQs: "In 2003, we Liberal Democrats were incredibly proud to lead the case against the Iraq war. "A war in which the UK blindly followed the US, in a move that was not back by the United Nations. "In light of reports that president Trump is seriously considering joining the war between Israel and Iran, launching a US strike against Iran's nuclear facilities, can the Deputy Prime Minister confirm that if president Trump does do this that today's Labour Government will not blindly follow the US into war again?" Rayner responded with: "The one thing I will say is that we agree with president Trump, that Iran must never have nuclear weapons. "But we've been consistent in urging Iran to engage with the diplomatic process and work with the United States, and we continue to support that diplomatic efforts." Earlier at the G7 Summit, Starmer had insisted Trump was interested in de-escalation in the Middle East, saying 'nothing' he had heard from the president suggested Washington was poised to get involved. In a statement on Monday, before Trump's departure, leaders reiterated their 'commitment to peace and stability' but stopped short of calling for a truce between Israel and Iran. British Typhoon fighter jets have also been deployed to the region, which Defence Secretary John Healey said on Tuesday was 'part of the moves to reinforce de-escalation in the region, to reinforce security in the region, and may also be used to help support our allies'.
Western Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Windsor Framework structures ineffective and overly bureaucratic
Mr Robinson said that the post-Brexit trading deal could never be effective until fundamental issues around lack of consent from unionists are addressed. The House of Lords Northern Ireland Scrutiny Committee has been holding evidence sessions examining the operation of the framework. The Windsor Framework was agreed between the UK and the EU in 2023, amending the Northern Ireland Protocol. It governs post-Brexit trading arrangements in the region. The DUP later reached the Safeguarding the Union deal with the previous UK government to further reduce some checks and paperwork on goods moving from the rest of the UK into Northern Ireland, leading to the restoration of the powersharing Executive at Stormont last year. However, many unionists remain opposed to the framework, stating it creates a new regulatory border within the United Kingdom and because Northern Ireland continues to follow some EU laws relating to goods. During his appearance before the committee, Mr Robinson was asked to assess the extent to which voices in Northern Ireland could be heard through the structures of the framework. He said: 'I don't have a lot of faith in the current structures. 'When you consider the ability for politicians, parliamentarians, stakeholders, businesses, to engage with them. 'The structures around the Windsor Framework, though they may have evolved, are ineffective, opaque and overly bureaucratic. The UK and EU agreed the Windsor Framework in 2023 (PA) 'They frustrate the ability for ordinary, routine and at times complex and serious engagement to either satisfy, resolve or ameliorate some of the harmful impositions that Northern Ireland finds itself in under these arrangements.' The DUP leader added: 'I believe it cannot ever be effective until the fundamentals are resolved around the imposition that Northern Ireland was placed in without the consent of any elected unionist in Northern Ireland, without the consent of party colleagues in Westminster.' In December, MLAs at Stormont voted to continue with the current arrangements for at least another four years in a democratic consent motion, which was part of the arrangements agreed between the UK and the EU. However, unlike other votes at Stormont, there was no requirement for cross-community support for the motion. Mr Robinson told peers: 'Though we have gone through a cycle of a parliamentary vote in Assembly terms in December of 2024, an inversion of cross-community protections. 'A false choice, do you wish this imposition to continue for a period of eight years or four years with a potential review. 'I don't believe they have been effective at all and if the Government were serious about increasing the opportunity to have voices heard and engage fundamentally in the propositions that are causing material impact, both constitutionally and practically in Northern Ireland, then they wouldn't only find an effective mechanism for that engagement but they would look at the fundamentals.' He added: 'We have at the heart of this an agreement between the UK and the EU where they decide what is going to happen to Northern Ireland without any recourse to the citizenry of Northern Ireland or the elected representatives. 'Then you have the attempt or the added aspects of inclusion and participation but without any substantial or meaningful outworkings of that participation or inclusion.'
