
The chatter in Moscow's Red Square
About a dozen people have gathered in the space, first constructed in the 14th century, for the festivities that precede the Victory Day parade on May 9 that commemorates the triumph of the Red Army over Nazi invaders in 1945, when World War II ended. This year will be the 80th anniversary, a reminder of the about 20 million Russian lives lost across four years.
Posters bearing '1945-2025' hang from every street corner, welcoming visitors to the Red Square. The revellers head towards the heritage market located on one side of the stone-paved expanse that has been witness to Russian history, from the Tzars to the communists to the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) in 1991. Until then, Ukraine had been one of 15 republics of the Soviet Union.
In the days running up to May 9, the market is dominated by supporters of President Vladimir Putin. They sing, wave tricolour white-blue-red flags, and distribute newspapers and pamphlets. These editorialise the news, declaring a definite victory in Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine.
'Our citizens know that we are not fighting with Ukraine, but with the U.S., and for that we need to threaten Washington, not Sumy,' says an article in Natsional'ny Curs (The Nationalist Path), a news pamphlet that openly calls for keeping Russia's nuclear arsenal ready. While the pamphlets and newspapers are in Russian, and that is the predominant language on the street, Moscow also has communities of Turks, Greeks, and Germans.
The enthusiastic support for Russia's military campaign in Ukraine is infectious and most of Moscow — citizens and travellers alike — reflects this. Seema Kushwaha, an Indian student in her 20s, is in Moscow for a few months to study Russian, on an exchange programme from Agra. She says, 'People back home worry about the situation here. But we don't have any fear as Russia is very strong in security matters. The war is heading in the right direction for Russia.'
The impact on Russia
The over three-year-old war began with Putin amassing troops along Russia's border with Ukraine and making demands against North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) expansion, which were rejected. The Russian army then went in, in what Putin called a 'special military operation'. On February 24, 2022, Putin announced the launch of missiles. Soon, Russia launched a full-fledged attack, bombing the capital Kyiv, and going to annex the eastern Ukrainian territories of the predominantly Russian-speaking Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia.
Within a day the west imposed sanctions on Russia, impacting travel, communication, and daily monetary transactions of regular people. For instance, international credit cards ceased to work and some mainstream apps, such as those from the Meta stable, are mostly inaccessible.
'But the sanctions have not cut us out from the world. Yes, they restrict us, but we still manage to travel using third countries such as the UAE,' says Viktor Panin, who teaches international relations, in Pyatigorsk, in southern Russia, who is visiting Moscow.
The war has not dampened the party-loving Russian spirit. Weekend festivities are necessary, but that comes after placing flowers at the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Here, two soldiers — a woman and a man — stand, as the cold wind prompts walkers to wear gloves and fur caps for one last time before summer arrives.
As people place blood red roses and carnations at the memorial, where an eternal flame has been burning for decades, tourist guides apologetically remind them not to try and look for GPS locations. 'The GPS is down in the Red Square. There has been a military alert this morning,' a guide says. A Ukrainian drone had managed to sneak into the Moscow region. The no-GPS information draws a careless shrug from visitors, who continue with their plans. The chatter in Red Square is one of defiance, not of fear.
The singers and pro-war demonstrators quickly take out a copy of Natsional'ny Curs. 'Did you know that since 1994 our strategic missiles have no flight missions, that is the missiles have not been aimed for a long time. The U.S. has started the war in Ukraine. They want to destroy Russia and are not going to stop as nothing threatens them,' it says on the the front page.
U.S. President Donald Trump has extended a proposal for talks and Russia has responded cautiously, leading to growing frustration in Washington DC. 'We are well aware of what a mutually beneficial deal looks like, which we have never rejected, and what a deal looks like that could lead us into another trap,' Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with Kommersant newspaper.
Arif Asalioglu, a Turkish analyst of international affairs, who has been in Moscow for 13 years, says Moscovites have emerged stronger despite the war. Sipping tea with a sugar cube in his mouth, he recalls his earlier days in the city, when people were less assertive on the streets, and regional divisions were heightened. Now, he says, Russia seems more united, but there are challenges. 'There is no official figure about the number of casualties in the war, and the worst fighting is behind us, but it wasn't easy for Russia. The birth rate has gone down as a result of the war and some of the early war supporters lost popularity as the war passed through highs and lows,' says Asalioglu. He anticipates that in the coming months, Russia will take more territory from Ukraine, reducing the country in size and importance on the European chessboard.
A united people
Some distance from the Red Square, at the famous Kyivskaya metro station, Asalioglu gently advises a group of friends: 'Be careful with your camera flash. Too many flashes may attract the attention of co-passengers who can alert the police about suspicious activities.'
But tourists will be tourists. Soon, there is a loud objection from the passengers about the camera flashes going off.
Kyivskaya metro station is named after the capital of Ukraine, the third largest republic within the erstwhile USSR. Eight decades ago, the soldiers of the Red Army fought their way into Ukraine and liberated the country from Nazi Germany's control. There are art galleries depicting this deep underground in Kyivskaya station, after a two-minute-long elevator ride. About 30 mosaics depict various aspects of life in Ukraine: the Black Sea sturgeon, women hard at work in fields, and dams being built. They signify the connection that makes Ukraine a part of the Russians' mental geography. The liberation war has been conflated with the military offensive against Ukraine.
Julia Pulekha (name changed to protect identity), a Ukrainian-origin Russian who hails from Kyiv, says her family has tried to avoid quarrels with the part of the family that continues to be in Ukraine. 'I have never experienced any discrimination from citizens of the Russian Federation in the 10 years that I have been here. On the contrary, we were accepted as the dearest people on earth and I am very grateful for it. If it had been different, we would not have stayed,' she says. Julia's grandparents continue to remain in Ukraine and they are determined not to leave home.
The war has not been just about two countries. On both sides, people with mixed ancestry and family ties to both sides have fought each other giving rise to bitter family feuds. Russians of Ukrainian origin have fought on the Russian side. 'I don't have any expectation about the war. I just hope that it will end soon. I am focusing on my personal life here but I am worried about my grandparents in Ukraine,' adds Julia.
A few stops away from Kyivskaya on the metro line is Mir (meaning peace in Russian). A five-minute walk away is Russia's largest mosque, the Jama, with a dome of gold and turquoise accents. Mustafa Kutukcu, the imam, presides over prayers for soldiers who hail from Dagestan, Chechnya, Ingushetia, and other Caucasian areas that are Muslim-dominated. Most Russians are adherents of Orthodox Christianity and nearly 20 million Russians are Muslims hailing from southern Russia and the Caucasian region. President Putin's narrative has presented the war as a collective effort supported by all parts of Russia.
Kutukcu is a Turkish-origin Russian. 'Irrespective of our origin, the government regards all those who gave up their lives for Russia as martyrs. They have looked after the families of those who perished in the war,' he says.
Between conversations with visitors and the faithful, soldiers come and hold his hands and ask him to pray for their safety as they take leave to fight on the front line with Ukraine.
Trump's outreach
At Russia's main international airports of Moscow and St. Petersburg, visitors are mostly from Asia, the Arab world, and Africa. Russia describes this as a reorientation of its state of affairs. 'Our national emblem, the double-headed eagle, has two heads in two directions. One head was turned to the west, but the head that looks to the east had its eyes closed. That has now changed, as the eyes of that eagle have opened, and Russia is now looking at the east for its requirements,' says Alikber K. Alikberov, director of the Institute of Oriental Studies, Russia's oldest think tank, which turned 200 years old in 2018.
At the airport though, the immigration clearance even for foreigners from the east often takes three to four hours. Passengers may also face 'military incidents' that force last-moment changes in flight paths. When the drone attack took place, it hit a target near Moscow's main Sheremetyevo airport, and flights were diverted.
Before the afternoon festivities begin at the Red Square, the grand white and gold Financial University under the Russian Federation opened its intimidating Soviet-style auditorium for thinkers and analysts from Russia, India, China, Turkey, and countries of Central Asia to discuss Russia's response to Trump's outreach to the Kremlin.
This is against the backdrop of President Trump's confrontation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in February this year, over a U.S.-Ukraine mineral agreement. At that meeting, Vice President J.D. Vance called Zelenskyy 'disrespectful' and accused him of being 'ungrateful' for the support from the U.S.
Geopolitical thinker Margarita F. Mudrak, professor and chair of the board of the think tank Russian Association of International Cooperation in St. Petersburg, travelled in the U.S. at the height of the Cold War in the late 1960s and the early 1980s, when people-to-people contact between the Soviet Union and the western countries was not really widespread.
Mudrak speaks sternly, saying that the way Russians look at the war is not dependent on the position of one particular leader of the west. The war is about terminating security threats that had been festering on its borders for a long time, she says. 'We know Trump. He is not a stable decision maker. The U.S. stopped sharing satellite navigation with Ukraine briefly, when they had to get Ukraine to agree to its terms and conditions on the minerals deal. But soon after the agreement was sealed, they resumed, which helps Ukraine aim its missiles at us,' Mudrak says. She adds: 'Trump is a businessman, not a strategic thinker. His aim is to secure critical minerals.' She makes it clear that none of the territory gained by Russia will be given back to Ukraine.
Starting with 2014, Russia has gradually expanded its territory on the west. First it annexed Crimea and after the beginning of the 'Special Military Operation' on February 24, 2022, it has gained substantial amount of territory in eastern Ukraine (Donetsk, Luhanksk and other areas) that it has not given up despite continuous attack.
The conversation among the analysts and researchers spreads from the stately university that dates back to 1919 to a Caucasian café outside campus that serves a variety of potatoes and meat. Then Russian military strategist General Nikolae Plotnikov, asks, 'Why is India so cautious? Sometimes we find other countries that do not have a record of friendship with Russia welcoming our ideas, but it is difficult to get India on board at times.' He surrounds himself with young admirers and a security detail, and is a part of Russia's back-channel team in talks with the Trump administration. The Indian government has announced that Prime Minister Narendra Modi will not be attending the Victory Day celebrations in Moscow on May 9.
The group of about 15 analysts stops off at the Museum of the Great Patriotic War of 1812. Here, in the cold corridors, are objects that were captured from the defeated army of French emperor Napoleon Bonaparte in 1812, after the Russian population united under the commanders of Czar Alexander I.
'The Russians who visit this museum remind themselves that enemies have tried to attack them again and again. They tried in 1812 and during Hitler's time,' says Sotiris Livas, a teacher of history and international politics from Athens. The current conflict, he says, is actually a war on NATO. 'History shows that the Russians have never been defeated in the big wars. They won each time, because they viewed these big conflicts through the lens of history, and they have responded similarly, irrespective of whether Russia was under the Czars, the Communists, or the contemporary rulers of the Kremlin,' says Livas.
As he listens to Livas, Timofey, an 11th grader, responds: 'Everyone has to remember our past as we have made sacrifices to safeguard our freedom.'
Later in the evening, thin flakes of snow begin to cover every visible surface, including the AI-driven vehicles used by food-delivery companies. Asalioglu only half-jokes: 'Russia is not about AI. It is about humans, and their strong will to fight. The days ahead will only be tougher for Ukraine.'
Kallol Bhattacherjee was in Moscow to participate in the Xth International Meeting of intellectuals organised by the Institute of Oriental Studies, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, MIRNAs and the A.M. Gorchakov Public Diplomacy Support Fund.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump says it will be up to Ukraine to decide on territorial swaps
By Steve Holland Trump says it will be up to Ukraine to decide on territorial swaps ABOARD AIR FORCE ONE -U.S. President Donald Trump said he would not negotiate on behalf of Ukraine in his Friday meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin and would let Kyiv decide whether to engage in territorial swaps with Russia. Trump said his goal was to get the two sides to start a negotiation, with any territorial swaps to be addressed then. "They'll be discussed, but I've got to let Ukraine make that decision, and I think they'll make a proper decision. But I'm not here to negotiate for Ukraine, I'm here to get them at a table," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One. Trump's remarks are likely to offer some assurance to Ukraine, which is worried that the U.S.-Russia talks could freeze the conflict at Ukraine's expense. Trump said the Russian offensive in Ukraine was likely aimed at helping to strengthen Putin's hand in any negotiations to end the war. "I think they're trying to negotiate. He's trying to set a stage. In his mind that helps him make a better deal. It actually hurts him, but in his mind that helps him make a better deal if they can continue the killing," he said. The U.S. president said he expected his meeting with Putin to produce results, given the stakes involved and weakness in the Russian economy. "He's a smart guy, been doing it for a long time but so have I ... we get along, there's a good respect level on both sides, and I think, you know, something's going to come of it," he said. Trump said it was a good sign that Putin was bringing business executives with him from Russia, but said no deals could be made until the war was settled. "I like that 'cause they want to do business, but they're not doing business until we get the war settled," he said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.

Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
How to win at foreign policy
WHEN DONALD TRUMP meets Vladimir Putin in Alaska it will be the seventh time the two have talked in person. This time is different, though. Since their last sit-down, Mr Putin has launched an unprovoked war, lost perhaps a million Russian soldiers (dead and wounded) and inflicted ceaseless misery on Ukrainians in pursuit of an imperial dream. Undaunted, Mr Trump hopes to get in a room with a wily dictator, feel him out and forge a deal. It is the biggest test yet of his uniquely personal style of diplomacy. It is also a reminder of how unpredictable American foreign policy has become. Will Mr Trump be firm, making clear that America and its allies will do what it takes to guarantee Ukraine's sovereignty? Or will he be in such a rush to reopen business with Russia that he rewards its aggression and leaves Ukraine vulnerable to future attacks? As everyone clamours for the president's ear, no one knows what he will do. At the beginning of Mr Trump's second term his supporters had a theory about how he would wield American power. Rather than relying on deep relationships and expertise, he would rely on his gut. As a master negotiator with a knack for sensing what others want and fear, he would cut through the waffle and apply pressure ruthlessly. Everyone wants access to American markets. By threatening to shut them out, he would force recalcitrant foreigners to end wars and reset the terms of trade to America's advantage. Career diplomats and experts would be replaced by rainmakers. Yes, his transactional approach might foster a bit of corruption. But if it brought peace in Ukraine or Gaza, who cared? Alas, there are drawbacks to this approach. Using tariffs as a weapon hurts America, too. More fundamentally, junking universal principles for might-makes-right repels friends without necessarily cowing foes. And the substitution of presidential whim for any coherent theory of international relations makes geopolitics less predictable and more dangerous. Mr Trump is not a globalist, obviously. Nor is he an isolationist, or a believer in regional spheres of influence. He simply does what he wants, which changes frequently. One way to make sense of Trumpism is that he divides his efforts at dealmaking into three categories: high, medium and low stakes. In the first category are America's relations with unfriendly great powers, principally China and Russia. Israel is here, too, because of its importance in American domestic politics. Iran makes an appearance, because of the way it threatens its neighbours. All these relationships are complex, difficult and matter a lot to Mr Trump. If he scores a win here—if he ends the war in Ukraine, or brings peace between Israel and the Palestinians, or finds a formula for co-operating with China without endangering national security—then the pay-off is potentially staggering. In the medium-stakes category Mr Trump puts Brazil, South Africa and, oddly, giant India. These are important countries that both America and China want in their camp. In most cases, their values are far closer to America's than to China's. Ties with them ought to be win-win. But they are unwilling to be bossed around, and take offence when Mr Trump insults or tries to bully them. The small stakes, for Mr Trump, are in small or poor countries. A superpower can wield great influence over such places, sometimes to good ends. Mr Trump helped cement a peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia, for example, and brokered a truce between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda. These are welcome achievements. Azerbaijan and Armenia had been fighting for 35 years. Mr Trump mediated a reopening of trade and transport links. The fruits may include a weakening of Russian influence in the area. The Congo-Rwanda deal is much shakier—Rwandan-backed rebels have violated it repeatedly—but not nothing. And there may be an upside for America, in the form of mineral deals. When it comes to medium-size stakes, Mr Trump's method works less well. He has started needless feuds with the leaders of Brazil (because it is prosecuting a Trumpy ex-president for allegedly attempting a coup), with South Africa (because he believes, wrongly, that it is persecuting whites) and with India (infuriating its prime minister with painful tariffs and undiplomatic boasting). The result? India will draw closer to Russia again, and be less inclined to act as a counterweight against China. Brazil and South Africa see China as a more reliable partner than America. Mr Trump has won headlines that play well with his most ardent supporters. But America has lost out. And when it comes to the highest stakes, the president is floundering. He has tried to coerce China with tariffs, but it is fighting back. This week Mr Trump blinked and extended another deadline. He also undermined his own national-security policy by lifting a ban on exports of Nvidia chips to China, while insisting that Uncle Sam gets a 15% cut. On Ukraine, he has been wildly inconsistent, one day blaming it for having been invaded and threatening to cut military aid, then accusing Mr Putin of bad faith and threatening stiffer sanctions on Russia. On Israel, he has consistently given Binyamin Netanyahu everything he wants and extracted nothing in return. If Mr Trump's bombing of Iran's nuclear sites made Israel safer, well and good. But he has failed to use his leverage to restrain Israel's unending war in Gaza. The world is flattery Other countries are learning how to play Mr Trump. A crypto deal and a nomination for a Nobel peace prize worked for Pakistan. A plane helped Qatar. The corruption is turning out to be as bad as almost anyone feared; the great deals have yet to materialise. Those who say Mr Trump is looking out for his own interests, not America's, have plenty of ammunition. All this is only a preliminary judgment. If Mr Trump stands up to Mr Putin this week, perhaps he can make his greatest-ever deal, ending Europe's worst war since 1945. Sadly, the odds are against it. For subscribers only: to see how we design each week's cover, sign up to our weekly Cover Story newsletter.

Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
The real collusion between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin
To thwart Donald Trump is to court punishment. A rival politician can expect an investigation, an aggravating network may face a lawsuit, a left-leaning university can bid farewell to its public grants, a scrupulous civil servant can count on a pink slip and an independent-minded foreign government, however determined an adversary or stalwart an ally, invites tariffs. Perceived antagonists should also brace for a hail of insults, a lesson in public humiliation to potential transgressors. Vladimir Putin has been a mysterious exception. Mr Trump has blamed his travails over Russia's interference in the 2016 election on just about everyone but him. He has blamed the war in Ukraine on former President Joe Biden, for supposedly inviting it through weakness, and on the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, for somehow starting it. Back when Russia invaded in February 2022, Mr Trump praised Mr Putin's 'savvy'. For months, as Mr Putin made a mockery of Mr Trump's promises to end the war in a day and of his calls for a ceasefire, the president who once threatened 'fire and fury' against North Korea and tariffs as high as 245% against China indulged in no such bluster. He has sounded less formidable than plaintive. 'Vladimir, STOP!' he wrote on social media in April. His use of the given name betrayed a touching faith that their shared intimacy would matter to his reptilian counterpart, too. When Mr Putin kept killing Ukrainians, Mr Trump took a step that was even less characteristic: he admitted to the world that he had been played for a fool. 'Maybe he doesn't want to stop the war, he's just tapping me along,' he mused on April 26th. A month later, he ventured that his friend must have changed, gone 'absolutely CRAZY!' Then on July 8th he acknowledged what should have been obvious from the start: 'He is very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.' Mr Trump threatened secondary sanctions on Russia but then leapt at Mr Putin's latest mixed messages about peace, rewarding him with a summit in America. Why, with this man, has Mr Trump been so accommodating? Efforts by journalists, congressional investigators and prosecutors to pinpoint the reason have often proved exercises in self-defeat and sorrow. The pattern seemed sinister: Mr Trump praised Mr Putin on television as far back as 2007; invited him to the Miss Universe Pageant in Moscow in 2013 and wondered on Twitter if he would be his 'new best friend'; sought his help to build a tower in Moscow from 2013 to 2016; and tried unsuccessfully many times in 2015 to secure a meeting with him. Then came Russia's interference in the election in 2016, including its hack of Democrats' emails to undermine the Democratic candidate, Hillary Clinton. Some journalists fanned suspicions of a conspiracy—'collusion' became the watchword—by spreading claims Mr Putin was blackmailing Mr Trump with an obscene videotape. The source proved to be a rumour compiled in research to help Mrs Clinton. Nine years later Mr Putin's low-budget meddling still rewards America's foes by poisoning its politics and distracting its leaders. Pam Bondi, the attorney-general, has started a grand-jury investigation into what Mr Trump called treason by Barack Obama and others in his administration. The basis is a misrepresentation of an intelligence finding in the waning days of Mr Obama's presidency. Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, has said that because Mr Putin did not hack voting machines, the finding that he tried to help Mr Trump was a lie. The conclusion under Mr Obama was instead that Mr Putin tried to affect the election by influencing public opinion. The exhaustive report released in 2019 by an independent counsel, Robert Mueller, affirmed on its first page that 'the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome.' Mr Mueller indicted numerous Russians, and he also secured guilty pleas from some Trump aides for violating various laws. But he did not conclude the campaign 'conspired or co-ordinated' with the Russians. To wade through the report's two volumes is to be reminded how malicious the Russians were and how shambolic Mr Trump's campaign was. It is also to lament the time and energy spent, given how little proof was found to support the superheated suspicions. And it is to regret how little Mr Trump was accorded a presumption of innocence. In the final words of the report, Mr Mueller noted that while it did not accuse Mr Trump of a crime, it also did 'not exonerate him'. One might understand his bitterness. The puzzle of Mr Trump's admiration for Mr Putin may have been better addressed by psychologists. Certainly Mr Putin, the seasoned KGB operative, has known how to play to his vulnerabilities, including vanity. Mr Trump was said to be 'clearly touched' by a kitschy portrait of himself Mr Putin gave him in March. Putin on the blitz Yet that patronising speculation may be unfair to Mr Trump, too. It certainly understates the hazard. He has weighty reasons to identify with Mr Putin. Since the 1930s a cornerstone of American foreign policy has been that no country can gain territory by force, a principle also enshrined in the charter of the United Nations. Yet in his first term, in pursuit of his vision of Middle East peace, Mr Trump twice granted American recognition of conquered territory, for Israel's claim to the Golan Heights and Morocco's claim to Western Sahara. He appears to envisage an end to the war in Ukraine that would also award Russia new territory. This is how 'savvy' people like Mr Trump and Mr Putin believe the world actually works, or ought to: not according to rules confected by stripy-pants diplomats to preserve an international order, but in deference to power exercised by great men. A world hostage to that theory may be the legacy of their true collusion. Subscribers to The Economist can sign up to our Opinion newsletter, which brings together the best of our leaders, columns, guest essays and reader correspondence.