Governor's office clarifies intentions for Indiana Historical Society building
A lease agreement between the state and the Indiana Historical Society could be in jeopardy under the latest state budget draft. (Niki Kelly/Indiana Capital Chronicle)
Despite language in the proposed state budget that could put the Indiana Historical Society (IHS) headquarters in jeopardy, Gov. Mike Braun's office now maintains the intention is not to force the nonprofit to give up its building.
The Indiana Capital Chronicle reported last week that provisions in the state's draft spending plan could leave the historical society in a bind.
In Braun's proposed spending plan — and the House-approved version — Republican budget writers penned language that appear to terminate the state's contract with the Indianapolis-based institution.
State's proposed budget could cost Indiana Historical Society its building
The historical society owns the downtown Indianapolis building where its headquarters, museum and archives are housed. It does, not however, own the land on which the building sits.
The contract in question — in tandem with a provision in state code — allows IHS to pay $1 per year to lease that land from the state, and in return, Indiana's Department of Administration (IDOA) handles various operational maintenance costs.
In current form, the state budget would repeal that existing code in Indiana law. Another section cobbled into the budget pulls language directly from the cancellation clause of the IHS contract.
The cancellation provision makes clear that '[i]f the Director of the State Budget Agency makes a written determination that funds are not appropriated or otherwise available to support continuation of this Lease, the Lease shall be canceled.'
Exact wordage appears in the budget: 'The director of the budget agency shall make a written determination that funds are not appropriated or otherwise available to support continuation of the performance of any contract or lease entered into under IC 4-13-12.1-8 (before its repeal).'
According to the contract, in the event of a canceled lease, IHS can either purchase the land or sell its building to the state.
A joint statement said 'The Indiana Historical Society and the Braun Administration are cooperatively working toward an agreeable solution.'
But Braun's office said he does not intend to completely void the agreement, and emphasized that 'this process was always intended to be collaborative.'
His team maintained the repeal would eliminate existing contract requirements and open the door for a new or renegotiated IHS contract. That could ultimately provide fewer maintenance services at the state's expense.
Even so, there is no proposed language in budgets penned by either Braun or House Republicans to explicitly trigger contract renegotiation with IHS.
Indiana's next budget is now in the hands of Senate Republicans. Both chambers have until the end of April to finalize the plan.
The House Republican caucus deferred questions about the IHS budget provisions to the governor's office. Senate Republicans have yet to take up the two-year spending plan.
The 2007 lease agreement between IHS and the state was intended to last until 2098. A second contract signed in April 2009 — meant to last through March 2039 — details an additional agreement around the parking lot located adjacent to the IHS building.
The last state budget, approved in 2023, appropriated close to $1 million per year to maintain the building, its exterior and the surrounding site. A legislative fiscal analysis estimated that repeal of the IHS lease would reduce state expenditures by roughly $2.3 million over the biennium.
One section of the contract says that 'upon the expiration or sooner termination of this lease, (IHS) shall surrender to (the state)' the land in question.
The cancellation provision, however, further states that IHS 'shall have the sole and exclusive option to purchase' the land if the agreement is terminated. In such an instance, the state and IHS must each obtain an appraisal of the land before agreeing on a purchase price.
If IHS did go through with a purchase, it would still have to notify the state before selling the property to a third party, however. The nonprofit would then have to provide the state an opportunity to purchase the land back 'at the same price' paid to the state, adjusted for inflation.
It's not clear in the contract what would happen if a deal can't be reached.
A separate provision in state law also says 'after completion of construction and negotiation of a lease under section 8 of this chapter, the society shall convey title to the building to the state.' Notably, the next state budget does not propose a repeal of that language.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump
Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting the unrest in Los Angeles is a consequence of federal involvement in state and local law enforcement efforts. 'Gavin Newsom says he didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Vance wrote in a post on X, attaching two photos that he said were taken before Trump ordered the National Guard to protect border patrol agents in California. One depicted rioters appearing to attack a 'border patrol' van, and another depicted a car set ablaze. The Hill was not able to verify the authenticity of the photos. 'Does this look like 'no problem'?' Vance asked. Vance suggested Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'fomented and encouraged the riots,' with the goal of promoting mass migration into the U.S., adding, 'It is their reason for being.' 'If you want to know why illegal aliens flocked to your state, stop accusing Donald Trump. Look in the mirror,' Vance said. 'If you want to know why border patrol fear for their lives over enforcing the law, look in the mirror.' Vance pointed to California's Medicaid expansion last year to low-income undocumented immigrants as an example of a policy that has 'encouraged mass migration into California.' Newsom has since proposed ending new Medicaid enrollment for undocumented adults, but his proposal faces resistance from the state legislature. 'Your policies that protected those migrants from common sense law enforcement. Your policies that offered massive welfare benefits to reward illegal immigrants. Your policies that allowed those illegal migrants (and their sympathizers) to assault our law enforcement. Your policies that allowed Los Angeles to turn into a war zone,' Vance continued. 'You sure as hell had a problem before President Trump came along. The problem is YOU,' Vance added. Vance's post is the latest in a back-and-forth between the administration and Newsom, who has resisted Trump's extraordinary steps to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops to the area and mobilize 700 active-duty marines. Newsom has insisted that the situation was under control before the Trump administration escalated tensions by making a provocative show of force. He accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities and endangering the principles of our great democracy.' After Trump suggested his border czar arrest Newsom, the California governor responded by saying, 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' 'I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' Newsom added Monday afternoon. Vance then replied to Newsom, saying, 'Do your job. That's all we're asking.' 'Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' Newsom responded, prompting Vance's latest response.


Business Upturn
23 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
TopLine Financial Credit Union Receives Twin Cities Best of Business 2025 Reader's Choice Award
MAPLE GROVE, Minn., June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — TopLine Financial Credit Union , a Twin Cities-based member-owned financial services cooperative , has been named the Best Credit Union in Minnesota by Twin Cities Business 2025 Best of Business Reader's Choice Poll. Twin Cities Business conducts an annual survey of their readers asking 'Which companies exemplify true excellence in their respective industries and would they confidently refer to a family member, friend or colleague?' and published results in its June/July issue and online. The communities the credit union services have recognized TopLine as one of the most appreciated and trustworthy financial institutions in Minnesota. Several qualities that make TopLine stand out include the credit union's dedication to our mission of 'Connected, We All Do Better' by providing affordable and competitive financial services, commitment of our employees to help consumers achieve their financial goals, positively making a local and global impact through community outreach activities via their TopLine Credit Union Foundation, and helping consumers with homeownership and investments. 'We are honored to receive the distinction in the Financial Services Credit Unions category of the Twin Cities Business 'Best of Business' poll,' said Mick Olson, President and CEO of TopLine Financial Credit Union. 'This recognition reflects the unwavering commitment, care, and compassion of our TopLine family of employees in supporting our members and communities and helping them achieve their financial dreams. We extend heartfelt gratitude to our members and communities for their trust and support, and congratulate all the esteemed organizations recognized this year.' Twin Cities Business is Minnesota's leading provider of business news, insight, and analysis through daily online new stories, e-newsletters, a monthly print magazine and live events. Along with their readers, they get to know the personalities of our region's most influential leaders, exploring the 'how' behind their success, strategies, and solutions. They discuss today's most pressing issues, examine trends and outlooks, and provide the context, perspective, and information leaders have come to depend on. TopLine Financial Credit Union , a Twin Cities-based credit union, is Minnesota's 9th largest credit union, with assets of over $1.1 billion and serves over 70,000 members. Established in 1935, the not-for-profit financial cooperative offers a complete line of financial services from its ten branch locations — in Bloomington, Brooklyn Park, Champlin, Circle Pines, Coon Rapids, Forest Lake, Maple Grove, Plymouth, St. Francis and in St. Paul's Como Park — as well as by phone and online at . Membership is available to anyone who lives, works, worships, attends school or volunteers in Anoka, Benton, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Pine, Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne, Washington and Wright counties in Minnesota and their immediate family members, as well as employees and retirees of Anoka Hennepin School District #11, Anoka Technical College, Federal Premium Ammunition, Hoffman Enclosures, Inc., GRACO, Inc., and their subsidiaries. Visit us on our Facebook or Instagram. To learn more about the credit union's foundation, visit CONTACT:Vicki Roscoe EricksonSenior Vice President and Chief Marketing OfficerTopLine Financial Credit Union [email protected] | 763.391.0872


Business Upturn
23 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Edmonton Lawyers Report a Surge in Civil Disputes Between Co-Founders
Edmonton, Alberta , June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — A new study from Forum Law, a leading Edmonton-based law firm, has uncovered a significant rise in civil disputes between co-founders of businesses across the region. This trend is drawing attention to the growing complexities and risks involved in startup partnerships, highlighting the need for clearer agreements and proactive legal planning. NON-FAMILY CIVIL COURT CASES INITIATED IN CANADA While entrepreneurship continues to thrive in Edmonton and across Canada, the increase in co-founder conflicts reveals underlying challenges that can threaten even the most promising ventures. Disputes between business partners can arise from a variety of issues including misaligned expectations, disagreements over roles and responsibilities, equity splits, and financial management. These conflicts often result in costly litigation, damaged business relationships, and even the dissolution of companies. Key Insights from the Study The Forum Law report analyzed recent case trends and identified several key factors contributing to the surge in co-founder disputes: Lack of Clear Agreements: Many startups begin without formalized partnership agreements, leaving roles, decision-making processes, and equity ownership open to interpretation and disagreement. Many startups begin without formalized partnership agreements, leaving roles, decision-making processes, and equity ownership open to interpretation and disagreement. Communication Breakdowns: Differences in vision, management style, and communication preferences often fuel misunderstandings between co-founders. Differences in vision, management style, and communication preferences often fuel misunderstandings between co-founders. Financial Disputes: Conflicts around funding, profit distribution, and financial transparency have become common flashpoints. Conflicts around funding, profit distribution, and financial transparency have become common flashpoints. Intellectual Property and Ownership Issues: Disputes over who owns business ideas, technology, or product rights are increasingly frequent. Disputes over who owns business ideas, technology, or product rights are increasingly frequent. Growth and Scaling Challenges: As startups grow, initial informal agreements may not suffice, creating friction around new roles and equity adjustments. Legal Experts Call for Proactive Measures 'Entrepreneurship is exciting but can be fraught with unexpected challenges,' said a representative from Forum Law. 'Our study underscores how important it is for co-founders to establish clear, legally binding agreements from the outset. Doing so can prevent misunderstandings and provide a roadmap for resolving conflicts if they arise.' The firm recommends that new business partners invest time in drafting detailed shareholder or partnership agreements, clearly defining each person's roles, equity stakes, dispute resolution methods, and exit strategies. Engaging experienced legal counsel early on can help entrepreneurs avoid pitfalls and protect their ventures. Supporting Edmonton's Entrepreneurial Community The rise in disputes signals an urgent need for education and support within Edmonton's growing startup ecosystem. Forum Law offers specialized legal services tailored to startups and entrepreneurs, helping them navigate the complexities of partnership law and safeguarding their businesses for long-term success. Civil disputes among co-founders not only disrupt businesses but also impact innovation and economic growth. By raising awareness and promoting best practices, Forum Law hopes to foster stronger, more resilient business partnerships throughout Alberta. To read the full study, visit: Edmonton Lawyers Report a Surge in Civil Disputes Between Co-Founders Alternative dispute resolution & Litigation About Forum Law Forum Law is a respected Edmonton-based law firm specializing in civil litigation, business law, and dispute resolution. With a commitment to practical solutions and client-focused service, the firm supports entrepreneurs, startups, and established businesses in navigating legal challenges and achieving successful outcomes. Press inquiries Forum Law Shamil Shamilov [email protected] 1 (587) 557-5670 11835 – 149 ST Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5L 2J1