These are the top workplace fears for U.S. employees right now
Unsurprisingly, politics and current events are the key drivers of U.S. workers' worries.
Workers' mental health is taking a beating as a result, with 74 percent saying they want mental-health resources specifically addressing global political turmoil.
For many employees, things are as bad as they've ever been. Almost half of the survey respondents said life was easier during the COVID-19 pandemic than it is now.
4 jobs hiring across the east coast
Executive Director, ROA, Washington D.C.
Director of Policy – North America, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Washington D.C. or New York City
Senior Campaigner (17-Month Fixed Term), Amnesty International USA, New York City / Washington D.C.
Director of Government Affairs, Blueprint Biosecurity, Washington D.C.
'American employees are struggling with their mental health, with global political turmoil and current events taking a particularly dire toll, and it's detrimental to how employees are showing up in the workplace,' says Alyson Watson, founder, and CEO of Modern Health.
Those factors are bad enough, but another piece of research identifies that a majority of Americans are also concerned about the prospect of losing their job this year.
Job losses loom
Another study, conducted by My Perfect Resume, outlines growing fears among workers.
Eighty-one percent are afraid they'll lose their job in 2025, and 20 percent of those are 'much more worried' about finding themselves unemployed in 2025 than they were a year ago.
Adding to that are fears that finding a new job won't be easy, with 57 percent expecting that finding a new position will be as difficult or harder than it was in 2024.
Even more worries are weighing hard on workers' minds. Ninety-two percent are concerned about a recession this year, and 33 percent believe the overall labor market will worsen.
Burnout is on the rise with workers' saying that increased workloads (29 percent), and lack of work-life balance (23 percent), are the significant contributing factors.
For those who have already been hit by job cuts this year, former president Joe Biden's recent comments at the national conference of Advocates, Counselors and Representatives for the Disabled (ACRD) in Chicago, may have hit home.
Biden hit out at cuts at the Social Security Administration and said a 'hatchet' had been taken to the organization.
'Already we can see the effects, for example, thousands of people who use the Social Security website every single day to check on their benefits and submit their claims,' he said.
'But now, the technology division of the Social Security administration has been cut in half. And so the website's crashing. People can't sign onto their accounts. What do you think it does?'
Remote work disappearing
American workers are also concerned about the erosion of remote and hybrid working.
Eighty-eight percent of respondents to My Perfect Resume's study said they predict more companies will require employees to return to the office this year.
While the most recent report from WFH Research, which monitors working from home before and since the start of the pandemic, found that these days, working from home is most common in the finance, tech, and professional and business services sectors.
It also identified that 13 percent of full-time employees are now fully remote, 61 percent are full-time on site, and 26 percent are working in a hybrid manner.
It is clear that as a result of waves of return to office mandates, fewer workers than before are able to enjoy a completely remote setup.
However, some light has emerged at the end of the tunnel for workers at the Food and Drug Administration, for example.
Just weeks after workers there were ordered back into the office, and were met with a range of issues like limited parking and makeshift office spaces, the agency has had a change of heart. It will now allow certain staff to work remotely, such as its review staff and supervisors.
In general however, jobs are trending away from offering remote working. LinkedIn statistics show that just 8 percent of jobs were remote as of December 2024. That's down from 18 percent in early 2022.
One outlier has emerged here, however: high paying, in-demand positions are still more likely to be offered for remote working.
Career site Ladders found that 10.4 percent of roles that pay $250,000 or more were advertised as remote in the third quarter of 2024.
The takeaway is that if you've got skills that are in demand in the labor market, you've still got negotiating power to work the way that suits you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Intercept
8 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Can Congress Stop Trump From Starting a War in Mexico?
More than 30 humanitarian, public interest, immigrant rights, faith-based, veterans' advocacy, and drug policy reform groups are calling on Congress to oppose the use of military force against drug cartels in Latin America by the Trump administration. Melding two failed American wars — the war on drugs and the war on terror — would 'put people at risk of violence and destabilize hemispheric relations while hindering, not helping, efforts to protect communities from drug trafficking and other crime,' according to the organizations, which include the Alianza Americas, Center for Civilians in Conflict, Drug Policy Alliance, Public Citizen, and Win Without War. President Donald Trump has secretly signed a directive to the Pentagon to begin using military force against select Latin American drug cartels that his administration has deemed terrorist organizations, according to an Intercept interview with a U.S. official who was not authorized to speak to the media. The authorization was first reported by the New York Times. The decision to involve the American military in what has previously been considered a law enforcement effort comes as Trump has increasingly turned to U.S. troops for law enforcement purposes on American soil and taken over the D.C. police. These efforts are seen as dangerous escalations of the use of military force and violations of long-held norms. The letter, sent to top congressional leaders on Friday, urges lawmakers 'to use the full slate of its powers to prevent the administration from launching a new war in Latin America without democratic debate or public accountability' by 'organiz[ing] hearings to assess the scope of the administration's envisioned use-of-force policy and its likely diplomatic, economic, and human impacts' and 'withhold[ing] funding for unauthorized, undebated, and unaccountable military action.' In January, the State Department declared eight Mexican drug cartels — the Sinaloa cartel, CJNG, the Northeast cartel, the Michoacán family, the United Cartels, and the Gulf Cartel — to be foreign terrorist organizations. The Salvadoran MS-13 and the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang were also named. That designation activates U.S. sanctions, including restrictions on financial transactions and bans on U.S. citizens from providing support to the groups. That same month, Trump mused that he might send U.S. commandos into Mexico to battle cartels. 'Could happen,' he said. 'Stranger things have happened.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth also threatened military action on Mexican soil. And a Justice Department guidance document urged employees to work toward the 'total elimination of cartels.' The coalition of groups pointed to the potential blowback of expanding the forever wars to Mexico and beyond. 'Unilateral and hastily conceived military action could contribute to the considerable human rights abuses, criminal violence, and forced displacement already harming communities in Latin America,' reads the letter. 'Militarized approaches to countering narcotics trafficking have often backfired. They have inadvertently incentivized criminal groups to traffic smaller and more potent drugs to evade interdiction, acquire deadlier weapons, and expand their networks of corruption to protect their profits.' Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum last week rejected the use of U.S. troops in her country. But earlier this week, Mexico extradited 26 alleged cartel members to the United States. Attorney General Pam Bondi hailed the cooperation. 'These 26 men have all played a role in bringing violence and drugs to American shores — under this Department of Justice, they will face severe consequences for their crimes against this country,' she said. 'We are grateful to Mexico's National Security team for their collaboration in this matter.' The U.S. war on drugs, first declared by Richard Nixon in 1971, has been an abject failure. It's estimated that the United States has spent more than $1 trillion battling the drug trade and drug use with dismal results. Nearly 1 million arrests are made for drug law violations in the U.S. each year, according to FBI statistics, making it the leading cause of arrest in the United States. One in 3 people in the U.S. has lost someone they know to a drug overdose. In 2024, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk called the worldwide war on drugs a 'clear failure' and called out 'militarized law enforcement responses' around the world. 'Overseas military strikes certainly won't solve drug overdose deaths in the U.S., which are far better addressed through public health measures,' said Stephanie Brewer, the director for Mexico at the Washington Office on Latin America or WOLA, another signatory of the letter. 'What military action abroad would do is open the door to increased violence, forced migration, and incalculable damage to U.S. relations with neighboring countries.' Trump has already sent thousands of National Guard and active-duty troops to the southern border to ostensibly halt the flow of drugs as well as immigrants. More than 10,000 troops are deploying or have deployed there, according to Northern Command. Under the direction of NORTHCOM, military personnel have deployed under the moniker Joint Task Force-Southern Border since March, bolstering approximately 2,500 service members who were already supporting U.S. Customs and Border Protection's border security mission. One-third of the U.S. border is now completely militarized due to the creation of four new national defense areas, or NDAs: sprawling extensions of U.S. military bases patrolled by troops who can detain immigrants until they can be handed over to Border Patrol agents. 'Launching military action in Latin America without congressional authorization would be illegal, reckless, and a betrayal of our democratic process — and Congress must intervene to stop it,' Sara Haghdoosti, the executive director of Win Without War, told The Intercept. 'We've seen this 'war on drugs' playbook before in the region, and it has failed time and again — fueling violence, displacing communities, and doing nothing to address the root causes of drug trafficking.' Haghdoosti added, 'What makes this even more egregious is that the Trump administration is pushing for war while slashing the very public health programs that save lives. People need healthcare, treatment, and support — not military posturing and strikes.'
Buzz Feed
8 minutes ago
- Buzz Feed
Trump's Smithsonian Order Sparks Backlash
It's true — as a part of his "Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History" executive order, the White House will be reviewing exhibits in Smithsonian museums to fit Donald Trump's interpretation of American history. In an open letter to the Smithsonian, the White House wrote that officials will conduct a "comprehensive internal review of selected Smithsonian museums and exhibitions. This initiative aims to ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." Online, people have compared the Trump administration's actions to those of nazis in the 1930s, when Adolf Hitler organized the removal of about 20,000 works of art from museums and private collections in an effort to align "German politics, society, and culture with Nazi goals," according to the Holocaust Memorial Museum. This comparison is not the only way the Trump administration's museum audit has appeared controversial online. There's a wide range of dissenting opinions. Here's what people are saying: What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats introduce bill to block Trump DC police takeover
A band of Democratic lawmakers is introducing legislation to thwart President Trump's takeover of the D.C. police department, arguing the White House is exceeding its authority. The resolution would terminate Trump's Monday order, something the lawmakers say comes as 'the President has concocted a false narrative around the city's crime rates' which have been declining for two years, while violent crime has reached a 30-year-low. 'Under the D.C. Home Rule Act, Congress has given the president the power only to direct the Mayor to make the Metropolitan Police Department available for a specific federal purpose but has given him no power simply to take over the Department. In any event, there is no federal emergency justifying such a takeover even if Congress sought to use its lawmaking power to effectuate it,' Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. 'Trump has made clear that his efforts in D.C., where 700,000 taxpaying American citizens lack the protections of statehood, are part of a broader plan to militarize and federalize the streets of cities around America whose citizens voted against him,' Raskin added, calling it a 'hostile takeover.' Trump also sent National Guard troops to the nation's capital, and tensions flared earlier in the week as officers set up checkpoints in the city. The Trump administration on Thursday escalated its takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department (MPD), with Attorney General Pam Bondi installing Drug Enforcement Agency Administrator Terry Cole as Washington's ' emergency police commissioner,' while rescinding policies that limited officers from taking policing actions purely for immigration enforcement purposes. 'President Trump's incursions against D.C. are among the most egregious attacks on D.C. home rule in decades,' said Del. Eleanor Holmes-Norton (D-D.C.). 'Our local police force, paid for by D.C. residents, should not be subject to federalization, an action that wouldn't be possible for any other police department in the country. No emergency exists in D.C. that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the D.C. Police for federal purposes, as required by law.' The legislation was also co-sponsored by House Oversight Ranking Member Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), but cannot be taken up during the August recess. Once lawmakers return, it's unlikely the GOP-controlled body would bring the legislation to the floor. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) sponsored a companion bill in the Senate. The lawmakers argue Trump's police takeover is only the latest in a string of actions they say undermine effective governance of the city, including on crime, though D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser's budget fully funded MPD. Earlier this year, Congress failed to include in its stopgap funding bill language that would allow D.C. to continue spending its local budget at fiscal 2025 levels — restricting $1 billion in city coffers. 'While Trump claims that federal control of D.C. is necessary to combat crime, the President's own actions are what is jeopardizing public safety in the District. He and his allies in Congress refuse to allow the District to access the $1 billion in locally-raised revenue that would have funded D.C. police, fire and emergency response services, and other public safety efforts,' the lawmakers said in a joint release. 'He fired and demoted dozens of D.C.'s most experienced career prosecutors, contributing to a larger backlog of criminal cases being held up in court and longer wait times for crime victims to obtain justice.' Van Hollen said Trump was absent when D.C. 'actually needed support from the National Guard' on Jan. 6. 'His current takeover is an abuse of power and nothing more than a raw power grab,' he said in a statement. 'The District of Columbia has made important progress on public safety in recent years, and can do more if Trump and House Republicans get the hell out of their way and stop blocking D.C. from accessing $1 billion of its own funds to strengthen policing and provide other public services.'
