Washington ‘Drags' Tehran to Negotiations as Military Option Remains on the Table
The administration of US President Donald Trump is intensifying pressure on Iranian authorities to adopt a clearer stance and to 'drag' them into direct negotiations, without ruling out military options.
While attention is focused on the US administration's pressure and its potential success in curbing Iran, the latter may counter Trump by leveraging 'international and regional cards,' according to an American researcher.
Earlier, Axios reported that President Trump's message to Iran set a two-month deadline for reaching a new nuclear deal, warning of consequences if the offer is rejected and Iran continues its nuclear program.
An American official and two sources familiar with the message told Axios that "Trump does not want open-ended negotiations with the Iranians."
Trump's National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, urged Iran to abandon all elements of its nuclear program, including missiles, armament, and uranium enrichment, or face a full range of other consequences.
While the White House has not officially confirmed a deadline for Tehran, Brian Katulis, a senior fellow at the Middle East Institute in Washington, suggested that Trump wants Iran's leadership to focus their thinking on taking a stance and moving seriously toward the negotiating table.
'Iran is facing critical decisions regarding its nuclear program and influence in the Middle East, while the Trump administration is pushing (by setting the deadline) for a clearer response than Iran has given so far,' Katulis told Asharq Al-Awsat.
According to Katulis, military action against Iran remains a possibility, but Trump's approach toward Iran is still unclear.
For his part, Patrick Clawson, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, believes Trump wants to demonstrate his ability to reach agreements on Ukraine, Lebanon, Gaza, and Iran, while Biden has been unable to do so.
Clawson told Asharq Al-Awsat, 'In each case, Trump has said: 'Make a deal or you'll pay a heavy price,' and for Iran, the 'heavy price' will become clear by the summer.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leaders
4 hours ago
- Leaders
US Strikes May Have Only Delayed Iran's Nuclear Program: Report
A preliminary US intelligence assessment has revealed that recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities may have only delayed Tehran's program by months, three sources familiar with the matter shared this information with Reuters. The Defense Intelligence Agency prepared the initial report, which is one of 18 US intelligence agencies. The assessment indicates that Iran could restart its nuclear program within months. One source estimated that the earliest restart could occur in one to two months. This classified assessment contradicts statements from President Donald Trump and high-ranking US officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They claimed the strikes effectively eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities. On Tuesday, Trump's administration informed the UN Security Council that the strikes had 'degraded' Iran's nuclear program. This statement fell short of Trump's earlier claim that the facilities had been 'obliterated.' When asked for comment, the White House referred to spokesperson Karoline Leavitt's statement to CNN. She called the assessment 'flat-out wrong.' 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' Leavitt stated. Damage Assessment Remains Uncertain A US official who reviewed the assessment noted that it included several caveats and 'ifs.' This official also mentioned that a more refined report is expected in the coming days. Analysts suggest that if the assessment relied on satellite imagery, it might not reveal the full extent of damage to the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment facility. Trump has argued that the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. However, Iran denies seeking such a weapon, asserting that its nuclear program serves peaceful purposes. Evaluating the damage at the Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear sites presents significant challenges. The Defense Intelligence Agency is not the only agency tasked with this evaluation. One source indicated that the assessment faced disagreement and was not universally accepted. A US official, speaking anonymously, stated that the true extent of the damage remains unknown. Nevertheless, the initial assessment suggests that the strikes may not have been as successful as the Trump administration claims. Infrastructure Damage Reported The report indicates the US attack caved in facility entrances and damaged infrastructure. However, one source noted that the strike did not collapse underground buildings. Restarting operations will depend on how long it takes Iran to dig out and repair power and water supply facilities. The Washington Post reported some centrifuges for enriching uranium remained intact after the strikes. The Pentagon disputed claims that the damage was insignificant but did not deny the existence of the DIA assessment. 'Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons,' Hegseth stated to Reuters. He emphasized that the bombs hit their targets perfectly, resulting in devastating impacts buried under rubble. However, one source indicated that Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated. David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, expressed that the US attack effectively destroyed Iran's uranium enrichment program for now. However, he warned that it failed to eliminate the longer-term threat. 'Iran retains an ability to break out and produce weapon-grade uranium,' Albright stated in a post on X. He highlighted that Iran's stock of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium, sufficient for about nine warheads, remains unaccounted for. Ongoing Debate and Canceled Briefings Initial military assessments can evolve as more information becomes available. It is common for opinions to vary across different US intelligence agencies. Democrats have previously stated that Trump's claims about the strikes eliminating or significantly hindering Iran's nuclear program lack supporting evidence. 'There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear program was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed,' House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday. Classified briefings for members of the House of Representatives and Senate regarding this matter were canceled on Tuesday. Short link : Post Views: 4
Al Arabiya
5 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Ukrainian President Zelenskyy Sidelined as NATO Leaders Meet to Agree Defense Spending Boost
Spurred by Russia's aggressive military buildup and Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, NATO leaders met Wednesday to agree to a significant boost in defense spending. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy could only look on from the sidelines. Ukraine, which has been at war with Russia since Moscow's illegal invasion in 2022, has been front and center at recent NATO summits, but as the alliance's annual leaders' meeting opened in The Hague, Zelenskyy was not in the room. Instead, he scheduled a series of face-to-face meetings with leaders at the summit venue, including with US President Donald Trump, who had a major bust-up with Zelenskyy earlier this year in the Oval Office. 'We'll discuss the obvious. We'll discuss his difficulty. He's got a little difficulty,' Zelenskyy Trump told reporters before joining the summit. 'He's a nice guy. I mean, I'm going to meet him today. I don't know. I assume we're going to be discussing Ukraine.' Trump's administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join NATO. The conflict has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the invasion on Kyiv. Russian leaders and military top brass have been accused of war crimes, including targeting civilian infrastructure. The International Criminal Court, based in The Hague, has issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin on charges of involvement in abducting Ukrainian children. Putin denies the charges. Zelenskyy spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the UK will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds (95 million dollars) raised from the interest on seized Russian assets. Zelenskyy dined Tuesday night at Dutch King Willem-Alexander's Huis Ten Bosch palace with NATO leaders, including Trump. The two leaders were seated at different tables – Zelenskyy sitting with Dutch Queen Maxima and Trump with the king. On Wednesday, as the NATO leaders met, Zelenskyy scheduled more meetings to keep his nation's battle at the forefront of their thoughts. Later in the day, Zelenskyy was traveling to France to sign off on plans to set up a new international court to prosecute those accused of orchestrating Russia's war against Ukraine. The special tribunal will target the senior Russian leaders who launched the full-scale invasion, the initial crime of aggression that underlies the countless atrocities Ukraine accuses Russian forces of committing.
Al Arabiya
6 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Trump whirlwind tests NATO summit unity
Will he play nice? That was the question for NATO leaders nervously waiting to see if a carefully choreographed show to please US President Donald Trump would pay dividends as the alliance summit began on Wednesday. Every precaution is in place to avoid a Trump blow-up at the Hague gathering, from giving him credit for a historic spending deal to keeping the meeting short and sweet. But that did not stop the volatile US leader launching a pre-summit grenade as he crossed the Atlantic on Air Force One, casting doubt on the very foundation of the 32-member alliance. He refused to state his commitment to NATO's Article Five clause, the basic agreement that says an attack on one member is an attack on all. 'Depends on your definition. There's numerous definitions of Article Five,' Trump told journalists in comments sure to rattle the European allies he dined with upon arrival on Tuesday night. 'I'm committed to being their friend,' he said. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte played down the comments as the summit opened on Wednesday, saying he believed Trump and the United States were still 'totally committed' to Article Five. In an earlier message, probably not designed for public consumption, Rutte heaped flattery on Trump, praising him for bringing everyone on board for the spending hike. 'Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win,' Rutte wrote in a gushing, caps-filled missive to Trump, who promptly posted it on social media. 'You are flying into another big success in The Hague,' wrote Rutte. NATO allies are set on Wednesday to rubber stamp a pledge to allocate 3.5 percent of GDP to core defense spending, plus another 1.5 percent to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. Rutte said that the spending boost by Europeans nations and Canada would make sure 'that we not only are able to defend ourselves against the Russians and others, but also to equalize.' 'And this is fair, that we spend the same as the US is spending,' Rutte said. Rutte said that Trump was in an 'excellent mood' after dining in royal splendour with the Dutch king and queen on Tuesday night and spending the night in their palace. 'This is incredible' Trump has long groused that European countries pay too little for their own security, upended by Russia's war in Ukraine. The spending hike is designed to keep him engaged with the alliance, after his return to power sparked fears that he could blow up the seven-decade-old organization. Spain was the main hold-out on the five-percent target, complaining that spending that amount on defense was 'unreasonable' -- and drawing Trump's ire in the process. Trump took fresh aim at Madrid en route to The Hague, calling its stance 'very unfair' and posting a graphic entitled 'Spain threatens to derail NATO summit' showing the relative outlay of alliance members. One of the lowest-spending NATO countries on defense in relative terms, Spain is only set to hit the current NATO target of two percent this year after a 10-billion-euro injection. Rutte stressed that the spending hike -- billed as 'historic' -- is needed to keep Russia in check, but even here Trump threatens to spoil NATO unity. The US leader has turned Western policy on Ukraine on its head, reaching out to Russian President Vladimir Putin and maintaining a volatile relationship with Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Trump and Zelenskyy are slated to have a tete-a-tete in The Hague -- with officials hoping to avoid a bust-up like their infamous Oval Office shouting match. Unlike previous summits, Zelenskyy has not been invited to the main working session of the leaders -- cut to two and a half hours, reportedly due to Trump's dislike of lengthy talks. Rutte said that allies would send the message that support for Kyiv was 'unwavering and will persist.' But despite his insistence that Ukraine's bid for membership remains 'irreversible', NATO will avoid any mention of Kyiv's push to join after Trump ruled it out. One European diplomat put it succinctly. 'We have a completely unpredictable US president.' 'We are hoping there won't be an ill-timed comment that is all anyone remembers. Everything has been done to reduce this risk,' the official said.
