Kill zone from the sky
A weary Ukrainian platoon commander, being evacuated from the front line, summed up the new face of war.
Kamikaze drones. Surveillance drones. Bomber drones. Drones that kill other drones.
These machines now dominate the skies over Ukraine.
They're cheap, deadly and ubiquitous – and among the main reasons Ukrainian forces believe they can keep resisting Russia's advance this year and beyond.
Soldiers describe the 10km-deep stretch of land on either side of the front as the 'kill zone', where drones spot and strike with brutal speed.
The war has evolved into the most drone-intensive conflict in history – a shift that has helped neutralise Russia's traditional advantages in manpower, artillery and armour.
'Any large vehicle near the front is a target,' said one Ukrainian commander. Columns of tanks, like those Russia used in 2022, now risk instant destruction.
The surveillance network is immense. Over 15,000 Ukrainian drone crews feed real-time footage into Ochi, a video integration system.
'The enemy sees you completely,' said Ochi's founder, Oleksandr Dmitriev.
'No matter where you go or what you are driving.'
In response, Russian troops now attack in small units – usually five or six on foot, motorbikes or quad bikes – to draw fire and expose Ukrainian positions for drone strikes.
Russia's Defence Ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
Despite tactical changes, Russian forces still hold the upper hand, pushing slowly through the east and north.
Russia has also ramped up its own drone production to millions annually.
Yet many Ukrainian officials and arms experts remain optimistic.
Even if US support dwindles, they say, drones and European military aid could help Ukraine hold out – for now.
New Ukrainian-made drone-missiles, named Peklo, during an exhibition dedicated to the Day of Ukrainian Armed Forces. — Reuters
'We can hold out for months,' said Oleksandr Kamyshin, arms expert and strategic adviser to President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 'In 2023 or 2024, it would have been a lot worse – we would be talking about days or weeks.'
On the front lines, drones are now the deadliest threat.
Ivan, a 35-year-old platoon commander known by the call sign 'Atom', said drones have replaced mines, shells and snipers as the most feared danger.
'They're demons,' he said. 'Everyone fears them now.'
Reconnaissance UAVs – often resembling toy planes – hover over the battlefield, relaying images in real time.
They spot for bomber drones that drop grenades with 3D-printed tailfins, and for kamikaze units fitted with RPG warheads, designed to pierce armour or hit enemy fighters directly.
Battlefield medics say the change is stark.
'Most of our injuries now come from drones,' said Olga Kozum, 34, who was treating wounded alongside Ivan.
Internal Ukrainian estimates suggest drones were responsible for 69% of strikes on Russian troops and 75% on equipment in 2024.
In comparison, artillery accounted for only 18% and 15%, respectively. Mortars made up most of the rest.
Both sides have developed fibre-optic drones that can't be jammed, as well as 'interceptors' – airborne hunter-killers designed to destroy enemy UAVs mid-flight.
Ukraine is also boosting its offensive capacity with long-range drones.
Kyiv plans to produce 30,000 such UAVs this year, capable of targeting deep into Russia – from ammunition depots to oil refineries.
'These are our asymmetrical answer,' said former drone commander Vadym Sukharevskyi.
He noted that a long-range drone costs US$50,000–300,000 – about a tenth of a missile's price, albeit with a smaller payload.
'You can't win a big war if you're only defending,' Kamyshin added.
'Long-range drone strikes are one of the main cards Ukraine can play against Russia.'
Ukraine's military-industrial sector now supplies 40% of its own equipment, including drones. Zelenskyy hopes to raise that to 50% within six months.
At the same time, European nations are increasing their contributions.
According to Germany's Kiel Institute, Europe overtook the United States in total military aid for the first time since June 2022, pledging €72bil compared to €65bil from Washington.
The shift is partly due to stalled US aid earlier this year, though President Donald Trump has recently pledged to send arms to Ukraine via Nato – if Europe pays.
Key details of the deal remain vague, including what types of weapons will be sent, how quickly and how the cost will be shared.
Still, Ukraine remains heavily reliant on US air defences and satellite intelligence.
Patriot systems – capable of intercepting Russia's increasingly frequent ballistic missile attacks – are in short supply. Ukraine has only seven fully operational Patriot batteries, far short of the 25 it says it needs.
While Europe is scaling up artillery production, it cannot fully replace the US role in sharing real-time intelligence, analysts say.
In the meantime, drone warfare continues to reshape the battlefield – faster and cheaper than any missile, more terrifying than any shell. — Reuters
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malaysia Sun
an hour ago
- Malaysia Sun
Switzerland offers Putin immunity for Ukraine peace talks media
The Russian president will not be arrested in the country under an International Criminal Court warrant, Bern has reportedly said Switzerland has indicated it would allow Russian President Vladimir Putin to attend possible Ukraine peace talks on its soil without facing arrest under an International Criminal Court warrant, according to media reports. Following a weekend during which Putin was welcomed to the US by President Donald Trump, who days later hosted Vladimir Zelensky and his key Western European backers, Moscow confirmed its readiness to participate in further talks on a lasting resolution to the Ukraine conflict and indicated that its diplomatic presence at such talks would be raised. A possible venue for such talks has not been identified. The Hague-based ICC issued arrest warrants in 2023 for Putin, as well as Russian Commissioner for Children's Rights Maria Lvova-Belova, over alleged unlawful deportation and transfer of children from former Ukrainian territories. Moscow has dismissed the allegations as politically motivated, explaining that it evacuated the children out of the war zone for their own safety. DETAILS TO FOLLOW (


Malaysia Sun
an hour ago
- Malaysia Sun
Millions take part in Moscow festival celebrating Indias culture
Record crowds joined a festival marking South Asian nations 78th independence India Day festivities in Moscow last week recorded 2.7 million visitors, according to the organizers. The four-day celebration in the Russian capital mixed yoga sessions, dance performance and Holi traditions with official ceremonies and awards. The festival was attended by India's Ambassador to Russia Vinay Kumar, Moscow Government Minister Sergey Cheremin, and officials from dozens of countries, according to festival founder and President of the Indian Cultural and National Center Sita Sammy Kotwani. This year's program included the launch of the India Day awards, the jury for which featured Anton Kobyakov, an adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova and Mosfilm director Karen Shakhnazarov. Awards were presented in ten categories such as yoga, Ayurveda, literature, business and humanitarian initiatives. The festival coincided with India's 79th Independence Day, marked on 15 August. The date commemorates India's liberation from British rule in 1947 and its emergence as a sovereign state. Independence Day is among the country's key national holidays and is observed annually with flag-raising ceremonies, cultural events and tributes to leaders of the independence movement. The event also coincided with an official visit to Russia by Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar, who is scheduled to hold talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov on Thursday. As part of the celebrations and to highlight close ties between the two countries, landmark buildings along Moscow's Novy Arbat Avenue were lit in the colors of the Indian flag, the Indian Embassy said in a post on X. (


The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Explainer-Does Trump have the power to ban mail-in ballots in U.S. elections?
FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Donald Trump holds up an executive order in the South Court Auditorium on the White House campus in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 5, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump wants to ban mail-in ballots in federal elections, a form of voting popular with many Americans. About three in 10 ballots were cast through the mail in the 2024 general election, according to the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. Trump, a Republican, does not have clear legal authority to do this, though his allies in Congress and state governments could enact policies barring the practice. Here is a look at Trump's authority and how the law could be changed. CAN TRUMP UNILATERALLY BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? Only states and the U.S. Congress can pass laws regulating elections. A unilateral ban by the president on mail-in ballots would likely exceed Trump's limited authority to enforce existing law. In a Monday social media post, Trump said mail-in ballots are susceptible to fraud and that he would lead a movement to ban them, beginning with an executive order bringing "honesty" to the November 2026 midterm elections. Republicans have filed scores of lawsuits seeking to end mail-in voting in recent years, citing possible fraud. Democrats generally support mail-in ballots as a way to expand access to voting. Voter fraud in the U.S. is extremely rare, multiple studies have shown. White House representatives provided a general statement about Trump's election policies but did not answer questions about his legal authority to ban mail-in ballots or what an executive order would say. COULD TRUMP'S ALLIES BAN MAIL-IN BALLOTS? States are responsible for administering their votes under the U.S. Constitution, and Republican-controlled legislatures could pass laws banning mail-in ballots so long as they do not conflict with federal law. Congress could ban the use of mail-in ballots in federal elections and override state laws protecting their use, but Trump's Republican Party has slim majorities in Congress and would face difficulty getting past opposition by Democrats. Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. To pass a mail-in ballot ban they would need to end the filibuster, a longstanding tradition requiring 60 of the chamber's 100 members to approve most legislation. State and federal laws banning mail-in voting could be challenged in court as unconstitutional impediments to voting. WHAT OTHER POWERS DO PRESIDENTS HAVE OVER ELECTIONS? Presidents in the U.S. have some discretion in enforcing election laws, and Trump could try to use those powers to end or restrict mail-in voting, though it is unclear how. In June, a federal judge blocked parts of an executive order by Trump requiring voters to prove they are U.S. citizens and attempting to prevent states from counting mail-in ballots received after Election Trump administration is appealing. "The Constitution does not grant the president any specific powers over elections," said U.S. District Judge Denise Casper, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama. (Reporting by Jack Queen, editing by Ross Colvin and Rosalba O'Brien)