
In 1948 a Labour government founded the NHS. My job now is to make it fit for the future
That the National Health Service was created amid the rubble and ruin of the aftermath of war makes that choice all the more remarkable. It enshrined in law and in the service itself our collective conviction that healthcare is not a privilege to be bought and sold, but a right to be cherished and protected. Now it falls to our generation to make the same choice.
There have always been those who have whispered that the NHS is a burden, too expensive, inferior to the market. Today, those voices grow louder, determined to use the crisis in the NHS as an opportunity to dismantle it. This government rejects the pessimistic view that universal healthcare could be afforded in the 20th century but not in the 21st. So does the public. But unless the NHS changes, the argument that it is unsustainable will grow more compelling. It really is change or bust. We choose change.
Today, the prime minister will launch our 10-year plan for health, to radically reimagine healthcare. More care will be available on your doorstep and from your own home, with thousands more GPs. Services and resources will be moved out of hospitals and into the community. New neighbourhood health centres[?] will house doctors, nurses, physios, therapists, tests, scans and urgent care under one roof, built around patients' convenience.
AI technology will liberate frontline staff from the drudgery of admin, giving them time to care. Saving just 90 seconds of data entry and note-taking per appointment would be the equivalent of hiring an extra 2,000 GPs. For patients, tech will make booking appointments and managing your care as easy as doing your shopping online.
By treating and caring for patients closer to home, we will reach patients earlier, to catch illness before it worsens, and prevent it in the first place. Our plan brings together a coalition of the willing on public health, working with supermarkets to make the healthy choice the easy choice and pharmaceutical companies to secure obesity jabs for NHS patients.
The plan is backed by an extra £29bn investment to fund the reforms, better services and new technology.
I am sometimes told that NHS staff are resistant to change. In my experience, they're crying out for it. They have suffered the moral injury of turning up to work, slogging their guts out, only to leave at the end of the day feeling exhausted and demoralised by the conditions that patients are being treated in because of circumstances beyond their control.
I spoke to a nurse in a community clinic who told me she spends more time filling out forms than seeing patients. That's not why she joined the NHS. We need to free up our staff to do what they do best – care. They're the ones driving innovation on the frontline, and their fingerprints are all over this plan.
To succeed, we need to defeat the cynicism that says that 'nothing ever changes'. We know the change in our plan is possible because it is already happening. We have toured the country and scouted the world for the best examples of innovation and reform. If Australia can effectively serve communities living in the remote outback, we can meet the needs of people living in rural and coastal England. If community health teams can go door to door to prevent ill health in Brazil, we can do the same in Bradford. We know we can build the 'neighbourhood health service', because teams in Cornwall, Camden and Northumberland are already showing us how.
Since July, we've already begun to turn the tide. We promised to deliver 2m extra elective appointments in our first year – we've delivered 4m and counting. Through our plan for change, we've taken almost a quarter of a million cases off the waiting list.
The science is on our side. The revolution in genomics, AI, machine learning and big data offers a golden opportunity to deliver better care for all patients and better value for taxpayers. We will take it, marrying the ingenuity of our country's leading scientists with the care and compassion of the health service.
Above all else, we will give power to the patient. In an age of next-day deliveries, an NHS that forces you to wait on the phone at 8am to book an appointment feels ridiculously outdated. Patients don't just want a service from the NHS, we want a say. We don't want the same as everyone else; we want care that meets our individual needs. Equality does not mean uniformity, it means that every person receives the right care for them.
This plan will give people real choices, faster responses and a say in how their care is delivered and where. It will fulfil Nye Bevan's commitment in 1948 that the NHS would put a 'megaphone in the mouth' of every patient, and make sure that the advantages enjoyed by the privileged few were available to all.
We know the British people are counting on us to make sure that the NHS not only survives, but thrives. We are determined not to let them down.
That's the plan – now it falls to us and the 1.5 million people working in the NHS to deliver it. It won't be easy, but nothing could be more worthwhile. If we succeed, we will be able to say with pride, echoed through the remaining decades of this century, that we were the generation that built an NHS fit for the future and a fairer Britain, where everyone lives well for longer.
Wes Streeting is secretary of state for health and social care
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Which tax rises could Rachel Reeves introduce to pay for the £5bn welfare U-turn?
This week's embarrassing climbdown on welfare saw the government's benefits reforms gutted almost entirely, while savings from the bill were slashed from £5bn to nothing. In the wake of the U-turn, there are now growing questions over how the government will raise the money to fill the black hole in the public finances. Ministers have already squeezed significant savings out of their departments in cuts that were unveiled at last month's spending review, meaning there is now a mounting expectation that the chancellor will be forced to raise taxes instead. But Labour's manifesto pledge not to raise taxes on 'working people' leaves the chancellor with a limited number of workable options. A few possibilities were floated by deputy prime minister Angela Rayner in a leaked memo to Rachel Reeves ahead of the spring statement, which saw her urge the chancellor to raise taxes - suggestions which were ignored. But perhaps this week's welfare climbdown will leave the chancellor with no option but to look again at Rayner's suggestions. Here, The Independent takes a look at a number of tax rises that the government could rely on to raise funds and balance the books. Tax threshold freezes The Treasury's most likely move would be to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds. This means that as wages rise with inflation, over the years workers are dragged into higher tax bands and end up paying more. A freeze on the threshold at which the higher 45 per cent tax rate is paid was one of the options suggested by Ms Rayner in her leaked memo. But there is growing speculation the government could extend the freeze across all tax brackets. It's a stealth tax, the impacts of which are not felt immediately, meaning it is normally better received among the general public compared with a direct hit to businesses or pay slips. But, if the freeze were extended to the end of the parliament, it could also bring in billions for the Treasury as earnings rise. The freeze, which is already planned to last until 2028, is expected to drag around two million workers into higher tax bands. Wealth tax There have been calls from Labour MPs on the left of the party to introduce a wealth tax, calls which have only grown in the wake of Tuesday's welfare climbdown. Rachael Maskell, the architect of the rebellion which forced the government into shelving key pillars of the bill, demanded the government increase taxes on the very richest to pay for the £5bn climbdown. Polling conducted by YouGov on behalf of Oxfam on the eve of the spring statement found more than three-quarters of people (77 per cent) would rather the government increase taxes on the very richest to improve public finances than see cuts to public spending. However, such a tax - which could look like a 2 per cent tax on net assets worth more than £10m - is thought to be very hard to implement, and could also lead to some of Britain's highest earners leaving the country. Pensions Ms Rayner also called for the lifetime pensions allowance to be reinstated. The allowance, which puts a cap on how much savers can put into their pension pot before a higher rate of tax is applied, was axed by the Tories. Labour had initially planned to reinstate the cap, but the plans were abandoned ahead of the election. However, amid the controversy over cutting winter fuel payments – and then later reversing the decision – the government may be hesitant to introduce any other policies which would upset pensioners. Corporation tax The chancellor could also look at increasing corporation tax for banks – one of the suggestions included in the deputy prime minister's memo. Politically, its fairly easy to tax banks as there is limited direct impact on voters. But it's important to note that banks in the UK are already highly taxed. They pay normal corporation tax of 25 per cent, plus a bank surcharge of 3 per cent. On top of this, they pay a bank levy of 0.1 per cent of their balance sheets. Dividends The deputy prime minister also proposed raising tax rates on dividends - a portion of a company's earnings received by a shareholder - for higher earners. Currently, tax is not paid on dividend income that falls within your income tax Personal Allowance. There is also a £500 dividend allowance each year, meaning individuals only pay tax on any dividend income above this. Removing it altogether would be worth £325 million a year, HMRC data indicates. However, there are concerns that raising dividend tax rates could discourage people from investing in companies – which is likely to have a net negative impact on the economy. Ms Rayner also suggested ending inheritance tax relief on shares listed on the smaller Aim stock market. The Aim stock market is a sub-market of the London Stock Exchange. From April 2026, qualifying Aim shares held at the time of death will be eligible for 50 per cent relief from inheritance tax - but Ms Rayner has suggested ending this entirely. While these changes might make businesses uncomfortable, they're actually unlikely to raise much money for the Treasury – meaning it's a less likely option for the chancellor.


Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Urgent Mounjaro warning: Common mistake puts patients at risk of deadly organ damage, expert says
A nurse has warned thousands of patients using the weight loss jab Mounjaro could be at risk of deadly organ failure, because GPs are failing to carry out a vital test. Dubbed the 'King Kong' of weight loss injections, Mounjaro can now be prescribed by NHS GPs in a bid to tackle the ongoing obesity crisis. But the injections often come with side effects ranging from severe dehydration, nausea and even life-threatening pancreatitis––which health professionals say could be avoided with a simple blood test. Rachel Joy, nurse and chief clinical officer at SheMed, a private healthcare provider, said: 'The safest way for people to use these jabs is through mandatory blood screening.' She continued: 'These blood tests help identify any underlying health issues that need to be managed before a patient starts the programme, or if the treatment is entirely unsuitable.' Blood tests can test for liver function, thyroid problems, uncontrolled pre-diabetes and high levels of harmful fats called triglycerides in the blood. These lipids come from foods, including butter, oil and other fats. While a certain level of these fats is essential for good health, high levels can raise the risk of heart disease. Ms Joy warned: 'If someone has really high triglycerides, they may be at higher risk of pancreatitis.' Pancreatitis is the inflammation of the pancreas, a gland located behind the stomach which is used in digestion and blood sugar regulation. While there is a high survival rate for this condition, it can trigger organ failure—which can be fatal. In some cases of severe acute pancreatitis, the pancreas can lose its blood supply and turn necrotic, which can cause deadly sepsis (a blood infection), which can in turn make other major organs fail. Severe acute pancreatitis can also trigger a systemic inflammatory response which causes other organs—like the lungs and kidneys—to fail. Ms Joy continued: 'People who have uncontrolled diabetes are also at an increased risk of becoming severely dehydrated which can be really serious. 'Without a blood test, this could be missed,' she added. Officials are now examining whether jab users affected by pancreatitis have a genetic trait that leaves them at greater risk of side-effects, which Ms Joy said could also be flagged by a simple blood test. 'Sometimes these things are subtle, but can have a massive impact. 'We should be putting these patients at the centre and treating obesity like any other clinical health condition.' She is now urging healthcare officials to reconsider rolling out these jabs without strict guidelines in place, as GPs struggle under time-constraints. As such, SheMed have made blood tests a mandatory part of their programme before prescribing the revolutionary jab. Last month, the UK medicines regulator launched a probe into the safety of fat jabs after hundreds of users developed pancreatitis, leaving ten dead. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said it has received more than 560 reports of people developing an inflamed pancreas after taking so-called 'GLP-1' injections since they were first launched. The MHRA is now calling for users who are admitted to hospital with pancreatitis to report the side effect to authorities using the regulator's Yellow Card scheme. Healthcare workers can also submit a report on patients' behalf. This involves providing further information and submitting a saliva sample which will be used to explore whether some people are at a higher risk of acute pancreatitis when taking these medicines due to their genetic makeup. Researchers hope this will ultimately enable doctors to use rapid genetic screening tests before prescribing drugs to make the process safer. Side effects continue to be a significant burden on the NHS and studies have shown they account for one in six hospital admissions. The main symptom of pancreatitis is severe pain in the stomach that radiates to the back and does not go away. Anyone who experiences this should seek immediate medical help. Dr Alison Cave, MHRA's chief safety officer, said: 'Evidence shows that almost a third of side effects to medicines could be prevented with the introduction of genetic testing.' It is predicted that adverse drug reactions could cost the NHS more than £2.2 billion a year in hospital stays alone she added. These blockbuster jabs have also been credited with lowering blood sugar levels for people with type 2 diabetes, but Ms Joy warned they are not a silver bullet and can come with a number of serious side effects. Recent estimates suggest that about 1.5 million people in the UK are taking weight loss jabs, many of which are bought privately due to NHS rationing. Most side effects linked to the jabs are gastrointestinal including nausea, constipation and diarrhoea. However Ms Joy warned that Mounjaro can also cause severe dehydration, especially in people with diabetes. It typically causes headaches and dizziness but if not treated quickly can even lead to seizures, kidney failure or prove fatal. There have been further reactions and deaths linked to other side-effects following the use of GLP-1 medicines. The MHRA stresses that it has not been established that the jabs caused the illnesses, but that the patients themselves have reported them as side effects. Professor Matt Brown, chief scientific officer of Genomics England, said: 'GLP-1 medicines like Ozempic and Wegovy have been making headlines, but like all medicines there can be a risk of serious side effects. 'We believe there is real potential to minimise these with many adverse reactions having a genetic cause. 'This next step in our partnership with the MHRA will generate data and evidence for safer and more effective treatment through more personalised approaches to prescription, supporting a shift towards an increasingly prevention-focused healthcare system.'


Daily Record
12 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Hot weather warning as painful symptom in the arm could require 999 call
The NHS has guidance about a lesser-known symptom of heat stroke to watch out for Brits are being urged to stay alert for an unusual arm symptom that could signal a serious health emergency amidst the current heatwave. With the UK weathering another week of high temperatures, it's vital to recognise heat stroke symptoms. The Met Office has revealed that England just experienced its warmest June ever with an average temperature of 16.9C, while Wales recorded its third warmest June since records started in 1884. Certain areas have recently felt the mercury rise to a blistering 34C. In light of these sweltering conditions, awareness of the risks posed by extreme heat is critical. The NHS cautions that heat exhaustion can quickly progress to heatstroke without timely intervention. The health service advises: "Heat exhaustion does not usually need emergency medical help if you can cool down within 30 minutes," but warns, "If it turns into heatstroke, it needs to be treated as an emergency." A less obvious sign of heat exhaustion to watch out for is cramping in the arms and legs, with abdominal cramps also possible. Experts at the Cleveland Clinic in the US warn that such cramps can develop when the body overheats. They explain: "Heat cramps are painful muscle spasms that happen when your body gets too hot." These spasms are seen as a mild form of heat-related illness and an early indicator of heat exhaustion. The experts warned: "When you sweat a lot, your body loses salt and nutrients (electrolytes) in the sweat. Drinking large amounts of water quickly helps hydrate you, but it also dilutes the nutrients in your body. That can cause your muscles to tighten and cramp." Other indicators of heat exhaustion can include: Tiredness Dizziness Headache Feeling sick or being sick Excessive sweating and skin becoming pale and clammy or getting a heat rash, but a change in skin colour can be harder to see on brown and black skin Fast breathing or heartbeat A high temperature Being very thirsty Weakness The NHS has stated: "The symptoms of heat exhaustion are often the same in adults and children, although children may become irritable too." How to act if someone has heat exhaustion In the event that someone exhibits signs of heat exhaustion, it's crucial to cool them down and ensure they're hydrated. The NHS advises taking these four steps: Move them to a cool place Remove all unnecessary clothing like a jacket or socks Get them to drink a sports or rehydration drink, or cool water Cool their skin – spray or sponge them with cool water and fan them. Cold packs, wrapped in a cloth and put under the armpits or on the neck are good too It's important to remain with the person until they recover, which should happen within 30 minutes. The NHS further instructs that if you or someone else shows signs of heatstroke, you should call 999 or head to A&E. These are: Still feeling unwell after 30 minutes of resting in a cool place, being cooled and drinking fluids A very high temperature Hot skin that's not sweating and might look red (this can be harder to see on brown and black skin) A fast heartbeat Fast breathing or shortness of breath Confusion and lack of coordination A seizure or fit Loss of consciousness If the patient loses consciousness while you're awaiting assistance, it's advised to place them in the recovery position.