
India's car economy leaves the middle class fuming
Bloomberg
Live Events
Bloomberg
Bloomberg
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The American way of life in the second half of the 20th century came to be synonymous with big cars, even bigger trucks, and the sprawling freeways on which they scurry about like purposeful ants. Cheerleaders point to productivity growth and the 24 cents private industry saved for every dollar invested in the highway network; critics talk about communities gutted by asphalt and the weakening of social ties in large cities. Nearly 75 years later, the car economy — with all its promises and pitfalls — has latched on to a new host half a world away.At 6 million-plus kilometers (4 million miles), India's road network is now the second largest in the world after the US, according to official data from New Delhi. Leave aside the vast differences in their quality, the most-populous nation has more than twice as many kilometers of roads per square kilometer of land as the US, a much bigger country by size. China, which has built a lot of highways but chosen highspeed trains as the focal point of transport, has a much lower density.For intercity travel, India's template ought to have been 21st-century China, not 20th-century America. The fastest train journey between Chennai and Bengaluru, two hubs of activity in southern India, takes over four hours. In that time, one could go from Beijing to Shanghai, a distance nearly four times greater. Whoosh, the Jakarta-Bandung line that Indonesia built with Beijing's help, is a good model. New Delhi, however, doesn't want a new dependence on China, even though its own first high-speed line, being built with Japan's shinkansen technology, is running years late.Roads continue to hog the limelight. Much of India's national highway system was built in the past 25 years. It has been the country's single-largest infrastructure development, ahead of railways and power, with nearly $30 billion invested last year. But since the network has been expanded with expensive debt, the cost to users is high.A still-small, car-owning middle class (fewer than one in 10 households) is feeling squeezed by the $7 billion it pays in tolls every year. The National Highway Authority, which racked up more than $40 billion in debt, is deleveraging. It's selling assets to private operators and investment trusts; it's also securitizing a part of its portfolio. But no matter who owns them, debt financing means roads still have to generate revenue. The burden on motorists will only swell as new highways get constructed.The US confronted the debt-financing problem well before President Dwight Eisenhower started the interstate highway program in 1956. Toll Roads and Free Roads, a 1939 report prepared for Congress, rejected the usage-fee option as revenue from traffic in many places wouldn't be enough to retire the bonds needed to back them. So the funding came from the government, which taxes motorists on gasoline and diesel.However, Indian motorists are paying 30% more for fuel than the average American. Then there is the vehicle itself. The auto industry complains that hefty taxes have put cars in the same category as drugs or alcohol. Half the cost of a new SUV is tax. It isn't hard to see why consumers are unhappy. The logistics industry is thrilled, though. The market share of roads in freight transport has grown to 65%. Some of it has come at the expense of the British-built railways, once the cornerstone of the sub-continent's urbanization.Blue-collar migrant workers don't have a choice. Trains moving at slow speeds of 35 to 50 kilometers per hour connect their homes in villages to their workplaces in cities. For the middle class, however, the romance of the Great Indian Railway Journeys has faded. Just like in the US, they're being pushed toward highways for relatively shorter distances and to air travel for the rest. This is when a dozen small airports haven't had a single passenger in months, according to Bloomberg News. Within cities, subways are coming up even in places where they aren't a practical option. Meanwhile, between cities, 'range anxiety' on highways means slow adoption of electric vehicles.No wonder then that roads accounts for 93% of carbon emissions from transport, compared with 84% in the US and 81% in China. 'Our malfunctioning toll plazas, with their long queues, cause waste of fuel, underutilization of the vehicle fleet, loss of productivity, and contribute to intense pollution,' says Anil K. Sood, a Hyderabad-based public policy analyst.In a deeply unequal society like India's, the cost of a car-centric economy is felt disproportionately by buyers of entry-level hatchbacks; they have practically gone on strike. Things are serious enough for the government to consider proposals like an annual highway pass to lower the load. But those will at best bring temporary relief. Better public transport is what will make the middle class breathe easy. Not cars.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US military evaluating options to prevent nuclear-armed Iran, general says
The top US general overseeing American forces in the Middle East said on Tuesday there were a range of options when asked if the military was prepared to respond with overwhelming force to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran. 'I have provided the secretary of defense and the president with a wide range of options,' US Army General Michael 'Erik' Kurilla, the head of US Central Command (CENTCOM), told a congressional hearing. Kurilla was responding to Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama, the chairman of the House of Representatives Armed Services Committee, who asked if CENTCOM was prepared to respond with overwhelming force if Iran does not permanently give up its nuclear ambitions. 'I take that as a yes?' the Alabama Republican asked, after Kurilla responded. 'Yes,' Kurilla said. Iran said on Monday it would soon hand a counterproposal for a nuclear deal to the United States in response to a US offer that Tehran deems unacceptable, while US President Donald Trump said talks would continue


Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Pentagon says estimated cost of national guard deployment to LA is $134 million: Report
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth pushed back against Democrats' criticism of the decision to deploy troops to Los Angeles, telling Congress that the Trump administration wants to protect immigration agents and keep demonstrations there from getting out of control. Asked by Representative Betty McCollum, a Minnesota Democrat, how much the deployment would cost, Hegseth criticized Governor Tim Walz's handling of protests that erupted after the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis 2020. President Donald Trump recognizes 'a situation like that, improperly handled by a governor like it was by Governor Walz, if it gets out of control — it's a bad situation for the citizens of any location,' Hegseth said. He said Immigration and Customs Enforcement 'has the right to safely conduct operations in any state and any jurisdiction in the country, especially after 21 million illegals have crossed our border under the previous administration.' Hegseth's comments during the hearing, which at times turned combative, echoed Trump's remarks Monday in which he said he 'watched Minneapolis burn.' Officials also gave more detail on the scope of the deployment and the role the Marines will play. Hegesth said the deployment would last 60 days, as detailed in a presidential memorandum over the weekend. Speaking alongside the defense secretary, Acting Pentagon Comptroller Bryn MacDonnell said the deployment is estimated to cost $134 million, which covers travel, housing and food. The funds would come from the department's operations and maintenance accounts. And in a separate Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith said the Marines deployed are trained in crowd control and 'being deployed to support law enforcement.' They are equipped with 'shields and batons' and 'they do not have arrest authority,' he said. The decision to send in the National Guard and the Marines has provoked an outcry from Democrats. Representative Pete Aguilar, a Democrat who's district includes a portion of Los Angeles, asked Hegseth 'Why are you sending war fighters to cities to interact with civilians?' 'Every American citizen deserves to live in a community that's safe, and ICE agents need to be able to do their job,' Hegseth responded. 'And if they're attacked, that's lawless, and President Trump believes in law and order. So he has every authority' to deploy troops under US law. The protests entered their fifth day on Tuesday after more clashes between police and demonstrators rallying against a rising number of raids by ICE agents, who local officials say have stoked fear in the immigrant-rich community. US law generally bars the use of the active-duty US military from carrying out domestic law enforcement. Trump over the weekend authorized Hegseth to deploy armed forces 'as necessary to augment and support the protection of Federal functions and property.'


News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Unveils '$1,000 Savings Account' For Every Baby Born During His Second Term
Last Updated: The proposal mandates the Treasury Department to fund the $1,000 initial investment, with newborns automatically enrolled in the program. US President Donald Trump unveiled a new federal program proposing government-funded $1,000 investment accounts for American babies, which he called 'Trump savings accounts'. The US President said that the initiative is one of the 'most important" components of his new proposed bill, despite immediate warnings from the Congressional Budget Office regarding its impact on national debt. During a White House roundtable- that included Dell CEO Michael Dell, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon and Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi- Donald Trump revealed specifics of the proposed savings accounts. These would be tax-deferred investment accounts designed to track overall stock market performance, benefiting children born between January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, he said. 'For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market," Donald Trump said. The proposal mandates the Treasury Department to fund the $1,000 initial investment, with newborns automatically enrolled in the program. These accounts would be administered by parents or legal guardians, allowing for an additional private investment of up to $5,000. Donald Trump said that the initiative is 'a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation." Legislative Hurdles For Donald Trump's Bill While the 'Big Beautiful Bill" has cleared the House, its journey through the Senate is expected to face stiff competition. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) issued a report last week warning that the 'Big Beautiful Bill" is projected to add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade- indicating that such an increase would necessitate cuts to existing federal programs, including Medicaid and food assistance. The 'Trump savings accounts' cannot be passed as a standalone program and would require the successful passage of the broader bill. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published: