logo
IAF plane crash puts spotlight on ageing Jaguar fighter jet: Are these planes too old to fly?

IAF plane crash puts spotlight on ageing Jaguar fighter jet: Are these planes too old to fly?

First Post3 days ago
An IAF's Jaguar fighter plane went down on Wednesday (July 9) in Rajasthan's Churu, killing both the pilots on board. This is the third such instance of a Jaguar crashing since the beginning of this year. Questions have been raised about the safety of this aircraft, which will be retired from use in 2031 read more
An Indian Air Force Jaguar aircraft. On Wednesday, the IAF's Jaguar crashed in Rajasthan's Churu, making it the third such mishap since the beginning of 2025. File image/PTI
The Indian Air Force (IAF) has lost two pilots today (July 9) after a Jaguar fighter jet crashed near Bhanuda village in Rajasthan's Churu district. A police official said that the aircraft crashed in an agriculture field in Bhanoda village around 1.25 pm on Wednesday, after it took off from the Suratgarh airbase.
The IAF has confirmed that both pilots on board suffered fatal injuries. 'An IAF Jaguar Trainer aircraft met with an accident during a routine training mission and crashed near Churu in Rajasthan, today. Both pilots sustained fatal injuries in the accident,' wrote the IAF on X.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Notably, this is the third Jaguar plane to crash this year — earlier, the IAF's Jaguar crashed in Gujarat in April, killing one pilot, while another one crashed in Haryana in March.
The crashes once again highlights the issues related to the aging plane and the challenges posed by their overall maintenance, repair and overhaul.
Jaguars, the work horse of the IAF
The SEPECAT Jaguar was first introduced in 1968, was a joint venture between the British Aircraft Corporation and the French Breguet Company to develop a new supersonic jet trainer for the French Air Force and Royal Air Force.
Originally, it was conceived to be a jet trainer with a light ground attack capability, but was later changed to include supersonic performance, reconnaissance and tactical nuclear strike roles. Today, it is a two-seater fighter aircraft with the ability to carry a variety of missiles, including air-to-air options, like the AIM-9 Sidewinder, ASRAAM, and R.550 Magic.
Ageing Jaguar fighter jets of the Indian Air Force perform a fly-past in Chennai. File image/AFP
In 1979, India acquired the Jaguars, christening them as Shamsher (meaning Sword of Justice in Persian). When the first two Jaguars were inducted into the IAF on July 27, 1979, Group Captain Kapil Bhargava noted in an article for Air Forces Monthly that it marked the beginning of a new era in the IAF's aviation capabilities.
The Jaguar soon earned a reputation as a low-level deep penetration strike specialist — this jet played a significant role in reconnaissance and high-altitude precision targeting support during the Kargil War in 1999. Even in the Balakot air strikes of 2019, the IAF used the Jaguar aircraft as decoys to bait the Pakistan air force's F-16 and move them away from the intended target area.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Today, the IAF operates approximately 120 Jaguar jets in six squadrons.
Jaguar's chequered legacy in the IAF
While the Jaguar has become a critical element of the IAF's fleet, it is not without its issues.
In 2025, there have already been three crashes involving the plane. On March 7, a Jaguar fighter jet crashed shortly after taking off from the Ambala airbase in Haryana. The remains of the ill-fated aircraft were scattered all over in the forest area on the hilly terrain near Raipur Rani in the Panchkula district of Haryana close to the Haryana-Himachal Pradesh border.
An official statement by the IAF read, 'A Jaguar aircraft of the IAF crashed at Ambala during a routine training sortie today, after encountering a system malfunction. The pilot maneuvered the aircraft away from any habitation on the ground before ejecting safely. An inquiry has been ordered by the IAF to ascertain the cause of the accident.'
Fortunately, the pilot escaped the crash with minimal injuries.
Wreckage at the site after a Jaguar fighter jet of the Indian Air Force crashed while on a training mission in April. File image/PTI
A little less than a month later, on April 2, another Jaguar crashed near Jamnagar Airfield during a night mission, claiming the life of Flight Lieutenant Siddharth Yadav. According to the IAF's official statement, both pilots ejected after detecting the failure, ensuring the jet crashed in an open field instead of populated areas. However, despite the ejection, Flight Lieutenant Yadav succumbed to his injuries.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Sources said that in the past, there have been multiple incidents involving the Jaguar as this fleet of aircraft has suffered over 50 major and minor incidents in its 45-year service with the IAF, some of which have been fatal.
Challenges the IAF faces in flying Jaguars
The crash on Wednesday once again raises questions if the Jaguar is indeed too old to fly. In fact, India's Air Force is the only major air force that still operates Jaguars; countries like Britain, France, Ecuador, Nigeria and Oman, which once had Jaguars in their fleet, have retired them long ago, with some jets put on display in air museums.
Experts note that many of the crashes involving the Jaguar fighter jet was a result of failures in the Rolls-Royce/Turbomeca Adour Mk 804 and Mk 811 engines. Many experts note that one of the biggest concerns with these engines is the thrust output, which is inadequate in India's hot-and-high flying conditions, especially from forward air bases near the Himalayas. As The Print notes in a report, the engines struggle with performance during critical mission phases such as take-off, climb, and low-level manoeuvring under full payload conditions.
Five SEPECAT Jaguar aircraft of the Indian Air Force in an arrowhead formation fly over the Yehlanka Airforce Base. File image/AFP
Moreover, the availability of spare parts for the Mk 804/811 engines has become a serious logistical bottleneck.
Tim Davis, a former Royal Air Force instructor in an IRDW report stated, 'Even with engine and avionics upgrades, you still face issues with airframe fatigue. There's only so much of an aircraft you can replace.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'It comes down this: even one pilot death is a tragedy. And the older the aircraft gets, the higher the risks.'
IAF's dwindling strength
The IAF has plans to phase out the Jaguar from its fleet by 2031. However, delays in acquiring the HAL Tejas Mk2, Rafale, and the MRFA (Multi-Role Fighter Aircraft), has forced the IAF to exnted the life of this ageing plane.
Today, the IAF is already short on its fighter squadrons from a sanctioned strength of 42.5 to just 30 jets presently. In fact, in February, Air Chief Marshal AP Singh highlighted the shortage of fighter jets, ruing the delays in the procurement of critical military platforms. He added that the Indian Air Force is 'very badly off in numbers', pointing out that it must induct 40 fighter jets every year to stay combat ready.
'We have fleets that will be phased out in the next five to 10 years. Those fleets will have to be replaced with new aircraft, and we already have vacancies available (shortfall). We are looking at 35 to 40 aircraft a year being produced somewhere. I understand capacities cannot come up overnight, but we need to start pushing ourselves towards that,' he was quoted as saying.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mechanical, electrical issues could also have led to change in fuel switch positions in ill-fated AI plane: Experts
Mechanical, electrical issues could also have led to change in fuel switch positions in ill-fated AI plane: Experts

Mint

time16 minutes ago

  • Mint

Mechanical, electrical issues could also have led to change in fuel switch positions in ill-fated AI plane: Experts

Mumbai, Jul 12 (PTI) The Air India aircraft, which crashed soon after takeoff in Ahmedabad last month, might have suffered mechanical or power supply issues that could have led to the change in the position of the switches that feed fuel into the plane, according to experts. They also opined that the reasons for the change in fuel switch position will be known during further investigations. The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary report has mentioned that fuel switches of engine 1 and 2 of the Boeing 787-8 aircraft were cut off within a gap of one second and later turned on before the crash on June 12. Federation of Indian Pilots (FPI) President and former Air India pilot Captain C S Randhawa said the position of the fuel switches can be changed only with a human interface. These switches are spring-loaded and have a lock. If they have to be put into RUN position, then first, it has to be pulled out and move into the position, he said. According to him, the switches are generally used in case there has been a flameout of both engines or the pilots have recycled the switches. "It is not clear from the preliminary report as to why the position of the switches was changed", he said and added that there could also have been an interruption in the power supply. "When the fuel control switch has to be cut off, the pilot flying will say, fuel control switch left, confirm. So, after the confirmation is made by the second pilot, the pilot monitoring will cut off (the switch). "In this case, the first officer was taking off the aircraft and the captain was pilot monitoring. Now, did this transfer of controls take place between the captain and the first officer? It is not clear from the report at all," he noted. The fuel switches are below the throttles. "Now, in case of a dual engine flameout, the auto-throttle switches are put off and fuel control switches are made to cut off and run. Basically, they reactivate," he said. A former Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) official said there was a change in the position of the fuel switches and the question is why it happened. "Now, the investigation will lead in this direction to why this switch position changed, whether it was a mechanical failure, whether it was intentional or unintentional or anything else or if there was a problem... The question is also whether there was a software glitch and or not," he said. In the report, there is no mention on whether there was any malfunctioning of the fuel switches earlier. A senior Boeing commander said it is not exactly clear from the preliminary report why the fuel switch was turned to CUTOFF from RUN position. The change might have happened inadvertently, he added. According to a senior official, who has been part of various aircraft accident investigations, investigations in the coming months will help in ascertaining the reasons, including whether there were any mechanical issues, for the change in position of the fuel switches. "The aircraft achieved the maximum recorded airspeed of 180 Knots IAS at about 08:08:42 UTC and immediately thereafter, the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another with a time gap of 01 sec. "The Engine N1 and N2 began to decrease from their take-off values as the fuel supply to the engines was cut off. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said.

A Second-by-Second Timeline of How Air Indias Dreamliner Flight Ended in Disaster
A Second-by-Second Timeline of How Air Indias Dreamliner Flight Ended in Disaster

Mint

time2 hours ago

  • Mint

A Second-by-Second Timeline of How Air Indias Dreamliner Flight Ended in Disaster

New Delhi, Jul 12 (PTI) London-bound Air India flight AI171 crashed 32 seconds after takeoff from Ahmedabad on June 12, after fuel supply to both engines was cut off within a second of each other. A preliminary report found that the confused pilots were unable to restore thrust in time. Here is a look at the sequence of events leading to the deadly crash: 11:17 Hrs IST: Air India Dreamliner VT-ANB lands in Ahmedabad from New Delhi, operating as flight AI423 13:13:00 Hrs: Aircraft requests pushback and start up 13:13:13 Hrs: ATC approved pushback 13:16:59 Hrs: ATC approved start up. 13:18:38 Hrs: Aircraft departs from Bay 34 at Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport 13:19:12 Hrs: ATC queried if the aircraft required the full length of the runway. The aircraft confirmed the requirement of full length of Runway 23. 13:25:15 Hrs: Aircraft requests taxi clearance, which was granted by air traffic control (ATC) 13:26:00 Hrs: Aircraft taxis to Runway 23 via Taxiway R4, backtracked and lined up for take-off 13:32:03 Hrs: Aircraft transferred from ground to tower control 13:33:45 Hrs: Aircraft instructed to line up on the Runway 23 13.37:37 Hrs: ATC clears take-off from Runway 23 13.37:37 Hrs: Takeoff roll starts 13:38:39 Hrs: Liftoff from runway 13:38:42 Hrs: Maximum speed of 180 knots reached Immediately thereafter, both Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches move from RUN to CUTOFF positions, one second apart. Engines begin to slow as fuel supply is cut off. Ram Air Turbine (RAT) deployed during the initial climb immediately after lift-off. One pilot is heard asking the other why he cut off fuel. The other answers that he has not done so 13:38:47 Hrs: Both Engine N1 and N2 drop below minimum idle speed. The RAT's pump begins supplying hydraulic power. 13:38:52 Hrs: Engine N1 fuel cutoff switch moves to RUN from CUTOFF 13:38:56 Hrs: Engine N2's fuel cutoff switch too rest to RUN Both engines relight, and Engine 1 begins to recover. Engine 2 is unable to reverse deceleration 13:39:05 Hrs: One of the two pilots issues a distress "MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAYDAY" call 13:39:11 Hrs: Data recording from the aircraft stops 13:44:44 Hrs: Fire tenders leave airport premises for rescue and firefighting

Pilot action 100% right, tried to revive engine: Ex-IAF pilot after Air India crash report
Pilot action 100% right, tried to revive engine: Ex-IAF pilot after Air India crash report

Hindustan Times

time4 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Pilot action 100% right, tried to revive engine: Ex-IAF pilot after Air India crash report

A 15-page preliminary report probing the deadly Air India plane crash has been released, a month after the accident. While a detailed investigation is still underway, the report provides some important insights into what may have gone wrong within seconds off the flight taking off on June 12. Air India plane pilot Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, and his co-pilot Clive Kunder, 32. Reacting to the report, former Indian Air Force (IAF) pilot Captain (retired) Ehsan Khalid backed the pilots who flew the ill-fated plane, saying they tried to revive the engine moments before the crash. Flight AI171, that was headed to London from Ahmedabad but crashed moments after take-off, was flown by Captain Sumeet Sabharwal and first officer Clive Kunder. "Pilot action 100 per cent right, they tried to revive the engine that is further corroborated with the fact that there was some movement of the fuel cut-off switch," the former IAF pilot said. His remarks came after a report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) revealed that shortly after take-off, both fuel cutoff switches on the AI171 flight moved from 'Run' to 'Cutoff' within a second of each other. However, the report also says that attempts were made by the pilots to re-engage the fuel switches, so the engines could be revived. Hours after the report was released, the former IAF pilot said it junks some speculation regarding the accident, and also supported how the pilots handled the situation. Talking about how a fuel switch operates and sharing his insights on what the report revealed, he told news agency PTI, 'The fuel cut-off switch is a physical switch, it has to be moved from one position to another, and it has to be moved from that position back. There is not automation involved in it. What automation is involved is the fuel shut-off valve'. While the preliminary probe report did reveal that the fuel switches were turned off, almost simultaneously, it was not specified what led to it. A conversation between two pilots from the cockpit was also detailed in the report. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the preliminary report said. However, when asked about the report, Civil aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu said 'do not jump to conclusions'. He also heaped praise on all pilots and said, "I truly believe we have the most wonderful workforce in terms of pilots and the crew in the whole world.' Earlier, the Airline Pilots' Association of India (ALPA) also reacted to the report, saying the probe was 'being driven in a direction presuming the guilt of pilots'. The report states that both engines of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner shut down just a second apart, which led to a rapid loss of altitude, resulting in the crash. Bird strikes or any signs of external damage have been ruled out, but the exact cause of the fuel cutoff remains under investigation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store