logo
Bill Gates doubles giving to $200 billion, says philanthropists can't cover government cuts

Bill Gates doubles giving to $200 billion, says philanthropists can't cover government cuts

CNBC08-05-2025

Billionaire Bill Gates announced on Thursday that he will double his charitable giving to $200 billion over the next 20 years.
In a blog post, the Microsoft co-founder wrote that he was motivated by the many challenges facing the world, such as children's health and climate change, as well as the late Andrew Carnegie's admonishment of wealth hoarding.
"People will say a lot of things about me when I die, but I am determined that 'he died rich' will not be one of them," Gates wrote. "There are too many urgent problems to solve for me to hold onto resources that could be used to help people."
Gates is currently the world's fifth richest person with a $168 billion fortune, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The $200 billion commitment assumes his charitable foundation's endowment will grow through investments.
The Gates Foundation, founded by Gates and his ex-wife, Melinda French Gates, in 2000, has already given away more than $100 billion. After Bill Gates has given away "virtually all" of his wealth, the foundation will close at the end of 2045, he said.
Gates is one of few billionaires to publicly step up their charitable giving as nonprofits and universities reel from federal funding cuts. Despite his increase in giving, he said philanthropists cannot cover the multibillion-dollar foreign aid cuts by the U.S. and other wealthy countries.
"The United States, United Kingdom, France, and other countries around the world are cutting their aid budgets by tens of billions of dollars. And no philanthropic organization—even one the size of the Gates Foundation—can make up the gulf in funding that's emerging right now," he wrote. "It's unclear whether the world's richest countries will continue to stand up for its poorest people."
The Inside Wealth newsletter by Robert Frank is your weekly guide to high-net-worth investors and the industries that serve them.
Subscribe here to get access today.
In an interview with the Financial Times, Gates criticized Elon Musk for his role in cutting U.S. foreign aid. In February, Musk's so-called Department of Governmental Efficiency effectively shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development. The federal agency disbursed $42.5 billion in 2023, according to government data, that provided lifesaving assistance, including health care, clean water and food across the globe.
"The picture of the world's richest man killing the world's poorest children is not a pretty one," Gates told the Financial Times.
In early March, the agency estimated that the cuts would have dire consequences, including 1 million children with severe acute malnutrition going untreated and up to 166,000 additional deaths from malaria.
Gates, his then-wife and Warren Buffett founded the Giving Pledge in 2010 as a commitment for the world's richest people to give away more than half their wealth in their lifetime or wills. French Gates has since stepped down from the Gates Foundation but has her own philanthropic organization.
Musk has signed the Giving Pledge. Gates told the New York Times that he doesn't know whether Musk will follow through.
"The Giving Pledge — an unusual aspect of it that you can wait until you die and still fulfill it. So who knows? He could go on to be a great philanthropist," he said before pointing to Musk's involvement in the foreign aid cuts.
Musk has given away less than 1% of his wealth, according to Forbes. The publication estimates his out-the-door giving — gifts that have been paid, not just pledged or parked in a foundation — at $620 million over his lifetime through 2023.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Four-day work week trend blasted by multi-millionaire businessman Kevin O'Leary: ‘Stupidest idea'
Four-day work week trend blasted by multi-millionaire businessman Kevin O'Leary: ‘Stupidest idea'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Four-day work week trend blasted by multi-millionaire businessman Kevin O'Leary: ‘Stupidest idea'

A multi-millionaire businessman has ripped into the growing trend of four-day work weeks, calling them the 'stupidest idea' he has ever heard. Shorter working weeks are becoming increasingly popular around the world, with big names like Medibank and Bunnings in Australia among those trialling the change. Kevin O'Leary, best known as one of the investors on Shark Tank, criticised the push for a reduced work week. The outspoken businessman, who is worth an estimated $US400 million, was asked about his thoughts on the push during a recent appearance on Fox News, following the popularity of the four-day week in France. 'That's the stupidest idea I have ever heard,' he said. 'I think we should let the French go to a two-day work week and then kick their ass internationally.' RELATED Four-day week 'wave' coming to Australia: '80 per cent hours for 100 per cent pay' Centrelink cash boost over 400,000 Aussies have weeks left to confirm: 'Get what's yours' Right to disconnect warning as worker sues former employer for $800,000: 'People are nervous' France announced plans to trial four-day working weeks for parents sharing custody of kids last year. The country introduced a 35-hour work week in 2000. Roughly 10,000 workers are already thought to be working four-day weeks. O'Leary, who has also been critical of Australia's right to disconnect laws, was against following in the country's footsteps. 'There is no such thing as a work week anymore anyways in a digital economy post-pandemic,' he said. 'I look at my staff, 40 per cent of them work remotely, all around the world. It's project-based. 'Can you get it done by the 15th of June? Yes, I can. I don't care when you do it, four-day, three-day, five-day.' His comments have divided people online, with some agreeing with him that results rather than work time was the most important thing. 'It's not about days or weeks anymore. It probably never was. It's about productivity in whatever period of time the business decides,' one said. 'Very true. Norms surrounding work are slowly going away between remote work and everything being digital,' another wrote. Others said they supported four-day work weeks and had experienced the benefits themselves. 'I have a four-day work week. I can't express the difference in how much better my work week is given one extra day to decompress,' one said. 'I have been running my company on a four-day work week for a few years now. I can't imagine going back to a five-day week,' another added. The four-day work week has been gaining traction in Australia, with major companies like Medibank and Bunnings testing out the working model. One common approach is the 100:80:100 model, where workers retain 100 per cent of their salary while reducing their hours to 80 per cent and committing to 100 per cent productivity. Medibank announced it would be moving another 250 employees to the trial in October, bringing the total number of participants to 500. Medibank head of people and sustainability Kylie Bishop said it had helped cut down on unnecessary meetings and workloads as staff were committed to getting everything done in the new timeframe. 'We've seen significant and sustained improvements in employee engagement, job satisfaction and the health and wellbeing of participants, while maintaining business performance and customer outcomes,' she said. A Robert Half poll of 1,000 workers and 500 hiring managers last year found 65 per cent of employees wanted a four-day work week with retention of their full salary. The Senate Inquiry into Work and Care recommended the government undertake a four-day work week trial back in in to access your portfolio

Big Tech's AI Ambitions Could Supercharge These Energy Stocks
Big Tech's AI Ambitions Could Supercharge These Energy Stocks

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Big Tech's AI Ambitions Could Supercharge These Energy Stocks

U.S. data centers are expected to consume 65 gigawatts of power between 2025 and 2028, about 45 GW more than existing capacity can accommodate, according to Morgan Stanley. Due to a mix of regulatory and economic hurdles, analysts expect AI providers and data-center operators to deploy "temporary, mobile generation" solutions to meet surging demand. Companies that make fuel cells, mobile natural gas turbines, and small modular nuclear reactors are some of the potential beneficiaries of this next phase of the AI infrastructure data centers are expected to consume a massive amount of energy in the coming years, and meeting that need could be a boon to some investments, according to Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley forecasts U.S. data centers will consume 65 gigawatts of power between 2025 and 2028, but available capacity could fall short by about 45 GW. To make up the difference, 'all potential 'de-bottlenecking' solutions will need to be drawn upon,' the analysts wrote in a note on Tuesday. Possible solutions, they say, include converting crypto mining operations into data centers, building data centers at large nuclear power plants, and constructing new natural gas-fired power plants. But all of that is easier said than done. First, the rising price of bitcoin could discourage miners from converting their mining facilities or selling excess power to data centers. Second, concerns about stressing regional power grids could compel regulators to mandate that new data centers not come online until additional power sources are connected to the grid. That's why Morgan Stanley expects to see hyperscalers and data-center owners adopt a 'bridge' approach, 'in which temporary, mobile generation is deployed' to address the regulatory and economic hurdles to quickly ramping power capacity. Small modular nuclear reactors are one solution that gives companies the flexibility they'll need. SMRs have the added benefit of providing reliable carbon-free energy that aligns with Big Tech's emission-reduction goals. However, small reactors are a nascent, "next decade technology," Morgan Stanley analysts said. For that reason, cloud hyperscalers like Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOG), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta Platforms (META) increasingly have turned to existing nuclear infrastructure during the AI buildout of the past few years. Meta on Tuesday signed a 20-year deal with Constellation Energy (CEG), America's largest nuclear power provider, to sustain its AI. Constellation and Microsoft last year agreed to bring back online a reactor at Pennsylvania's Three Mile Island. With SMRs still a ways off, new data centers are likely to rely on small, mobile natural gas generators from the likes of GE Vernova (GEV) and Caterpillar (CAT). Hyperscalers may also buy from fuel cell manufacturers like Bloom Energy (BE), whose electricity servers are a low-carbon way to convert natural gas, biofuel, or hydrogen into power. These fuel cells, the analysts said, offer the benefit of short lead times, reliable equipment, the ability to add redundant capacity in the event of a unit failure, and exceptional flexibility in terms of power output. 'We believe [Bloom Energy] could quickly increase manufacturing capacity to ~3 GW per year, with the potential for further increases in output if demand grows,' the analysts wrote. 'Bloom Energy is in our view one of the under-appreciated beneficiaries of the rapid growth in data center power demand globally.' Read the original article on Investopedia Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store