Insider Reveals Major Update In T.J. Watt Extension Talks
Insider Reveals Major Update In T.J. Watt Extension Talks originally appeared on Athlon Sports.
T.J. Watt and the Pittsburgh Steelers have yet to come to terms on a contract extension. As a result the 2021 NFL Defensive Player of the Year has held out from the team, missing mandatory minicamp last week.
Advertisement
The good news? It appears both sides are working amicably to make some progress on this front. Watt's value to the Steelers remains unquestioned and the team wants their homegrown defensive star to stay in the Steel City long term.
There are a few obstacles to navigate for the Steelers while working through these negotiations. Myles Garrett's record-setting deal earlier in the offseason has adjusted the price point for Watt and other players like Micah Parsons looking for a similar deal.
And in that same vein it creates further complication for the Steelers, competing with another team in accomplishing the same goal.
ESPN insider Adam Schefter provided some additional clarity on the situation during an appearance on the Pat McAfee Show on Wednesday. Schefter does not believe Watt's deal will match that of Garrett but he will still get his big pay day.
"I don't know that he's going to get more than Myles Garrett. I think T.J. Watt's going to get a nice, strong, healthy deal...
Advertisement
"I can't imagine T.J. Watt wouldn't be there for the start of training camp, that Pittsburgh would not get a deal done... He's seen all the money that's gone around and he wants to make sure he gets rewarded in the appropriate way."
Garrett has become the benchmark comparison for the other pass rushers due for extensions this offseason. But as Schefter details the key similarities really end with being star players at the same position.
Players like Watt and Parsons will both get significant pay days in the coming weeks or months. However, the age makes a difference.
Parsons being four years younger than Garrett and still entering his athletic prime makes him surpassing the Cleveland Browns' star more of a reality. Watt, still worth a hefty price, turns 31 this fall with his peak athletic years likely behind him.
Advertisement
That does not mean his impact will be felt any less on the field. But it makes for a change in the perspective with regard to these deals.
Regardless, it appears Watt and the Steelers are getting on the path toward a deal. Whenever they arrive at their final destination, expect a huge extension for No. 90.
Related: Analyst Disputes Theory That Steelers Wanted Justin Fields
Related: Steelers Reportedly Extend Safety DeShon Elliott
This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 18, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
ESPN disrespects Steelers LB T.J. Watt on All Quarter Century Team
ESPN disrespects Steelers LB T.J. Watt on All Quarter Century Team ESPN undertook the project of putting together its All Quarterback Century teams on offense and defense. When you think about the best players from 2000 to 2025, plenty of Pittsburgh Steelers, past and present, come to mind. One player who immediately came to mind for us was edge defender T.J. Watt. Watt has been in the league since 2017 and has a league-high 108 sacks during that stretch. So he had to make the list, right? Well, kinda. Watt wasn't named one of the four best. He made the practice squad. And who made the list over him? Of course it's Cleveland Browns edge Myles Garrett. We have no issue with Demarcus Ware, Julius Peppers and Jared Allen making the list. They are all NFL legends and deserving. But putting Garrett on the team and relegating Watt to the practice squad just feels like ESPN is trolling the Steelers at this point. Joining Watt on the practice squad was Michael Strahan, with whom Watt shares the single-season sack title.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
West Indies vs Australia 2025: Full Schedule, Venues, and Squads
West Indies vs Australia 2025: Full Schedule, Venues, and Squads originally appeared on Athlon Sports. Australia is set to tour the West Indies in mid-2025 for a comprehensive series that includes three Test matches and five T20 Internationals. Advertisement The tour will contribute to the new World Test Championship cycle and also act as preparation for future T20 tournaments. The Test series will open on 25 June at Kensington Oval in Bridgetown, Barbados. The second Test is slated for 3 July at the National Cricket Stadium in St George's, Grenada, with the final match to be held on 12 July at Sabina Park in Kingston, Jamaica. Australia and the West Indies have faced off in 118 Tests. Australia holds the advantage with 60 wins, while the West Indies have 32 victories. Twenty-five matches ended in draws, and one resulted in a tie. Following the Test series, the T20I leg will begin on 20 July at Sabina Park. The second match will be played at the same venue on 22 July. Warner Park in Basseterre, St Kitts will host the remaining three T20Is on 25, 26, and 28 July. Advertisement Australia last toured the Caribbean in 2021, where the hosts won the T20I series 4-1 and claimed the ODI series 2-1. The Australian Test squad features established names such as Pat Cummins (captain), Marnus Labuschagne, and Steven Smith, alongside new additions Sam Konstas and Beau Webster. Matthew Kuhnemann also returns to the side. The T20I team will be led by Mitchell Marsh and includes power-hitters like Glenn Maxwell and Tim David. West Indies' Test side includes captain Roston Chase, veteran Kraigg Brathwaite, and newcomers Brandon King, Kevlon Anderson, and Johann Layne. Shai Hope and Tevin Imlach will serve as wicketkeepers. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 19, 2025, where it first appeared.
New York Times
3 hours ago
- New York Times
What's the Steelers' ceiling with Aaron Rodgers? How much freedom will he have? Mailbag
Welcome back to another Steelers mailbag. After months of waiting, the city of Pittsburgh finally has a quarterback. Today, you have questions about Aaron Rodgers' ceiling, how the new QB and offensive coordinator Arthur Smith will find middle ground, depth at the wide receiver position and more. Let's dive right in. (Note: Questions have been lightly edited for clarity and length.) Advertisement How close to Aaron Rodgers' ceiling does he have to play to get the Steelers their long-awaited playoff win? Obviously, he's never going to be an MVP-caliber performer again, but if you get 80 percent of that, is it enough? — Tim D. Some believe Rodgers' signing turned the Steelers into a Super Bowl contender overnight. Others think this year will be a complete disaster. I predict something right in the middle. If the defense can play at a top-10 level (as it has in each of the past three seasons) and the investments in the offense line help the running game improve, I see the Steelers as a nine- or 10-win team that will be fighting in the final weeks of the season to qualify for the playoffs. When it comes to actually winning a playoff game, to me, it's all about the matchup. The Kansas City Chiefs, Buffalo Bills and Baltimore Ravens are the three best teams in the AFC. The Steelers' defense has looked average, at best, against these three opponents lately. Defensive coordinator Teryl Austin admitted during minicamp that the Steelers had a 'Baltimore problem' last year. I don't think Rodgers raises the ceiling enough at this stage of his career to legitimately stand toe-to-toe with Patrick Mahomes, Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson. Instead, I put the Steelers in the same tier as the Houston Texans, Denver Broncos, Los Angeles Chargers and Cincinnati Bengals. If the Steelers face one of these teams in the playoffs, it will be a coin flip. How much of the offense will be Arthur Smith's, and how much of it will be Rodgers'? — Joe T. Rodgers and Smith plan to get together this summer to work through the playbook and make tweaks to fit the new QB. But already, I think there's more middle ground than most people realize. Rodgers has played primarily in two offensive systems: Mike McCarthy's West Coast offense and Matt LaFleur's Shanahan-style offense (which itself is rooted in the West Coast system, dating back to Mike Shanahan's days under Bill Walsh). Coincidentally, Smith has a lot of the same influences. He comes from a branch on LaFleur's coaching tree, as an assistant under LaFleur in Tennessee, but was also inspired by many others, like Ken Whisenhunt, whose offenses featured a lot of West Coast tendencies. We'll have to wait to see how it looks in training camp, but I'd imagine the Steelers will take many of the quick game concepts from the West Coast offense. That will help get the ball out of Rodgers' hand, keep him upright more often and take advantage of his quick release. Think lots of quick slants to DK Metcalf. Then, they'll also have plenty of Shanahan-style concepts like wide-zone runs and play-action passing built off of those runs. I also think the Steelers will lean heavily into 4×1 formations, which put four eligible receivers on one side of the formation. That's an en vogue concept that the Packers and others have utilized with great success, so it's both familiar to Rodgers and trendy. Advertisement It was said that Smith did not like Russell Wilson changing plays at the line of scrimmage. Do you think he will allow Rodgers to do so? — Anonymous U. This is a hot-button issue in Pittsburgh, with numerous readers asking some variation of this same question. From what I understand, there was some friction between Wilson and Smith by the end of the 2024 season. Some of that centered on how frequently the QB wanted to make adjustments at the line of scrimmage. It's not that Smith was completely opposed to Wilson making changes or told him he wasn't allowed to do so, but there were times the OC wanted the QB to run the play as called. I think Smith has enough respect for Rodgers that he'll afford the four-time MVP a bit more freedom, especially with hand signals to make route adjustments without changing the entire play. In my opinion, if the Steelers believe in Rodgers at this stage of his career, their best bet is that the veteran can use his brain and his experience to work around any physical limitations. They'll need to give Rodgers plenty of autonomy within the offense for him to take full advantage of these attributes. Over or under for Rodgers: 25 passing touchdowns and 4K yards? — Gordon M. In 20 NFK seasons, Rodgers has passed for at least 25 touchdowns in every season in which he's played 15 games or more. You'd be a good oddsmaker, because 25 seems pretty much spot on. I'd probably take the over, but that bet hinges upon Rodgers staying healthy. As for the passing yards, 4,000 seems too high to me. Even though Rodgers has surpassed that total 10 times and threw for 3,897 yards last season, he had to attempt the second-most passes in the league to reach that figure. I imagine the offense will be much more balanced than that. Wilson and Justin Fields combined for 3,264 last year, and Rodgers (if healthy) should be slightly better. The Steelers, despite additions, still seem pretty thin at wide receiver. Should we expect another signing (Amari Cooper? Gabe Davis?) or an upcoming season with the actual group of wideouts in-house? — Abraham D. There's been plenty of smoke about a possible trade — so much so that it's clear GM Omar Khan is doing his due diligence to explore all options. Allen Lazard, in particular, still feels like an obvious target, given his history with Rodgers. It's worth noting the Steelers led the league in 13 personnel usage (one back, three tight ends) in 2024, so a pass catcher could also come in the form of a tight end. Advertisement At the same time, I get the sense the Steelers want to see what they have in camp. Can Roman Wilson be the player the Steelers thought they were drafting in the third round? Is there another level for Calvin Austin III to reach? How much does Robert Woods have left? I could see the Steelers going into camp with the current group and evaluating during the preseason. If they make a move, I could see it coming around cutdown day, when a veteran might be available for a bargain — either in a trade or after he's released. If the Steelers had kept George Pickens and then let him walk after the upcoming season, wouldn't they have gotten a third-round compensatory pick? — Keith O. Maybe, but not necessarily. There's a complex formula to determine whether a team will get a comp pick and in what round. The most important piece is that a team must lose more qualifying free agents than it signs. Who can say with certainty that's going to happen next offseason? I understand fans were looking forward to seeing Pickens and Metcalf together. Unfortunately, sometimes with a player like Pickens, there's an expiration date. To me, that expiration date arrived when Mike Tomlin publicly said Pickens had to grow up, and then the WR showed up late for the very next game in which he was active. Even though I will never question Pickens' talent for a second, I don't think you can win big with that type of player. With Rodgers now on board, what position group do you consider to be the weakest link on the team? — Matt Z. Receiver feels like the thinnest position group, even if there are some intriguing depth pieces. I still worry about a potential Metcalf injury. We saw what happened last year when Pickens got hurt. His absence coincided with the late-season spiral. I'm not sure the Steelers are in a better position to deal with a prolonged absence of the No. 1 WR. Cornerback could either become a strength or a concern. (We'll probably see both sides this season.) If Joey Porter Jr. cleans up his penalty issues and Darius Slay plays at a high level, they'll be pretty solid. Slay could also help the Steelers play more man coverage, which could benefit Minkah Fitzpatrick. Safeties often get their interceptions off of tips and overthrows when someone else is doing his job well. But if Porter doesn't take a step forward in Year 3 and Slay shows his age, that position group could be in trouble. We also have to throw the offensive line in here. As I've written about plenty, Rodgers was the worst quarterback in the league against the blitz last season (min. 300 attempts), at minus-0.20 EPA per dropback. He's going to be protected by Broderick Jones, who has played almost exclusively on the right side through his first two seasons, and Troy Fautanu, who has one career NFL start and will be playing the right side after focusing almost exclusively on the left in college. Having two new, inexperienced starters at tackle doesn't sound like a great formula to protect a 41-year-old QB. The defensive line is also a bit thin. I like the top three a lot (Keeanu Benton, Cameron Heyward, Derrick Harmon), but I worry about a potential injury to that group. The talent drops off quickly once you get to the backups. Remember these answers, because they're also the early draft needs. After the obvious need at QB, receiver, cornerback and the trenches will be good places for the Steelers to address in the 2026 NFL Draft. Advertisement Are the Steelers happy with their O-line options, and could we yet see players brought in? — Alan L. Last year, the Steelers kept nine offensive linemen on the initial 53-man roster. The five starters (from left to right) will be: LT Broderick Jones, LG Isaac Seumalo, C Zach Frazier, RG Mason McCormick and RT Troy Fautanu. As it stands now, Ryan McCollum fits as a backup center, Calvin Anderson is a backup tackle, Max Scharping is a backup guard and Spencer Anderson can play all five positions in a pinch. I could definitely see the Steelers looking for a more experienced swing tackle, especially considering Jones' up-and-down play during his first two seasons and Fautanu's injury history. An addition like that could bump Calvin Anderson out of the picture. If the Steelers can find a more established guard, Scharping's spot could also be in jeopardy. Is this more of a prove-it year for Mike Tomlin (because he finally has what most people think is a competent QB) or a throwaway (because that QB is 41 and was really the only option left)? — Joseph Y. I feel like it's going to be very similar to last year. Remember that at one point, Tomlin was getting Coach of the Year buzz for navigating a messy QB situation and leading the Steelers to a 10-3 start. Then, when the season came unraveled, many of the people who praised Tomlin were calling for his job. In reality, Tomlin has nothing to prove to ownership. Remember that after the Steelers got embarrassed by the Buffalo Bills two years ago in the playoffs, extending Tomlin's playoff winless drought to seven seasons, the Steelers' response was to give Tomlin a raise that made him one of the NFL's highest-paid coaches in a new contract that runs through 2027. For better or worse, that's simply how the Rooney family does business with coaches. That said, public opinion and job security are two different things. If the Steelers win a playoff game, I think most will feel like they met expectations. Anything less will be a disappointment. The worst-case scenario for Tomlin is that he wins 10 games this season, ties Chuck Noll for the most regular-season wins in team history and then gets blown out in the first round of the playoffs yet again. Rather than celebrating Tomlin's consistency in the regular season, the conversation would almost certainly be centered around how the Steelers have nearly gone a decade without a playoff win. Do you see any scenario where Rodgers becomes a multiyear solution if his play is decent? — Nick D. By far the most likely scenario is that Rodgers plays this season in Pittsburgh at about a middle-of-the-road level, and then the Steelers draft a rookie QB in the first round in 2026. Though it's unlikely Rodgers will stick around for a second season, I wouldn't completely rule it out. He'd need to play well enough to push the Steelers out of position to draft a top QB, the team would need to be wishy-washy about its options and Rodgers would need to commit immediately. I'm not sure I see all those things happening, but you never know.
