logo
‘Expensive and complicated': Most rural hospitals no longer deliver babies

‘Expensive and complicated': Most rural hospitals no longer deliver babies

Yahoo11-06-2025
A mother prepares her infant son for bed. Since 2020, 36 states have lost at least one rural labor and delivery department. In rural counties, the loss of hospital-based obstetric care is associated with increases in births in hospital emergency rooms, less prenatal care and higher rates of babies being born too early. (Photo by)
Nine months after Monroe County Hospital in rural South Alabama closed its labor and delivery department in October 2023, Grove Hill Memorial Hospital in neighboring Clarke County also stopped delivering babies.
Both hospitals are located in an agricultural swath of the state that's home to most of its poorest counties. Many residents of the region don't even have a nearby emergency department.
Stacey Gilchrist is a nurse and administrator who's spent her 40-year career in Thomasville, a small town about 20 minutes north of Grove Hill. Thomasville's hospital shut down entirely last September over financial difficulties. Thomasville Regional hadn't had a labor and delivery unit for years, but women in labor still showed up at its ER when they knew they wouldn't make it to the nearest delivering hospital.
'We had several close calls where people could not make it even to Grove Hill when they were delivering there,' Gilchrist told Stateline shortly after the Thomasville hospital closed. She recalled how Thomasville nurses worked to save the lives of a mother and baby who'd delivered early in their ER, as staff waited for neonatal specialists to arrive by ambulance from a distant delivering hospital.
'It would give you chills to see what all they had to do. They had to get inventive,' she said, but the mother and baby survived.
Now many families must drive more than an hour to reach the nearest birthing hospital.
Nationwide, most rural hospitals no longer offer obstetric services. Since the end of 2020, more than 100 rural hospitals have stopped delivering babies, according to a new report from the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform, a national policy center focused on solving health care issues through overhauling insurance payments. Fewer than 1,000 rural hospitals nationwide still have labor and delivery services.
A small town tries to revive its hospital in the middle of a rural health crisis
Across the nation, two rural labor and delivery departments shut their doors every month on average, said Harold Miller, the center's president and CEO.
'It's the perfect storm,' Miller told Stateline. 'The number of births are going down, everything is more expensive in rural areas, health insurance plans don't cover the cost of births, and hospitals don't have the resources to offset those losses because they're losing money on other services, too.'
Staffing shortages, low Medicaid reimbursement payments and declining birth rates have contributed to the closures. Some states have responded by changing how Medicaid funds are spent, by allowing the opening of freestanding birth centers, or by encouraging urban-based obstetricians to open satellite clinics in rural areas.
Yet the losses continue. Thirty-six states have lost at least one rural labor and delivery unit since the end of 2020, according to the report. Sixteen have lost three or more. Indiana has lost 12, accounting for a third of its rural hospital labor and delivery units.
In rural counties the loss of hospital-based obstetric care is associated with increases in births in hospital emergency rooms, studies have found. The share of women without adequate prenatal care also increases in rural counties that lose hospital obstetric services.
And researchers have seen an increase in preterm births — when a baby is born three or more weeks early — following rural labor and delivery closures. Babies born too early have higher rates of death and disability.
The decline in hospital-based maternity care has been decades in the making.
Traditionally, hospitals lose money on obstetrics. It costs more to maintain a labor and delivery department than a hospital gets paid by insurance to deliver a baby. This is especially true for rural hospitals, which see fewer births and therefore less revenue than urban areas.
'It is expensive and complicated for any hospital to have labor and delivery because it's a 24/7 service,' said Miller.
A labor and delivery unit must always have certain staff available or on call, including a physician who can perform cesarean sections, nurses with obstetric training, and an anesthetist for C-sections and labor pain management.
You can't subsidize a losing service when you don't have profit coming in from other services.
– Harold Miller, president and CEO of the Center for Healthcare Quality & Payment Reform
'There's a minimum fixed cost you incur [as a hospital] to have all of that, regardless of how many births there are,' Miller said.
In most cases, insurers don't pay hospitals to maintain that standby capacity; they're paid per birth. Hospitals cover their losses on obstetrics with revenue they get from more lucrative services.
For a larger urban hospital with thousands of births a year, the fixed costs might be manageable. For smaller rural hospitals, they're much harder to justify. Some have had to jettison their obstetric services just to keep the doors open.
'You can't subsidize a losing service when you don't have profit coming in from other services,' Miller said.
And staffing is a persistent problem.
Harrison County Hospital in Corydon, Indiana, a small town on the border with Kentucky, ended its obstetric services in March after hospital leaders said they were unable to recruit an obstetric provider. It was the only delivering hospital in the county, averaging about 400 births a year.
And most providers don't want to remain on call 24/7, a particular problem in rural regions that might have just one or two physicians trained in obstetrics. In many rural areas, family physicians with obstetrical training fill the role of both obstetricians and general practitioners.
Even before Harrison County Hospital suspended its obstetrical services, some patients were already driving more than 30 minutes for care, the Indiana Capital Chronicle reported. The closure means the drive could be 50 minutes to reach a hospital with a labor and delivery department, or to see providers for prenatal visits.
A fifth of Americans are on Medicaid. Some of them have no idea.
Longer drive times can be risky, resulting in more scheduled inductions and C-sections because families are scared to risk going into labor naturally and then facing a harrowing hourlong drive to the hospital.
Having fewer labor and delivery units could further burden ambulance services already stretched thin in rural areas.
And hospitals often serve as a hub for other maternity-related services that help keep mothers and babies healthy.
'Other things we've seen in rural counties that have hospital-based OB care is that you're more likely to have other supportive things, like maternal mental health support, postpartum groups, lactation support, access to doula care and midwifery services,' said Katy Kozhimannil, a professor at the University of Minnesota School of Public Health, whose research focuses in part on maternal health policy with a focus on rural communities.
Medicaid, the state-federal public insurance for people with low incomes, pays for nearly half of all births in rural areas nationwide. And women who live in rural communities and small towns are more likely to be covered by Medicaid than women in metro areas.
Experts say one way to save rural labor and delivery in many places would be to bump up Medicaid payments.
As congressional Republicans debate President Donald Trump's tax and spending plan, they're considering which portions of Medicaid to slash to help pay for the bill's tax cuts. Maternity services aren't on the chopping block.
But if Congress reduces federal funding for some portions of Medicaid, states — and hospitals — will have to figure out how to offset that loss. The ripple effects could translate into less money for rural hospitals overall, meaning some may no longer be able to afford labor and delivery services.
Abortion-ban states pour millions into pregnancy centers with little medical care
'Cuts to Medicaid are going to be felt disproportionately in rural areas where Medicaid makes up a higher proportion of labor and delivery and for services in general,' Kozhimannil said. 'It is a hugely important payer at rural hospitals, and for birth in particular.'
And though private insurers often pay more than Medicaid for birth services, Miller believes states shouldn't let companies off the hook.
'The data shows that in many cases, commercial insurance plans operating in a state are not paying adequately for labor and delivery,' Miller said. 'Hospitals will tell you it's not just Medicaid; it's also commercial insurance.'
He'd like to see state insurance regulators pressure private insurance to pay more. More than 40% of births in rural communities are covered by private insurance.
Yet there's no one magic bullet that will fix every rural hospital's bottom line, Miller said: 'For every hospital I've talked to, it's been a different set of circumstances.'
Stateline reporter Anna Claire Vollers can be reached at avollers@stateline.org.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival
Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival

Newsweek

time7 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iowa Democratic Representative J.D. Scholten announced Monday that he is suspending his 2026 U.S. Senate campaign and endorsing fellow Democratic legislator Josh Turek in the primary race to potentially challenge Republican Senator Joni Ernst. Newsweek reached out to Scholten via email on Monday for comment. Why It Matters Scholten's endorsement consolidates Democratic support around healthcare advocacy, with Turek bringing a personal perspective to the issue. The two-time Paralympic gold medalist said his family relied on public assistance programs like Medicaid, as well as Iowa's Area Education Agencies and free summer lunch program as he was growing up, having gone through 21 surgeries by the age of 12 for spina bifida, according to his official campaign biography. The 2026 Iowa Senate race represents a critical opportunity for Democrats in a state that has shifted increasingly Republican in recent cycles. Senator Ernst's response to healthcare concerns has become a focal point for Democratic challengers seeking to make the race competitive. An important update 👉 Today I'm suspending my campaign and endorsing Josh Turek. We can't sit by while healthcare is ripped from millions of Americans and there's no better Democrat in Iowa to hold Joni to account for her cruelty than my friend fighter State Rep. Josh Turek. — J.D. Scholten (@JDScholten) August 18, 2025 What To Know Scholten, a Sioux City Democrat, entered the race in June after Ernst sparked controversy for responding to comments at a town hall about Medicaid cuts. "People are not ... well, we all are going to die," the senator said in part. Ernst's office later clarified to news outlets that she was attempting to make a broader philosophical point about mortality, not specifically about Medicaid policy. Turek, a Democrat from Council Bluffs, launched his campaign on Tuesday. The endorsement comes as both lawmakers represent western Iowa districts and share backgrounds as athletes serving in the state legislature. Scholten, a professional baseball pitcher for the minor league Sioux City Explorers, said he and Turek share many similarities as athletes representing western Iowa at the Statehouse. The Democratic primary field remains crowded despite Scholten's exit. Iowa Senator Zach Wahls, D-Coralville, Des Moines School Board Chair Jackie Norris and Nathan Sage, former Knoxville Chamber of Commerce director, are running for the seat, alongside Turek. On the Republican side, Jim Carlin, a former state lawmaker and Joshua Smith, who has run as a Libertarian candidate in previous elections, are also campaigning for the GOP nomination. Ernst has not officially said if she plans to run for reelection in 2026, though she has told reporters an announcement would be "coming soon." She also told a GOP audience last week that Democrats can "bring it on" in the 2026 election. The lawmaker has raised nearly $1.8 million in the first half of 2025 and scheduled an October fundraiser, possibly signaling preparations for a reelection campaign, the AP reports. Early polling of the race shows the senator with a slight advantage in Iowa. A June Public Policy Polling survey found that Ernst would lead a generic Democrat by about two percentage points—45 percent to 43 percent, with 12 percent still unsure. The poll did not ask voters about specific Democratic candidates. The poll surveyed 568 Iowa voters. What People Are Saying Scholten in a statement on Monday in part: "There are still so many issues facing Iowans today, but we can't sit by while healthcare is ripped from millions of Americans. And there is no better Democrat in Iowa to talk about healthcare issues than my friend: State Rep. Josh Turek." Scholten on his endorsement decision in part: "From the very beginning, I thought a prairie populist athlete from Western Iowa would be the best candidate to win in the General election. I still do, but instead of me, I have complete confidence that Josh Turek can take this on." Turek responding to Scholten's message on X: "I am honored to have the support of J.D. Over the last several years, J.D. and I have fought alongside one another in the state legislature to lower costs for Iowa's families, to make health care more affordable and accessible, to make housing more affordable, and to make life a little bit easier and a little bit better for Iowa's families." He concluded: "We have an incredible opportunity to beat Joni Ernst in 2026, and I'm proud to join forces with J.D." JD Scholten, running for congress in Iowa's 4th Congressional District against Steve King, waves to supporters outside the Wing Ding Dinner on August 9, 2019 in Clear Lake, Iowa. JD Scholten, running for congress in Iowa's 4th Congressional District against Steve King, waves to supporters outside the Wing Ding Dinner on August 9, 2019 in Clear Lake, Iowa. ALEX EDELMAN/AFP via Getty Images What Happens Next? Turek and Scholten will hold an event in Council Bluffs Monday evening. Ernst is expected to formally announce her potential reelection campaign within the coming weeks. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.

Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care
Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care

Newsweek

time12 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The first wave of the opioid epidemic began 26 years ago, and it continues to be a major issue for the health care system today. However, there is one treatment model that shows promise—but it could see progress stunted by future Medicaid cuts. In 2022, 81,806 opioid-involved overdose deaths occurred in the United States, more than any year prior. However, in 2024, overdose deaths relating to synthetic opioids dropped by almost 37 percent from 2023. A form of treatment that has proved and could continue to prove beneficial for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) is the collaborative care model (CoCM). In the SUMMIT randomized clinical trial, published in 2017, 32.8 percent of patients in a CoCM displayed abstinence from opioids or alcohol, as compared to 22.3 percent in standard care. Collaborative care models are revolutionizing treatment for opioid use disorder, combining the expertise of a primary care doctor, behavioral health clinician and consulting specialist, like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist. Collaborative care models are revolutionizing treatment for opioid use disorder, combining the expertise of a primary care doctor, behavioral health clinician and consulting specialist, like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva How do collaborative care models work? The CoCM is depicted as a triangle and involves a behavioral health clinician, a consulting specialist (like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist) and a primary care provider, collaborating to provide behavioral health services to a patient. This treatment model stems from research conducted at the University of Washington at its Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center to understand whether it was possible to leverage the power of the relationship between a primary care physician and their patient while also increasing access to mental health services. Dr. Rachel E. Kishton, a physician at Penn Medicine, headquartered in Philadelphia, was recently named medical director of the Penn Integrated Care (PIC) program, where she oversees Penn's integrated and collaborative care programs. "By including everything within the primary care setting and centering that relationship between the primary care physician and the patient, you get over the hump of the fear and stigma related to it but also start from a place of trust," Kishton told Newsweek. Collaborative care models have been used to treat individuals with disorders like OUD and alcohol use disorder but are also used to treat mental health disorders. Within this lies the biggest challenge in treating patients for OUD using a CoCM. More often than not, OUD is accompanied by comorbid mental health disorders. According to Kishton, the need for a shift to more immediate and definitive treatment for mental health disorders is overlooked, compared to other disciplines in medicine. Kishton provided the metaphor of a patient having a heart attack. In that scenario, the patient should be rushed to the catheterization lab, not kept in an outpatient office and given aspirin. The distinction isn't always clear when a patient is having a mental health crisis. Physicians need better guidelines to respond to behavioral health patients with the proper level of urgency, the same way they would for a patient experiencing physical symptoms. "More research is definitely needed to understand when you send someone to the cath lab," she said, continuing the metaphor. "We need to ensure this research is continued to understand what the next steps are." Dr. Tyler Winkelman, a primary care physician at Hennepin Healthcare in Minneapolis, explained that often patients with depression or anxiety come in with the understanding that they have the disorder, whereas OUD patients often have yet to recognize what they're dealing with. "We've had a lot of success in referring patients with anxiety, depression and alcohol use disorders to the model," Winkelman said. "It has been trickier to figure out how to adapt the model for people with opioid use disorder." As a result of this, Hennepin recently started shifting its CoCM strategy. It previously treated OUD similarly to mental health disorders and is now using the model to prioritize care coordination and access, since that's what the patient population needs most. The collaborative care model is a highly evidence-based and adaptable form of treatment. The behavioral health clinician in the model will typically utilize evidence-based therapy modalities, including cognitive behavioral therapy and behavioral activation. The typical progression for these programs is six to eight sessions with a therapist over three to four months. However, despite the model appearing somewhat formulaic, Kishton emphasized that collaborative care programs vary across institutions. "If you've seen one collaborative care program, you've seen one collaborative care program," Kishton said. "They can be very different, depending on what the goals are, where the funding's coming from and what the core patient group is that you're working with." How do collaborative care models help build patient trust? In addition to Penn Medicine, other institutions around the country are working to create collaborative care programs to serve this patient population. Dr. Gavin B. Bart, who has been a physician of internal and addiction medicine at Hennepin Healthcare for 20 years now, believes the collaborative care model is instrumental in helping people with substance-abuse disorders. "People with substance use disorders are complicated because they've been so marginalized by the health care system," Bart said. "Having care coordination within a single site helps prevent the fragmentation of care that is sort of the standard right now." The CoCM addresses this fragmentation of care by providing patients with direct and immediate access to care within one facility, preventing them from having to find and build trust with a new provider. "The initial part of treating addiction requires much more upfront management to make sure the patient's needs are being mapped, their withdrawal is being managed and other medical issues are managed," said Bart. "And it should be done in a quick manner, otherwise the patients walk away and don't come back." Nurse Practitioner Brenda Bauch works within Hennepin's addiction clinic and shed some light on the vulnerability patients often come into the clinic with. "We see patients who often have a distrust of doing something new," Bauch said. "We have access to effective FDA-approved medications for OUD. That's wonderful and can be life-changing. But initially, it's about saying, 'You're welcome here in wherever you're at in your state of transformative change.'" Could Medicaid cuts limit access to collaborative care? Hennepin Healthcare provides services through grants provided by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). However, Minnesota's state Medicaid agency is yet to adopt the billing codes that cover the cost of a collaborative care program. Bart and Winkelman from Hennepin Healthcare expressed concern regarding pending Medicare and Medicaid cuts. "As a public safety net hospital, we're certainly concerned about the potential cuts," Bart said. "The best we can do to preserve our finances is not squander the knowledge we've gathered through research and public health information. There's data that tells us for every dollar invested in treatment, the amount of savings that occur elsewhere in society in terms of reduced rates of incarceration, increased employment rates and more. We need to not lose touch with that as we create our plans, moving forward, to make America healthy." Despite this possible obstacle, Hennepin Healthcare has been largely successful in helping OUD patients transform their lives. Aside from sharing concerns regarding the financial sustainability of the collaborative care program at Hennepin, Winkelman, too, is "extremely optimistic" about the model's future in treating OUD and other disorders. "I've had so many patients in the last two years benefit dramatically from these services, and we've really been able to help patients get back on their feet," he said. "It has improved the quality of health care that we've provided. And I really see it as the standard of care moving forward in primary care." What's on the horizon for collaborative care models? Currently, research is shifting to examine not only how the collaborative care model can address substance abuse symptoms but also the co-occurring mental health conditions. Penn Medicine's Whole Health Study focused on this with a randomized controlled trial designed to assess collaborative care models and their effectiveness in treating patients for OUD and the comorbid mental disorders that accompany it. The study utilized three conditions. In the first, primary care doctors were prescribing buprenorphine and referring patients out for mental health care. Currently, buprenorphine, a Schedule 3 controlled substance, is one of the medications most commonly used to treat OUD and help patients reduce or quit their opioid usage. In the second condition, a collaborative care model was implemented with a licensed clinical social worker and a psychiatrist who were providing mental health treatment within the primary care practice. The final condition added a peer or certified recovery specialist to increase treatment engagement and retention. The study's principal investigator, David Mandell, professor of psychiatry and director of the Penn Center for Mental Health, shared details regarding the initial results the center recently shared with the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD) organization in New Orleans. "In all three conditions, there's a substantial reduction in opioid use, and [use] stays low for the six months they're in [the CoCM]," said Mandell. "But our collaborative care condition also results in substantial reduction in psychiatric symptoms and even remission from psychiatric disorder, relative to the usual care condition." According to the study's protocol published in 2021, poor treatment retention is relatively common in CoCMs treating OUD. Mandell described a few reasons why this occurs: the location of care sites, which can make it difficult to live one's life during treatment; punitive measures and caregivers' refusal to see patients after relapses; and problems that accompany opioid use, like food insecurity and housing instability. The center recruited participants from among primary care doctors' existing patients; these patients had either initiated treatment or had been in treatment for some time but were still experiencing psychiatric distress. Hence, convincing patients to begin treatment wasn't necessarily part of conducting the study. "One of the really exciting things we see is, across the conditions tested, 80 percent of people stayed in treatment," Mandell said. "This suggests they liked their doctors, thought the treatment was effective and thought people were meeting them where they were." Mandell believes one of the main reasons for this is the harm reduction approach used by Penn primary care doctors, in which they're more responsive to patients' needs and don't use the punitive approach often taken to OUD patients. When asked about the most rewarding part of the trial, Mandell mentioned seeing how much the primary care doctors loved the model, because they've been eager to secure a high level of support for their patients for a long time. Mandell also enjoyed reading patient testimonials, talking about how much they loved their therapists and benefited from their treatment. "The emails we get, where they say, 'You've turned my life around. Things are so great,' relative to what they were. 'I don't know what I would've done without this social worker.' That's very rewarding," said Mandell. To ensure success, Mandell had a multidisciplinary team working alongside him, and working with the members has been one of his favorite parts of leading the trial because of their determination to help this patient population. "This patient population has a lot of stigma around it, and many people are not interested in helping these folks," he said. "They believe, 'You could stop if you wanted,' and 'You get what you deserve.' But these are people really committed to helping OUD patients and figuring out the best way to support them. And that has just absolutely restored my faith in humanity."

Looming Medicaid cuts prompt caregiver concern on Long Island. Why they say "we are nervous"
Looming Medicaid cuts prompt caregiver concern on Long Island. Why they say "we are nervous"

CBS News

time12 hours ago

  • CBS News

Looming Medicaid cuts prompt caregiver concern on Long Island. Why they say "we are nervous"

New York faces significant impacts due to federal Medicaid cuts. Supporters of the cuts say the changes will reduce fraud and abuse, but others worry about impacts to the vulnerable. Former college athlete and administrative assistant Lisa Pope is among the Medicaid dependent Long Islanders that rely on nonprofit human services organizations that offer addiction and mental health treatment. She's now on a positive path forward, thanks in part to the Thrive/Family and Children's Association. "I'm 59 years old. I've been in recovery now for 20 months," Pope said. "Medicaid is important for my life right now, it's been a life save. It's given me the support that I need. The counselors are there." "But as the changes started happening in Washington, D.C., we're nervous," said Dr. Jeffrey Reynolds of the Family and Children's Association. Reynolds said he was about to expand the Family and Children's Association and open a $7 million mental health, substance abuse and primary care facility in Westbury. But after Congress passed what the Trump administration dubbed the Big Beautiful Bill Act in July, cuts to Medicaid are looming. "So we canceled the project, a really painful decision," Reynolds said. "We are going to see devastating impacts on our community because of the cuts in this big, ugly bill," Rep. Laura Gillen said. Gillen and Reynolds were invited to Thrive Center in Westbury to hear first hand from counselors and clients. The Medicaid cuts are due to take effect in 2026. The Trump administration said the cuts are aimed at eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse within the Medicaid program, and will curb unsustainable spending growth. Thrive peer counselor and former addict Ryan Kiser is worried about the impact. "It's a frightening thing. To ask for help, it can be such a fleeting moment. Any barriers that come in between someone and any potential recovery supports could potentially cost a life," Kiser said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store