8 countries that are scaling up AI in their military
Countries around the world are spending millions to introduce the latest artificial intelligence technology into their military operations.
Artificial intelligence can automate some operations in the military and save crucial time by speeding up certain aspects of strategic decision making under human supervision — like pinpointing targets and coming up with courses of action.
But for all of its merits, the technology is also equally worrisome to some experts.
'We all probably suffer from automation bias, which is this idea that we are tempted to and often will accept the recommendation, for example, that a large language model spits out, or prediction that one of these systems is making, because we feel as though the system must have more information than we do, and must be processing it and sequencing it and ordering it better than we could,' legal scholar and former associate White House counsel Ashley Deeks told Quartz earlier this month.
What exacerbates the problem even more is that AI systems are like 'black boxes,' according to Deeks, in that it is tough for users to understand how or why it reaches certain conclusions. This could make it even tougher for officers to figure out who to trust when their gut and experience, and the AI system are saying opposite things.
The Department of Defense is majorly scaling up artificial intelligence in the military.
The potential value of all AI-related federal contracts increased by almost 1200% just from 2022 to 2023, according to a Brookings report, and so much of this spend was by the Pentagon that 'all other agencies become a rounding error.'
The Department has been working to get AI capabilities into defense operations since 2021, including through the use of autonomous weapons and AI-powered computer vision to identify airstrike targets.
Recently, the Pentagon awarded artificial intelligence giant Scale AI a reportedly multi-million dollar prototype contract to integrate AI agents into military planning and decision making workflows under its flagship operation Thunderforge. Under the program, Pentagon and industry partners will use AI agents in everything from military campaign development and resource allocation to wargaming simulations, planning scenarios and proposed courses of action, and strategic assessments.
Artificial intelligence capabilities have long been integrated into Israeli military operations, and has increasingly been in the spotlight as Israel's war on Gaza continues.
A long list of major big tech companies have provided AI services to the Israeli military to be used in wartime operations and decision making, prompting concern over the technology's role in human rights violations against Palestinian civilians.
Palantir (PLTR) signed a strategic partnership with the Israeli Defense Ministry last year to increase the use of its AI technology to support the military's 'war-related missions,' Bloomberg reported.
Google (GOOGL) and Amazon (AMZN) have provided AI services to the Israeli military since 2021 under its controversial, $1.2 billion 'Project Nimbus.' Alphabet made the decision despite some company officials warning that the technology could be used to facilitate human rights violations, according to a New York Times report.
A recent Associated Press investigation found that the Israeli military uses Microsoft (MSFT) and OpenAI artificial intelligence technology, including models made for commercial use. The investigation also said that the Israeli military uses AI to sift through intelligence and intercepted communications, pinpointing targets for drone strikes and for mass surveillance.
Beijing is perhaps United States' number one rival in the AI arms race.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping has made military artificial intelligence a top strategic priority. The People's Liberation Army has invested heavily in scaling up AI to assist in situational awareness, unmanned weapons, decision making and more. Beijing's focus on the matter has made U.S.-based innovators and politicians concerned, with Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang saying that the technology could help China 'leapfrog' the military capacity of 'Western powers.'
Late last year, the Chinese army reportedly used an early version of Meta's (META) Llama as a base to develop a military-focused AI tool called ChatBIT. The military AI can gather and process intelligence, and offer information for operational decision making.
Last week, Hong Kong-based South China Morning Post reported that the People's Liberation Army started to use DeepSeek's AI model for non-combat related support. The model is reportedly being used particularly in military hospitals for now.
Russia has been in a major overhaul of high technology weapons development, dubbed Putin's superoruzhie (aka 'super weapons'), since 2018, in an effort to counter the perceived military technology strength of Western powers.
Russia's war with Ukraine was one of the first documented instances of military AI weapons being used in active combat, including electronic warfare systems capable of jamming communication systems. But perhaps Russia's most notorious AI-enabled method of warfare is to use the technology in massively scaling up disinformation campaigns.
But Russia's military AI capabilities have been developing rather slower than expected, and experts say the West is skeptical of Moscow's ability to scale its development. Russia spends less on research and development than other superpowers like U.S. or China and faces a talent development and retention problem, causing it to lag behind the U.S. and China in developing and scaling these technologies. But recently, reports say Russia has asked for China's help in developing its artificial intelligence capabilities.
Much like its enemy Russia, Ukraine is also focusing on building out and scaling its military AI capabilities.
While the current deployment of Ukrainian military AI in the field is only partial and employs a human-centric approach with officers making final decisions, the country is increasingly investing in the technology to achieve its main objective of replacing humans in direct combat with autonomous unmanned systems. In achieving this objective, Ukraine has sought help from many major American big tech companies like Anduril, Palantir, Microsoft, Amazon and Google.
Ukraine is using the technology to develop autonomous drones, AI-powered tools that provide real-time intelligence to support wartime strategic decision making and find targets, to clear landmines, and to train soldiers with AI simulations. The country has also partnered with Scale AI to aid recovery planning by conducting post-strike damage analysis of buildings targeted by Russia's drone strikes.
South Korea is working around the clock to develop military AI capabilities to counter threats by a Russia-backed North Korea, and aid its military power in the context of a shrinking population.
The East Asian country reportedly tested its first self-developed artificial intelligence models during joint military exercises with the U.S. earlier this month. The system, called Generative Defense AI, was tested in the military exercise to see if it can be applied to actual command and control systems, according to the South Korean defense ministry.
On Thursday, North Korean leader Kim Jong Un supervised a test of brand new AI-equipped suicide and reconnaissance drones.
'The field of unmanned equipment and artificial intelligence should be top-prioritized and developed in modernizing the armed forces,' Kim said, according to state media agency KCNA.
Experts say North Korea is getting technical help from Russia to expand its military technology capabilities, including the use of artificial intelligence.
While North Korea's military AI efforts unsurprisingly lack transparency, KCNA reported that Kim was also briefed on new technological advancements in intelligence-gathering capabilities, electronic jamming and attack systems at the test site on Thursday.
The United Kingdom government established the Defense Artificial Intelligence Center in 2021 in order to transform its defense department 'into an AI-ready organization.' The center aims to develop AI that would speed up defense operations and decision-making and automate the 'dull, dirty, and dangerous' tasks, according to the center's web page.
To achieve this goal, the UK has been putting its resources into research in how AI can pose threats but also be used to develop weapons both on the field and in cyber-warfare.
In a 20-page strategy report published in 2023, the UK military laid out its plans to be 'AI-ready by April 2024.' But in a defense committee hearing in late March 2024, British defense procurement minister James Cartlidge said that the military is not yet at that stage, despite having counted significant progress in incorporating AI in 'some important areas.'
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
10 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Warped Idealism of Trump's Trade Policy
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Tomorrow is Donald Trump's deadline to agree to trade deals before he imposes tariffs, and he means it this time. Why are you laughing? (In fact, since saying that yesterday, he's already chickened out with Mexico, putting the 'taco' in, well, TACO.) But the president has already written off hopes of reaching agreements with some allies. Yesterday, Trump announced that he was raising tariffs on many Brazilian goods to 50 percent across the board, as retribution for Brazil's prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro, a Trump ally. This morning, Trump wrote on Truth Social that Prime Minister Mark Carney's decision to recognize a Palestinian state 'will make it very hard' to strike a deal with Canada. The president's perpetual caving can make him seem craven and opportunistic, but you can detect a different impulse in his handling of trade policy too: a warped kind of idealism. When Trump began his political career, he said he would put ' America First,' rather than using American power to enforce values overseas. Wars to fight repressive autocrats were foolish ways to burn cash and squander American lives. The promotion of human rights and democracy were soft-headed, bleeding-heart causes. Trump, a man of business, was going to look out for the bottom line without getting tangled up in high-minded crusades. Now that's exactly what he's doing: using trade as a way to make grand statements about values—his own, if not America's. This is troubling on legal, moral, and diplomatic levels. The Constitution specifically delegates the power to levy tariffs to Congress, but legislators have delegated some of that capacity to the president. Trump has invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which allows him to impose tariffs in response to an 'unusual and extraordinary threat,' on the basis that Congress cannot act quickly enough. This use of the law is, as Conor Friedersdorf and Ilya Somin wrote in The Atlantic in May, absurd. The White House's months of vacillation on its tariff threats since make the idea of any emergency even less credible. Understanding why Trump would be sensitive about Bolsonaro's prosecution, which stems from Bolsonaro's attempt to cling to power after losing the 2022 election, is not difficult—the parallels between the two have been often noted—but that doesn't make it a threat to the United States, much less an 'unusual and extraordinary' one. Likewise, Canadian recognition of a Palestinian state is unwelcome news for Trump's close alliance with Israel, but it poses no obvious security or economic danger to the U.S. A Congress or Supreme Court interested in limiting presidential power could seize on these statements to arrest Trump's trade war, but these are not the legislators or justices we have. Setting aside the legal problems, Trump's statements about Brazil and Canada represent an abandonment of the realpolitik approach he once promised. Even if Carney were to back down on Palestinian statehood, or Brazil to call off Bolsonaro's prosecution, the United States wouldn't see any economic gain. Trump is purely using American economic might to achieve noneconomic goals. Previous presidents have frequently used U.S. economic hegemony to further national goals—or, less charitably, interfered in the domestic affairs of other sovereign nations. But no one needs to accept any nihilistic false equivalences. Trump wrote in a July 9 letter to Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva that the case against Bolsonaro was 'an international disgrace' and (naturally) a 'Witch Hunt.' Although the U.S. has taken steps to isolate repressive governments, Trump's attempts to bail out Bolsonaro are nothing of the sort. The U.S. can't with a straight face argue that charging Bolsonaro is improper, and it can't accuse Brazil of convicting him in a kangaroo court, because no trial has yet been held. The U.S. government has also long used its power to bully other countries into taking its side in international disputes, but the swipe at Canada is perplexing. The Trump administration remains the most stalwart ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (notwithstanding some recent tensions), and the U.S. government has long withheld recognition of any Palestinian state as leverage in negotiations. Even so, slapping tariffs on Canada for a symbolic decision such as this seems unlikely to dissuade Carney or do anything beyond further stoking nascent Canadian nationalism. This is not the only way in which Trump's blunt wielding of tariffs is likely to backfire on the United States. Consumers in the U.S. will pay higher prices, and overseas, Jerusalem Demsas warned in April, 'the credibility of the nation's promises, its treaties, its agreements, and even its basic rationality has evaporated in just weeks.' But it's not just trust with foreign countries that the president has betrayed. It's the pact he made with voters. Trump promised voters an 'America First' approach. Instead, they're getting a 'Bolsonaro and Netanyahu First' government. Here are three new stories from The Atlantic: Virginia Giuffre's family was shocked that Trump described her as 'stolen.' Every scientific empire comes to an end. Hamas wants Gaza to starve. Today's News President Donald Trump's tariffs are set to take effect tomorrow as his administration scrambles to finalize trade deals with key partners. Mexico received a 90-day extension, while other countries, including China and Canada, remain in negotiations. Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy to the Middle East, and Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will visit Gaza tomorrow to inspect aid distribution as the humanitarian crisis worsens in the region. Dispatches Evening Read By Katherine J. Wu For decades, evolutionary biologists pointed to such examples to cast hybridization as hapless—'rare, very unsuccessful, and not an important evolutionary force,' Sandra Knapp, a plant taxonomist at the Natural History Museum in London, told me. But recently, researchers have begun to revise that dour view. With the right blend of genetic material, hybrids can sometimes be fertile and spawn species of their own; they can acquire new abilities that help them succeed in ways their parents never could. Which, as Knapp and her colleagues have found in a new study, appears to be the case for the world's third-most important staple crop: The 8-to-9-million-year-old lineage that begat the modern potato may have arisen from a chance encounter between a flowering plant from a group called Etuberosum and … an ancient tomato. Tomatoes, in other words, can now justifiably be described as the mother of potatoes. More From The Atlantic Take a look. These photos capture moments from the 2025 World Aquatics Championships in Singapore, where more than 2,500 athletes from over 200 nations competed in events spanning six aquatic sports.
The Intercept
2 hours ago
- The Intercept
U.S. Security Contractors in Gaza Risk War Crimes Charges, Democrats Say
Security firms employing U.S. military veterans for a controversial food distribution operation in Gaza have exposed them to the risk of criminal charges under U.S. laws against war crimes, torture, and forced deportation, four Democrats in Congress said Thursday. In a letter to the two firms' CEOs, Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and three other lawmakers said they were 'horrified' by reporting about the companies' 'deadly' security operations on behalf of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. 'We are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel — or investors — of the immense legal risks they face.' The members of Congress say that news reports and firsthand witnesses indicated employees for Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions were 'sent to Gaza armed for combat' and directed by Israeli officials to use lethal force. 'As a result, we are deeply concerned that you may have failed to alert your personnel — or investors — of the immense legal risks they face for conducting what amounts to military operations on behalf of the Israeli government on land outside of the State of Israel,' the lawmakers say. They asked the companies to answer a series of questions about whether they had warned staffers about their legal risks, including from international courts, and to preserve documents related to their interactions with the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Safe Reach Solutions and UG Solutions did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The letter represents the latest ratcheting up of congressional pressure — so far all from Democrats — on the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and the contractors supporting its operations in the Middle East. Founded only in February, the foundation became the main conduit for U.S.- and Israeli-backed aid into Gaza after Israel lifted a total blockade at the end of May. The foundation's decision to employ armed contractors at its sites, and its close cooperation with Israel, have drawn widespread condemnation from other aid groups who say they violate core humanitarian principles. Some of the security contractors supporting its operations are former U.S. service members, including Special Operations veterans. Welch was joined by Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., and Democratic U.S. Reps. Joaquin Castro of Texas and Sara Jacobs of California. Castro and Jacobs's districts in San Antonio and San Diego, respectively, are home to large populations of U.S. military veterans. Hundreds of people have died trying to access aid at the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's distribution points, according to the United Nations, many of them under Israeli fire. Read our complete coverage The foundation's chair has brushed off reports of chaos and violence at its distribution sites as 'Hamas disinformation' and boasted about its success. Dozens of Senate Democrats in a letter earlier this week said the foundation had failed to address the growing crisis in Gaza and called on President Donald Trump's administration to expand aid through other nonprofits.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Donald Trump expected to hike tariffs on Canadian goods if no trade deal reached by midnight
OTTAWA — U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to sign executive orders Thursday making good on his threat to hike tariffs by his Aug. 1 deadline, as Canadian officials remain holed up in Washington seeking out an eleventh-hour deal. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday afternoon that Trump would sign orders in the afternoon or evening, and that countries which had yet to strike a deal would hear from the Trump administration about the planned increases by midnight. 'Yes, tomorrow, Aug. 1, the reciprocal rates will be going into effect,' Leavitt said. 'If more deals are cut between now and midnight, we'll see what happens. I do know foreign leaders are ringing his phone, realizing this deadline is a real thing for them tomorrow, and they're bringing offers to the table.' Dominic LeBlanc, Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet lead on Canada-U.S. trade, Carney's chief of staff Marc-Andre Blanchard, and Kirsten Hillman, Canada's ambassador to the U.S., are currently in Washington attempting to strike a deal. A failure to do so means Trump will likely fulfil his threats to increase tariffs on Canadian goods that don't comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) from 25 per cent to 35 per cent. Trump said Thursday that he had initiated a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico following a call with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, and that Mexican imports would continue to be subject to a 25 per cent tariff, along with a 25 per cent tariff on autos and a 50 per cent tariff on steel, aluminum and copper. But the gulf between Canada and its largest trading partner appeared to widen early Thursday morning, when Trump warned that Canada's plan to recognize a state of Palestine had marred trade talks with Ottawa on the eve of his deadline to strike a trade deal. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!,' Trump posted on his Truth Social account shortly after midnight. Carney said Wednesday that Canada intends to recognize a Palestinian state in September, a pledge that is contingent on the Palestinian Authority, the governing body in the occupied West Bank, agreeing to a series of democratic reforms. The reforms include holding general elections in 2026, in which Hamas can have no role, and ensuring that a Palestinian state is demilitarized. The prime minister said Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas had agreed to the conditions. The announcement, which followed similar declarations from France and the United Kingdom, deepened the divide between Canada and Trump, a key ally to Israel. Trump's penchant for throwing last-minute wrenches into the works — particularly when they're not trade-related — is unprecedented, said veteran trade lawyer John Boscariol. 'Trump is not using tariffs strictly for trade purposes but instead to achieve all these other objectives, and he moves the goalposts,' said Boscariol, head of the trade law group at the law firm McCarthy Tetrault. Trump's late-night musing about Canada's potential recognition of a Palestinian state was reminiscent of his reference to the prosecution of former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro in his tariff letter to Brazil. 'This makes it much more challenging for Canada's negotiators,' Boscariol said, warning that just because Mexico got an extension of the Aug. 1 deadline doesn't mean Canada will. 'Mexico has its own issues with fentanyl and other illegal narcotics,' Boscariol said. 'But on the Canadian side, Trump is not happy with our supply management program, dairy in particular, and so I think Canada does have unique issues that could cause us to have a different outcome.' The CEO of Canada's Automotive Parts Manufacturers' Association dismissed Trump's social media posting as a distraction tactic rather than a real negotiating stance. 'The White House is firing a confetti canon of grievances around the world, mostly likely to distract from domestic problems for Trump,' said Flavio Volpe. Volpe said he expects the CUSMA tariff exemptions to continue whether there's a deal or not, because they serve U.S. interests. 'The CUSMA exemptions are there because the Americans need them. We did some hard work early in this trade war to show them that,' Volpe said. At a Wednesday news conference in Ottawa, Carney said it was possible trade talks would continue past Thursday's midnight deadline. While he framed the ongoing negotiations as 'constructive' and 'complex,' he suggested that U.S. tariffs on key sectors like autos, steel and aluminum will likely remain in place, given Trump's view that such measures are necessary for the national security of the United States. With files from Mark Ramzy and Alex Ballingall
