logo
Lawyers warn Starmer recognising Palestinian state could break international law

Lawyers warn Starmer recognising Palestinian state could break international law

BBC News31-07-2025
Some of Britain's most distinguished lawyers have warned the government that recognising a Palestinian state would breach international law.Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced the UK would move towards recognition unless Israel met certain conditions, including agreeing a ceasefire and reviving the prospect of a two-state solution, on Tuesday.A day later, Canada announced it would also move towards recognition at a UN summit in September, where 147 of the UN's 193 member states already formally recognise a Palestinian state.However, opponents argue Palestine does not meet the legal requirements for statehood under international law because important criteria have not been met.
The Montevideo Convention sets out the criteria for the recognition of a state under international law as a defined territory, a permanent population, an effective government and the capacity to enter into relations with other states.A group of 43 peers, including some of the UK's most eminent lawyers, has set out their belief that Sir Keir's pledge could be in breach of international law as the territory may not meet these criteria for statehood.In a letter to the government's attorney general, Lord Hermer, first reported by the Times, they call for him to advise the prime minister against recognition."It is clear that there is no certainty over the borders of Palestine," they argue, and also that "there is no functioning single government, Fatah and Hamas being enemies". "The former has failed to hold elections for decades, and the latter is a terrorist organisation, neither of which could enter into relations with other states," the letter adds. The peers warn that it "would be unwise to depart from" the Convention, signed in 1933, "at a time when international law is seen as fragile".They add: "You have said that a selective, 'pick and mix' approach to international law will lead to its disintegration, and that the criteria set out in international law should not be manipulated for reasons of political expedience."Accordingly, we expect you to demonstrate this commitment by explaining to the public and to the government that recognition of Palestine would be contrary to the principles governing recognition of states in international law."Lord Hermer has previously insisted that a commitment to international law "goes absolutely to the heart" of the government's approach to foreign policy.The BBC has obtained a full list of signatories, which includes the prominent barrister Lord Pannick - who represented the previous government at the Supreme Court over its Rwanda scheme.As well as lawyers, some of Parliament's most prominent Jewish voices, including crossbench peer Baroness Deech, Labour's Lord Winston and the Conservatives' Baroness Altmann, have also put their name to the letter.
The peers' intervention follows condemnation of Sir Keir's announcement by Emily Damari, a British-Israeli women who was held captive by Hamas for more than a year, who said Sir Keir is "not standing on the right side of history". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also claimed it "rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism".Responding to fears the decision to recognise a Palestinian state does not align with the 1933 Montevideo Convention, business minister Gareth Thomas told Times Radio: "We haven't signed up to the Montevideo Convention, but is there a clear population in in Palestine? Yes, there is in Gaza and the West Bank."We have made clear that we think you would recognise the state of Palestine, and that state of Palestine would be based on the 1967 borders."Of course, there would have to be land swaps and there would be a shared capital of Jerusalem. They are well-regarded international views."Thomas stressed the UK Government had "made clear that there needs to be reform to the Palestinian Authority, that Hamas can have no role in the future government of Gaza and Palestine more generally". Pointing to the 147 other countries that have already recognised a Palestinian state, he added that the prime minister "was in talks this week with a series of countries, including Canada, and Canada have overnight, as you will have seen, taken the decision to recognise Palestine in September".Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his country plans to recognise a Palestinian state as part of the two-state solution - that is Israel and Palestine living side-by-side.Carney said his decision was prompted by the "catastrophe" in Gaza, and because he feared the prospect of a Palestinian state was "receding before our eyes".The Palestinian Authority - which runs parts of the occupied West Bank - must commit to "much-needed reform" he said, and Hamas, which controlled Gaza, "can play no part".The UK has said it too would recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel committed to a ceasefire.Sir Keir has said the UK will only refrain from recognition if Israel allows more aid into Gaza, stops annexing land in the West Bank, agrees to a ceasefire, and signs up to a long-term peace process over the next two months.He also said Hamas must immediately release all remaining Israeli hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, disarm and "accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza".
Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel issues chilling deadline for a million Palestinians to flee Gaza
Israel issues chilling deadline for a million Palestinians to flee Gaza

Daily Mirror

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Israel issues chilling deadline for a million Palestinians to flee Gaza

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged Israel to immediately reconsider its decision after the plan to re-occupy Gaza was approved overnight by a majority vote Israel has warned Palestinians in Gaza City that they have less than two months to evacuate before it launches a full-scale military occupation. ‌ Their plan, approved on Thursday night by the nation's security cabinet, will see a deadline of October 7 set for a million people to flee before soldiers roll in. But Israel's plan to re-occupy Gaza is 'deeply alarming' and could lead to "catastrophic consequences', the UN declared. ‌ The evacuation deadline is set for the two-year anniversary of the Hamas massacre that kick-off the war back in 2023. Benjamin Netanyahu 's government said the move, which will order the population to move to the south of the Strip before commencing its assault, is one of liberation. It comes after Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine ‌ Netanyahu told Fox News on Thursday: 'We intend to, in order to ensure our security, remove Hamas there, and to pass it to civilian governance that is not Hamas and not anyone advocating the destruction of Israel. We want to liberate ourselves and liberate the people of Gaza from the awful terror of Hamas.' Israel's plot to take over Gaza City is "wrong" and "will only bring more bloodshed", Prime Minister Keir Starmer has said. He urged the country to immediately reconsider its decision "to further escalate its offensive in Gaza", after the plan was approved overnight by a majority vote. ‌ In a statement, Sir Keir said: "This action will do nothing to bring an end to this conflict or to help secure the release of the hostages. It will only bring more bloodshed. Every day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens and hostages taken by Hamas are being held in appalling and inhuman conditions. What we need is a ceasefire, a surge in humanitarian aid, the release of all hostages by Hamas and a negotiated solution. Hamas can play no part in the future of Gaza and must leave as well as disarm." Netanyahu has clashed with his military chiefs over the occupation plans. They believe there is no strategic gain to be made as regards Israel's security and nor will it help get the remaining hostages freed. The plans to re-take Gaza in its entirety also clash with advice from Israel 's senior military commanders. ‌ According to reports this week. Assistant Secretary General Miroslav Jenča told the UN Security Council on Wednesday that under international law, Gaza "is and must remain an integral part of a future Palestinian state.' He also warned Gaza faces "squalid" and "inhumane" conditions, and urged Israel to immediately allow the unimpeded passage of sufficient aid. On Wednesday a UN clinic sheltering displaced people in Gaza City was been hit, according to on the ground witnesses. But United States President Donald Trump said it is 'pretty much up to Israel' to decide if it proceeds. Trump has been distracted this week as the Gaza warning comes after Russian President Vladimir Putin warned of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. Many military experts believe Hamas has been almost destroyed by the war, most of its leadership killed and aid blockades have left fighters struggling to survive. Israelis have repeatedly demonstrated in the streets for Netanyahu to end the war and prioritise the release of hostages. Netanyahu and Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir are said to have had a bust-up with Zamir arguing that the decision constitutes a 'trap' for his troops. The pair argued, according to Hebrew media reports, over a post on X by the PM's son, Yair Netanyahu, who does not hold a government position. The younger Netanyahu lashed out at Zamir and suggested that he was behind a 'rebellion and attempted military coup that is fit for a banana republic in Central America in the 70s.' Zamir objected to that accusation, saying in the meeting, according to the Kan public broadcaster: 'How does that look? Why are you attacking me? Why are you speaking against me in the middle of a war?' Horrific imagery of starving children in the Strip, with close to 100 feared to have died of malnutrition or starvation, has galvanised world opinion against Netanyahu's insistence the war must continue. Many Israelis fear the continued attacks will further endanger the lives of the surviving hostages.

ALEX BRUMMER: Labour should put Thames Water into special administration regime
ALEX BRUMMER: Labour should put Thames Water into special administration regime

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

ALEX BRUMMER: Labour should put Thames Water into special administration regime

Those of us choosing to holiday in Britain this year will be extremely cautious about taking a dip in the nearest beach, river or lake. Many of our heavily indebted water firms neglect their responsibility for sewage-free wild swimming and nature. Fines for spills are regarded by financiers, with scant regard for consumers, as another cost of doing business. Nowhere is this more pronounced than at Thames Water, weighed down by £16.8billion of debt, where commercial sharpshooters are asking regulator Ofwat for an exemption from fines as a price for supporting an enterprise ruined by ruthless financial engineering. Despite the mess, befuddled ministers and regulators, with the apparent support of Thames chairman Adrian Montague, believe there is a deal to be done. The principal holders of the Thames debt – Elliott, Apollo, Silver Lake and Pimco, advised by investment bankers Jefferies – are remorseless. They have minimal interest in Thames' 16m trapped customers but are determined to make a killing on the company's debt. The recent, thorough report on the failing water industry by former Bank of England deputy governor John Cunliffe, with its 88 recommendations, plots a way forward. It seeks to end the regulatory fragmentation which has allowed owners and financiers to play havoc with the rules. What it failed to do is provide a roadmap for Government decision-makers as they struggle with Thames. The right thing for Labour is to put Thames into a special administration regime (SAR). It could then use legal powers to deploy an independent administrator to deliver a haircut to the debt and mitigate the high interest payments. The way would then be clear for genuine, long-term infrastructure investors to come in and begin the mammoth task of restoring Thames' credibility. There is no shortage of candidates. We are not talking about the 'vampire kangaroo' Macquarie, which despite its poor stewardship of Thames is being allowed to make a similar hash of Southern Water. The original great hope for saving Thames was a rescue by private equity barons at KKR through an infrastructure fund. It retreated at the last moment, after finishing due diligence, when the group's investment committee baulked at the potential reputational risk. If the Government decided to put the enterprise into special administration, several bidders likely would appear. The owners of Northumbria Water, part of London-listed CKI, controlled by Hong Kong tycoon Li Ka-Shing, would be keen on doing a deal and be in for the long term. There would be no demand for regulatory exemptions. CKI is already a big investor in Britain with interests in power and gas networks, and Britain's biggest container port at Felixstowe in Suffolk. Ofwat and regulators are thought to be broadly in favour of taking the SAR route. The blockages are at a higher level. A Government which is already taking control of the railways and rescuing British Steel doesn't want to be seen as prioritising public ownership and control, even if only temporarily, over market solutions. The ultimate opponents are the Treasury. It is understood to be fearful of taking new obligations on to the books. This might happen should the SAR regime fail to produce a buyer and a quick sale. There is a mistaken belief that blocking debt ghouls, such as Elliott, would be seen as unfriendly to overseas investment in Britain. It couldn't be more wrong.

Hostage's mum blasts Sir Keir Starmer and urges him to explain why Labour is rewarding terrorists
Hostage's mum blasts Sir Keir Starmer and urges him to explain why Labour is rewarding terrorists

The Sun

time16 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Hostage's mum blasts Sir Keir Starmer and urges him to explain why Labour is rewarding terrorists

A HOSTAGE'S mum has urged the PM to explain why Labour is rewarding terrorists. British-Israeli Ditza Or blasted Sir Keir Starmer for pushing ahead with plans to recognise Palestine, while her son Avinatan remains a Hamas captive. 2 Ms Or, whose grandfather moved from East London to Israel, said: 'Why are you incentivising terrorists to keep my son forever? "Can you look me in the eye and tell me that leaving my son trapped in a terror tunnel while rewarding Hamas is in line with British values?' Sir Keir has pledged to recognise Palestine as a state in September, unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza. But the move has sparked fury from families of British hostages, who branded the PM's plan a prize for terror and war crimes. Avinatan, 32, was abducted from the Nova music festival on October 7 and has now been held for more than 670 days. Yesterday, US vice-president JD Vance said: 'We have no plans to recognise a Palestinian state. "I don't know what it would mean to really recognise a Palestinian state — given the lack of a functional government there.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store