Ford, Chevrolet, Polestar among over 900,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued multiple recalls last week, including notices for nearly 600,000 Cadillac, GMC and Chevrolet vehicles.
Are you looking to see if any recalls were issued on your vehicle? If the car isn't listed below, owners can check USA TODAY's automotive recall database or search NHTSA's database for new recalls. The NHTSA website allows you to search for recalls based on your vehicle identification number, or VIN.
Here's what you need to know about the vehicle recalls published by NHTSA from April 28 to May 4.
GM recalls multiple models for potential engine failure
General Motors recalled some Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC vehicles equipped with a 6.2L V8 engine as the engines may fail.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
The connecting rod and/or crankshaft engine components in these vehicles may have manufacturing defects that can lead to engine damage and engine failure, according to the recall notice.
The recalled vehicles include:
2021-2024 Cadillac Escalade
2021-2024 Cadillac Escalade ESV
2021-2024 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2021-2024 Chevrolet Suburban
2021-2024 Chevrolet Tahoe
2021-2024 GMC Sierra 1500
2021-2024 GMC Yukon
2021-2024 GMC Yukon XL
Drivers may notice some warning signs before engine failure, including a knocking or banging sound from the engine, the check engine light turning on, or other engine performance issues.
Dealers are to inspect the engine and repair or replace the engine as necessary for free. Vehicles that pass the inspection will have services performed on them, free of charge. Notification letters are to be mailed June 9.
Affected vehicles: 597,571
Fords, Lincolns recalled for faulty rearview camera
Ford Motor Company recalled certain Ford and Lincoln vehicles for potentially faulty rearview cameras and displays.
The company recalled Ford Broncos as they may have a 360-degree view camera that "may not display a rearview image when the vehicle is placed in reverse." A group of 2015 vehicles were pulled in a separate recall as they may have a faulty terminal header connector in their "rearview camera printed circuit board," which causes a blank or distorted image.
The vehicles covered under the recalls include:
2015 Ford Expedition
2015 Ford F-250
2015 Ford F-350
2015 Ford F-450
2015 Lincoln MKC
2015 Lincoln Navigator
2022 Ford Bronco
2023 Ford Bronco
Dealers are to replace the cameras free of charge and notification letters are to be sent May 5.
Polestar recalls Polestar 2s for faulty rearview camera
Polestar recalled some of its 2021-2025 Polestar 2 vehicles as they may have a rearview camera image that does not display when the vehicle is placed in reverse.
The company said that there is a synchronization error between the Parking Assist Camera and the Infotainment Head Unit resulting in a "Camera is temporarily unavailable" message, according to the recall report.
Dealers are to update the vehicle software, free of charge, and notification letters are expected to be mailed June 19.
Affected vehicles: 27,816
Volkswagen recalls 2025 ID. BUZZes for lack of seat belts
Volkswagen recalled certain 2025 ID. BUZZ vehicles as they have a third-row rear bench that is wide enough for three passengers but is designed for two passengers and equipped with two seat belts, according to the NHTSA.
Dealers are to install trim to adjust the width of the third-row rear seats, free of charge.
Notification letters are to be sent June 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Americans Call Distracted Driving Dangerous, But Few Admit to Doing It
According to a new Verra Mobility study released for Distracted Driving Awareness Month, 85% of Americans believe distracted driving is just as dangerous as drunk driving. That stat alone should give anyone pause. But here's the kicker: while most drivers say they see reckless behavior on the road all the time, far fewer are willing to admit they've done it themselves. So what did the numbers really show, and what should they mean for everyday drivers like us? Verra Mobility surveyed 2,000 frequent drivers across the U.S. The vast majority say they're noticing bad behavior regularly: 89% say they see speeding at least a few times per week 67% report seeing someone run a red light at least once a month 65% have spotted drivers using their phones while behind the wheel 60% have witnessed someone speeding in a school zone And overall, 63% of respondents believe the average driver has gotten worse in recent years. These observations line up with national data. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving led to more than 3,000 deaths in 2024. That's not just a statistic—it's thousands of families impacted by something as preventable as checking a text message. Here's where things get interesting. When asked about their own driving, people painted a much rosier picture. 65% say they've never driven distracted in the past year 74% claim they haven't used their phone behind the wheel 85% say they've never sped in a school zone It's a bit of a reality check. We may see ourselves as safe and alert, but the numbers suggest we're often not as careful as we think. But here's the disconnect: AAA has found that 87% of U.S. drivers engage in unsafe behaviors behind the wheel. And according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, distracted driving was responsible for more than 3,000 deaths and over 400,000 injuries in 2022 alone. So, while we're pretty quick to notice risky behavior in others (like speeding or phone use), we're not always as honest about our own habits. Despite the disconnect between what people see and what they report doing, one thing is clear: most Americans want safer streets, especially when kids are involved. 59% support automated enforcement to curb dangerous driving 77% support it for school zones A whopping 96% support it for school buses These tech-enabled tools, like speed cameras and red-light enforcement, aren't just about catching bad behavior — they're designed to reduce it. And they're shown to work, especially in school zones and high-risk areas. Jon Baldwin, EVP of Government Solutions at Verra Mobility, summed it up this way: "I believe that the average American is a good driver and cares about safety... being self-aware is key to making our roads safer so that everyone takes responsibility for their own driving behavior." If you're reading this and thinking, 'Yeah, I've seen bad drivers,' maybe it's also a good moment to ask: How often am I fully focused when I'm behind the wheel? The next time your phone buzzes, or a shortcut tempts you to speed through a yellow light, take a beat. Our streets — and the lives on them — deserve your full attention.
Digital Trends
12 hours ago
- Digital Trends
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
Welcome to Digital Trends' weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. Buckle up, folks — this week we're taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let's bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities. Recommended Videos Even if you're mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it's become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we're talking about this week's public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump. What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla's Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump's election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years. Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about FSD's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow. When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla. It didn't help that the Trump administration followed Musk's recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis. The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk's companies, it's unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it. Back to the tech Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology. For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it's the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators. Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon's upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech. For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception. Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo or compete effectively with Zoox? We'll have to wait and see. Flying cars In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle. What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey. But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation's Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby's slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more… driveable. Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the 'car' back in 'flying car.' This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it's not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year. On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It's refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world. But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer). The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights. While the $300,000 price tag won't fit everyone's budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don't have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
Eight-car crash reported on I-635, two hurt, Kansas Highway Patrol says
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — Eight cars were involved in a crash Saturday afternoon on Interstate 635 in Wyandotte County, according to the Kansas Highway Patrol. Two people were reported to have minor injuries. Overland Park Greek community celebrates St. Dionysios Festival The crash was reported before 12:30 p.m. in the northbound lanes of I-635, north of Kansas Avenue near Kansas City, Kansas. According to a crash log from the highway patrol, a 24-year-old man in a GMC Sierra was traveling north on I-635 when he lost control and struck an Acura sedan driven by a 20-year-old man. The Acura spun out and caused one car after another to hit each other. In total, eight vehicles were involved in the crash, according to the highway patrol. The driver of the GMC Sierra was not injured. The driver of the Acura and a 28-year-old driver in a Volkswagen Jetta were taken to a hospital with what appeared to be minor injuries, the highway patrol said. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
