Thailand moves to make recreational cannabis illegal again – DW – 06/25/2025
Three years after decriminalizing cananbis, Thailand is on course to reclassify it as a narcotic, potentially collapsing a $1 billion industry and shutting down thousands of cannabis shops in popular tourist areas.
Thailand is set to reclassify cannabis as a narcotic only three years after the country became one of Asia's first to decriminalize its recreational use.
Coming in the wake of a government coalition split, the major policy reversal would renew controls on the recreational use of cannabis and shut down a booming $1 billion (€860 million) industry.
Thailand removed cannabis from its narcotics list in 2022 but failed to implement a regulatory framework, allowing tens of thousands of cannabis shops to open, many in popular tourist areas.
Government spokesman Jirayu Houngsub said the unregulated market has caused social issues, especially among young people.
"The policy must return to its original goal of controlling cannabis for medical use only," he said.
The decision also comes after the withdrawal of the Bhumjaithai Party — once the main advocate for legalization — from Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra's ruling coalition. The split followed criticism of Shinawatra's handling of a border dispute with Cambodia.
Late Tuesday, the health ministry issued an order banning recreational cannabis sales and requiring a doctor's prescription for any legal purchase. The new regulations will take effect once published in the Royal Gazette, expected in the coming days.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"Cannabis will be classified as a narcotic in the future," quotes Health Minister Somsak Thepsuthin as saying.
The Thai Chamber of Commerce had estimated the industry — covering both recreational and medicinal cannabis — could have been worth $1.2 billion by 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
NATO allies pledge 5% on defense to keep US on board – DW – 06/25/2025
Most NATO allies promised to ramp up defense spending and reaffirmed their "ironclad" commitment to mutual defense. But there are lingering concerns over the scale and scope of US engagement. From the perspective of the European NATO allies, it all went to plan: A short, one page and five point declaration, a nice group photo and even dinner with the Dutch king and queen. US President Donald Trump was in good spirits at the NATO summit at The Hague. When he addressed the press, Trump claimed credit for ending the war in Iran, and for getting the NATO allies to increase their defense spending to 5% of their national GDPs by 2035. He praised the European members of the alliance for "the love and passion they showed for their countries," but also said they needed the US. He hailed the new pledge as a "big win for Europe and for western civilization." The declaration says the allies will spend 5% on defense but split it in two parts. At least 3.5% of GDP will be spent on hard defense – that includes purchase of weapons – and up to 1.5% will go towards other defense-related investments that enhance military mobility and protect against cyber attacks. The trajectory and balance of spending will be reviewed in the next four years. Yet not all NATO members are fully on board. President Trump called out Spain for refusing to increase spending and warned he would make the country pay more through trade. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Spain is the lowest NATO spender at less than 1.3% and has only recently agreed to meet the 2% target that was made a decade ago. Observers said the political turmoil at home made it nearly impossible for Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez to agree to the 5% goal. Tens of thousands protested in Madrid last week after a senior leader of Sanchez' socialist party was accused of corruption and the opposition called for the prime minister to resign. Sanchez asked NATO for an exemption and said Spain would achieve the military capabilities that Nato had asked for but that 2% of GDP would be enough for that. Poland, which is leading in defense spending and already this year announced plans to increase it to 4.7% of its GDP, was not happy. "We believe that any deviation from this principle by any member country is a bad example," Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz said. He may have had a point. Slovakia soon piggybacked on Spain and also refused to meet the target. "The Slovak Republic has other priorities in the coming years than armament," Prime Minister Robert Fico posted on X. "The Slovak Republic must, similarly to Spain, reserve the sovereign right to decide at what pace and in what structure it is prepared to increase the budget." Belgian Foreign Minister Maxime Prevot told the local press his country "may not have done so by making a noisy statement like Spain, but I can assure you that for weeks our diplomats have been working hard to obtain the flexibility mechanisms that could help to lighten the burden of the Belgian effort,' But even if most allies do reach the 5% target, there is lingering uncertainty over the US' commitment to the alliance. On his way to the summit President Trump said there were "numerous definitions" of Article 5 – NATO's mutual defense clause. After his arrival however, he reassured the US was with the NATO allies "all the way." Still, the European allies had to do some damage control. "Stop worrying," NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said at the press conference. "The United States is totally committed to NATO." In the summit declaration the allies then reaffirmed an "ironclad commitment" to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5, "an attack on one is an attack on all." Kristine Berzina, Washington DC-based managing director of the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Geostrategy North, who is currently at The Hague to attend the summit, told DW that in a way, President Trump was right. But that this was hardly the perfect time to deliberate on the nuances of the clause. She said while it was left on individual members to choose the extent of their support to an ally under attack, the only time Article 5 has been invoked was following the September 11th attacks on the United States. "The US has been the beneficiary of Article 5 and that's the part that President Trump should remember," she said. There are also concerns that over time, the US may dial down its support to NATO. "Later this year we can expect the US to consult allies on its global force posture – that will likely be reduced military presence in Europe and then focus on how the Europeans can fill those gaps," Rafael Loss, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) told DW. But he added that the good news was that the US wasn't "dumping everything on the Europeans suddenly." Berzina of the GMF said there was already a conversation about how to compensate Europe for a reduction in troops and assets. "It's possible the US might deploy more nukes in allied countries as a deterrent against adversaries."
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Is Donald Trump making Europe great again? – DW – 06/25/2025
The US president's erratic trade policy is unnerving investors in the US, while at the same time opening up opportunities for European businesses to capture their attention. Will they seize the moment? Time is running out for American and European trade negotiators working to cut a tariff deal before a July 9 deadline set by US President Donald Trump. So far, it remains unclear whether or not Trump's threat of imposing a 50% levy on nearly all European Union imports will materialize — a move that could escalate the dispute into a full-blown transatlantic trade war. Given Trump's erratic trade policy, global investors have grown increasingly wary of the US economy — and at the same time, are beginning to turn their attention toward Europe, especially Germany, the continent's largest economy. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video While the American S&P 500 stock market index has seen big ups and downs since Trump became US president in January, Germany's blue-chip DAX index has risen steadily, and is up more than 15% now. In addition, the US dollar has lost 10% of its value against the euro, with the British pound and the Swiss franc also rising against the US currency. Joachim Nagel, the president of Germany's central bank, the Bundesbank, cautioned about fresh turbulence in global financial markets if the trade conflict with the US isn't resolved. Speaking at a May 14 event in Madrid, Nagel said that "disruptive" was the word that jumped to his mind as he listened to Trump's April 2 announcement of sweeping "reciprocal tariffs" on many countries, adding the move caused a global-stock slump and a weakening dollar that brought financial markets "close to a meltdown." The International Monetary Fund (IMF) already sees "signs of strain" in the US economy amid Trump's policies, warning in its April 2025 Fiscal Monitor that US debt could spiral out of control. In an interview in May, IMF's First Deputy Managing Director Gita Gopinath told the that the US's budget deficits were "too large" and that Washington needed to address its "ever-increasing" debt burden. According to the US Treasury Department, America is now saddled with over $36 trillion (€31.6 trillion) in debt — more than 120% of its GDP as of last year and nearly twice Germany's debt-to-GDP ratio. In 2025, the US's budget deficit is expected to exceed 6.5%, adding to the debt burden. German economist Hans-Werner Sinn sees little room left for the US to continue on its current fiscal path. "The Americans need to tighten their belts. This lifestyle, this world of endless malls and few factories, can't be sustained indefinitely," the former president of the ifo Institute in Munich told DW. Ralph Ossa, chief economist at the World Trade Organization (WTO), shares the view that Washington needs to reduce its trade deficit with the EU and the rest of the world. But like most economists, he sees tariffs as a misguided tool to achieve that. "From an economic standpoint, there's a broad consensus that tariffs are not the right instrument to address trade deficits," he told DW. Ossa likens the US strategy to a person who spends more than they earn and accumulates debt. "If I, Ralph, have a debt problem — because I buy too many cars, for example — then one way to tackle it is to tax the cars so I buy fewer. But that's obviously not the most direct way to address the issue." Stefan Wintels, CEO of Germany's state-owned development bank, KfW, believes Donald Trump's aggressive trade and tariff policies have spooked investors and driven them to reassess Europe. "During my roadshows in New York, London, and Zurich, I see rising interest from international investors in Germany as a location. Many institutional investors are overexposed in the US and want to invest more in Europe, especially in Germany," Wintels said in a recent interview with German business daily In just a few months, sentiment toward Europe and Germany among global investors has "completely shifted," he said, adding: "In over 30 years in this business, I've never seen such a rapid change in investor mood. We must do everything we can to harness this momentum for Germany and Europe." Even global financial heavyweights like US investment firm Blackstone are being drawn to Europe. The company's CEO, Steve Schwarzman, has announced plans to invest up to $500 billion in the continent over the next decade. In an era of geopolitical volatility, Europe is becoming increasingly attractive to investors — thanks in part to Germany's multi-billion-dollar infrastructure and defense investment packages that were adopted by parliament in March. "We see a major opportunity here," Schwarzman told Bloomberg TV in early June. "They're changing their approach, which we believe will lead to higher growth rates." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The European Commission has also acknowledged the need to strengthen the EU's single market of nearly 450 million consumers. In response to global trade tensions, the EU Commission is preparing to tackle what it calls the "ten biggest obstacles" to internal EU trade. According to a leaked strategy paper obtained by German media platform Table Briefings, "all it takes to make up for a 20% fall in the goods exports to the US, is a 2.4% increase in intra-EU goods trade." One key plank in the strategy is cutting the EU's massive bureaucracy to the benefit of particularly small and medium-sized enterprises, making it easier for them to operate across borders within the EU. There's also growing consensus in Brussels that the pace of free trade agreements with countries like India and Indonesia needs to accelerate. Negotiating over decades — as happened with the Mercosur trade deal with Latin America — is no longer viable. But already now, Europe, and particularly Germany, is reaping the benefits of investors' heightened awareness. The so-called SuperReturn International conference held annually in Berlin, drew thousands of top investors this year, including from pension funds, insurers, and sovereign wealth funds managing around €46 trillion ($53.2 trillion) in assets. Touted as the world's largest private equity and venture capital conference, the event attracted representatives from firms like BC Partners, Permira, and Brookfield Asset Management, for example, who all showed an interest in Europe as an investment destination. New York-based Apollo Global Management — already managing about $100 billion of its $800 billion portfolio in Europe — said it intends to focus even more heavily on Germany over the next decade. "We see in this country [Germany] alone the opportunity to put $100 billion in the ground in the next decade," Apollo President Jim Zelter told the , adding that this is "a number that would be hard to match around the globe."
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
'Miracle' HIV drug lenacapavir approved amid US budget cuts – DW – 06/24/2025
The US has approved lenacapavir for HIV prevention. However, experts worry that cuts to the health budget will "squander" the drug's chance of reducing infections. The battle against HIV has been dealt repeated blows in 2025 with cuts to funding for major global aid programs by the United States. There have also been budget cuts closer to home. And experts have told DW the cuts risk undermining efforts to end the HIV epidemic in the US by 2030, even now, with the approval of lenacapavir — what UNAIDS officials have described as a "miracle" drug — in HIV prevention. Lencapavir provides six months of protection against HIV infection. The renowned journal named it 2024's scientific "breakthrough of the year." Some experts are asking whether the promise of the drug could be undone by the defunding of US public health agencies that are vital for getting lencapavir to those who need it most. "Are we going to squander this, probably the greatest opportunity in 44 years of HIV prevention both in the US and globally?" asked Mitchell Warren, executive director of the nonpartisan HIV organization AVAC, in an interview with DW. Winnie Byanyima, executive director of UNAIDS, the United Nations agency that addresses HIV and AIDS around the world, dubbed lenacapavir a "miracle product" in 2024. If it was hype, it was well-founded hype. In late-stage clinical trials, lenacapavir had a near-perfect record of suppressing HIV infection. Having already approved it as a treatment to reduce viral load in patients with the disease, the US Food and Drug Administration has now confirmed lenacapavir as a pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) drug. PrEP drugs are taken before having unprotected sex or injecting drugs to protect against HIV. Unlike other PrEP drugs, which aim to disrupt the virus at one stage of its life cycle, lencapavir has been shown to attack HIV at several stages, increasing its effectiveness. About 400,000 US patients use some form of PrEP, usually a daily pill. But a twice-a-year injection with lenacapavir would provide people with the longest-lasting protection yet. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In his first term, US President Donald Trump started an "Ending the HIV Epidemic" (EHE) initiative, an effort to stop the transmission of the disease within the US by the end of this decade. But the current Trump administration's cost-cutting drive has downsized the federal health budget, affecting key public health agencies, such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and programs including Medicare and Medicaid. America's global aid initiatives, including USAID and PEPFAR (the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief), have also been substantially wound back. "Whether it's the NIH research infrastructure [or] USAID for foreign assistance, these are big programs and none of them are HIV specific," Warren said. "But each one of them is diminished now in [its ability] to deliver the comprehensive and integrated programs that have been really at the forefront [of HIV response]." The result of this lost funding, Warren said, is that especially vulnerable groups, such as those from low-income backgrounds, gay and bisexual men and sex workers, may not benefit from the new PrEP drug, lenacapavir, which could provide them with unprecedented protection. Research has found that in US states which have expanded Medicaid coverage to offer health services to "all people with household incomes below a certain level," a growing number of people are using PrEP. Jeffrey Crowley, director of the Center for HIV and Infectious Disease Policy at the O'Neill Institute in Washington, said services like expanded Medicaid coverage have meant better access to HIV programs for those with the disease. "This is an incredible accomplishment, and it's helped drive a lot of the progress we've seen," Crowley told DW. He also said the cuts will mean people lose access to HIV services, which other programs can't cover. "I think the American people can be proud of how we responded to the HIV crisis domestically and globally, but this is all at risk. We've come so far, after so much death, why would we take a step backward?" To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Every year, more than a million new HIV cases are reported globally and, until recently, US support through programs like USAID and PEPFAR was essential in helping regions most affected by the disease, especially countries in Africa. However, the Trump administration's aid withdrawal has already had an impact. Data from UNAIDS suggests there will be 2,300 more HIV cases per year because of the cuts to PEPFAR alone. Annual infections to date were already at about 3,500. "Less funding means we will get more and more off track," said Byanyima in mid-June. "We don't know what the total impact [of the US cuts] will be, but impact there will be. Already, you see in several countries a drop in the number of people going to clinics." The US government continues to support pregnant women and new mothers via PEPFAR, but the changes have stopped access to PrEP for gay and bisexual men, sex workers and drug users — groups that are disproportionately affected by HIV. Warren said it was akin to "throwing out a whole generation" of progress.
