logo
Russia isn't sounding rattled by Trump's ultimatum on Ukraine

Russia isn't sounding rattled by Trump's ultimatum on Ukraine

Straits Times17-07-2025
People close to the Kremlin say Mr Vladimir Putin believes he is winning and sees no reason to stop without major Ukrainian concessions.
Russia appears unrattled by President Donald Trump's new ultimatum aimed at ending the war in Ukraine, retreating to a long-held position that it will weather any sanctions and continue pursuing its war goals in Ukraine regardless of outside pressure.
Russian commentators have also questioned whether Mr Trump has really reversed course and is fully committed to supporting Ukraine.
Mr Trump issued a
50-day ultimatum for Moscow to come to a peace deal, before implementing penalties drafted by the US Congress on Russia and its trading partners. He also agreed to supply weapons to Ukraine, to be paid for by Europe.
Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov called Mr Trump's remarks 'very serious' on July 15 and something that would concern President Vladimir Putin. But he said Moscow would need time to analyse the position.
On July 16, Mr Peskov said he hoped the United States was still pressuring Ukraine to continue peace talks. Ukraine and many Western analysts say Russia has sought to string Mr Trump along by holding talks without a real readiness to make a deal.
'Many statements have been made,' Mr Peskov said. 'Many words about disappointment.' Ukraine, he added, was reading Washington's support 'as a signal to continue the war'.
On state television, Russian commentators expressed doubt about Mr Trump's plans, saying the weapons he promised were unlikely to change the battlefield reality. Some also suggested Mr Trump would be unable to penalise buyers of Russian oil without sharply increasing global oil prices, to the detriment of the United States and its Western allies.
'I don't think the Russians are overly impressed,' said Mr Alexander Gabuev, director of the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Centre in Berlin, adding: 'There is still more bark than bite.'
Mr Gabuev said the Kremlin's calculus remained unchanged: Moscow believes that with Ukraine losing territory and struggling to find enough troops and Western support, time is on Russia's side. Moscow is still seeking Ukraine's capitulation to a broad range of demands, including that it cede more territory, cap the future size of its military and stay out of military alliances.
People close to the Kremlin say Mr Putin believes he is winning and sees no reason to stop without major Ukrainian concessions. Mr Putin has not yet spoken publicly about Mr Trump's new stance.
Moscow wants to understand what is behind Mr Trump's threat to impose 'very severe' tariffs within 50 days, Russia's foreign minister, Mr Sergey Lavrov, said on July 15. Mr Lavrov mentioned other time frames Mr Trump had given previously, including a promise last year to end the conflict within 24 hours.
'It used to be 24 hours,' he said. 'It used to be 100 days. We have been through all of this, and we really want to understand what motivates the president of the United States.'
Russia's stable of political commentators, writing on Telegram and speaking on state television, have expressed little alarm. Some suggested Russia would continue fighting unfazed. Others said Mr Trump was bluffing. Still others thought Mr Trump remained uncommitted to Ukraine.
Mr Andrei Kartapolov, chair of the defence committee in Russia's lower chamber of parliament, said it remained unclear from Mr Trump's comments what types and quantities of US weapons would be delivered to Ukraine.
Speaking on the 60 Minutes talk show on Russian state television on July 15, Mr Kartapolov said the additional Patriot air defence systems that Mr Trump had approved for shipment were expensive, took a long time to produce and were susceptible to Russian strikes. (Officials told The New York Times, however, that nearly all of the weapons in question are immediately available to ship to Ukraine.)
'We are ready for any development,' Mr Kartapolov said.
Mr Konstantin Simonov, a commentator on the same show, argued that Mr Trump had not in fact changed his position.
'He does not listen to us on the topic of the root causes of the conflict,' Mr Simonov said. 'His position is simple: Let's finish everything, quickly, fix it. Here are your geopolitical bills for my peacekeeping services.'
Mr Simonov, director general of a Russian think-tank called the National Energy Security Fund, predicted that Mr Trump would ultimately approve new penalties against Russia.
But he questioned whether Washington would be willing to 'further tighten the spiral of conflict with China,' one of the biggest buyers of Russian oil, through harsh oil-related measures against Beijing. US negotiators recently brokered an agreement with China after Mr Trump began a trade war.
Russian officials have underscored that they are willing to continue direct negotiations with Ukraine. But US officials say the talks have seen little progress toward peace, though the two sides have agreed to prisoner swops and exchanges of dead soldiers.
Mr Fyodor Lukyanov, a Russian foreign policy analyst who has advised the Kremlin, wrote that Moscow likely assumes the United States under Mr Trump would not become as involved in supporting Ukraine as Washington had been in recent years.
Though Mr Trump is 'fed up', Mr Lukyanov wrote, 'Putin's position has not changed one iota, and, apparently, he does not intend to adjust it in any way in order to maintain relations'. NYTIMES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California says Trump sent military to ‘silence' LA protests
California says Trump sent military to ‘silence' LA protests

Straits Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

California says Trump sent military to ‘silence' LA protests

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox This comes as Mr Trump said he was taking the extraordinary step of deploying the National Guard to fight crime in Washington. LOS ANGELES - The US government's unprecedented use of National Guard troops in Los Angeles to protect officers carrying out President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown was illegal and should be ended, a lawyer for the state of California told a federal judge on Aug 12. The lawyer said evidence presented from the landmark trial that began on Aug 11 showed that soldiers had violated a 19th century law that bars the military from civilian law enforcement. 'The government wanted a show of military force so great that any opposition to their agenda was silenced,' said the lawyer, Ms Meghan Strong of the California Attorney General's Office. Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton countered that there was 'substantial violence' in Los Angeles meriting military intervention and that the troops were only there to protect federal agents and property. Mr Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June in response to days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids. California's Democratic governor, Mr Gavin Newsom, opposed the move and sued, alleging it violated prohibitions on the use of the military in law enforcement. US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will determine whether the government violated the Posse Comitatus Act (PCA). Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Multimedia World Photography Day: Celebrating the art of image-making World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Opinion Singpass use in dating apps raises difficult questions Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Judge Breyer will also hear arguments on Aug 13 on Mr Newsom's legal right to bring the case. The judge has not said when he will rule. The trial comes as Mr Trump said he was taking the extraordinary step of deploying the National Guard to fight crime in Washington and suggested he might take similar actions in other American cities. In the California trial, the administration sought to prove that the military was only used to protect federal personnel or federal property, which the administration said are permissible exceptions to the PCA. California, meanwhile, sought to convince Judge Breyer that troops crossed the line by setting up roadblocks, diverting traffic and making arrests, which Ms Strong described as prohibited policing actions. Government witnesses testified that although those actions are generally prohibited, there are exceptions when federal agents or property are in danger. Judge Breyer appeared sceptical at times of the government's assertion that Mr Trump had sole discretion to decide when troops were needed. The president said in June the protests amounted to a rebellion against federal authority. 'Is it a 'rebellion' because the president says it is a 'rebellion'?' Judge Breyer asked Mr Hamilton during the government's closing argument. Many of the troops have been withdrawn from Los Angeles, but California Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Aug 11 that 300 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state. The trial before Judge Breyer will have limited impact on Mr Trump's plan to deploy hundreds of National Guard troops to Washington. REUTERS

US deficit grows to US$291 billion in July despite tariff revenue surge
US deficit grows to US$291 billion in July despite tariff revenue surge

Business Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Business Times

US deficit grows to US$291 billion in July despite tariff revenue surge

THE US government's budget deficit grew nearly 20 per cent in July to US$291 billion despite a nearly US$21 billion jump in customs duty collections from President Donald Trump's tariffs, with outlays growing faster than receipts, the Treasury Department said on Tuesday. The deficit for July was up 19 per cent, or US$47 billion, from July 2024. Receipts for the month grew 2 per cent, or US$8 billion, to US$338 billion, while outlays jumped 10 per cent, or US$56 billion, to US$630 billion, a record high for the month. The month of July this year had fewer business days than last year, so the Treasury Department said that adjusting for the difference would have increased receipts by about US$20 billion, resulting in a deficit of about US$271 billion. Net customs receipts in July grew to about US$27.7 billion from about US$7.1 billion in the year-earlier period due to higher tariff rates imposed by Trump, a Treasury official said. These collections were largely in line with the increase in June customs receipts after steady growth since April. Trump has touted the billions of dollars flowing into US coffers from his tariffs, but the duties are paid by companies importing the goods, with some costs often passed on to consumers in the form of higher prices. Consumer price index data on Tuesday showed increases in prices for some tariff-sensitive goods like furniture, footwear and auto parts, but they were offset by lower petrol prices in the overall index. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up For the first 10 months of the fiscal year, customs duties totaled US$135.7 billion, up US$73 billion, or 116 per cent, from the year-earlier period. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox Business Network's Kudlow programme that the growing US tariff revenue will make it difficult for the Supreme Court to rule against Trump's import taxes if a legal challenge to them makes its way to the country's top court. Ken Matheny, director of macroeconomics Yale University's Budget Lab, said it is unclear how much further monthly tariff revenue will grow, but the applied tariff rate measured by customs duties divided by the value of goods imports is still around 10 per cent, lower than the current average tariff rate of about 18 per cent based on the latest announcements. Significant numbers of firms are likely holding goods in bonded customs warehouses in the hope that negotiations will bring tariff rates down, but at some point those goods will enter the country, triggering duty payments, he said. 'I suspect these numbers are showing us there is a sizable balance of imports where the duties haven't been recognised yet,' Matheny said, adding that this could lead to a 'temporary big surge in duties.' The overall year-to-date budget results showed a US$1.629 trillion deficit, up 7 per cent, or US$112 billion, from the same period a year earlier. Receipts were up 6 per cent, or US$262 billion, to US$4.347 trillion, a record high for the 10-month period, while outlays grew 7 per cent, or US$374 billion, to US$5.975 trillion, also a 10-month record. The year-to-date customs duties were more than eaten up by an increase of 10 per cent or US$141 billion in costs for government healthcare programmes, including Medicare for seniors and Medicaid for the poor, to US$1.557 trillion. The Social Security pension programme, the largest single expense item, saw an increase of 9 per cent or US$108 billion over the first 10 months of fiscal 2025 to US$1.368 trillion. Interest on the public debt also continued to grow, topping US$1.01 trillion for the 10-month period, an increase of 6 per cent or US$57 billion over the prior year due to slightly higher interest rates and increased debt levels. REUTERS

Stocks to watch: Wilmar, CapitaLand Investment, City Developments, Yangzijiang Financial, Haw Par Corp
Stocks to watch: Wilmar, CapitaLand Investment, City Developments, Yangzijiang Financial, Haw Par Corp

Business Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Business Times

Stocks to watch: Wilmar, CapitaLand Investment, City Developments, Yangzijiang Financial, Haw Par Corp

[SINGAPORE] The following companies saw new developments that may affect trading of their securities on Wednesday (Aug 13): Wilmar International : The agribusiness group on Tuesday posted a net profit of US$594.9 million for H1, up 2.6 per cent from US$579.6 million in the year-ago period. This was attributed to stronger performances in its plantation and sugar milling, which rose on the back of higher palm oil prices and fresh fruit bunch production. Shares of Wilmar closed flat at S$2.97 on Tuesday, before the announcement. CapitaLand Investment (CLI) : It will invest more than 192 billion rupees (S$2.8 billion) in Maharashtra by 2030 to deepen its presence in the key Indian markets of Mumbai and Pune, CLI said on Tuesday at the launch of its first India data centre in Navi Mumbai. The planned investments are an 'integral part' of CLI's wider growth strategy for India, where it aims to expand its funds under management from more than S$8 billion currently to around S$15 billion by 2028. CLI shares closed 0.7 per cent or S$0.02 lower at S$2.75 on Tuesday. City Developments Ltd (CDL) : It posted a 3.9 per cent year-on-year rise in its first-half net profit to S$91.2 million on Wednesday, up from S$87.8 million in the previous corresponding period. This translates to a basic earnings per share (EPS) of S$0.097, compared with S$0.092 in the year-ago period. The board proposed a final dividend of S$0.03 per share, a slight increase from S$0.02 a year prior. The property development segment was once again the largest revenue contributor with a 24.3 per cent jump. The counter closed flat at S$6.35 on Tuesday before the announcement. Yangzijiang Financial : The investment management company on Tuesday posted a 28 per cent rise in net profit to S$137.7 million for its H1, from S$107.4 million in the year-ago period. This was largely driven by the reversal of credit loss allowances, higher contributions from maritime joint ventures and net foreign exchange gains. The group said that the subsidiary which it is proposing to spin-off, YZJ Maritime Development, intends to raise up to S$250 million through the placement of new shares to accredited investors and institutional investors. The counter ended S$0.015, or 1.5 per cent, higher at S$0.99 on Tuesday. Haw Par Corporation : The Tiger Balm ointment maker posted an 18.2 per cent rise in net profit to S$144.1 million for its first half ended June, from S$122 million in the previous corresponding period. H1 revenue rose 7 per cent to S$126.3 million, from S$118.1 million a year earlier, as demand for healthcare products remained resilient. Shares of Haw Par closed S$0.19 or 1.3 per cent lower at S$14.13 on Tuesday, before the results were released. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Hong Leong Asia : The group posted a 13.1 per cent rise in net profit to S$56 million for the first half ended June, from S$49.5 million in the year-ago period. This was mainly due to the strong performance of its subsidiary Yuchai, as well as higher precast concrete volumes, the company said on Tuesday. Shares of Hong Leong Asia closed 1.1 per cent or S$0.02 higher at S$1.86 on Tuesday, before the release of the results. ValueMax Group : The group on Tuesday posted a net profit of S$48 million for H1 , up 35.5 per cent from S$35.4 million in the year-ago period. This was attributed to 'robust performance' across all its core business segments – pawnbroking, moneylending, gold and jewellery retail and trading. Revenue rose 16.8 per cent to S$268.3 million, from S$229.8 million previously. Shares of ValueMax closed S$0.05 or 6.6 per cent higher at S$0.805 before the announcement on Tuesday. Prime US Reit : Its H1 2025 distribution per unit declined 33.3 per cent to US$0.0012 , from US$0.0018 in the year-ago period. Income available for distribution slid 28.6 per cent to US$16.7 million, from US$23.3 million. The manager attributed the drop to the divestment of One Town Center, an office tower in Florida, in July 2024 as well as higher finance expenses. Units of Prime US Reit closed up 0.6 per cent or US$0.001 at US$0.174 on Tuesday, before the announcement. Trading halt: Ascent Bridge called for a trading halt at 12.05 pm on Tuesday, pending the release of an announcement. Its shares ended the day 1.4 per cent or S$0.01 lower at S$0.68.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store