Paris court convicts eight over 2016 Kim Kardashian armed heist
Seven of the convicted received prison sentences of between three and eight years, some of which were suspended, and another received a fine.
The court did not order any additional time behind bars for the accused, with Chief Judge David De Pas saying that the defendants' ages – six are in their 60s and 70s – and their health issues weighed on the court's decision to impose sentences that he said 'aren't very severe'.
'The crime was the most terrifying experience of my life, leaving a lasting impact on me and my family,' Kardashian, who was not present for the verdict, said in a statement on Friday.
'While I'll never forget what happened, I believe in the power of growth and accountability and pray for healing for all. I remain committed to advocating for justice and promoting a fair legal system.'
De Pas told the convicted men that they had 'caused fear' during the October 2, 2016, robbery of millions of dollars worth of jewels from the Kardashians in their hotel room during the Paris Fashion Week. During the theft, Kardashian was tied up and said she feared for her life.
Aomar Ait Khedache, the 69-year-old ringleader of the gang dubbed by the French press as the 'grandpa robbers', used a cane to walk into the courthouse.
Khedache was given a sentence of eight years in prison, five of which were suspended. Three others were given seven years with five suspended. Three more received prison sentences ranging from three to five years, mostly or completely suspended, and an eighth person was found guilty on a weapons charge and fined. Due to time served in jail, none of the accused will return to detention.
Two of the 10 defendants were acquitted.
The trial was heard by a three-judge panel and six jurors, before whom Kardashian testified last week.
During an emotional testimony, Kardashian recounted the harrowing experience of the robbery and the fear she felt being at the mercy of a group of armed men. During the theft, she was thrown onto a bed, tied up and had a gun pressed to her.
'I absolutely did think I was going to die,' she said. 'I have babies. I have to make it home. They can take everything. I just have to make it home.'
Kardashian is known for her interest in law and obtained her law degree in the United States earlier this week. She has also been an outspoken advocate for criminal justice reform.
Earlier in the trial, a letter written by Khedache expressing remorse for his actions was read to Kardashian, who said that she appreciated the letter and forgave him, even if nothing could change the 'trauma and the fact that my life was forever changed'.
Kedache again asked for 'a thousand pardons' via a written note on Friday, with the other defendants also using their final remarks before the court to say that they were sorry for their actions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
11 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Ex-adviser to King Charles: UK incontrovertibly complicit in Gaza genocide
London, United Kingdom – Jonathon Porritt, a 75-year-old Oxford-educated environmentalist, is among the hundreds of people that the UK has cracked down on over their support of Palestine Action. He was arrested and charged earlier this month, under Section 13 of the Terrorism Act, for holding up a sign at a rally decrying the government's decision to outlaw the protest group. 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action,' read the cardboard placard that he, and many of the 520 others arrested, raised. His bail hearing is scheduled for late October. But Porritt is not a criminal. He spent 30 years advising the king on environmental issues when the monarch held the Prince of Wales title. He has also chaired a sustainable development commission set up by former Prime Minister Tony Blair, and throughout his career has worked in politics, academia and directed Friends of the Earth. In 2000, he was awarded a CBE, a high-ranking order, for services to environmental protection. Al Jazeera spoke to Porritt about his activism, Palestine, the role of business and the effect of weapons manufacturing and climate change. Al Jazeera: As the crisis in Gaza worsens, you have urged the UK to take action to stop Israel's onslaught. With more than 700 other business leaders, you recently called for targeted sanctions against those accused of violating international law, including war crimes. Does that include Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, since he is wanted for arrest by the International Criminal Court? Jonathan Porritt: It would certainly include members of his cabinet who have been very forthright in the comments that they've made, which clearly breach any understanding of the rights of people to exist … and indicate a readiness to ethnically cleanse Gaza and indeed to prepare to do the same in the West Bank. It's very clear that those sanctions do now need to be brought forward, and I think it is important that it's business leaders that are suggesting that you just can't allow those kinds of blatant attacks on the Palestinian people to continue. Al Jazeera: On an individual level, many people appalled at Israel's conduct in Gaza have joined a campaign to boycott Israeli goods, in an attempt at hitting the economy that fuels the war. Is this an effective way to stem the violence? Porritt: It is something I do on an individual level. And this is purely personal, but I would be deeply unhappy buying anything exported into the UK from Israel. I feel that the government of Israel at the moment and its track record in terms of the way it's dealt with the situation in Gaza and the West Bank is so repugnant to me personally that I feel uncomfortable supporting the economic standing of that country, so that's my own personal choice. I don't go out of my way to suggest that everybody needs to do that. I think lifestyle decisions are really important, ethical decisions are really important, but do they actually change very much? Probably not, is the reality, and an awful lot of people simply don't know the issues behind these choices. Al Jazeera: Your arrest earlier this month made headlines. What do you think figures such as King Charles and Tony Blair, who you've worked with, would make of your radical activism? Porritt: I was comfortable taking on establishment roles as chair of the commission [launched by Blair], for instance, [and] helping to set up the Prince of Wales's business and sustainability programme, all that kind of stuff. But my life started as an activist in the Green Party and in Friends of the Earth, so they probably always knew that I was more predisposed to that tactical route than to the inside track that I nonetheless spent 30 years pursuing. Al Jazeera: With several wars raging, is the link between militaries and weapons companies, which are major carbon polluters, and climate change being talked about enough? Porritt: No, and this really bugs me a lot. The investment in nuclear weapons of one kind or another, upgrades going on all over the world, and increasing the number of warheads again – this is just crazy, and on the 80th anniversary of Hiroshima you think, how can that possibly be? And then, then you look at the environmental impacts of all of that, of course, including the CO2 footprint of vast increases in expenditure on arms, and it's just the worst possible way of trying to increase security for people in their own country – to make these hugely carbon-intensive and destructive investments and yet more weapons of mass destruction. Al Jazeera: The UK has proscribed Palestine Action as a terror organisation, but its backers say outlawing the group is a way to silence dissent as Israel wages war in Gaza. It is now legally challenging the proscription. What does Palestine Action stand for, in your view? Porritt: What Palestine Action actually stands for is a readiness to use violence against property as part of its campaigning tactics against, in particular, those arms companies [that are] deeply complicit in the continuing genocide in Gaza. They see as being proportionate when set against the devastation going on in Gaza. That choice about tactics is morally based, wholly defensible … and in no way indicative of a formally designated terrorist organisation. In the last few years, there's been an astonishing legal crackdown on basic rights in this country, particularly the right to the freedom of speech and the right to freedom to protest The designation as a terrorist organisation … is to try and silence Palestine Action. That's where I come back to the now incontrovertible proof of the UK government's complicity in this genocide, and because of that complicity – its continuation of licences for arms quite clearly being used to massacre innocent people across Gaza – if you look at that complicity, they needed something extra. They needed an even bigger stick to shut Palestine Action up so that the citizens of the UK were not permitted to recognise just how abhorrent this government's behaviour is.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
US judge denies bid to unseal Epstein grand jury records
A United States federal judge has denied a Department of Justice bid to unseal grand jury records from Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking case, stating the government already has plenty of material related to Epstein that it could release if it chose to do so. The ruling issued by New York Judge Richard Berman on Wednesday follows a similar decision from a judge overseeing the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, the deceased sex offender's former girlfriend and a central figure in his web of abuse. Berman said in his decision that the information available in the grand jury transcripts 'pales in comparison to the Epstein investigative information and materials in the hands of the Department of Justice'. The administration of President Donald Trump has continued to face sharp scrutiny over its handling of information and material related to the disgraced financier and child sex abuser, with whom Trump previously had a long and close relationship. The New York judge said on Wednesday that no victims testified during the Epstein grand jury, and that the only witness called was a federal law enforcement agent with no 'direct knowledge of the facts of the case'. The case included a PowerPoint presentation and a phone log, which Berman said would also remain sealed. While several current members of the Trump administration leaned heavily into Epstein-related conspiracies and said they would release all available information before they entered the White House, Trump has reacted testily to questions about the government's reluctance to do so. Criticism ramped up after the Justice Department said last month that it would not release further information on Epstein and that it had no further details about an alleged 'Epstein files' of the sex offender's clients and associates. Several US news outlets reported that Trump was briefed by Attorney General Pam Bondi that his name appeared on the list. Some anger has come from Trump's own base of supporters, for whom speculation about Epstein's death by suicide in prison and his influence with powerful political and economic figures has been an object of fascination for years.
Al Jazeera
a day ago
- Al Jazeera
Mo Chara says court case is a distraction from genocide in Gaza
Mo Chara says court case is a distraction from genocide in Gaza NewsFeed Irish rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh, known as Mo Chara, appeared in a London court to fight a terrorism charge over allegedly displaying a Hezbollah flag. Surrounded by hundreds of supporters, the Kneecap band member said the case was a distraction from Israel's genocide in Gaza. Video Duration 00 minutes 24 seconds 00:24 Video Duration 02 minutes 33 seconds 02:33 Video Duration 01 minutes 39 seconds 01:39 Video Duration 00 minutes 39 seconds 00:39 Video Duration 00 minutes 36 seconds 00:36 Video Duration 00 minutes 54 seconds 00:54 Video Duration 00 minutes 40 seconds 00:40
