logo
EXCLUSIVE This couple moved to Australia from India with nothing. Now they own 18 properties - here's why they say it makes no sense for Aussies to buy a home of their own to live in

EXCLUSIVE This couple moved to Australia from India with nothing. Now they own 18 properties - here's why they say it makes no sense for Aussies to buy a home of their own to live in

Daily Mail​20-07-2025
A savvy migrant couple who own 18 investment properties are advising Australians against buying a house or unit to live in if their goal is to live in an upmarket suburb.
Rasti Vaibhav, 48, and his wife Rupali Rastogi, 43, came to Australia in 2006 with a background in IT and banking.
They only had a 10 per cent mortgage deposit when they started their investment journey in 2011 by buying land and building a $440,000, four-bedroom house in the Newcastle suburb of Fletcher.
Now, they own an impressive portfolio of 18 properties around the country - in Sydney 's outer west, Melbourne 's north, on Brisbane 's fringes and south of Perth.
The investment properties cost them $5.8million total - and they conservatively estimate they would now be worth $11.3million.
To Mr Vaibhav, the biggest mistake Australians can make is spending years saving up for a mortgage deposit to live in a nice suburb of Sydney, as an owner-occupier - only to find prices have increased and put their dream out of reach.
'It's very emotional - "I live in my own home and I can choose to change the décor as and when I like it" - but just be aware that's very costly,' Mr Vaibhav told Daily Mail Australia.
'The traditional way of what people have learnt about debt... is that "I need to have my own home and then when I am actually paid off, then I'll be looking at investments".'
Mr Vaibhav and his wife have turned this on its head - choosing to live a much cheaper life renting at Narraweena, near Dee Why, on Sydney's northern beaches, rather than buying their dream $3.5million home nearby.
Meanwhile, as house prices grow at a much faster pace than wages, the couple have set themselves up for life by nurturing an impressive portfolio.
Mr Vaibhav said his annual rent of $100,000 was much cheaper than repaying $230,000 a year to the bank for the same kind of house in the area a short walk to the sand.
'The price in Sydney has been going up and up and up,' Mr Vaibhav said.
Sydney's median house price is now approaching $1.5million, which means those saving up for a 20 per cent deposit and stamp duty end up being priced out.
'They have to keep saving, keep earning and if you look at the average rate of saving, that will take a few years for them to get to that point but by the time they get there, the price has already shot up further,' he said.
'It becomes unaffordable for a lot of people on average.
'We chose the path that's not so conventional.
'It's much easier to think about rent-vesting. Live where you want to live for the lifestyle, for the friends, for the school, for the workplace.'
Ms Rastogi said that after living at Epping in the city's north, they moved to the northern beaches and rented, first in North Curl Curl, then Narraweena, to be near a selective school - and the ocean.
'Our daughter always really wanted to live next to the beaches just for the lifestyle,' she said.
The family believed that was better than buying a house to be an owner-occupier in a far, outer suburb that was a long way from the beach and the city.
'When people can't afford to live in their desired suburb, what they do is they go a bit more further and when they're priced out, they go further out and all of a sudden, they realise they are so much (more west) to the CBD that they're spending about one-and-half hours one-way to their workplace,' Mr Vaibhav said.
'To us, saving that three hours per day is more important.
'It's also about the time and the peace that they're able to spend time with their loved ones in pursuing their hobbies that they want to do.'
Mr Vaibhav argued renting in an upmarket suburb, despite the prospect of eviction, was a risk worth taking, to build a property portfolio and have a desirable lifestyle.
'We are actually at the whims of our landlord - there's a risk we are taking on our lifestyle that we're not sure 100 per cent that we will not be asked to leave the property,' he said.
'But we have always signed leases that gives us surety - currently, we're on a two-year lease; it's kind of a house for us for the next two years.'
The couple, with a background in IT, have lived in eight rental properties since moving to Australia from Singapore in 2006, two years after they married.
During the Global Financial Crisis, they leased a home at Kensington near the University of New South Wales as Mr Vaibhav studied for a Master of Business Administration, while his wife became the main breadwinner working as a Westpac insurance analyst.
Even on a combined income of $200,000, a little later, they realised saving up to live in a rich suburb of Sydney was beyond their reach - and saw an opportunity to build up a portfolio of houses in more affordable suburbs.
'I learnt that money is not enough here, even as professionals in a good industry,' Mr Vaibhav said.
'We realised the cost of living was so high and there's not much we can do about owning a home and paying it off as a loan.'
After buying in Newcastle, they bought investment properties at Campbelltown and Dharruk in western Sydney, the New South Wales Central Coast, Melbourne's north, Logan, Ipswich and Caboolture near Brisbane and Lakelands and Warnbro south of Perth.
'We really want to keep it very, very affordable,' he said.
A young person daunted about high prices in Sydney can look for a house selling for $600,000 in an outer suburb of another capital city, and capitalise on good rental yields and capital growth as an investor, he said.
'They can choose to start making that money work harder for them,' he said.
Rising prices also meant someone could borrow against that property to buy another one, having more leverage in getting a loan as population growth fed house price increases.
'When it goes up in value, you go extract equity out again and do it again, treating this as a business,' he said.
Investment properties incur a capital gains tax with a 50 per cent discount while owner-occupier homes are free of the capital gains tax.
'Rent-vesting isn't about choosing between a home or an investment; it's about having both,' Mr Vaibhav said.
The couple have, since 2020, run buyers' agency Get RARE Properties or Get Rich and Retire Early.
Eventually, they want to live in their own home as owner-occupiers but are achieving this as investors first - planning to eventually sell several houses to ultimately buy their dream home.
'We have just delayed our buying a home - it doesn't mean that we'll never own our own home,' Mr Vaibhav said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Benjamin Sesko set 48-hour deadline as Newcastle have no plans to replicate Man Utd deal
Benjamin Sesko set 48-hour deadline as Newcastle have no plans to replicate Man Utd deal

Daily Mirror

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Benjamin Sesko set 48-hour deadline as Newcastle have no plans to replicate Man Utd deal

Newcastle United have reportedly informed RB Leipzig of a deadline in terms of their interest in a possible move for striker Benjamin Sesko, who is also a target for Manchester United Newcastle United have provided a 48-hour deadline regarding their interest in Benjamin Sesko. Eddie Howe's side have identified the RB Leipzig striker as a target as the club look to add reinforcements in attack. ‌ The Magpies, who are preparing for a Champions League campaign, currently have limited options up front. First-choice striker Alexander Isak has been the subject of a rejected bid worth up to £120million from Liverpool, while the expiry of Callum Wilson 's contract leaves prospect William Osula as the club's only other recognised centre-forward. ‌ Newcastle have also been linked with a move for Brentford star Yoane Wissa, who scored 19 league goals last term. However, the club are determined not to allow their pursuit of Leipzig forward Sesko to emulate Manchester United's earlier transfer strategy. ‌ talkSPORT have reported that Newcastle have informed Leipzig of their desire for clarity in terms of Sesko's next steps by Wednesday. It is said that the club are confident of reaching an agreement with the German side. Leipzig are thought to value the 22-year-old striker at around £70million. Sesko is also a target for Man United and had been on Arsenal's radar prior to the Gunners signing Viktor Gyokeres from Sporting CP. However, the report also claimed that Newcastle feel they must have a clear idea of Sesko's intentions before the latter half of the week. It is said that Leipzig have yet to receive any formal offers for Sesko, despite recent reports. Newcastle's unwillingness to find themselves in a transfer saga is contrary to Man United's approach to signing Bryan Mbeumo from Brentford. Despite the club's public interest in Mbeumo, Man United had several offers turned down before the striker finally arrived at Old Trafford in a deal worth up to £71m. Newcastle wish to avoid replicating a similar scenario with Sesko. The Isak situation provides Newcastle with extra motivation to accelerate negotiations for Sesko and any other transfer targets. Aside from potentially losing a star player, Howe will want to ensure any new recruits have time to settle before the start of an important season for the club. ‌ Newcastle reportedly value their star forward at £150m and turned down an initial £110m offer from Liverpool last week. Sky Sports spotted the striker arriving at Newcastle's training ground on Monday, having spent time training with former side Real Sociedad. When asked if he thought Isak would report back to the club as the squad prepared to return from their pre-season tour of Asia, Newcastle boss Howe said: "Of course I'd like him to be (there), but whether he will I don't know at this moment in time. We have been here with the time difference, preparing for training and for games. Other people have been dealing with that situation back at home." ‌ Isak scored 27 goals across all competitions as Newcastle finally ended their long wait for silverware by winning the Carabao Cup and secured a Champions League spot by finishing fifth in the Premier League. He was brought by Newcastle in for around £63m in August 2022. Meanwhile, Sesko scored 21 goals in 45 games for Leipzig, including four goals in the Champions League. The centre-forward is one of the most sought-after strikers in European football, having thrived during his spells in Austria and Germany. Newcastle have welcomed winger Anthony Elanga from Nottingham Forest for £55m and secured a loan move for goalkeeper Aaron Ramsdale so far this summer. In terms of outgoings, the club have recouped some money through the sales of Lloyd Kelly and Sean Longstaff to Juventus and Leeds United, respectively.

Benjamin Sesko holds transfer talks as Man Utd and Newcastle wait for answer
Benjamin Sesko holds transfer talks as Man Utd and Newcastle wait for answer

Daily Mirror

time7 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Benjamin Sesko holds transfer talks as Man Utd and Newcastle wait for answer

Manchester United and Newcastle remain in a tug of war over Benjamin Sesko, whose current club RB Leipzig are preparing to dig their heels in around the asking price RB Leipzig's hierarchy met with Benjamin Sesko and his agent Elvis Basanovic on Sunday night to discuss the striker's possible sale to one of two Premier League clubs. ‌ But the Bundesliga club have firmly rejected Newcastle's initial offer of €75 million plus a €5 million bonus, demanding a guaranteed €80 million up front, while Manchester United remain hopeful of usurping the Toon by bringing the Slovenia star to Old Trafford instead. ‌ Sesko was not in Leipzig's matchday squad for their friendly against Serie A side Atalanta on Saturday afternoon with the much coveted striker kept out amid the tug of war between the Premier League giants. ‌ Newcastle, meanwhile, are in a separate dispute with their current top marksman Alexander Isak looking to pursue a new challenge. Liverpool remain the frontrunner to sign the Sweden international but his asking price remains an issue. It is unclear how interlinked Isak's future is with their move for Sesko with manager Eddie Howe previously stating his desire to have two high-class options for every position. United made their first approach for the Slovenian star last week, through intermediaries, who opened up dialogue over a potential deal. Those talks have progressed and will be stepped up this week, once United have returned home from their three-game tour of the US. ‌ Although United are looking to offload several players before the summer transfer window closes, they have scope to sign a striker without selling. Marcus Rashford's season-long loan move to Barcelona cleared £12m off their annual wage bill, with the La Liga club covering his entire salary. United also raised £20.7m from sell-on clauses including Anthony Elanga's switch to Newcastle, moves for Alvaro Fernandez and Maxi Oyedele, and the £5m paid by Chelsea to pull out of their deal to sign Jadon Sancho. ‌ In addition, United's failure to qualify for Europe this season – for only the second time in 35 years - means they are not bound by UEFA'S limit of spending no more than 70 per cent of annual income on transfers and wages. The structure of the deals for Matheus Cunha and Bryan Mbeumo, who cost a combined £133.5m, with payments spread over instalments, has given United greater freedom to spend.

Does Nunez move raise questions over PIF priorities?
Does Nunez move raise questions over PIF priorities?

BBC News

time37 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Does Nunez move raise questions over PIF priorities?

To add to a deeply frustrating transfer window for Newcastle fans, it now looks like Darwin Nunez could make a move from Liverpool to Al Hilal in Saudi Liverpool to sell Nunez to free up the cash to potentially pursue Alexander Isak again makes so little sense to me. Al Hilal and Newcastle have the same overall owners, and they must know how much we do not want Liverpool to suddenly have a glut of cash is particularly galling when taken in the context of Eddie Howe's recent comments - that players have to "earn the right" to train with the rest of the squad. Not a Newcastle fan? Find and follow your clubThe team are back from pre-season and back in training this week, which represents a real opportunity to have a serious conversation and hopefully move forward without all this noise and also makes me think about what the priority is for our majority owners PIF. More and more discontent has been felt in the fanbase lately over where Newcastle sit on PIF's list of priorities, and allowing another of their clubs to benefit at the potential expense of us feels even more like we are being overlooked. Perhaps it is their clever way of getting money into NUFC, but I think most fans would say we would rather an improved contract was given to Isak, the dust of the summer settles, and he stays with us a little while more from Charlotte Robson at the True Faith: Newcastle United Podcast, external

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store