UK-based aid worker describes escape from Russian missile attack in Ukraine
A UK-based aid worker said he and his friends and colleagues were "so lucky to be alive" after they narrowly escaped a Russian missile attack on a hotel in Ukraine on Wednesday night that left at least four dead.Karol Swiacki, a Polish national and founder of the Bournemouth-based charity Ukraine Relief, was at the Central Hotel in Kryvyi Rih having dinner with friends when the missile struck."We are all safe we didn't have a scratch, it is incredible," Mr Swiacki told BBC News adding "we still don't know how we survived this, honestly."Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Telegram that more than 30 people were wounded in the attack and rescuers were still at the scene.
The charity worker - who has previously won a BBC award - is in Ukraine carrying out aid relief work including delivering sports equipment to a school and renovating a school for 550 children. He is also visiting schools, shelters and orphanages with Ukraine Relief's trustee, Marc Edwards - a British national who now lives in the US.The duo were having dinner with friends at the hotel restaurant at the time of the strike. The dining party included two US volunteers, two workers from a Ukrainian charity foundation, and a young boy and his pregnant mother."We'd just put our stuff in our rooms and went to eat with our local Ukrainian contacts and the cell phone alarm went off so we ran to the shelter," said Mr Edwards.Mr Swiacki said: "We took two steps and there was a big boom, absolute nightmare, everything just within seconds changed into a very apocalyptic news screams, alarms."Live coverage and analysis
Video sent by Mr Swiacki to the BBC showed smoke filling the restaurant with half-eaten meals and takeaway boxes on tables."There was so much stuff that we couldn't see where we were going," said Mr Swiacki.Mr Edwards confirmed that the blast "took out all the windows" and they had to climb out of the restaurant through a broken window.The duo went back into the hotel to retrieve some of their belongings and to see if anyone else was hurt.They also went outside the hotel to look for the vehicles they were using to travel around the country."Three vehicles we had with us were all destroyed – they were full of aid," said Mr Edwards.Mr Swiacki's van, which he had parked outside the hotel, was "smashed completely to pieces".
"We heard some noises we don't want to hear again. Somebody was trapped under the rubble next to our van and didn't make it. Someone was hit from shrapnel and didn't make it. I'm numb," he said. Mr Swiacki described the scene as "crazy, absolutely nightmare" and that he and the group he was with were lucky to have survived.He says the restaurant was on the ground floor and he thinks it is the only one room or at least one of the few rooms that didn't collapse.The duo are still in Kryvyi Rih and despite the shock of the explosion, Mr Swiacki says he has not been deterred him from continuing his aid work with Ukraine."I will never stop helping people after this," he said.The attack happened ahead of a European security summit on Wednesday which Zelensky is attending.Reacting to it, Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said it showed "why Ukraine needs defence capabilities: to protect human lives from Russian terror".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
24 minutes ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer doubles down on Israeli ministers' sanctions despite being slammed by US
SIR Keir Starmer yesterday doubled down on sanctioning Israeli ministers, despite being savagely rapped by the US. Donald Trump 's administration hit out at Britain after the PM broke with tradition and imposed a travel ban and asset freeze on two far-right members of Israel's government, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. 4 4 4 In a scathing attack on the move, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the sanctions 'do not advance American efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home and end the war'. Mr Rubio warned Britain 'not to forget who the real enemy is'. The US ambassador to the UK said he 'fully supported' Mr Rubio's slap down and warned the PM against 'impeding constructive dialogue'. Ben-Gvir, who is pushing to annex the West Bank and wants to permanently expel Palestinians from Gaza, said: 'The American administration is a moral compass in the face of the confusion of some Western countries that choose to appease terrorist organizations like Hamas. 'Israel is not afraid — we will continue to fight terrorism. 'History will judge the Chamberlains of our time.' At PMQs Sir Keir defended the sanctions as a bid to 'uphold human rights and defend the prospect of a two-state solution'. The PM said: "Acting alongside our allies, we have sanctioned individuals responsible for inciting appalling settler violence and expansion. "We will continue to support all efforts to secure a ceasefire, the release of all hostages despicably held by Hamas and the humanitarian aid that needs to surge in. Greta Thunberg's Gaza 'Freedom Flotilla' boarded & seized by Israeli forces 4
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Experts cast doubt on Reeves' plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through ‘technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax
Experts have cast doubt on the Chancellor's plan to make her sums add up by saving billions through 'technical efficiency gains', slashing admin spending and clamping down on tax. The Treasury said it planned to make more use of artificial intelligence, reforming the workforce – including through job cuts – and selling off its London property portfolio. The plans are forecast to save £13.8 billion a year by 2028/29 – including £9 billion a year from the health and social care budget alone. At the same time, a drive to recover more owed taxes is predicted to deliver a £7.5 billion annual gain by 2029/30. And government department administration costs will be culled by 11 per cent by the time of the next election, the Treasury projects – with another huge cut pencilled in for 2026 which will take the savings to 16 per cent, or £2.2 billion. Raoul Ruparel, a former Downing Street adviser to Theresa May, said the latter were 'pretty brutal real-terms cuts across the board'. 'Traditionally, these sorts of cuts are very hard to deliver,' said Mr Ruparel, who is director of the Boston Consulting Group Centre for Growth. The plans for efficiency savings rely heavily on making the National Health Service more productive – that is, doing more with less. They assume annual productivity growth of 2 per cent a year in the NHS, which the Treasury admits would mark a 'substantial increase' on improvements achieved in past years. The productivity plan 'will deliver efficiencies across all healthcare services, primarily through the combined impact of operational and clinical improvements, technology and digital transformation and workforce initiatives', the Treasury said. They will include reducing the use of agency staff and levels of sickness absence. The Government also plans to relocate more civil servants out of London, cutting the number by 12,000 by 2030. But at the same time, its ambition to bring in more unpaid taxes will involve hiring more people – with 5,500 compliance and 2,400 debt management staff expected to be brought in. The closure of 11 central London offices will save £94 million a year by 2032 and the disposal of properties no longer needed will bring in £1 billion, the Government said. Julian Jessop, economics fellow at the Institute of Economic Affairs think-tank, said: 'There is huge scope to boost productivity and make efficiency savings in the public sector. 'It is much less obvious that this Government will be the one to do it.' Also among the expected savings is the claim that the Ministry of Housing will use AI to speed up routine tasks such as checking errors and note taking. 'This will reduce demands on staff time by an estimated 500,000 hours per year,' the Treasury said. Ms Reeves also announced that she will tear up Treasury rules designed to safeguard value for money in order to pour money into infrastructure projects in the Midlands and the North, where Labour is under threat from Reform. Regional mayors have railed for years at the Treasury's so-called 'Green Book' rules which direct investment to areas where it will produce the most economic benefit. Under the new system, the Treasury will limit the use of 'benefit-cost reviews' which have been blamed for halting investment in the North. The new proposals will mean that even projects where the costs outweigh the benefits may not 'automatically constitute poor value for money'.
Spectator
35 minutes ago
- Spectator
The BBC's Israel problem
Intrepidly, the BBC dared recently to visit Dover, Delaware – source, it implied, of starvation in Gaza. I listened carefully as its State Department correspondent, Tom Bateman, hunted down the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in the state which, he explained, is 'a corporate haven for those who like privacy'. Brave Tom did not find much, but that only proved to him that 'The main ingredients of this aid are its politics'. The foundation's chairman says he is a Christian Zionist which, for the BBC, is almost as bad as saying you are a neo-Nazi. The portentousness aside, it is reasonable to ask tricky questions of the American/Israeli organisation which claims it can solve aid in Gaza. The BBC's problem is that it would never, ever apply its investigative zeal to the cartel currently responsible for the aid that seems not to get through. When has it ever doorstepped the UNWRA operatives who moonlight for Hamas? When has it ever challenged the political 'ingredients' of UN agencies as they heap abuse on Israel and stay respectfully silent about Hamas? When has it complained that Hamas does not answer its calls? Perhaps Hamas does answer, welcoming the BBC's trusting approach. The Office of Rail and Road has noticed that our railway system comes down too hard on the innocent. Yes. The weekend before last, about to return from Newcastle, I found I had lost my ticket. I went to the ticket office, bearing my complete receipt, which even included my seat reservation. The man was pleasant, but said there was no way I could have a free new ticket or even an eventual refund. So I had to pay £133 (nearly £50 more than I had already paid) to travel. Approaching the train, I noticed that the barrier was open. Boarding, I found the computer seat reservations had all gone down. Alighting at King's Cross, I realised that no guard had checked my ticket on the journey and that the barriers were open and unmanned. So if I had 'cheated', I would have been unmolested but because I had owned up, I was out of pocket. Obviously this all started with my carelessness, but why can rail companies treat one as guilty until proven innocent though English law says the opposite? I spoke twice in Oxford last week to highly intelligent, mainly undergraduate audiences. The atmosphere reminded me of 1980s secret meetings of dissidents behind the Iron Curtain arranged by British intellectuals, such as Roger Scruton, who were smuggled in. One encountered young people who feared discovery but showed a touching belief in the life of the mind as they thirsted for freedom in the desert of enforced conformity. For the sake of their careers, I shall not reveal who my audiences were. From one attendee, I learnt that in Mods, the first half of the Oxford four-year Classics degree, one no longer studies Virgil or Homer. Instead, the only compulsory texts are Terence and Plautus. This is like reading theology without studying the Old or New Testaments (which, come to think of it, is probably now commonplace). Are there any subjects, outside the liberal arts, in which each generation is encouraged to know less than the previous one? Are there physics degrees which drop quantum theory, or maths ones without calculus? We have contrived a culture in which universities grow, yet knowledge shrinks. As a graduate of Cambridge, I am depressed by my university's decision to open up the Chancellorship to all of us. We always felt smug about Oxford's beauty contest between superannuated politicians. Ours was uncontested. Now we have to endure a dingier version of the Oxford rhodomontade. The Chancellor of Cambridge should not strike attitudes or take sides, as a vote compels. He or she should be unspeakably grand/rich/disinterested. For many years, the late Duke of Edinburgh held the post, faction-free, because he was married to the then Queen, had a mind of his own and had never been to a university. After Prince Philip, our Chancellor was Lord Sainsbury of Turville, a blamelessly benevolent prince of commerce. Now there are ten candidates, all with 'statements' staking their claims. Gina Miller, the eurofanatic, wishes to 'affirm Cambridge's commitment to modernity and equality'. Sandi Toksvig, the television personality, says she speaks up for 'equity, inclusion, rewilding, sustainability and tackling online bias'. We don't want someone who speaks up. Why can't we have the present Duke of Edinburgh, alumnus of Jesus College, who gives diligent public service and will therefore remain silent? There are a great many stories about ransomware and the damage it causes. Presumably these attacks happen mainly because the businesses attacked pay the ransom. One never reads about this, or how criminals get away with the money. If a business pays, is it acting legally? If a public limited company pays a ransom, could shareholders sue? If, on the contrary, it is argued that paying the ransom is good for shareholders, could they sue a company that refused to pay? Friends tell me – and I believe them – that Chloe Dalton's new book Raising Hare is excellent. It does not automatically follow that she is right to call for a new law to impose a close season on hare-culling. The patchy shortage of hares (in some places, the fields are teeming with them) is not attributable to shooting but to habitat loss, vermin and European Brown Hare Syndrome. Besides, as is so often the case when people itch to legislate, there is a relevant law already. Under the Hares Preservation Act 1892, it is an offence to sell, or expose for sale, any hare or leveret between the months of March and July inclusive. Hares may only be sold if shot between 1 August and the last day of February. There is therefore no commercial incentive to orphan a hare in the breeding season.
