Trump's attempted funding freeze was blocked. So why are billions in grants for solar still locked up?

Boston Globe

04-02-2025

In theory, that means the spigot should be back on. Except, according to solar advocates, legal experts, and awardees, as of Monday
the Solar for All funds remained inaccessible. In Massachusetts, that means some $156 million that would benefit an estimated
31,000 households is on ice.
Advertisement
Experts say it's an example of how the Trump administration is going full-speed to disrupt agency work and delay funding distribution with little concern for consequences — like lawsuits — that could come later.
It's not just Solar for All that's at risk.
Massachusetts and New England were awarded more than a billion dollars by the Biden administration to build a more resilient energy grid, lower energy costs, and create thousands of jobs, according to Maria Hardiman, spokeswoman for the state Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs. 'We secured these funds through agreements with federal agencies, and those agreements should be honored by the new administration,' Hardiman said.
Solar energy plays a critical role in helping the state reach its climate goals to lower greenhouse gas emissions that come from burning fossil fuels. Other large-scale renewable energy projects — including offshore wind, or interstate transmission lines to bring hydroelectric energy from Canada — take years to complete, require federal permits, and are ripe for lawsuits, all of which can lead to delays. But the consistent spread of solar energy, rooftop by rooftop, has helped chip away at the state's reliance on fossil fuels.
Advertisement
This summer, when a heat wave led to extreme energy demand, the solar panels disbursed across rooftops, over parking lots, and along highways helped
What's more, solar energy can help low-income households reduce their electricity bills — key in Massachusetts, where rates are particularly high. The solar enabled by the Solar for All grant, which was awarded to the state Department of Energy Resources, is anticipated to lower energy bills by 20 percent for thousands of households.
Advertisement
The state is partnering with Boston Housing Authority and MassHousing on the grant; the locations for the first projects have not yet been announced.
In response to detailed questions about the status of the program and the legal basis for a continued pause on its funds, an EPA spokesperson responded, 'EPA is working to diligently implement President Trump's executive orders as well as subsequent associated implementation memos.' They directed additional questions about the pause to the Department of Justice, which declined to comment.
Related
:
It's a thorny legal situation, because the Solar for All funds, like many other programs funded by large climate spending bills passed under Biden, have already been obligated to states and other awardees, including tribes and nonprofits. All of the awardees had applied to the federal government for their own piece of the $7 billion program, and, once awarded, were left to design and implement Solar for All in a way that meets their specific needs.
These types of so-called
'environmental justice' programs, targeting communities that are low-income or where little to no English are spoken,
are uniquely vulnerable
under Trump because of the administration's stances opposing both climate action and anything related to diversity and inclusion.
The Trump administration's attempt to halt money that's already under contract is a 'pretty extreme step,' said Rob Bradner, an attorney who specializes in federal policy and funding and who is a partner at Holland & Knight.
'There is definitely a question as to whether they have the legal authority to do this,' Bradner said.
The ongoing pause also appears to be at odds with the court orders, according to Jillian Blanchard, vice president of climate change and environmental justice at Lawyers for Good Government, a network of pro bono attorneys.
Advertisement
'There's an inconsistency' between what the Trump administration is saying in communication to courts, and what is happening on the ground, Blanchard said. 'The Constitution gives Congress, not the president, the power of the purse — for a reason.'
Up until the pause, any awardee could log into a federal online portal to file for reimbursement. Now, they're locked out.
'These grantees built out plans and strategies operating under the fair assumption that they would receive funds legally allocated to them, but they have now been deprived of the certainty they need to move forward,' said Sean Gallagher, senior vice president of policy for the Solar Energy Industries Association.
Massachusetts had already won the Solar for All award, negotiated a contract, produced a work plan, and had the work plan approved, according to Greg King, a community solar developer who had been providing feedback on Massachusetts' plans. A team at the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center was created and charged with fine tuning the details, he said.
Other New England states are in the same boat. Rhode Island has not received any of the $49.3 million it was awarded. Vermont can't access the $62.5 million it won, either, according to Melissa Bailey, director of Vermont's state energy office.
In Connecticut, which received a $62.5 million award, state officials are moving ahead with the Solar for All program, despite the uncertainty. 'We continue to operate under approved work plans for these grants and are implementing projects in accordance with these, ensuring that our progress moves forward as planned,' according to James Fowler, a spokesman for the Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection.
Related
:
Advertisement
Since learning of the its $62 million award, the Maine Governor's Energy Office has been carrying out work, including the recent hiring of two full time staff to develop the program. So far, the state has received just $26,000 of its federal grant. Now, it's waiting on guidance from the EPA about what will happen next.
It's anybody's guess.
'Just because the states might have a legal right to those dollars under the terms of the contract, that doesn't mean that it automatically happens unless there is a willing participant in the federal government to release those funds,' said Jeremy McDiarmid, general counsel at the clean trade group Advanced Energy United.
And while that could make a strong case for a lawsuit, there are implications to taking that route, McDiarmid said. 'That is a very, very costly, slow, and high transaction cost way to do business.'
At the same time, business leaders worry that pause on funding is going to introduce new uncertainty to the solar industry, just as it's taking off in the region. An organization or company considering going into business with the federal government might ask, 'Is it worth the risk?,' said Joseph Curtatone, president of the Alliance for Climate Transition.
'This step is going to hurt working families, this will hurt our economy, and it will certainly undercut our credibility, which you can't gain back overnight,' he said.
It also sends the country's solar industry back to 'business as usual,' in which the benefits of solar power — lower energy bills and reduced
greenhouse gas
emissions — are inaccessible to low-income and disadvantaged communities, according to King, the Massachusetts community solar developer.
'Honestly, with Solar for All, we thought we now had a perfect environment for solar development,' King said. 'Now, the Solar for All program is a huge question mark.'
Sabrina Shankman can be reached at