China State Media Asks Nvidia to Prove H20 Chips Are Secure
China's top internet watchdog summoned Nvidia representatives earlier this week to discuss what Chinese officials called significant security vulnerabilities in the H20. The Cyberspace Administration of China said that Nvidia would need to explain potential security risks and provide documents as needed, citing comments by US lawmakers about the need to install tracking capabilities on advanced chips being exported.
'As soon as 'backdoors' in chips are triggered, we can encounter a 'nightmare,'' the People's Daily, a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party, said in a commentary on Friday. 'We need to maintain the security of the cyberspace and we cannot allow 'infected' chips to be put to work.'
More scrutiny of the artificial intelligence chip would throw a wrench China's already-contentious trade talks with the US. Santa Clara, California-based Nvidia had designed the H20 to comply with US export controls on its technology, and the company was hoping to start sales after the US granted a license.
'Cybersecurity is critically important to us,' Nvidia said in a statement Thursday. 'Nvidia does not have 'backdoors' in our chips that would give anyone a remote way to access or control them.'
US and Chinese officials met in Stockholm this week to discuss trade terms in talks that Chinese state media said 'deepened mutual trust,' though the two sides still have several disagreements over the potential new tariffs. The warning in People's Daily may signal that Chinese officials don't find H20s, which are less powerful than Nvidia's most high-end chips, to be worthy offerings.
The Trump administration in April barred Nvidia from selling H20s to China in an escalation of the ongoing tech war between the world's two largest economies. Trump officials then pledged to lift those restrictions in July as part of a trade deal for China to allow more sales of rare-earth magnets needed to make a range of high-tech products.
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick had touted the resumption of sales of the H20 as a breakthrough that came from bilateral discussions in London, framing it as a concession to China. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, meanwhile, said earlier this week the magnet issue has been 'solved.' However, it is unclear whether Nvidia has received licenses to resume shipping those semiconductors.
Nvidia boss Jensen Huang himself recently concluded a high-profile visit to Beijing, where he feted national Chinese champions such as DeepSeek and celebrated the country's rising prowess in AI. The billionaire had denied Nvidia installed backdoors in its product, saying that wouldn't make business sense.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
From code to combat: AI-driven drones rewrite battle rules from Op Spider Web to Operation Sindoor
In an insightful conversation with Firstpost, Sai Pattabiram, Founder and CEO of an Indian drone manufacturer company, Zuppa, explained the significance of drones in modern warfare and the challenges that come with it. read more In the span of just a few months, the world witnessed three innovative military operations that changed the dynamics of modern warfare. These missions were: Operation Spider Web, Operation Rising Lion and Operation Sindoor. All these military operations had one thing in common: the use of autonomous drones where AI plays a key role in their trajectories and the actual work of the drones. While the technology has made the war games a level playing field, it has also raised numerous security concerns. In an insightful conversation with Firstpost, Sai Pattabiram, founder and CEO of an Indian drone manufacturer company, Zuppa, explained the significance of drones in modern warfare and the challenges that come with it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zuppa is a Chennai-based drone manufacturer and seller to the Indian army. Its drones took part in Operation Sindoor India, launched to target nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following the Pahalgam terror attack. Pattabiram explained the tech that makes these drones so vital for various services. 'One needs to understand that a drone is unmanned because an embedded electronic motherboard known as the autopilot has replaced the Human pilot,' he said. 'This autopilot consists of both hardware and software layers that enable a user to use it much like a mobile phone or a laptop. This is called the Cyber Physical Stack of the drone, as shown below: Pattabiram mentioned that it is the electronic layer where the automation and AI drone technology are usually built. 'The evolution of drone tech in terms of deployment that has been witnessed across conflicts globally, from Operation Sindoor to Operation Spider Web and everything in between, has been in these layers,' Pattabiram told Firstpost. 'The technology life cycle of innovation happening in this layer has dropped significantly to 8 – 10 weeks. Thus, indicating an innovation in drone use happening every 2-3 months. Much of this evolution that has been witnessed today has been in these layers,' he said. Pattabiram emphasised that the future of drone technology will be its ability to adapt quickly. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD From delivering groceries to delivering bombs In the span of just a few years, there has been an evolution in how drones are being used. From delivering items one purchased online to dropping bombs and turning into suicide bombers. While speaking on the evolution of the use of drones, Pattabiram emphasised that the dual-use technology can deliver anything, be it food or bombs. 'Initially, drones' dual-use technology was not given enough care across the world, not only in India. Nobody looked at it as a dual-use technology. They all looked at it as separate military applications and separate civilian applications,' he told Firstpost. However, Pattabiram also pointed out how these drones can be used by terrorists, raising a security concern. 'Civilians, military and terrorists can use the same thing for three very different purposes. Like a farmer can use a drone for spraying pesticides or nutrients. The military could use it to use a drone to ship material from point A to point B, and the terrorists could use it as a kamikaze mode or even as a bomb dropping,' he said. 'So this dual-use nature of drones is what is now turning out to be a kind of revolution for most of the people in the security apparatus or the security organisations. And this all started primarily with Ukraine using FPV drones.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zuppa's Kamikaze Micro Drone Ajeet Mini. Image Source: Zuppa 'Now, FPV drones today are known as kamikaze drones. Today we know it as drones which can damage lethally, which can deliver lethal blows, like Operation Spider that happened recently. But FPV drones were never intended to be this,' he explained. 'FPV drones were racing drones. There is an FPV racing league and Ukraine and Russia, both countries, that practically use FPV, flyers, people who do drone racing to fly these drones into war. Drones as Dual-use technology weren't expected and weren't something people thought of,' he added. Ukraine Operation Spider Web: The concerns & opportunities On June 1, 2025, Russia was rocked by a drone attack on its key military infrastructure. Ukraine eventually announced that after over one and a half years of planning, they had conducted what they called 'Operation Spider Web'. In the mission, Ukraine used a whopping 117 drones to strike the Russian airfield. What was shocking was the fact that the strikes were conducted 600 kilometres away from the battleline and 1,000 kilometres away from the Ukrainian border. While speaking to Firstpost, Pattabiram noted that this was the 'first time we saw the use of the remote operational capabilities of the drone.' He also mentioned how Elon Musk's Starlink played a crucial role in the operation. 'While Kamikaze drones themselves haven't changed much since their first use in the Ukraine-Russia war, it's their evolution in terms of deployment that has been changing modern warfare. Like Operation Spider Web was a very innovative use of Kamikaze drones way inside enemy lines,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine's Security Chief Briefs President Zelenskyy on Operation Spider's Web. Image: X/@ZelenskyyUa However, he also stated that the 'true impact of Operation Spider Web is not only on Russia, but it is on the entire global security ecosystem, given the scale and asymmetry of damage it has inflicted in terms of cost and operational preparedness'. 'This operation has galvanised the former Indian Army Chief to state that the Entire Country is now a battlefield thanks to the scale of this operation,' he said. Not something new Another point on which Pattabiram emphasised was the fact that 'such a kind of operation has not happened in India. 'In India, if you see, we have had the Jammu air base attack in 2021. Which again was possibly by a locally operated drone. Possibly even locally assembled using locally available material. Means material within India,' he said. 'So the Operation Spider Web has woken up the security apparatus across the world. This Operation is going to change the way people look at drones. The way people operate drones in war as well,' he said. Open source code and the risks of hijacks One of the key aspects of the Operation Spider Web is the fact that Ukraine used open-source codes to develop the drones that ultimately struck the Russian airfield. However, if the easily available codes fall into the wrong hands, the impact would be detrimental. While raising concerns over the matter, Pattabiram recalled the hijacking of an Indian drone back in August 2024. 'The drone was taken over on the 23rd of August 2024 by Pakistan, and it's not like that was the first time it's happened, it's happened before as well. A lot of this can be directly attributed to the use of open source code,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SBU chief Lt. Gen. Vasyl Maliuk is standing beside a schematic map of the operation. @SBUkr 'The code layer of a drone is where the vulnerability of hacking or the vulnerability of misuse lies. The code can be downloaded from GitHub, and it can be used, and the commands can be directly given to the drone to hack. So, considering this open-source code is a major risk from a security perspective,' he explained. The need for a regulatory framework When asked how the risk can be tackled, Pattabiram suggested innovative ideas. 'The key is that there is a lot of learning that is possible from the telecom sector. Chinese phones that were sold here without IMEI numbers. Which meant there was no traceability of the phone. So they could be misused for various things, and nobody knows where it is. Now, today the drone is in the same status. Despite the civilian drone regulation having been in place since 1921. For the last 4 years, nobody knows where a drone is operating or who is operating,' he averred. 'So, considering this, DGCA has a digital sky on which you can register a drone. But there is something beyond the online portal on which you register, and you get one thing called a UIN number. So the regulatory framework has a very simple thing to be done, i.e. using the telecom as a learning point.' 'So all they need to do is completely stop the import of autopilots and then introduce SIM cards into every autopilot in India. So that every SIM card has an IMEI number. And it has an IMEI number, which is your subscriber number. This way, you can trace the drone from the telecom network to where it is. Who is operating it, and the moment you have got the IMEI number, and you have done a KYC for it, you know who owns the drone,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When it comes to imported autopilots, Pattabiram said that those drones need to be controlled. 'It should not be an open item. A drone autopilot cannot be imported under OGL or a general licence. There should be specific people who are allowed and authorised to import it based on licensing. And the second is that all autopilots need to have a SIM card on them. If this is done, then I think one can get rid of a lot of problems. The first drone war in South Asia: India-Pak conflict While the Indian and Pakistani military clashed with each other on numerous occasions, the conflict that erupted following the devastating Pahalgam attack saw drones taking the centre stage. 'Operation Sindoor was the first time a totally non-contact remote war played out in the subcontinent, with neither side crossing either the IB or the LOC. This was possible primarily on account of the deployment of remote technologies like drones and missiles,' Pattabiram said. 'Having said that, it is important to note the fact that the small drone war has been happening even before Operation Sindoor, with Pakistan violating lower-level Indian airspace over the past couple of years, every day by sending hundreds of drones to deliver drugs, small arms, explosives, etc. This war is interestingly continuing even after May 10th 2025.' A debate will take place in the Upper House of Parliament over India's Operation Sindoor. Representational Image 'The importance of addressing and building capabilities for this particular type of low intensity, dispersed, highly asymmetric war is one of the biggest learning's from Operation Sindoor. This is exactly the kind of warfare that is stretching out the Ukraine-Russia war for over three years now. The Israel-Iran war and the Israel-Houthi wars are other such conflicts that are stretching out. The result of such stretched-out, open-ended conflicts can be both costly and debilitating to the economies of the countries involved,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pattabiram emphasised that India needs to build capabilities and abilities to block enemy drones from coming to India. Mentioning how Pakistan often uses drones to send drugs within the Indian borders, he called for finding ways to neutralise these threats. A general view of a damaged portion of a building, after it was hit by an Indian strike, in Muridke near Lahore, Pakistan, May 7. Jain played a big part in Operation Sindoor. Reuters AI & Drones During the conversation with Firstpost, Pattabiram noted that AI automation is going to be the future of drones. 'The question of trying to operate them manually is not going to be feasible. The skill level required to fly this kind of FPV drone takes years for somebody to build into that kind of capability. Due to this, it is not scalable as well,' he said. 'It needs to be AI-based. It needs to have self-autonomous capabilities, which do not exist. But looks like many of the countries and many of the companies, including us, are also working along those lines in terms of autonomous AI and Machine learning is being infused into drones,' he asserted, emphasising that the integration of AI and drones is an 'unavoidable future'. So, the swarm drone concept is another concept that is going to be very, very strong going forward. The only thing that you will see grow going forward is the technology content, and the way the technology is used is going to start scaling very well,' he said. Operation Rising Lion: Are drone bases new sleeper cells? After Israel conducted Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear facilities, it was revealed that Mossad had drone bases within Iranian territory. It was from these bases that they activated the drones and conducted the strikes on military and nuclear facilities in Iran. While talking about the operation, Pattabiram compared setting up drone bases within enemy territory to setting up sleeper cells or deploying terrorists on foreign land. 'It is more on the lines of a terrorist operation. So it is like you are having terrorists within the country, within the enemy country, and you are operating those sleeper cells,' he said. 'In some ways, it is very similar to a sleeper cell concept. And that is exactly what Ukraine and Israel, or Mossad, did. They have activated certain existing assets in terms of people within the other country. This is very, very similar to what has been happening in India. In terms of Pahalgam, or in terms of Patankot or in terms of Bombay, 26-11. Now, in the terrorist case it is human, in this case it is a drone. But the basic concept is the same,' he said. Pattabiram emphasised that the only way to counter these attacks would be the same way one works on counter terrorism measures. 'So it is a counter terrorism and counterinsurgency kind of scenario that has to be used for something like this. Now, one of the ways of figuring it out is controlling the availability of material to be able to activate these things. And the second is legitimacy in terms of seeing who is using this material, who is buying this material,' he explained. Are drones replacing battle tanks? Over the decades, the rules of warfare have evolved significantly. From the use of horses to battle tanks. Then missiles came into play, making countries target each other irrespective of the distance. However, the three operations that rocked the world in the span of a few weeks beg one question: Are drones replacing battle tanks? When Firstpost asked this question, Pattabiram said drones are being used for the first time as a 'de-escalatory asymmetric'. 'When a war moved from a horse to a tank, the tank was far more expensive than a horse. But still, people took it because it offered certain strong advantages over a horse. When it moved from propeller planes to jet planes, jet planes were far ahead of propeller planes in terms of capabilities. So even though it was higher in terms of cost, people adopted it because it delivered asymmetric impact to the forces,' he explained. When bombs evolved into missiles, a similar kind of asymmetry happened where the cost escalated, but the impact also escalated. But drones are the first time in the history of warfare where it has gone the other way around. Where the cost has reduced, but the impact has increased.' 'So, thereby enabling larger deployment of drones, covering larger areas and being cost-effective, they are a de-escalative asymmetry which delivers a higher impact,' he added. To support his assertion, Pattabiram gave an example of how to take down a tank with millions of dollars of Russian bombers, Ukraine just used $2,000 drones. 'So, where this also plays is now if somebody were to use missiles to stop drones, then you are stopping a $2000 drone with a $2 million missile. When it comes to that kind of equation, it can bleed a country,' he said. Can drones be a deterrent in war as nuclear weapons have been? When asked if drones can be given the same stature as nuclear weapons for deterrence in war, Pattabiram emphasised that while drones can be solid levellers, they are not deterrents and the impact is not as significant as a nuclear weapon. 'The drones are turning out to be more of irritants and more of psychological players, rather than being something like an impact player, like nuclear weapons,' Pattabiram said. 'Nuclear weapons have more of an impact as a deterrent. Whereas drones are turning out to be more than something, they start affecting people psychologically as well as people, keep irritating and chipping away.' 'So nuclear is something like, one hard bang. This is something that gives a thousand cuts. So, drones and nuclear weapons can't be compared to that extent; one is kind of destructive in one shot. So there is a difference between the two,' he concluded. While drones might not be as lethal as nuclear weapons, one thing remains clear: they will be at the centre stage of modern warfare.
The Hindu
8 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Rupee falls 11 paise to 87.29 against U.S. dollar in early trade
The rupee depreciated 11 paise to 87.29 against the U.S. dollar in early trade on Monday (August 4, 2025), weighed down by sustained foreign fund outflows and concerns over trade tariffs. Forex traders said the weakness in the dollar index and easing crude oil prices supported the rupee at lower levels. At the interbank foreign exchange market, the rupee opened at 87.21 and fell to an early low of 87.29 against the American currency, registering a decline of 11 paise over its previous close. On Friday, the rupee closed at 87.18 against the U.S. dollar. "Indian Rupee opened at 87.20 level this morning after the fall in Dollar index and is expected to be in the range of 87- 87.50," said Anil Kumar Bhansali, Head of Treasury and Executive Director, Finrex Treasury Advisors LLP. Mr. Trump also outlined steep duties against 70 countries, raising uncertainty over trade tariffs, Bhansali said. Meanwhile, Brent crude prices fell 0.26% to $69.49 per barrel in futures trade, as OPEC+ agreed for a production hike in September this year, while concerns over a cooling US economy and trade tariffs also weighed. The dollar index, which gauges the greenback's strength against a basket of six currencies, fell by 0.40% to 98.74. Meanwhile, the U.S. FED Governor resigned, opening the door for U.S. President Donald Trump to make an imprint on the Central Bank much earlier than anticipated. The U.S. Treasury yields also fell as traders heavily scaled up bets of a FED rate cut in September. In the domestic equity market, Sensex advanced 262.08 points or 0.33% to 80,861.99, while Nifty rose 98.50 points or 0.4% to 24,663.85. Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) offloaded equities worth ₹3,366.40 crore on a net basis on Friday, according to exchange data.
Mint
8 minutes ago
- Mint
Donald Trump defends tariff strategy, seeks ‘fairness, not leverage' after slapping duties on India & others
President Donald Trump emphasised that the United States aims for fairness in tariff negotiations, not leverage. He expressed a desire for reciprocity and noted that the world's biggest economy will benefit financially from these negotiations. Speaking to the reporters in Pennsylvania, Trump was quoted saying, "I'm not looking for leverage, I'm looking for fairness." He added, "We want to see reciprocal wherever we can, and all I can say is this: our country will be taking in hundreds of billions of dollars." Trump's comments came after the US signed several trade agreements, while still engaged in negotiations with multiple countries, including India. On July 30, the US President announced a 25% tariff on India, citing high duties and non-monetary trade barriers. He also criticised India's energy and military purchases from Russia, while imposing an additional penalty. In a post on his Truth Social handle, Trump wrote, 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country.' He pointed out that India imports military equipment and oil from Russia, the country responsible for the war in Ukraine, according to Trump. Therefore, he intends to impose a 'penalty' on India. Following the tariff announcement, India has maintained that it is continuing talks with US negotiators over a Free Trade Agreement (FTA), which was initiated by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Trump during a meeting in Washington in February. India is considering various options, such as increasing US imports, but has ruled out immediate retaliation against President Donald Trump's tariff threat, according to a Bloomberg report citing people familiar with the matter. Over the past few months, India and the US have conducted multiple rounds of trade negotiations. New Delhi chose to lower tariffs on products such as Bourbon whiskey and motorcycles. (With inputs from agencies.)
