logo
Understanding prescribed debt: why millions of South Africans pay expired credit

Understanding prescribed debt: why millions of South Africans pay expired credit

IOL News27-05-2025
Millions of South Africans unknowingly pay expired debts due to a lack of awareness about their rights. This article explores the concept of prescribed debt, the aggressive tactics used by collectors, and essential steps consumers can take to protect themselves.
Image: Kindel Media/Pexels
In theory, prescribed debt offers relief: if a debt hasn't been acknowledged, paid, or legally pursued within three years, it's no longer enforceable. But in reality, many South Africans are still being hounded for these expired debts, and most don't know they have the right to say no.
Many consumers don't realise they have rights when it comes to old debt. If you haven't made a payment, acknowledged the debt, or been legally pursued in three years, it may be prescribed, and no longer legally recoverable. But even a simple phone call where you say, 'I'll pay when I can' can restart the clock.
The National Financial Ombud (NFO), South Africa's financial watchdog for consumer justice, handled 40,859 cases in its first year (March 2024–March 2025) across banking, credit, insurance, and other financial services, resolving over 60% of credit-related cases—including many prescribed debt disputes—in favour of consumers.
The bigger issue is how prescribed debts often remain on credit reports, damaging people's chances of renting homes, securing jobs, or qualifying for new credit. Why are credit bureaus still listing prescribed debt? We've seen countless cases where consumers are unfairly penalised for debts that should've been erased years ago.
What is prescribed debt?
Under South African law, most credit-related debt prescribes after three years of no payment, acknowledgment, or legal action. This is governed by the Prescription Act. Yet debt collectors continue to chase these expired debts — often using aggressive tactics, unclear language, or verbal traps.
In townships and rural areas, many consumers are approached in their home language and pressured into making promises they don't fully understand. 'Just answering a call or saying 'yes' can have consequences. That's why legal advice is so important.
The Rise of Credit — and Collection Pressure
The economic stress is clear. According to the Eighty20 Credit Stress Report, in Q4 2024: Total loan balances reached R2.5 trillion , a year-on-year increase of R78 billion (3.2%)
Credit card debt grew by nearly 6%
Retail credit balances increased by 4%
Overdue debt
hit
R200 billion
, making up
8%
of total debt, up
R11.5 billion
from the previous year
With more people relying on personal loans and store credit just to stay afloat, collection activity is also on the rise, including efforts to recover debt that may legally be prescribed.
Grey Areas and Unethical Practices
Prescribed debt collection has become a lucrative industry for certain attorneys and debt buyers. Many operate in legal grey areas, using scare tactics to trick consumers into paying expired debt.
In some cases, people receive SMSes that look like court summonses. It's misleading, and often, illegal. Consumers need to know that they have a choice — and that fear shouldn't guide financial decisions.
5 Ways to Protect Yourself
Understand the 3-year rule
: If no payment, acknowledgment, or legal action has occurred in three years, most debts prescribe.
Be careful what you say
:
Avoid phrases like 'I'll pay soon'
— this
can reset the prescription period.
Get legal advice
: Don't ignore communications, but don't assume you must pay
either
.
Check your credit report
: Dispute prescribed debt listings with the credit bureau.
Request written proof
: Never agree to pay without a written record of the debt's validity.
Not all debt prescribes. Court orders, municipal debt, and home loans with bonds may be enforceable for 15 to 30 years. But for most unsecured credit — the kind being chased today — the three-year limit still applies.
Rather than avoiding the calls or blindly agreeing to pay, speak to a professional.'
* De Lange is a director and head of legal at Milaw Legal.
PERSONAL FINANCE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Experts advocate for robust data sharing in SA to crack down on economic crime
Experts advocate for robust data sharing in SA to crack down on economic crime

Daily Maverick

time12 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Experts advocate for robust data sharing in SA to crack down on economic crime

Financial crime on the continent isn't just growing — it is mutating. With billions of rands lost annually and corrupt structures entrenched, it's clear that breaking down silos and boosting private-public information sharing is no longer optional; it's now essential. This was the scary picture that emerged at a recent Institute of Commercial Forensic Practitioners conference. Experts from both the private and public sectors hammered home the message that the future of economic crime prevention in Africa hinges on smashing information silos and building airtight data-sharing frameworks. 'Economic crime remains a significant issue in South Africa, with South Africans losing millions due to economic crime,' said Elzé Matthee, researcher and academic trainee at North-West University. According to the SA Banking Risk Information Centre's 2023 annual crime statistics, an actual loss of R3.35-billion was recorded due to economic crime — on the back of 1.5-million separate criminal incidents. Meanwhile, the 2024 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index indicates that South Africa's score has further dropped by three points since 2019 to a score of 41 out of 100. South Africa shares the same ranking as Burkina Faso, Kosovo and Vietnam, followed by Colombia at 87th. The problem is complex, expensive to investigate, and worsened by outdated frameworks that keep private-sector intelligence locked away from those who need it most — the authorities. Matthee said that one measure to enhance the prevention and detection of economic crime was through information-sharing frameworks in the form of private and public sectors. What this means going forward Effective information sharing between the private and public sectors is a critical, yet underutilised, weapon in combating economic crime. Key benefits include: The private sector holds an extensive pool of information that is often inaccessible to public authorities. This data supports identifying beneficial owners of corporate structures, verifying customers, monitoring transactions and conducting intelligence-driven enquiries. Enhanced information sharing strengthens anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism efforts through targeted and timely actions. It enables faster, more pertinent reporting during ongoing investigations and live incidents, improving responsiveness. When prioritised within specific private-public information sharing frameworks, it significantly increases the detection and disruption of suspicious activities. From theory to action Matthee said that between 4 October and 15 October 2024, South Africa ran 14 coordinated operations targeting corruption, illegal wildlife trafficking and illicit financial flows. More than R189-million was recovered, and the Financial Recovery Committee issued Section 34 directives against 30 individuals linked to money laundering in state-owned enterprises. These wins, though impressive, represent just the tip of the iceberg — but are proof that strategic data pooling between sectors works. Significant step forward The broader institutional landscape has also taken notice. The National Treasury also recently announced that the Financial Action Task Force confirmed that 'South Africa has substantially completed all 22 action items' that were contained in the action plan adopted when South Africa was greylisted in February 2023. DM

Lack of jobs pushes workers overseas
Lack of jobs pushes workers overseas

eNCA

time12 hours ago

  • eNCA

Lack of jobs pushes workers overseas

JOHANNESBURG - South Africa's unemployment crisis is now driving domestic workers to look for better opportunities overseas. READ: Domestic workers | SA urged to invest in its domestic workers Immigration experts say stagnant pay and shrinking job prospects, are pushing many abroad, with nearly 8,000 South Africans, securing permits for Canada last year. The local domestic work sector is shrinking fast. Nicholas Avramis, a migration and recruitment expert, discussed this with eNCA.

De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision ‘disgraceful'
De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision ‘disgraceful'

The Citizen

time14 hours ago

  • The Citizen

De Lille dissolves SA Tourism board – but Outa calls her decision ‘disgraceful'

Patricia de Lille dissolves the SA Tourism board for governance failures. However, Outa said it is 'outraged' by her action. Tourism Minister Patricia de Lille has dissolved the SA Tourism board with immediate effect over what she called unlawful decisions. De Lille informed the board of her decision on 19 August, following consideration of their written representations as to why the board should not be dissolved. De Lille removes SA Tourism board for unlawful conduct The minister said the board members neglected to address the crucial question of the legality of the process the board used when calling a special board meeting on 1 August, when the unlawful resolution was taken. De Lille said legal advice to her confirmed that the board's special meeting on 1 August 2025 was convened unlawfully. She said section 18(2) of the Act empowers only the board chairperson to convene a special board meeting. 'As of 1 August 2025, the board had no chairperson to lawfully convene a special board meeting following the resignation of Professor Gregory Davids the day before (31 July 2025), but this notwithstanding, the board elected to convene a special board meeting, and in doing so, the board acted unlawfully and ultra vires its powers,' the minister said. ALSO READ: WATCH: Minister of Tourism Patricia de Lille launches Tourism Month Minister warned board in the past In the past, De Lille had warned the board about the potential consequences of calling special and ordinary meetings without following the proper procedures. In a meeting with the board on 4 July 2025, and a letter to the board on 13 July 2025, the minister voiced her concerns about the board's disregard for governance protocols. The minister said this compromised the board's integrity and may have made the results of such meetings invalid and unlawful. The board responded by letter on 22 July 2025, assuring De Lille that it had put in place interventions, and these 'enhancements have and will ensure that all meetings are properly constituted, chaired and documented…' 'In the exercise of its powers, the board must always be guided by the principle of legality, which is part of the rule of law as set out in section 1(c) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa,' De Lille said. The department said the minister will initiate the process to appoint a new board and invite nominations for eligible people in due course. In the interim, De Lille will appoint one or more individuals to manage the board's affairs until she installs a new board. 'The minister assures South Africans and the tourism sector that these developments will not derail the ongoing programmes, including SA Tourism's collaboration with the Tourism Business Council of South Africa, to deliver a successful G20 summit,' the department said. Outa calls De Lille's decision 'disgraceful' In response to De Lille's action, the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) said it is 'outraged'. 'This action is nothing short of gross political interference and represents a direct assault on governance and accountability within a state entity,' it said. Outa said the SA Tourism board was addressing serious governance concerns, including irregular financial conduct. It added that it suspects De Lille's decision was made to protect the suspended SA Tourism CEO Nombulelo Guliwe. 'Instead of supporting her own competent board for holding executive management accountable, the minister has chosen to protect the SA Tourism CEO by disbanding the very body tasked with oversight. 'As far as Outa is concerned, the fact that the board does not have a chairperson – which incidentally is the minister's fault – doesn't make the board's decision unlawful in taking the necessary action that it did. We believe the board was quorate and unanimous in how it arrived at the decision to suspend the CEO, pending a disciplinary enquiry into her conduct. NOW READ: The missed opportunity in South African tourism

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store